bugzilla | 11 Aug 2011 17:22
Picon

[Bug 7564] should it be possible to direct marginalia to othr regions?

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7564

Liam R E Quin <liam <at> w3.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |CLOSED

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

bugzilla | 11 Aug 2011 17:22
Picon

[Bug 7564] should it be possible to direct marginalia to othr regions?

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7564

Liam R E Quin <liam <at> w3.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #1 from Liam R E Quin <liam <at> w3.org> 2011-08-11 15:22:00 UTC ---
No.

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

bugzilla | 11 Aug 2011 17:23
Picon

[Bug 7565] marginalia: extension regions, or multple region bodies?

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7565

Liam R E Quin <liam <at> w3.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #2 from Liam R E Quin <liam <at> w3.org> 2011-08-11 15:23:59 UTC ---
Closed. A misunderstanding (Fabio)

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

bugzilla | 11 Aug 2011 17:24
Picon

[Bug 7565] marginalia: extension regions, or multple region bodies?

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7565

Liam R E Quin <liam <at> w3.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |CLOSED

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

bugzilla | 11 Aug 2011 17:27
Picon

[Bug 7566] Clarify relationship between marginalia and footnotes

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7566

Liam R E Quin <liam <at> w3.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #1 from Liam R E Quin <liam <at> w3.org> 2011-08-11 15:27:08 UTC ---
WG decided not to offer dynamic marginalia regions. Use side-floats instead.

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

bugzilla | 11 Aug 2011 17:27
Picon

[Bug 7566] Clarify relationship between marginalia and footnotes

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7566

Liam R E Quin <liam <at> w3.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |CLOSED

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

bugzilla | 11 Aug 2011 18:01
Picon

[Bug 7562] initial caps - allow auto for font-size?

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7562

Liam R E Quin <liam <at> w3.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |CLOSED

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

bugzilla | 17 Aug 2011 13:05
Picon

[Bug 13804] New: Is normative rgb-icc() prototype wrong?

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13804

           Summary: Is normative rgb-icc() prototype wrong?
           Product: XSLFO
           Version: 1.1
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: XSL-FO
        AssignedTo: tgraham <at> mentea.net
        ReportedBy: tgraham <at> mentea.net
         QAContact: xsl-editors <at> w3.org

The rgb-icc() prototype [1] in the normative HTML for XSL 1.1 is:

color rgb-icc(numeric, numeric, numeric, NCName, numeric, numeric)

However, the non-normative XML source [2] for XSL 1.1 contains:

<proto name="rgb-icc" return-type="color"><arg type="numeric"/><arg
type="numeric"/>
<arg type="numeric"/><arg type="NCName"/><arg type="numeric"/><arg
type="numeric" occur="rep"/></proto>

I.e., the 'occur="rep"' on the last <arg> does not make it any different from
an <arg> without it.

In contrast 'occur="opt"' adds a "?" after the argument in the rendered
(Continue reading)

bugzilla | 18 Aug 2011 16:33
Picon

[Bug 13827] New: Do cie-lab-color() and cie-lchab-color() need optional white point?

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13827

           Summary: Do cie-lab-color() and cie-lchab-color() need optional
                    white point?
           Product: XSLFO
           Version: 2.0 Working Draft
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: XSL-FO
        AssignedTo: tgraham <at> mentea.net
        ReportedBy: tgraham <at> mentea.net
         QAContact: xsl-editors <at> w3.org

XSL FO 2.0's cie-lab-color() and cie-lchab-color() [1] are meant to be
compatible with what can be expressed in SVG Color 1.2 [2].

The cielab() and cielchab() functions in SVG Color 1.2 both have an option
white point parameter.

Should XSL FO 2.0 have this parameter in its functions?

Regards,

Tony Graham.

[1] http://www.w3.org/Style/XSL/Group/2009/03/xslfo20.html#d2e7142
[2] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/modules/color/master/SVGColor.html
(Continue reading)

bugzilla | 18 Aug 2011 16:47
Picon

[Bug 13828] New: ICC reference may be out of date

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13828

           Summary: ICC reference may be out of date
           Product: XSLFO
           Version: 2.0 Working Draft
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P2
         Component: XSL-FO
        AssignedTo: tgraham <at> mentea.net
        ReportedBy: tgraham <at> mentea.net
         QAContact: xsl-editors <at> w3.org

SVG Color 1.2 uses:

[ICC42]
    International Color Consortium. Specification ICC.1:2004-10 (Profile
version 4.2.0.0) Image technology colour management — Architecture, profile
format, and data structure.
    Available at http://www.color.org/ICC1V42.pdf

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.


Gmane