Arthur Barstow | 29 May 13:21 2015
Picon

RfC: Style Sheet for Technical Reports; deadline July 7

Fantasai is leading an effort to improve the style sheet used for new 
Technical Reports. She created a survey [1] that is supposed to reflect 
the entire group's feedback but she also welcomes individual feedback 
via the spec-prod list [2], using the 10 questions below as a guide.

If you have individual feedback, please send it directly to [2], using a 
Subject: prefix of "[restyle]" by July 7.

If you have feedback you propose be submitted on behalf of the group, 
please reply to this e-mail, by July 3 so I  have time to collate the 
feedback and submit it by the deadline.

In the absence of any feedback on behalf of the group, my reply to the 
survey will be that the existing style sheet meets the "We Can Live With 
It Test".

-Thanks, ArtB

[1] https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/tr-design-survey-2015/
[2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/spec-prod/

On 5/27/15 2:02 PM, fantasai wrote:
> We are updating the style sheets for W3C technical reports.
>   This year's styling project is minor improvements and cleanup,
>   not major changes, so the look and feel will remain substantially 
> the same.
>   Also, please note that since the publication system work is ongoing,
>   no markup will be harmed in the development of the 2016 style sheet.
>   Given that, however, we hope to improve the quality and consistency
>   of styles used across W3C.
(Continue reading)

Arthur Barstow | 27 May 14:59 2015
Picon

[ime-api] Fwd: [blink-dev] Removing IME API code from Blink

Below is a proposal to remove the "experimental" IME API implementation 
from Blink.

Is there sufficient interest from other implementers to keep this spec 
on the TR track or should we formally stop work on it and publish a WG Note?

Travis, All, WDYT?

-Thanks, ArtB

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	[blink-dev] Removing IME API code from Blink
Date: 	Wed, 27 May 2015 14:15:15 +0900
From: 	Takayoshi Kochi <kochi@...>
To: 	blink-dev <blink-dev@...>

IME API, experimentally implemented a while ago, has been under 
experimental flag
but we haven't got enough signal from users to get it out of experimental.
Therefore I'm thinking of removing the code from Blink (and Chromium) 
for code health.
This is not an intent to deprecate, and if we get enough interest we may 
readd/reimplement
the spec.

We don't have real-world usage number of IME API.  Even though IE11 
implements
IME API, theirs are ms- prefixed (while Blink's is unprefixed) and some 
of their API are available
under Metro mode only due to their implementation details, so we guess 
(Continue reading)

bugzilla | 27 May 05:26 2015
Picon

[Bug 27418] [Shadow]: Need to define what .styleSheets actually does on a shadow root

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27418
Bug 27418 depends on bug 26850, which changed state.

Bug 26850 Summary: [Shadow]: Style element should specify when to create and add style sheet in shadow DOM
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26850

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |MOVED

--

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

bugzilla | 27 May 05:26 2015
Picon

[Bug 27375] [Shadow]: Define whether <style>s in shadow trees are loaded

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27375
Bug 27375 depends on bug 26850, which changed state.

Bug 26850 Summary: [Shadow]: Style element should specify when to create and add style sheet in shadow DOM
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26850

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |MOVED

--

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

bugzilla | 27 May 05:25 2015
Picon

[Bug 27379] [Shadow] How should element.requestFullscreen(); work in shadow dom

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27379
Bug 27379 depends on bug 26365, which changed state.

Bug 26365 Summary: [Shadow]: Need an equivalent definition of 'in a Document' for shadow trees
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26365

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |MOVED

--

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

bugzilla | 27 May 05:25 2015
Picon

[Bug 27757] [Shadow]: how is the autofocus attribute supposed to be handled?

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27757
Bug 27757 depends on bug 26365, which changed state.

Bug 26365 Summary: [Shadow]: Need an equivalent definition of 'in a Document' for shadow trees
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26365

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |MOVED

--

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

bugzilla | 27 May 05:25 2015
Picon

[Bug 27325] [Shadow]: Figure out how session history should work for <iframe>s in shadow DOM

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27325
Bug 27325 depends on bug 26365, which changed state.

Bug 26365 Summary: [Shadow]: Need an equivalent definition of 'in a Document' for shadow trees
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26365

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |MOVED

--

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

bugzilla | 27 May 05:25 2015
Picon

[Bug 27380] [Shadow] How should various document internal references work when SVG is being used in shadow DOM

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27380
Bug 27380 depends on bug 26365, which changed state.

Bug 26365 Summary: [Shadow]: Need an equivalent definition of 'in a Document' for shadow trees
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26365

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |MOVED

--

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

bugzilla | 27 May 05:20 2015
Picon

[Bug 27418] [Shadow]: Need to define what .styleSheets actually does on a shadow root

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27418

Hayato Ito <hayato@...> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |MOVED

--- Comment #4 from Hayato Ito <hayato@...> ---
Moved to https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/70

--

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

bugzilla | 27 May 05:07 2015
Picon

[Bug 27775] [Shadow]: Define the behavior of *closed* shadow trees.

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27775

Hayato Ito <hayato@...> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |MOVED

--- Comment #17 from Hayato Ito <hayato@...> ---
Moved to https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/85

--

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

bugzilla | 27 May 05:02 2015
Picon

[Bug 27757] [Shadow]: how is the autofocus attribute supposed to be handled?

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27757

Hayato Ito <hayato@...> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |MOVED

--- Comment #5 from Hayato Ito <hayato@...> ---
Moved to https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/97

--

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.