Casey Brown | 6 Feb 2010 02:57
Favicon

Re: New Wiktionary logo vote

On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Casey Brown <lists@...> wrote:
> It looks like no one ever sent a message to these mailing lists about
> the new Wiktionary logo vote!

The logo vote is now over and the results are available on
Meta-Wiki.[1]  We're also working on a collection of different
language texts that will go under the winning logo[2], please add the
tagline that they use in your language!

[1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wiktionary/logo/refresh/voting#Results_2
[2] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiktionary/logo/refresh/localization_text

--

-- 
Casey Brown
Cbrown1023
Anatoliy Goncharov | 6 Feb 2010 17:33
Picon

Re: New Wiktionary logo vote

Hmm, but why the inscription «the free dictionary» on the logo is 
lowercased, and in the table[2] the column «The free dictionary» (and 
all translations) has the first letter in uppercase.

06.02.2010 3:57, Casey Brown написав:
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Casey Brown<lists <at> caseybrown.org>  wrote:
>    
>> It looks like no one ever sent a message to these mailing lists about
>> the new Wiktionary logo vote!
>>      
> The logo vote is now over and the results are available on
> Meta-Wiki.[1]  We're also working on a collection of different
> language texts that will go under the winning logo[2], please add the
> tagline that they use in your language!
>
> [1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wiktionary/logo/refresh/voting#Results_2
> [2] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiktionary/logo/refresh/localization_text
>
>    

--
Anatoliy Goncharov, Wikimedia Ukraine Deputy Chairman
ahonc.ua <at> gmail.com; ICQ: 364-176-156; http://ua.wikimedia.org

_______________________________________________
Wiktionary-l mailing list
Wiktionary-l <at> lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiktionary-l
Milos Rancic | 27 Feb 2010 18:32
Picon
Gravatar

Discussion about proposal for multilingual Wiktionary

I am cleaning Requests for new languages [1] at Meta. Some of the
requests are clearly out of the Language committee scope, and they
need wider discussion for concluding them.

One of such requests is for multilingual Wiktionary [2]. Please,
discuss here (at foundation-l; I am sending this message to
wiktionary-l to poke those who are not at foundation-l) or on wiki at
the page [2].

[1] - http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages
[2] - http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wiktionary_multilingual
Milos Rancic | 3 Mar 2010 07:23
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Discussion about proposal for multilingual Wiktionary

On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Milos Rancic <millosh@...> wrote:
> I am cleaning Requests for new languages [1] at Meta. Some of the
> requests are clearly out of the Language committee scope, and they
> need wider discussion for concluding them.
>
> One of such requests is for multilingual Wiktionary [2]. Please,
> discuss here (at foundation-l; I am sending this message to
> wiktionary-l to poke those who are not at foundation-l) or on wiki at
> the page [2].
>
> [1] - http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages
> [2] - http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wiktionary_multilingual
>

The request has been rejected as invalid. The explanation for
rejection is below:

According to the Language proposal policy, Language committee may
approve just a project which intends to be written in one language.
Thus, this proposal is invalid. If you want to create multilingual
Wiktionary, please create a page Multilingual Wiktionary and start
discussion about the idea at wiktionary-l. Note, also, that there is a
free content project OmegaWiki, which is in fact multilingual
Wiktionary. --Millosh  06:18, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Milos Rancic | 27 Feb 2010 18:32
Picon
Gravatar

Discussion about proposal for multilingual Wiktionary

I am cleaning Requests for new languages [1] at Meta. Some of the
requests are clearly out of the Language committee scope, and they
need wider discussion for concluding them.

One of such requests is for multilingual Wiktionary [2]. Please,
discuss here (at foundation-l; I am sending this message to
wiktionary-l to poke those who are not at foundation-l) or on wiki at
the page [2].

[1] - http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages
[2] - http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wiktionary_multilingual

Milos Rancic | 3 Mar 2010 07:23
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Discussion about proposal for multilingual Wiktionary

On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Milos Rancic <millosh@...> wrote:
> I am cleaning Requests for new languages [1] at Meta. Some of the
> requests are clearly out of the Language committee scope, and they
> need wider discussion for concluding them.
>
> One of such requests is for multilingual Wiktionary [2]. Please,
> discuss here (at foundation-l; I am sending this message to
> wiktionary-l to poke those who are not at foundation-l) or on wiki at
> the page [2].
>
> [1] - http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages
> [2] - http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wiktionary_multilingual
>

The request has been rejected as invalid. The explanation for
rejection is below:

According to the Language proposal policy, Language committee may
approve just a project which intends to be written in one language.
Thus, this proposal is invalid. If you want to create multilingual
Wiktionary, please create a page Multilingual Wiktionary and start
discussion about the idea at wiktionary-l. Note, also, that there is a
free content project OmegaWiki, which is in fact multilingual
Wiktionary. --Millosh  06:18, 3 March 2010 (UTC)


Gmane