headers
Koen van der Drift | 1 Nov 02:24
Picon
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: upgrade to 10.5 problem


On Oct 31, 2007, at 7:20 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:

> I'm not sure how this happened, but /sw/fink/10.5 should be a  
> symlink, not a directory.  Try removing it and then running "fink  
> reinstall fink".
>

So my previous error (not a reference at /sw/lib/perl5/Fink/ 
Services.pm line 1910) was solved by fixing the symlink from 10.4 to  
dists. Then I did a fink reinstall fink, but got my original error  
message again:

Setting up fink (0.27.7-41) ...
Checking system... powerpc-apple-darwin9.0.0
This is the first fink release which can be used with Mac OS X 10.5.   
We support bootstrapping with this
version, and we expect that upgrading from 10.4 will go smoothly with  
this version.  However, DIRECT
UPGRADING FROM 10.4-transitional, 10.3 OR EARLIER IS NOT SUPPORTED.
ln -s 10.4 /sw/fink/10.5
ln -s 10.5 /sw/fink/dists
Scanning package description files

Updating the list of locally available binary packages.
Scanning dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc
Changed package: dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/base/ 
fink_0.27.7-41_darwin-powerpc.deb
Downloading the indexes of available packages in the binary  
distribution.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
David R. Morrison | 1 Nov 04:36
Favicon

Re: upgrade to 10.5 problem

Well, to get going for now, you should run the following commands  
manually:

  rm -rf /sw/fink/10.5
  ln -s 10.4 /sw/fink/10.5

(You might also need "ln -s 10.5 /sw/fink/dists", but that symlink  
should already be there.)

I still can't figure out why your system is doing this, but I am  
working on an update to fink which will cope with poorly-configured  
installations and correct them (as above).

   -- Dave

On Oct 31, 2007, at 9:24 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote:

>
> On Oct 31, 2007, at 7:20 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure how this happened, but /sw/fink/10.5 should be a  
>> symlink, not a directory.  Try removing it and then running "fink  
>> reinstall fink".
>>
>
> So my previous error (not a reference at /sw/lib/perl5/Fink/ 
> Services.pm line 1910) was solved by fixing the symlink from 10.4  
> to dists. Then I did a fink reinstall fink, but got my original  
> error message again:
>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
David R. Morrison | 1 Nov 04:38
Favicon

Re: upgrade to 10.5 problem

And just to clarify: /sw/fink/10.5 is *not* supposed to be a  
directory, its supposed to be a symlink to 10.4.  The 10.4 and 10.5  
distributions are sharing a common "tree" of finkinfo files.

   -- Dave

On Oct 31, 2007, at 11:36 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:

> Well, to get going for now, you should run the following commands  
> manually:
>
>  rm -rf /sw/fink/10.5
>  ln -s 10.4 /sw/fink/10.5
>
> (You might also need "ln -s 10.5 /sw/fink/dists", but that symlink  
> should already be there.)
>
> I still can't figure out why your system is doing this, but I am  
> working on an update to fink which will cope with poorly-configured  
> installations and correct them (as above).
>
>   -- Dave
>
>
> On Oct 31, 2007, at 9:24 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote:
>
>>
>> On Oct 31, 2007, at 7:20 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not sure how this happened, but /sw/fink/10.5 should be a
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Koen van der Drift | 1 Nov 11:40
Picon
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: upgrade to 10.5 problem


On Oct 31, 2007, at 11:36 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:

> Well, to get going for now, you should run the following commands  
> manually:
>
> rm -rf /sw/fink/10.5
> ln -s 10.4 /sw/fink/10.5

Thanks - now it works! I had to do an additional fink index -f and  
fink scanpackages to make fink recognize all the packages that were  
already installed.

cheers,

- Koen.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Ebrahim Mayat | 1 Nov 13:23
Picon

Re: No /etc/fonts directory in Leopard (OS X.5)

On Oct 31, 2007, at 5:23 PM, Alexander Strange wrote:

Do you have fontconfig-path installed? If so, try removing it.

Doing that would entail also removing fc-ghostscript-fonts and all the packages that depend on it.  

