Europe and US hotels offers

Style of third level sections...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In W3C Specifications,

- - First level sections are very large, bold, and blue.

- - Second level sections are large, normal weight, and blue.

- - Third level sections are normal size, bold, and black.

I find the transition from "blue" to "black" very jarring. In
particular, these sections lose the appearance of being section
dividers.

This problem is particularly noticable in documents like the XSL/XML
Query Data Model where paragraphs discussing infoset properties often
contain a fair amount of bold text.

Is there any possibility that a different style might be applied?

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

- -- 
Norman.Walsh <at> Sun.COM    | What are the thoughts of the canvas on which
XML Standards Architect | a masterpiece is being created? "I am being
Web Tech. and Standards | soiled, brutally treated and concealed from
Sun Microsystems, Inc.  | view." Thus men grumble at their destiny,
                        | however fair.--Jean Cocteau
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQE/cHDCOyltUcwYWjsRAtr7AKCRu5P63YIZ20TouYENATPWSqHNjwCfU3Xq
eGuOuZEwo1qdygq4QUf98p0=
=xR43
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

RE: Style of third level sections...

We could make the third level headings blue also.

All the best, Ashok

> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-query-editors-request <at> w3.org [mailto:w3c-query-editors-
> request <at> w3.org] On Behalf Of Norman Walsh
> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 9:12 AM
> To: spec-prod <at> w3.org
> Cc: w3c-query-editors <at> w3.org
> Subject: Style of third level sections...
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> In W3C Specifications,
> 
> - - First level sections are very large, bold, and blue.
> 
> - - Second level sections are large, normal weight, and blue.
> 
> - - Third level sections are normal size, bold, and black.
> 
> I find the transition from "blue" to "black" very jarring. In
> particular, these sections lose the appearance of being section
> dividers.
> 
> This problem is particularly noticeable in documents like the XSL/XML
> Query Data Model where paragraphs discussing infoset properties often
> contain a fair amount of bold text.
> 
> Is there any possibility that a different style might be applied?
> 
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
> 
> - --
> Norman.Walsh <at> Sun.COM    | What are the thoughts of the canvas on which
> XML Standards Architect | a masterpiece is being created? "I am being
> Web Tech. and Standards | soiled, brutally treated and concealed from
> Sun Microsystems, Inc.  | view." Thus men grumble at their destiny,
>                         | however fair.--Jean Cocteau
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8
<http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
> 
> iD8DBQE/cHDCOyltUcwYWjsRAtr7AKCRu5P63YIZ20TouYENATPWSqHNjwCfU3Xq
> eGuOuZEwo1qdygq4QUf98p0=
> =xR43
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 

RE: Style of third level sections...

formats for publishing of recommendations

  Dear Sirs or Madams,

   I would like to have all of the technical recommendations, working drafts, candidate recommendation and
so on, available in several formats (not just html or xml). I would like to have as addition PDF (for A4),
html-tar.gz. versions,  published with and referenced from the recommendations (like
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/ -> this version)

  The idea is that I would be able to print and assimilate them more easily and without additional efforts. I
don't thing that it is so difficult to make it, if you already have the document's sources.

  It is not really a question, but a comment about the technical recommendations/working drafts. I am not
sure, that this is the right address to send my mail to, so please forward it, if necessary.
  Best wishes
      Diljan Palauzov
______________________________________________________________________________
Die Besten ihrer Klasse! WEB.DE FreeMail (1,7) und WEB.DE Club (1,9) -
bei der Stiftung Warentest - ein Doppelsieg! http://f.web.de/?mc=021184