headers
Don McKenzie Paul | 1 Sep 2002 01:20
Picon
Picon

Latest Vim

I'm still using 10.1.5. The latest Vim dies rather quickly when I try 
to compile.

Don

vim61/README_unix.txt
patch -p1 </sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/editors/vim-6.1-2.patch
patching file configure
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1164.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file configure.rej
### execution of patch failed, exit code 1
Failed: patching vim-6.1-2 failed

--

-- 

-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone?  Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
jeff whitaker | 1 Sep 2002 01:47
Picon

Re: Latest Vim

Don:  Sorry - fixed now.

-Jeff

On Sat, 31 Aug 2002, Don McKenzie Paul wrote:

> I'm still using 10.1.5. The latest Vim dies rather quickly when I try
> to compile.
>
> Don
>
> vim61/README_unix.txt
> patch -p1 </sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/editors/vim-6.1-2.patch
> patching file configure
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 1164.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file configure.rej
> ### execution of patch failed, exit code 1
> Failed: patching vim-6.1-2 failed
>
>

--

-- 
Jeffrey S. Whitaker         Phone : (303)497-6313
NOAA/OAR/CDC  R/CDC1        FAX   : (303)497-6449
325 Broadway                Web   : http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/~jsw
Boulder, CO, USA 80305-3328 Office: Skaggs Research Cntr 1D-124

-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone?  Get a new here for FREE!
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Thomas Harrington | 1 Sep 2002 02:59
Picon
Favicon

Re: Broken vim

On Saturday, August 31, 2002, at 01:09 PM, "Ian L." 
<lists <at> logicallemon.com> wrote:

> On 8/30/02 7:31 PM, Thomas Harrington enlightened us with:
>
>> You were right about /usr/local/include/, I was finally able to 
>> rebuild
>> vim and it works now.  But something's odd about it all, because
>> although I had a /usr/local/include/ directory, it was empty.  However
>> once I removed it, the build process proceeded normally.
>
> I can confirm this problem. My /usr/local/include has a few things in 
> it. So
> when I ran `fink install vim' I received this error:

Those are the same errors that I had.  For what it's worth, you get the 
same errors if you grab the Unix source from www.vim.org and try to 
build it yourself.  So it's not specifically a fink problem, I think.

--

-- 
Tom Harrington
tph <at> acm.org

-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone?  Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Ian L. | 1 Sep 2002 03:31

Re: Re: Broken vim

On 8/31/02 8:59 PM, Thomas Harrington enlightened us with:

>> On 8/30/02 7:31 PM, Thomas Harrington enlightened us with:
>> 
>>> You were right about /usr/local/include/, I was finally able to
>>> rebuild
>>> vim and it works now.  But something's odd about it all, because
>>> although I had a /usr/local/include/ directory, it was empty.  However
>>> once I removed it, the build process proceeded normally.
>> 
>> I can confirm this problem. My /usr/local/include has a few things in
>> it. So
>> when I ran `fink install vim' I received this error:
> 
> Those are the same errors that I had.  For what it's worth, you get the
> same errors if you grab the Unix source from www.vim.org and try to
> build it yourself.  So it's not specifically a fink problem, I think.

You are correct, Tom. The different errors I received when I tried to
compile Vim via Fink both with X and without Xwindows were the same when I
downloaded the package and compiled it on my own.

(If you've just tuned in, this was fixed by temporarily renaming
/usr/local/include to something else.)

--

-- 
Ian L.
    http://www.logicallemon.com/
    - Perl, Mac OS X, Zsh, Vim
    - bass guitar, downtempo electronica
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
segment289 | 1 Sep 2002 03:38
Picon

threaded xfree86?

Hi,

What are the "threaded" versions?  If I have to ask, does that
mean that I should just stick to the non-threaded versions?

ObVersionInfo:

$ fink --version
Package manager version: 0.10.0
Distribution version: 0.4.0.cvs

Mac OS X 10.1.5, all updates.
December 2001 development tools.

