headers
Kevin Horton | 1 Jan 2012 11:56
Favicon

image-exiftool-pm update

Benjamin,

The image-exiftool-pm package is quite out of date.  I needed some of the changes in the newer versions, so I
made a local package for image-exiftool-pm 8.65 (the current version).  I only needed to change the
version and Source-MD5 (change it to 8b27b63af0eec744afb7f373750c282b).  The new package builds OK in
maintainer mode, and works correctly for me on OS X 10.7.
--
Kevin Horton
Ottawa, Canada

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual 
desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure 
costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel <at> lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Alexander Hansen | 2 Jan 2012 14:18
Picon
Gravatar

Re: image-exiftool-pm update


On 1/1/12 5:56 AM, Kevin Horton wrote:
> Benjamin,
> 
> The image-exiftool-pm package is quite out of date.  I needed some
> of the changes in the newer versions, so I made a local package for
> image-exiftool-pm 8.65 (the current version).  I only needed to
> change the version and Source-MD5 (change it to
> 8b27b63af0eec744afb7f373750c282b).  The new package builds OK in
> maintainer mode, and works correctly for me on OS X 10.7. -- Kevin
> Horton Ottawa, Canada
> 
> 
> 
> 

If you don't hear from Ben before January 8, then go ahead and commit
the update.  I take full responsibility. :-)

--

-- 
Alexander Hansen, Ph.D.
Fink User Liaison
http://finkakh.wordpress.com/
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Sven de Vries | 3 Jan 2012 02:59
Picon
Favicon

fink re-alpine 2.02; ssl certs

Dear Mr. Fujinaka,

just upgraded my laptop to lion and installed a fresh fink and re-alpine.
But I got quite suprised that (at least in my setting) I had to move the 
certificates from /sw/etc/ssl/certs to /System/Library/OpenSSL/certs/

When I did: sudo dtruss alpine
it revealed lines like

stat64("/usr/lib/libssl.0.9.8.dylib\0", 0x7FFF6871A420, 0x7FFF6871B2A0)= 0 0

stat64("/System/Library/OpenSSL/certs/378e4d7b.0\0

which makes it look to me, as if alpine is indeed this time using the 
system-openssl and not the fink-one.

When I noticed, that the fink-ssl wasn't a dependency of re-alpine, i made 
fink install it and then rebuild re-alpine, still realpine looked into the 
System-not-sw-location.

Either place is fine, but unless something is wrong in my new 
setup, it might be useful to change the info-text of re-alpine.

thanks for maintaining it,
best
sven

---------- Forwarded message ----------

Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 07:08:36 -0700 (PDT)
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
David Fang | 5 Jan 2012 03:07
Picon
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: pidgin for osx 10.7?

> Hi, sorry to bother you, I was just wondering when there might be a fink 
> package for 10.7. thanks!

Hi,
 	I still don't have a 10.7 machine to test on, and the last time I 
asked, there were still some dependencies missing in 10.7 that were 
blocking pidgin.  Can you or someone try linking/copying pidgin.info from 
the 10.4 tree and see if it "just works" on 10.7?
 	To checkout the 10.4 tree on 10.7, just edit /sw/etc/fink.conf:
SelfUpdateTrees: 10.7 10.4
and re-selfupdate.

Fang

--

-- 
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual 
desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure 
costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel <at> lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |
headers
David R. Morrison | 5 Jan 2012 06:17
Favicon

Re: pidgin for osx 10.7?

The dependent packages not yet in 10.7 are: farsight2, libnice, and silc-toolkit.

All three of these, and pidgin itself, built for me on 10.7 this evening.

  -- Dave

On Jan 4, 2012, at 6:07 PM, David Fang wrote:

>> Hi, sorry to bother you, I was just wondering when there might be a fink 
>> package for 10.7. thanks!
> 
> Hi,
> 	I still don't have a 10.7 machine to test on, and the last time I 
> asked, there were still some dependencies missing in 10.7 that were 
> blocking pidgin.  Can you or someone try linking/copying pidgin.info from 
> the 10.4 tree and see if it "just works" on 10.7?
> 	To checkout the 10.4 tree on 10.7, just edit /sw/etc/fink.conf:
> SelfUpdateTrees: 10.7 10.4
> and re-selfupdate.
> 
> Fang
> 
> 
> -- 
> David Fang
> http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
> http://www.achronix.com/
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
David Fang | 5 Jan 2012 07:22
Picon
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: pidgin for osx 10.7?

H Dave,
 	Thanks for testing these out for us.  Ok to commit as-is to 10.7 
then?  (anyone on fink-core can check-in pidgin for me.)

Fang

> The dependent packages not yet in 10.7 are: farsight2, libnice, and silc-toolkit.
>
> All three of these, and pidgin itself, built for me on 10.7 this evening.
>
>  -- Dave
>
>
> On Jan 4, 2012, at 6:07 PM, David Fang wrote:
>
>>> Hi, sorry to bother you, I was just wondering when there might be a fink
>>> package for 10.7. thanks!
>>
>> Hi,
>> 	I still don't have a 10.7 machine to test on, and the last time I
>> asked, there were still some dependencies missing in 10.7 that were
>> blocking pidgin.  Can you or someone try linking/copying pidgin.info from
>> the 10.4 tree and see if it "just works" on 10.7?
>> 	To checkout the 10.4 tree on 10.7, just edit /sw/etc/fink.conf:
>> SelfUpdateTrees: 10.7 10.4
>> and re-selfupdate.
>>
>> Fang
>>
>>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Hanspeter Niederstrasser | 6 Jan 2012 16:05

python26-2.6.7-2 test failure

Failure on 10.7.  2.6.7-1 (before the ctypes fix) built OK back in July.

