Brianna Laugher | 1 Nov 01:35
Picon
Gravatar

Fwd: Invitation to Libre Graphics Meeting 2008

I hope some of our Polish contributors might be able to go!!

cheers,
Brianna

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jolanta Soja <jolanta.soja@...>
Date: 1 Nov 2007 02:45
Subject: [Clipart] Invitation to Libre Graphics Meeting 2008
To: Open Clip Art Library <clipart@...>

Hi,

I'm Jolanta Soja, and I'm an organizator of Libre Graphics Meeting
2008 (Check http://www.libregraphicsmeeting.org for more info,
please).

LGM is all about participation. Artists and developers, feel free to
bring your laptops and show us what you can (and can't yet) do. Libre
Graphics Meeting is free to attend, and open to all.

This upcoming edition will take place from 8-11th of May 2008 in
Wroclaw, a great city with over 600 thousand population, located in
southwestern Poland, 160 km from Germany and 120 km from the Czech
Republic.

As an official organizer I have the pleasure to invite Open Clip Art
Library project team to participate in LGM 2008. Please let us know if
we can expect you joining us.

(Continue reading)

Aude | 1 Nov 06:38
Picon

New photography rules in U.S. National Parks and other federal lands

The U.S. Department of the Interior is considering changing rules regarding photography on land managed by the Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Services, and the National Park Service.  That would include all national parks, and other places ( e.g. the National Mall in DC).

New Filming Rules Proposed on Federal Lands

http://dcist.com/2007/10/31/filming_rules_o.php#more

Tourists would still be allowed to take pictures, but the definition of commercial photography is vague in what they propose.  I think I would still take pictures and upload them to Commons.  But, technically I suppose we are commercial or freelance photographers, since we allow such use.  I would not like it if the new rules allow security personnel to be more bothersome when I'm taking photographs.

-Aude

_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@...
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
Artur Fijałkowski | 1 Nov 10:15
Picon

Re: Fwd: Invitation to Libre Graphics Meeting 2008

2007/11/1, Brianna Laugher <brianna.laugher@...>:
> I hope some of our Polish contributors might be able to go!!

Would be great fun attending on this conference (and we have quite
large SVG team in south Poland).

AJF/WarX
Cary Bass | 2 Nov 19:32
Picon

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Greenspan illustration project

Cross posting to Commons-l and Foundation-l (forgive the duplication):

The Greenspan Illustration Project

    What is it?

The Wikimedia Foundation has received a donation from Philip Greenspun 
for the purpose of creating and improving illustrations on Wikimedia. 
The Board has decided to accept his donation of $US20,000 for this 
special purpose.

This is the first time the Foundation has been directly involved in 
funded content creation, although the German chapter's experience in 
winning a government grant to write articles on sustainable development 
has helped pave the way. The Foundation wants a "hands-off" minimal 
administration role with the bulk of the work of organizing the project 
and creating the content to be completed by members of our community.

Since this is the first time we've done this, we're not sure how it will 
go. This is a bit experimental and we ask for your patience and 
enthusiasm to help make it a success.

Brianna Laugher (<http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pfctdayelise>) 
will be coordinating the project, with my help as the Foundation's 
Volunteer Coordinator.

    How will it run?

Since Philip's kind donation is a lot of money and we're planning to pay 
around US$40 per illustration (with some lower and higher amounts, see 
details to follow), we want to progress the project in stages. Starting 
out with a small number of 50 requested illustrations, we'll look at our 
results and modify and improve it for successive stages.

The project will flow along as follows:

    * Create list of requested illustrations.
    * Open illustration requests on issue tracking software
    * Users will self-assign requests, signaling his or her intent to
      create that illustration.
    * On creation and approval, the user is paid the amount as set in
      the original request.

