headers
Charles Lepple | 2 Mar 04:18
Picon

moving Python 2.6 to stable?

Python 2.6 has been in Fink for a few months - can we move it to  
stable? Are there any known issues remaining?

--

-- 
Charles Lepple
clepple <at> gmail

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Daniel Macks | 2 Mar 05:12

Re: moving Python 2.6 to stable?

On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 10:18:50PM -0500, Charles Lepple wrote:
> Python 2.6 has been in Fink for a few months - can we move it to  
> stable? Are there any known issues remaining?

I think python2.6-config --ldflags doesn't give the -L flag...nobody
can agree where the lib *should* be (upstream puts shared and static
in two different places), so at worst a package would need an explicit
-L flag to use it, and has probably needed it for a while for many
different pythonversions over the years.

dan

--

-- 
Daniel Macks
dmacks <at> netspace.org
http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Ebrahim Mayat | 2 Mar 10:15
Picon

Committing a package version change

Good Day

Would I need to submit a "new package" in order commit a version  
change ? My question relates to the upcoming new release of the  
fluidsynth package.

Thanks in advance.
Ebrahim 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
Charles Lepple | 2 Mar 14:14
Picon

Re: Committing a package version change

On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 4:15 AM, Ebrahim Mayat <ebmayat <at> mac.com> wrote:
> Good Day
>
> Would I need to submit a "new package" in order commit a version
> change ? My question relates to the upcoming new release of the
> fluidsynth package.

There is a category in the tracker for "Updated version of existing":

http://sourceforge.net/tracker2/?func=browse&group_id=17203&atid=414256

--

-- 
- Charles Lepple

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Alexander Hansen | 2 Mar 13:28
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Committing a package version change


On Mar 2, 2009, at 4:15 AM, Ebrahim Mayat wrote:

> Good Day
>
> Would I need to submit a "new package" in order commit a version
> change ? My question relates to the upcoming new release of the
> fluidsynth package.
>
> Thanks in advance.
> Ebrahim
>

People do that; you can also just send a note here if the changes are  
small:  like just a new version, revision, Source-MD5, etc.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Alexander Hansen | 2 Mar 16:43
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Committing a package version change

Charles Lepple wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 4:15 AM, Ebrahim Mayat <ebmayat <at> mac.com> wrote:
>   
>> Good Day
>>
>> Would I need to submit a "new package" in order commit a version
>> change ? My question relates to the upcoming new release of the
>> fluidsynth package.
>>     
>
> There is a category in the tracker for "Updated version of existing":
>
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker2/?func=browse&group_id=17203&atid=414256
>
>   
Right; my prior comment assumed "new package" meant "new tracker
entry".   If you're going to use the tracker, please do create a new
entry rather than reopening an old one.

--

-- 
Alexander Hansen
Fink User Liaison

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Alexander Hansen | 3 Mar 22:06
Picon
Gravatar

Re: [Fink-i18n] porting "FreeCAD"

Tobias Krieger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to anything related to porting but me and some others would
> like to port the opensource CAD programm, written in C++ to Darwin,
> Leopard, best with Aqua look :-)
>
> http://juergen-riegel.net/FreeCAD/Docu/index.php?title=Main_Page
>
> Currently we are able to compile it without error, but when starting
> ./FreeCAD in Terminal we get:
>
> dyld: Symbol not found: __ZN10SoQtViewer11sizeChangedERK7SbVec2s 
> Referenced from: /Users/kferguson/FreeCAD/lib/libFreeCADGui.2.dylib 
> Expected in: dynamic lookup 
>  
> Trace/BPT trap
>
> (next to some other problems we have with Soqt, Coin,...)
>
> Is there some intro on how to port or do you have any tips, ideas? (We
> have found the Apple Document "How to port ..." but this is very very
> basic).
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Tobias Krieger 
>
> -- 
> Rover Development and
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Alexander Hansen | 4 Mar 15:28
Picon
Gravatar

*bind* update doesn't yet have a clean update path

I got the following:

....
While trying to install:
  libbind6-5.999-2
  libbind6-dev-5.999-2

The following inconsistencies found:
  libbind6 conflicts with bind9-ssl (<< 9.5.0-1), but bind9-ssl is installed

Trying to resolve dependencies...
Could not resolve inconsistent dependencies!

Fink isn't sure how to install the above packages safely. You may be able to
fix things by running:

  fink scanpackages
  sudo apt-get update
  sudo apt-get install libbind6-dev=5.999-2 libbind6=5.999-2
...
And then when I tried that, I got:

Unpacking libbind6 (from .../libbind6_5.999-2_darwin-i386.deb) ...
/sw/bin/dpkg: error processing
/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-i386/net/libbind6_5.999-2_darwin-i386.deb
(--unpack):
 trying to overwrite `/sw/lib/libbind.4.dylib', which is also in package
bind9-ssl-shlibs
Selecting previously deselected package libbind6-dev.
Unpacking libbind6-dev (from .../libbind6-dev_5.999-2_darwin-i386.deb) ...
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Jean-François Mertens | 4 Mar 15:53
Picon
Gravatar

Re: *bind* update doesn't yet have a clean update path

Was this part of a fink selfupdate ?
I would have thought this would have updated bind9-ssl
before trying to install libbind6 (as a required new dep
of etherape or ekg-unified) _ if not because
of being sufficiently clever, then just because barring
dependency problems it does things in alphabetical order...

If one wants to be able to upgrade in your order too,
it is possibleto add (provisionally) a Replaces
to the Conflicts in libbind6 : the lib does have the same
install_name..

JF

On 04 Mar 2009, at 15:28, Alexander Hansen wrote:

> I got the following:
>
> ....
> While trying to install:
>   libbind6-5.999-2
>   libbind6-dev-5.999-2
>
> The following inconsistencies found:
>   libbind6 conflicts with bind9-ssl (<< 9.5.0-1), but bind9-ssl is  
> installed
>
> Trying to resolve dependencies...
> Could not resolve inconsistent dependencies!
>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Alexander Hansen | 4 Mar 16:11
Picon
Gravatar

Re: *bind* update doesn't yet have a clean update path

Jean-François Mertens wrote:
> Was this part of a fink selfupdate ?
update-all
> I would have thought this would have updated bind9-ssl
> before trying to install libbind6 (as a required new dep
> of etherape or ekg-unified) _ if not because
> of being sufficiently clever, then just because barring
> dependency problems it does things in alphabetical order...
I think apt is clever enough to handle this, but I'm not sure that fink is.
>
> If one wants to be able to upgrade in your order too,
> it is possibleto add (provisionally) a Replaces
> to the Conflicts in libbind6 : the lib does have the same
> install_name..
>
> JF
>
> On 04 Mar 2009, at 15:28, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>
>> I got the following:
>>
>> ....
>> While trying to install:
>>   libbind6-5.999-2
>>   libbind6-dev-5.999-2
>>
>> The following inconsistencies found:
>>   libbind6 conflicts with bind9-ssl (<< 9.5.0-1), but bind9-ssl is
>> installed
>>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane