Koen van der Drift | 1 Oct 15:23
Picon

Re: emboss and 10.6

I just noticed that emboss is restricted to 10.4 and 10.5 because it
depends on system-java14. From the emboss website I know it also works
with java 1.5. So is there a way that I can change the info file to
include system-java15? Or maybe just system-java, without the version
number? What java version is included on 10.6?

Thanks,

- Koen.

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Koen van der Drift
<koenvanderdrift <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got a report from a user that emboss builds fine on 10.6/64bit. He
> also added a -O3 optimization without any problems. I have a PPC and
> am stuck on 10.5, so cannot verify it.
>
> Not sure if this is the way to report it, but feel free to add emboss
> to the list of packages that works with 10.6.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Koen.
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
(Continue reading)

Jack Howarth | 2 Oct 02:12
Picon

Re: Fink update all failed compiling gcc 4.4.4

  The issue of build failures from development libraries
in /usr/local seems to come up endlessly. I have wondered
if there is some way that a 'strict' build mode could be
introduced into fink. The idea would be for packages known
to commonly suffer from this issue, the info file could
invoke a strict mode during the fink build process where
fink would first look for headers or static libraries in
/usr/local. If found, the build would abort with a clear
message that /usr/local needs to be moved aside. Unless
the package maintainer included the strict build keyword
in the info file, this check would not normally occur.
             Jack

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12, 2009. Register now&#33;
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel <at> lists.sourceforge.net
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Gravatar

Re: Fink update all failed compiling gcc 4.4.4

Jack Howarth wrote:
>   The issue of build failures from development libraries
> in /usr/local seems to come up endlessly. I have wondered
> if there is some way that a 'strict' build mode could be
> introduced into fink. The idea would be for packages known
> to commonly suffer from this issue, the info file could
> invoke a strict mode during the fink build process where
> fink would first look for headers or static libraries in
> /usr/local. If found, the build would abort with a clear
> message that /usr/local needs to be moved aside. Unless
> the package maintainer included the strict build keyword
> in the info file, this check would not normally occur.

Can't the package itself just do this on its own during CompileScript?

if -e /usr/local/include/evil.h ; echo "you need to move /usr/local" ; 
exit 1

No need to add extra code to fink and have it maintain an ever growing 
list of possibly offending headers/libraries.

Hanspeter

--

-- 
Hanspeter Niederstrasser
hanspeter AT snaggledworks DOT com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
(Continue reading)

Jack Howarth | 3 Oct 06:12
Picon

Re: Fink update all failed compiling gcc 4.4.4

Hanspeter,
   I wasn't proposing a check for a specific list
of files but rather as simple option of a strict
build mode which would abort if any *.h or *.a
files existed inside of /usr/local.
               Jack

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12, 2009. Register now&#33;
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel <at> lists.sourceforge.net
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Gravatar

Re: Fink update all failed compiling gcc 4.4.4

Jack Howarth wrote:
>    I wasn't proposing a check for a specific list
> of files but rather as simple option of a strict
> build mode which would abort if any *.h or *.a
> files existed inside of /usr/local.

Jack Howarth earlier wrote:
> The idea would be for packages known
> to commonly suffer from this issue, the info file could
> invoke a strict mode during the fink build process where
> fink would first look for headers or static libraries in
> /usr/local

That's what I read this as, but regardless, instead of doing "if -e 
/usr/local/include/evil.h", a package could just as easily just see if 
there' _a_ file in /usr/local and crash out.  The end result is the 
same, though.

The possibilities mentioned so far are 1) add code into Fink to have a 
'strict' tag, followed by 2) have packages susceptible to bad files be 
marked 'Strict: true', or A) have packages susceptible to bad files add 
a quick check into CompileScript.  The 2nd path seems a heck of a lot 
easier and can be done by any maintainer, plus it's probably more flexible.