Things to note:

    * The list of requests will be approved by Brianna, in order that
      balance exists among "things any decent reference work needs";
      "things the Wikimedia community requests"; and "things we nearly
      have, or have poor versions of".
    * Approval: a review group will be formed in order to provide
      assessment of submitted images. The main checks will be 1)
      editor's original work and acceptable license, 2) correct
      rendering on MediaWiki and 3) how well the image depicts the
      requested item. No image will be accepted that do not pass all
      three of these checks.
    * Other checks will be recommended (e.g. language-neutral version).
    * The payment system is not yet finalized.

    How you can help

If you are interested in suggesting illustrations to be created, you 
don't have long to wait: soon there will be some pages on Meta where you 
can get involved. We will write to foundation-l when the pages are ready 
for your input.

If you are interested in being part of the review group, please email 
Brianna as follows:

brianna.laugher AT gmail DOT com

    The benefits

This project can have two good outcomes. One, we get illustrations we 
wouldn't otherwise have, or wouldn't otherwise have had so quickly. 
Another benefit is that we can use this project as a way to encourage 
and launch new people into the "illustrator community".

Creating high-quality SVGs is not a skill a lot of people have 
immediately, but may be developed fairly quickly. While many people 
might be vaguely interested in it but no more, a monetary incentive 
might be enough to push them to act, and learn, and create. Some of the 
image requests will be for smaller amounts (US$15) for relatively 
simpler illustrations—these will be specifically targeted to newcomers 
to encourage them to get involved. At the end of this project we might 
have $20,000 worth of illustrations, but the value of the content 
creating community will potentially be a lot higher. We expect a side 
benefit to this project will be the creation/finding and maintenance of 
good documentation for specific tasks using tools like Inkscape.

    More details

See the project specifications at:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/foundation/5/51/WMF_Greenspun_Illustration_Project_Proposal.pdf

--

-- 
Cary Bass
Volunteer Coordinator

Your continued donations keep Wikipedia running! Support the Wikimedia Foundation today:
http://donate.wikimedia.org 

Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
Phone: 727.231.0101
Fax: 727.258.0207
E-Mail: cbass@...
Cary Bass | 2 Nov 19:41
Picon

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Greenspun illustration project

Forgive my mispelling in the announcement.  Substed "a" for "u"

Cary Bass wrote:
> Cross posting to Commons-l and Foundation-l (forgive the duplication):
>
> The Greenspun Illustration Project
>
>
>     What is it?
>
> The Wikimedia Foundation has received a donation from Philip Greenspun 
> for the purpose of creating and improving illustrations on Wikimedia. 
> The Board has decided to accept his donation of $US20,000 for this 
> special purpose.
>
> This is the first time the Foundation has been directly involved in 
> funded content creation, although the German chapter's experience in 
> winning a government grant to write articles on sustainable development 
> has helped pave the way. The Foundation wants a "hands-off" minimal 
> administration role with the bulk of the work of organizing the project 
> and creating the content to be completed by members of our community.
>
> Since this is the first time we've done this, we're not sure how it will 
> go. This is a bit experimental and we ask for your patience and 
> enthusiasm to help make it a success.
>
> Brianna Laugher (<http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pfctdayelise>) 
> will be coordinating the project, with my help as the Foundation's 
> Volunteer Coordinator.
>
>
>     How will it run?
>
> Since Philip's kind donation is a lot of money and we're planning to pay 
> around US$40 per illustration (with some lower and higher amounts, see 
> details to follow), we want to progress the project in stages. Starting 
> out with a small number of 50 requested illustrations, we'll look at our 
> results and modify and improve it for successive stages.
>
> The project will flow along as follows:
>
>     * Create list of requested illustrations.
>     * Open illustration requests on issue tracking software
>     * Users will self-assign requests, signaling his or her intent to
>       create that illustration.
>     * On creation and approval, the user is paid the amount as set in
>       the original request.
>
> Things to note:
>
>     * The list of requests will be approved by Brianna, in order that
>       balance exists among "things any decent reference work needs";
>       "things the Wikimedia community requests"; and "things we nearly
>       have, or have poor versions of".
>     * Approval: a review group will be formed in order to provide
>       assessment of submitted images. The main checks will be 1)
>       editor's original work and acceptable license, 2) correct
>       rendering on MediaWiki and 3) how well the image depicts the
>       requested item. No image will be accepted that do not pass all
>       three of these checks.
>     * Other checks will be recommended (e.g. language-neutral version).
>     * The payment system is not yet finalized.
>
>
>     How you can help
>
> If you are interested in suggesting illustrations to be created, you 
> don't have long to wait: soon there will be some pages on Meta where you 
> can get involved. We will write to foundation-l when the pages are ready 
> for your input.
>
> If you are interested in being part of the review group, please email 
> Brianna as follows:
>
> brianna.laugher AT gmail DOT com
>
>
>     The benefits
>
> This project can have two good outcomes. One, we get illustrations we 
> wouldn't otherwise have, or wouldn't otherwise have had so quickly. 
> Another benefit is that we can use this project as a way to encourage 
> and launch new people into the "illustrator community".
>
> Creating high-quality SVGs is not a skill a lot of people have 
> immediately, but may be developed fairly quickly. While many people 
> might be vaguely interested in it but no more, a monetary incentive 
> might be enough to push them to act, and learn, and create. Some of the 
> image requests will be for smaller amounts (US$15) for relatively 
> simpler illustrations—these will be specifically targeted to newcomers 
> to encourage them to get involved. At the end of this project we might 
> have $20,000 worth of illustrations, but the value of the content 
> creating community will potentially be a lot higher. We expect a side 
> benefit to this project will be the creation/finding and maintenance of 
> good documentation for specific tasks using tools like Inkscape.
>
>
>     More details
>
> See the project specifications at:
>
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/foundation/5/51/WMF_Greenspun_Illustration_Project_Proposal.pdf
>
>   

--

-- 
Cary Bass
Volunteer Coordinator

Your continued donations keep Wikipedia running! Support the Wikimedia Foundation today:
http://donate.wikimedia.org 

Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
Phone: 727.231.0101
Fax: 727.258.0207
E-Mail: cbass@...
SJ Klein | 3 Nov 04:32
Picon

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Greenspun illustration project


Huzzah!  A worthy goal; thanks, philg.  I am thinking of the many 
fantastic illustrators who pepper the projects, waiting for people to
ask them for suitably interesting or difficult illustrative tasks --
one of the most delightful classes of wiki editors I have ever run across.

We'll see how funded content creation goes; but whether or not the funds 
end up being the key to encouraging new work, these illustrators certainly 
deserve this sort of attention for their fine work.

SJ

On Fri, 2 Nov 2007, Cary Bass wrote:

> Forgive my misspelling in the announcement.   Subst "a" for "u".
>
> Cary Bass wrote:
>> Cross posting to Commons-l and Foundation-l (forgive the duplication):
>>
>> The Greenspun Illustration Project
>>
>>
>>     What is it?
>>
>> The Wikimedia Foundation has received a donation from Philip Greenspun
>> for the purpose of creating and improving illustrations on Wikimedia.
>> The Board has decided to accept his donation of $US20,000 for this
>> special purpose.
>>
>> This is the first time the Foundation has been directly involved in
>> funded content creation, although the German chapter's experience in
>> winning a government grant to write articles on sustainable development
>> has helped pave the way. The Foundation wants a "hands-off" minimal
>> administration role with the bulk of the work of organizing the project
>> and creating the content to be completed by members of our community.
>>
>> Since this is the first time we've done this, we're not sure how it will
>> go. This is a bit experimental and we ask for your patience and
>> enthusiasm to help make it a success.
>>
>> Brianna Laugher (<http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pfctdayelise>)
>> will be coordinating the project, with my help as the Foundation's
>> Volunteer Coordinator.
>>
>>
>>     How will it run?
>>
>> Since Philip's kind donation is a lot of money and we're planning to pay
>> around US$40 per illustration (with some lower and higher amounts, see
>> details to follow), we want to progress the project in stages. Starting
>> out with a small number of 50 requested illustrations, we'll look at our
>> results and modify and improve it for successive stages.
>>
>> The project will flow along as follows:
>>
>>     * Create list of requested illustrations.
>>     * Open illustration requests on issue tracking software
>>     * Users will self-assign requests, signaling his or her intent to
>>       create that illustration.
>>     * On creation and approval, the user is paid the amount as set in
>>       the original request.
>>
>> Things to note:
>>
>>     * The list of requests will be approved by Brianna, in order that
>>       balance exists among "things any decent reference work needs";
>>       "things the Wikimedia community requests"; and "things we nearly
>>       have, or have poor versions of".
>>     * Approval: a review group will be formed in order to provide
>>       assessment of submitted images. The main checks will be 1)
>>       editor's original work and acceptable license, 2) correct
>>       rendering on MediaWiki and 3) how well the image depicts the
>>       requested item. No image will be accepted that do not pass all
>>       three of these checks.
>>     * Other checks will be recommended (e.g. language-neutral version).
>>     * The payment system is not yet finalized.
>>
>>
>>     How you can help
>>
>> If you are interested in suggesting illustrations to be created, you
>> don't have long to wait: soon there will be some pages on Meta where you
>> can get involved. We will write to foundation-l when the pages are ready
>> for your input.
>>
>> If you are interested in being part of the review group, please email
>> Brianna as follows:
>>
>> brianna.laugher AT gmail DOT com
>>
>>
>>     The benefits
>>
>> This project can have two good outcomes. One, we get illustrations we
>> wouldn't otherwise have, or wouldn't otherwise have had so quickly.
>> Another benefit is that we can use this project as a way to encourage
>> and launch new people into the "illustrator community".
>>
>> Creating high-quality SVGs is not a skill a lot of people have
>> immediately, but may be developed fairly quickly. While many people
>> might be vaguely interested in it but no more, a monetary incentive
>> might be enough to push them to act, and learn, and create. Some of the
>> image requests will be for smaller amounts (US$15) for relatively
>> simpler illustrations—these will be specifically targeted to newcomers
>> to encourage them to get involved. At the end of this project we might
>> have $20,000 worth of illustrations, but the value of the content
>> creating community will potentially be a lot higher. We expect a side
>> benefit to this project will be the creation/finding and maintenance of
>> good documentation for specific tasks using tools like Inkscape.
>>
>>
>>     More details
>>
>> See the project specifications at:
>>
>> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/foundation/5/51/WMF_Greenspun_Illustration_Project_Proposal.pdf
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Cary Bass
> Volunteer Coordinator
>
> Your continued donations keep Wikipedia running! Support the Wikimedia Foundation today: http://donate.wikimedia.org
>
> Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
> Phone: 727.231.0101
> Fax: 727.258.0207
> E-Mail: cbass@...
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l@...
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@...
Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
Eugene Zelenko | 3 Nov 04:33
Picon

Attribution for Commons Images on lenta.ru

Hi!

I noticed today Commons image
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Mus_Musculus-huismuis.jpg as
illustration for article http://www.lenta.ru/news/2007/11/02/mouse/
about newly created GMO super-mouse.

Other example is Minsk photo
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Victory-square.jpg in
http://lenta.ru/news/2007/07/31/venez/.

In both cases attributions are far from ideal. Should we take any
actions (I mean educational one)?

With best regards,
Eugene.

PS

lenta.ru on my opinion is one of the best Russian news sites.
Zachary Harden | 3 Nov 04:43
Picon

Re: Attribution for Commons Images on lenta.ru

Greetings Eugene,

http://lenta.ru/info/correct.htm seems to be the correct link to send corrections to lenta.ru. We could try that route.

Regards,

Zachary Harden


> Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 20:33:34 -0700
> From: eugene.zelenko-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
> To: commons-l <at> lists.wikimedia.org
> Subject: [Commons-l] Attribution for Commons Images on lenta.ru
>
> Hi!
>
> I noticed today Commons image
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Mus_Musculus-huismuis.jpg as
> illustration for article http://www.lenta.ru/news/2007/11/02/mouse/
> about newly created GMO super-mouse.
>
> Other example is Minsk photo
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Victory-square.jpg in
> http://lenta.ru/news/2007/07/31/venez/.
>
> In both cases attributions are far from ideal. Should we take any
> actions (I mean educational one)?
>
> With best regards,
> Eugene.
>
> PS
>
> lenta.ru on my opinion is one of the best Russian news sites.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Commons-l mailing list
> Commons-l-RusutVdil2icGmH+5r0DM0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l

Peek-a-boo FREE Tricks & Treats for You! Get 'em!
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@...
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
Eugene Zelenko | 3 Nov 04:52
Picon

Re: Attribution for Commons Images on lenta.ru

I think http://lenta.ru/info/letter.htm can be better way, since this
is more question of policy then question of typo.

On 11/2/07, Zachary Harden <zscout370@...> wrote:
>
>  Greetings Eugene,
>
> http://lenta.ru/info/correct.htm seems to be the correct
> link to send corrections to lenta.ru. We could try that route.
>
> Regards,
>
> Zachary Harden
>
>
> > Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 20:33:34 -0700
> > From: eugene.zelenko@...
> > To: commons-l@...
> > Subject: [Commons-l] Attribution for Commons Images on lenta.ru
>
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > I noticed today Commons image
> >
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Mus_Musculus-huismuis.jpg
> as
> > illustration for article
> http://www.lenta.ru/news/2007/11/02/mouse/
> > about newly created GMO super-mouse.
> >
> > Other example is Minsk photo
> >
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Victory-square.jpg
> in
> > http://lenta.ru/news/2007/07/31/venez/.
> >
> > In both cases attributions are far from ideal. Should we take any
> > actions (I mean educational one)?
> >
> > With best regards,
> > Eugene.
> >
> > PS
> >
> > lenta.ru on my opinion is one of the best Russian news sites.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Commons-l mailing list
> > Commons-l@...
> > http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
>
> ________________________________
> Peek-a-boo FREE Tricks & Treats for You! Get 'em!
> _______________________________________________
> Commons-l mailing list
> Commons-l@...
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
>
>
Brianna Laugher | 3 Nov 15:08
Picon
Gravatar

Re: New photography rules in U.S. National Parks and other federal lands

On 01/11/2007, Aude <audevivere@...> wrote:
> The U.S. Department of the Interior is considering changing rules regarding
> photography on land managed by the Bureau of Land Management, Fish and
> Wildlife Services, and the National Park Service.  That would include all
> national parks, and other places ( e.g. the National Mall in DC).
>
> New Filming Rules Proposed on Federal Lands
> http://dcist.com/2007/10/31/filming_rules_o.php#more
>
> Tourists would still be allowed to take pictures, but the definition of
> commercial photography is vague in what they propose.  I think I would still
> take pictures and upload them to Commons.  But, technically I suppose we are
> commercial or freelance photographers, since we allow such use.  I would not
> like it if the new rules allow security personnel to be more bothersome when
> I'm taking photographs.

Thanks a lot, Aude, for bringing this to our attention. I think
Wikimedians should try and fight any kind of change like this as hard
as they can. I think what ends up happening is anyone with a
particularly impressive looking camera gets hassled.

Is there anything WMF could do? (make a submission, or even just a
loud angry noise about it?)
What can American Wikimedians do?

According to http://www.spj.org/news.asp?REF=739#739 ,

>>
The public comment period is now closed and a hearing will be
scheduled before a final ruling is made. Because no date has been
scheduled for the public hearing, SPJ leaders are encouraging
journalists and members of the public to voice their concerns by
writing to:

Department of Interior/National Park Service
Attn: Lee Dickinson, Special Park Uses Program Manager
National Park Service
1849 C St., NW, ORG CODE 2460
Washington, DC 20240
<<

Hm, how can we be notified when the hearing is scheduled I wonder?

cheers
Brianna

--

-- 
They've just been waiting in a mountain for the right moment:
http://modernthings.org/

Gmane