The second option would be to edit the "fonts.conf" configuration file in "/usr/X11/lib/X11/fonts".
When trying this, however, I came across the following notice:

       DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE.
        IT WILL BE REPLACED WHEN FONTCONFIG IS UPDATED.
        LOCAL CHANGES BELONG IN 'local.conf'.

Waiting for the new fink fontconfig package still remains the best option.

EM 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
Permalink | Reply | 501 comments |
headers
Sébastien Maret | 1 Nov 15:50
Picon
Gravatar

gfortran/g95 in ftw3, hdf5 and octave

Jeffrey,

I've made some trivial changes in your fftw3, hdf5 and octave packages
so they use gfortran instead on g95 (which isn't present in the 10.5
branch).

Do you mind if I commit the changes?

Sébastien

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Jeff Whitaker | 1 Nov 16:01
Favicon

Re: gfortran/g95 in ftw3, hdf5 and octave

Sébastien Maret wrote:
> Jeffrey,
>
> I've made some trivial changes in your fftw3, hdf5 and octave packages
> so they use gfortran instead on g95 (which isn't present in the 10.5
> branch).
>
> Do you mind if I commit the changes?
>
> Sébastien
>   

Sébastien:

Please do, thanks.

-Jeff

--

-- 
Jeffrey S. Whitaker         Phone  : (303)497-6313
Meteorologist               FAX    : (303)497-6449
NOAA/OAR/PSD  R/PSD1        Email  : Jeffrey.S.Whitaker <at> noaa.gov
325 Broadway                Office : Skaggs Research Cntr 1D-124
Boulder, CO, USA 80303-3328 Web    : http://tinyurl.com/5telg

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Sébastien Maret | 1 Nov 17:06
Picon
Gravatar

Re: gfortran/g95 in ftw3, hdf5 and octave

On 11/1/07, Jeff Whitaker <jswhit <at> fastmail.fm> wrote:
> Sébastien Maret wrote:
> > Jeffrey,
> >
> > I've made some trivial changes in your fftw3, hdf5 and octave packages
> > so they use gfortran instead on g95 (which isn't present in the 10.5
> > branch).
> >
> > Do you mind if I commit the changes?
> >
> > Sébastien
> >
>
> Sébastien:
>
> Please do, thanks.

Done.

Sébastien

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Robert T Wyatt | 1 Nov 18:20
Picon

Re: No /etc/fonts directory in Leopard (OS X.5)

Ebrahim Mayat wrote:
> On Oct 31, 2007, at 5:23 PM, Alexander Strange wrote:
> 
> Do you have fontconfig-path installed? If so, try removing it.
> 
> Doing that would entail also removing fc-ghostscript-fonts and all the packages that depend on it.  
> 
> The second option would be to edit the "fonts.conf" configuration file in "/usr/X11/lib/X11/fonts".
When trying this, however, I came across the following notice:
> 
>        DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE.
>         IT WILL BE REPLACED WHEN FONTCONFIG IS UPDATED.
>         LOCAL CHANGES BELONG IN 'local.conf'.
> 
> 
> Waiting for the new fink fontconfig package still remains the best option.
> 
> EM 

FWIW, in my case this allowed me to run xdrawchem:

bash-3.2$ sudo apt-get remove x-ghostscript-fonts
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
   x-ghostscript-fonts xfig

YMMV, --rtw

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 501 comments |
headers
Koen van der Drift | 1 Nov 23:44
Picon
Favicon
Gravatar

error with versioned package when updating to perl 588

I'm updating some of my packages to perl 5.8.8 so they can be built on  
10.5 For one I get the following error:

Validating .deb dir root-xml-twig-pm588-3.26-1...
Error: File in a language-versioned package is neither versioned nor  
in a versioned directory.
	Offending file: /sw/bin/xml_merge
	Offending file: /sw/bin/xml_split
	Offending file: /sw/share/man/man1/xml_merge.1
	Offending file: /sw/share/man/man1/xml_split.1

I don't recall this happening on 10.4. Any pointers on how to solve  
this?

thanks,

- Koen. 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |

Gmane