Hanspeter

--

-- 
Hanspeter Niederstrasser
hanspeter at snaggledworks.com

(Continue reading)

William G. Scott | 3 Oct 21:34
Favicon

pymol-py26 in stable requires pmw-py26 which is in unstable only

I've "inherited" pymol and just got email from a user who I surmise is  
trying to install the stable pymol-py26 and runs into an unmet  
dependency for pmw-py26.  (The problem doesn't arise for -py25  
variants, so I think what happened it a newer pymol got moved into  
stable without the upgrade needed for the dependency.)

What is the best course of action?

Thanks.

Bill

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12, 2009. Register now&#33;
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel <at> lists.sourceforge.net
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

David R. Morrison | 3 Oct 21:49
Favicon

Re: pymol-py26 in stable requires pmw-py26 which is in unstable only

Bill,

Writing to the maintainer (in this case "None") was the correct course  
of action.

I've just moved the unstable version to stable.

  -- Dave

On Oct 3, 2009, at 12:34 PM, William G. Scott wrote:

> I've "inherited" pymol and just got email from a user who I surmise is
> trying to install the stable pymol-py26 and runs into an unmet
> dependency for pmw-py26.  (The problem doesn't arise for -py25
> variants, so I think what happened it a newer pymol got moved into
> stable without the upgrade needed for the dependency.)
>
> What is the best course of action?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Bill
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
> is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart  
> your
> developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and  
(Continue reading)

Asko Kauppi | 5 Oct 21:22
Gravatar

Fink stable should upgrade Lua51 package


http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/package.php/lua51

Just noticed today that fink stable is lagging behind in 5.1.1-3,  
which is way old.

Asking the unstable 5.1.4-1 to be made stable; haven't gotten any  
negative feedback on it at all.

This is crucial for running multithreading on Lua (>= 5.1.1-14 is  
required).

- Asko

ps. I did a ticket on this. Don't know if that is the right way to  
proceed: #2873092

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12, 2009. Register now&#33;
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel <at> lists.sourceforge.net
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

(Continue reading)

Alexander Hansen | 5 Oct 21:49
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Fink stable should upgrade Lua51 package

Asko Kauppi wrote:
> http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/package.php/lua51
>
> Just noticed today that fink stable is lagging behind in 5.1.1-3,  
> which is way old.
>
> Asking the unstable 5.1.4-1 to be made stable; haven't gotten any  
> negative feedback on it at all.
>
> This is crucial for running multithreading on Lua (>= 5.1.1-14 is  
> required).
>
> - Asko
>
>
> ps. I did a ticket on this. Don't know if that is the right way to  
> proceed: #2873092
>   
Are all of the dependencies available in stable?
Is it known to build on 10.6/32 bit? 10.6/64-bit ? 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12, 2009. Register now&#33;
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel <at> lists.sourceforge.net
(Continue reading)

Ivan Agudo | 6 Oct 14:18
Picon
Favicon

gcc44-4.4.1-1000

Hi,

I get the following message from the Fink Commander whenever I try to install software involving gcc44, although I already installed the Xcore Tools:


Can't resolve dependency "xcode (>= 3.1.2)" for package "gcc44-4.4.1-1000"
(no matching packages/versions found)
Exiting with failure.

Thanks a lot for any hint on the solution.

Regards,


--

Package manager version: 0.27.16

Distribution version: 0.9.0.rsync i386

Mac OS X version: 10.5.8

Xcode version: 3.1.2

gcc version: 4.0.1 (Apple Inc. build 5490)

make version: 3.81

Feedback Courtesy of FinkCommander



-------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Ivan Agudo
Instituto de Astrofisica de Andalucia (CSIC)
C/Camino Bajo de Huetor, 50, 18008 Granada/Spain
Tel.: +34-958-230-632  Fax : +34-958-814-530
E-mail: iagudo <at> iaa.es URL: http://www.iaa.es/~iagudo
-------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12, 2009. Register now&#33;
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel <at> lists.sourceforge.net
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Gmane