[Bug 966] section edit links have problems with HTML header markup
http://bugzilla.wikipedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966
rowan.collins@... changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OS/Version|Windows 2000 |All
Summary|section edit links have |section edit links have
|problems with headers not in|problems with HTML header
|TOC |markup
------- Additional Comments From rowan.collins@...
2004-12-01 03:33 UTC -------
To be honest, I'd say that the "trick" being used to keep these headers out of
the ToC is itself a bug, and that a heading should be a heading and no cheating
by using a different kind of markup.
However, there does seem to be a long-standing problem with the section edit
code, where the code which inserts "[edit]" links is divorced from the code
which counts the sections for "§ion=X" edits. (See also, for example, bug
904, which appears to have been fixed). Without looking at the code, I'd guess
this is because "section counting" isn't done while parsing, but adding the
"[edit]" links is; I wonder if there's some way the counting *could* be done in
the "proper" parser, or made more structurally similar.
--
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.wikipedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
(Continue reading)