Thanks,
Dan

--
This email impairs your ability to operate heavy machinery.
<mailto:segment289 <at> mac.com>

-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone?  Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
segment289 | 1 Sep 2002 05:15
Picon

Re: threaded xfree86?


On Saturday, August 31, 2002, at 10:57 , dylan wrote:

>
> On Saturday, August 31, 2002, at 09:38 PM, segment289 <at> mac.com wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> What are the "threaded" versions?  If I have to ask, does that
>> mean that I should just stick to the non-threaded versions?
>
> From here:
>
> http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/package.php/xfree86-base-threaded
>
> we find out that:
>
> Package xfree86-base-threaded
> In current-unstable:     Version 4.2.0.1-1
> XFree86 libraries, utilities, clients and data.
>
> XFree86 is a free X11 implementation that supports Darwin and Mac OS X. 
> This will let you run X11 applications and desktop environments. This 
> version is patched to use threads (needed for some apps).
>
> If you already have xfree86-base installed, you must remove it manually 
> first using "sudo dpkg -r --force-depends".

It says that in the "info," too.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
dylan | 1 Sep 2002 06:14
Picon
Favicon

Re: threaded xfree86?


On Saturday, August 31, 2002, at 11:15 PM, segment289 <at> mac.com wrote:

>
> On Saturday, August 31, 2002, at 10:57 , dylan wrote:
>
>>
>> On Saturday, August 31, 2002, at 09:38 PM, segment289 <at> mac.com wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> What are the "threaded" versions?  If I have to ask, does that
>>> mean that I should just stick to the non-threaded versions?
>>
>> From here:
>>
>> http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/package.php/xfree86-base-threaded
>>
>> we find out that:
>>
>> Package xfree86-base-threaded
>> In current-unstable:     Version 4.2.0.1-1
>> XFree86 libraries, utilities, clients and data.
>>
>> XFree86 is a free X11 implementation that supports Darwin and Mac OS 
>> X. This will let you run X11 applications and desktop environments. 
>> This version is patched to use threads (needed for some apps).
>>
>> If you already have xfree86-base installed, you must remove it 
>> manually first using "sudo dpkg -r --force-depends".
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
jeff whitaker | 1 Sep 2002 14:07
Picon

Re: threaded xfree86?


On Sat, 31 Aug 2002 segment289 <at> mac.com wrote:

> Hi,
>
> What are the "threaded" versions?  If I have to ask, does that
> mean that I should just stick to the non-threaded versions?

Yes.

The threaded version is only needed for one app - cdat.

-Jeff

--

-- 
Jeffrey S. Whitaker         Phone : (303)497-6313
NOAA/OAR/CDC  R/CDC1        FAX   : (303)497-6449
325 Broadway                Web   : http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/~jsw
Boulder, CO, USA 80305-3328 Office: Skaggs Research Cntr 1D-124

-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone?  Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
segment289 | 1 Sep 2002 14:39
Picon

Re: threaded xfree86?


On Sunday, September 1, 2002, at 08:07 , jeff whitaker wrote:

>
> On Sat, 31 Aug 2002 segment289 <at> mac.com wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> What are the "threaded" versions?  If I have to ask, does that
>> mean that I should just stick to the non-threaded versions?
>
> Yes.
>
> The threaded version is only needed for one app - cdat.

Thanks.  :-)

Dan

--
This email impairs your ability to operate heavy machinery.
<mailto:segment289 <at> mac.com>

-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone?  Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Jeremy Erwin | 1 Sep 2002 18:52
Favicon

building darwin tools on macosx

Has anybody here had good success building apple tools from cvs? I'm 
specifically interested in recent versions of the compiler, but I am 
flummoxed by Apple's rather strange build system. Could somebody either 
point me to a reliable howto or post short instructions? Specifically I 
would be interested in learning what gcc depends on.

Jeremy Erwin

-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone?  Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane