Ryan Kaldari | 22 May 2013 01:06
Picon

Sex Ratios in Wikidata, Wikipedias, and VIAF

An interesting blog post about sex ratio data from Wikipedia and Wikidata:
http://hangingtogether.org/?p=2877

Interestingly, Wikidata only allows assigning a 'sex' to a person, not a 
'gender'.

Ryan Kaldari

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap <at> lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Andreas Kolbe | 20 May 2013 21:57
Picon

What should we do about Wikipedia?

Hi all, 


A really good piece by Martha Nichols and Lorraine Berry appeared today in the online literary magazine, Talking Writing.


It quotes the opinions of several women writers and is a follow-up to both Filipacchi's op-ed and the more recent Salon story:


Both are excellent reads.

Best,
Andreas
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap <at> lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Michael J. Lowrey | 20 May 2013 03:10
Picon
Gravatar

WisCon?

Anybody else going to be at WisCon next weekend? It's where I learned
of Wikipedia (it's Laura Quilter's fault), and certainly one of the
best places on the planet to discuss Gendergap-related issues.

--

-- 
Michael J. "Orange Mike" Lowrey

"When I get a little money I buy books; and if any is left, I buy food
and clothes."
     --  Desiderius Erasmus

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap <at> lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Audrey Cormier | 19 May 2013 16:09
Picon
Favicon

Images of radical feminist protests

I'm wondering what the thinking is among list members concerning photos depicting more militant feminist protest activity. 

I've been searching for images on Flickr that relate to feminism worldwide, and selecting some to copy to Commons. I've come across a few that are definitely in the radical end of the spectrum. The photos themselves range from "could be offensive to some people" (e.g. topless demonstrators) to "fully intended to be offensive to some/many people" (e.g. anti-male graffiti, posters dealing with menstruation). 

Now, it's one thing to discuss militancy in an article, it's another to see photos. They have documentary value, and I'm of the mind to go ahead and add them to the Radical feminism article. Since they were intended to shock, though, I do hesitate to do it. 

Would they serve an article well, or detract? Opinions?

Audrey
(aka OttawaAC)
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap <at> lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Sarah Stierch | 18 May 2013 17:26
Picon

Women on the list: what have you been editing lately?

I figure it's high time to start a positive (or call to action oriented) focus thread again that is focused on empowering women on this list to share. 

Women - and those who identify as - what have you been editing lately? 

---

I've been working hard at building my "to do" lists for the crowdsourcing aspect of my World Digital Library project. I miss having time to edit and write larger articles, but, that isn't in the cards yet. 

On the flipside, I've been helping out at Articles for Creation again. We have a backlog of over 1000!!! 
 :)

Sarah

--
--
Sarah Stierch
Museumist, open culture advocate, and Wikimedian
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap <at> lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Ole Palnatoke Andersen | 18 May 2013 01:17

Re: Category:Nude portrayals of computer technology

http://toolserver.org/~magnus/glamorous.php?doit=Do+it!&category=Nude+portrayals+of+computer+technology should answer George's question. It takes a while loading and it isn't worksafe - unless you can get away with thumbnails

-Ole.


On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 1:10 AM, George Herbert <george.herbert <at> gmail.com> wrote:
I'm at work and can't really get away with looking at the gallery images from here without trouble.  However...

Has anyone looked at them to see where (if anywhere) they are in use on projects?

-george


On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Nathan <nawrich <at> gmail.com> wrote:
I'm sure EVula knew that Commoners wouldn't abide his deletion of
their fap galleries. They've never liked it much before, and this
gallery is even nerdy! Double whammy. The uploader freaked out with
inspiring rapidity.

The arguments given in a previous deletion review are instructive;
only the most mechanical reading of the project scope policy, in the
way most charitable to retaining pornographic collections, were even
considered. The closer said, paraphrasing: "Pornographic? Sure, don't
care. Objectifies women? Sure, don't care. Not useful on another
Wikimedia project? Sure, don't care. It was on Flickr, so they must
have consented to publication on Commons, case closed."

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap <at> lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap



--
-george william herbert
george.herbert <at> gmail.com

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap <at> lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap




--
http://palnatoke.org * <at> palnatoke * +4522934588
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap <at> lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Alison Cassidy | 17 May 2013 23:58
Picon

Category:Nude portrayals of computer technology

Hi all,

Can someone please explain to me why Category:Nude portrayals of computer technology (NSFW) even exists? How is a category like this, whatever about the image, remotely encyclopedic or useful to the project? It is populated entirely with sexualized images of women - almost all naked or semi-naked - with only tangential references to computer technology.

I'm a computer engineer myself, and a paid-up member of SWE. Given the drive to get more women involved in STEM fields, I see stuff like this as being really damaging. And this is just one single example.

-- Allie
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap <at> lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Sarah Stierch | 15 May 2013 20:29
Picon

Two days left to apply: Program Evaluation & Design Workshop in Budapest, June 22-23

[pardon the cross-post] 

Hello everyone,

This is a reminder that there are 2 days left to apply to attend the first Program Evaluation & Design Workshop, which will take place in Budapest, June 22-23. Applications close at 12 AM PST May 17.

Please review this recent blog announcing the event:


Wikimedia community members, chapter staff/volunteers, solitary volunteers - anyone who is a program leader is encouraged to apply. Please note, we have only 20 slots available and limited funding to support attendees. If you do apply, you must email me at sarah <at> wikimedia.org if you are requesting funding before/after you apply. 

We will be filming our workshop, so don't fret if you cannot attend this first one, or aren't accepted to attend this time. 

You can get a better taste for the event through our evolving Meta Event page: 


Thank you Wikimedia Magyarország for your support and assistance. 

-Sarah

--
--
Sarah Stierch
Museumist, open culture advocate, and Wikimedian
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap <at> lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Netha Hussain | 15 May 2013 20:09
Picon
Gravatar

Fwd: [cultural-partners] Sex Ratios in Wikidata Wikipedia and Authorty Files

Cross posting from [cultural partners]

Begin forwarded message: 

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Klein,Max <kleinm <at> oclc.org>
Date: Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:56 PM
Subject: [cultural-partners] Sex Ratios in Wikidata Wikipedia and Authorty Files
To: Wikimedia Chapters cultural partners coordination - closed list <cultural-partners <at> wikimedia.ch>


Hello All,

I wanted to share with you some data I collected about sex ratios in Wikidata, after the so called categorygate New York times article. I wanted to see how other languages stacked up about representing sexes in their wikipedia.

This is how Biography articles stack up in all languages:


See the full blog post at http://hangingtogether.org/?p=2877





Maximilian Klein
Wikipedian in Residence, OCLC
+17074787023

_______________________________________________
Cultural-Partners mailing list
Cultural-Partners <at> wikimedia.ch
https://intern.wikimedia.ch/lists/listinfo/cultural-partners
Please treat emails sent to this list as confidential.Ask senders for permission before forwarding emails off-list.



--
Netha Hussain
Student of Medicine and Surgery
Govt. Medical College, Kozhikode
Blogs : nethahussain.blogspot.com
swethaambari.wordpress.com

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap <at> lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Theo10011 | 14 May 2013 21:56
Picon

Breast cancer related information

Hi


This news story is doing the rounds in the news but I don't know if everyone has seen the original NY times op-ed by Angelina Jolie[1]. She talks about her preemptive and precautionary double-mastectomy because she found out she was at a higher risk for breast cancer after genetic screening. I saw the news about this earlier but didn't read her op-ed until now, it's helpful to see her perspective on this. 

This might be a bit personal, but a relative passed away last year who had breast cancer and the cancer had metastasized after a mastectomy and several rounds of chemo. She was a mother of 3 and a fiercely strong woman who faced it head-on, and even made preparation for her own death when the doctors said there wasn't a lot to do near the end. Anyway, It occurred to me, what her reaction or choice would have been in this case. I've also seen this issue brought up again a few times among my friends and family, it's a scary thought and a decision most women said they wouldn't want to think about until they have to - but they all would have wanted more information to make the most informed choice possible.

It is safe to say that most people today use Wikipedia as the front line of information and resource for issues like these. Now, In Ms. Jolie's case I'm sure this was a very personal decision but she prob. also had access to the best medical resources and information about the risk and the tests. I suppose with all the charities and promotion breast cancer awareness already has - with marathons, television ads, and benefits - the true value of a resource like Wikipedia might be under-utilized. Once someone hears they are at risk or they should get tested, they most likely go to Wikipedia before a doctor to read up about it.

Anyway, I wanted to do something in this regard. I suppose it's needless to say that this is a bit personal for me. I have lurked on this list since it was founded, and besides occasional interrupts, just observed. This seems like a worthy issue to devote time to if anyone wants to join me. I still can't think of a proper way to organize this - a wikiproject doesn't seem right or if something like this already exists, but I'm not sure. I saw the related articles about the subject, some of them need cleaning up and revising the hard medical facts in to a coherent voice - generally simplifying the language. I also wanted to see if I can organize things better and put all the resources on a single page, with pictures and templates on the articles to guide people directly to a centralized resource point. I thought maybe more veteran editors here like Risker, SlimVirgin or PeteF can give some advice on how to go about organizing the information and making a start.

Kind regards
Theo

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap <at> lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Katherine Casey | 14 May 2013 17:01
Picon

Sexuality-related userboxen: give me your thoughts!

I've noticed that enwp has a lot of sexuality-related userboxen. Some of these are innocuous or positive (i.e. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:UBX/LGBTsupport), some seem to be a bit over-share-y (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:UBX/abstinence_reluctant), and some seem downright creepy to me (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:UBX/girlfriendwish). When you put them together (for example, as found on the - real but anonymized - userpage excerpt here), you can very easily end up with what feels like a very, very sexualized userpage, which means a very, very sexualized user experience for anyone who visits that page. Reading the userpage that screenshot came from, for example, gave me the feeling that anyone female who speaks to that user is going to be evaluated for their sexual usefulness to the user.

Userboxen can be a sensitive issue, historically speaking, and everyone seems to draw the line differently between appropriate ones and inappropriate ones. I'm interested in getting some thoughts on where the line is, and on whether the ones that cross the line inappropriately sexualize the atmosphere on the project. My personal feeling is something along the lines of "Speaking out about your sexual identity is good, but I don't want to hear about what specific sexual characteristics you have or want your sexual partners to have". I'd welcome the lists's thoughts on whether any, some, or none of the following userboxen (not an exhaustive list of sexuality-related ones, just some I've pulled out as good examples of the question) are appropriate to have hosted and used on our projects:

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap <at> lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Gmane