======================================================================
FAIL: test_byte (ctypes.test.test_cfuncs.CFunctions)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
   File 
"/sw/build.build/python26-2.6.7-2/Python-2.6.7/Lib/ctypes/test/test_cfuncs.py", 
line 20, in test_byte
     self.failUnlessEqual(self._dll.tf_b(-126), -42)
AssertionError: 43 != -42

======================================================================
FAIL: test_byte_plus (ctypes.test.test_cfuncs.CFunctions)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
   File 
"/sw/build.build/python26-2.6.7-2/Python-2.6.7/Lib/ctypes/test/test_cfuncs.py", 
line 26, in test_byte_plus
     self.failUnlessEqual(self._dll.tf_bb(0, -126), -42)
AssertionError: 43 != -42

======================================================================
FAIL: test_short (ctypes.test.test_cfuncs.CFunctions)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
   File 
"/sw/build.build/python26-2.6.7-2/Python-2.6.7/Lib/ctypes/test/test_cfuncs.py", 
line 44, in test_short
     self.failUnlessEqual(self._dll.tf_h(-32766), -10922)
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 5 comments |
headers
Daniel Johnson | 7 Jan 2012 01:49
Picon

Re: python26-2.6.7-2 test failure


On Jan 6, 2012, at 10:05 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:

> Failure on 10.7.  2.6.7-1 (before the ctypes fix) built OK back in July.
> 
> ======================================================================
> FAIL: test_byte (ctypes.test.test_cfuncs.CFunctions)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File 
> "/sw/build.build/python26-2.6.7-2/Python-2.6.7/Lib/ctypes/test/test_cfuncs.py", 
> line 20, in test_byte
>     self.failUnlessEqual(self._dll.tf_b(-126), -42)
> AssertionError: 43 != -42
> 
> ======================================================================
> FAIL: test_byte_plus (ctypes.test.test_cfuncs.CFunctions)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File 
> "/sw/build.build/python26-2.6.7-2/Python-2.6.7/Lib/ctypes/test/test_cfuncs.py", 
> line 26, in test_byte_plus
>     self.failUnlessEqual(self._dll.tf_bb(0, -126), -42)
> AssertionError: 43 != -42
> 
> ======================================================================
> FAIL: test_short (ctypes.test.test_cfuncs.CFunctions)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
Hanspeter Niederstrasser | 7 Jan 2012 13:15

Re: python26-2.6.7-2 test failure

On 01/06/2012 7:49 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote:
>
> On Jan 6, 2012, at 10:05 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
>
>> Failure on 10.7.  2.6.7-1 (before the ctypes fix) built OK back in July.
>>
>> ======================================================================
>> FAIL: test_byte (ctypes.test.test_cfuncs.CFunctions)
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>    File
>> "/sw/build.build/python26-2.6.7-2/Python-2.6.7/Lib/ctypes/test/test_cfuncs.py",
>> line 20, in test_byte
>>      self.failUnlessEqual(self._dll.tf_b(-126), -42)
>> AssertionError: 43 != -42
>>
>> ======================================================================
>> FAIL: test_byte_plus (ctypes.test.test_cfuncs.CFunctions)
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>    File
>> "/sw/build.build/python26-2.6.7-2/Python-2.6.7/Lib/ctypes/test/test_cfuncs.py",
>> line 26, in test_byte_plus
>>      self.failUnlessEqual(self._dll.tf_bb(0, -126), -42)
>> AssertionError: 43 != -42
>>
>> ======================================================================
>> FAIL: test_short (ctypes.test.test_cfuncs.CFunctions)
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Daniel Johnson | 7 Jan 2012 13:48
Picon

Re: python26-2.6.7-2 test failure


On Jan 7, 2012, at 7:15 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:

> On 01/06/2012 7:49 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote:
>> 
>> On Jan 6, 2012, at 10:05 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
>> 
>>> Failure on 10.7.  2.6.7-1 (before the ctypes fix) built OK back in July.
>>> 
>>> ======================================================================
>>> FAIL: test_byte (ctypes.test.test_cfuncs.CFunctions)
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>   File
>>> "/sw/build.build/python26-2.6.7-2/Python-2.6.7/Lib/ctypes/test/test_cfuncs.py",
>>> line 20, in test_byte
>>>     self.failUnlessEqual(self._dll.tf_b(-126), -42)
>>> AssertionError: 43 != -42
>>> 
>>> ======================================================================
>>> FAIL: test_byte_plus (ctypes.test.test_cfuncs.CFunctions)
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>   File
>>> "/sw/build.build/python26-2.6.7-2/Python-2.6.7/Lib/ctypes/test/test_cfuncs.py",
>>> line 26, in test_byte_plus
>>>     self.failUnlessEqual(self._dll.tf_bb(0, -126), -42)
>>> AssertionError: 43 != -42
>>> 
>>> ======================================================================
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |

Gmane