Philippine Linux Users Group (PLUG) ()

headers Junix Gaspar | 2 Feb 06:45

_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
according to comelec, there is a backup plan in case transmission thru
cell carriers is not possible (jammed signals including). but they
will not divulge what this backup plan is.

maybe, these jamming operators want to lure comelec into going to the
backup plan so that necessary dagdag-bawas can happen in the backup
plan.

ala, 24 ba

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Junix Gaspar <junixophobia@...> wrote:
> Anybody just bought a signal jamming device lately?
>
> Well a lot of politicos did!!!
>
> http://www.gmanews.tv/story/182973/comelec-takes-up-jamming-threat-at-en-banc-meeting
>
> _________________________________________________
> Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
> http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
> Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
>
_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph

Hello List,

Anyone in the list successfully deployed this software?

http://code.google.com/p/erpts/

Email me privately.

John
_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 3:40 PM, John Homer H Alvero
<johnhomer@...> wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> Anyone in the list successfully deployed this software?
>
> http://code.google.com/p/erpts/
>
> Email me privately.

Kay-ano nga pribado man? 
_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph

Hi,

These jamming devices only works for wireless protocols (eg. GSM GPRS). Comelec have the option to use
kawasaki protocol to transport signed data to the next level :->

fooler.
----------
Sent via Nokia Email Client thru a Nokia Phone

------Original Message------
From: John Homer H Alvero <johnhomer@...>
To: "Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Technical Discussion List" <plug@...>
Date: Tuesday, February 2, 2010 3:37:17 PM GMT+0800
Subject: Re: [plug] Code Review & SysAdmin of Election 2010 Computers

according to comelec, there is a backup plan in case transmission thru
cell carriers is not possible (jammed signals including). but they
will not divulge what this backup plan is.

maybe, these jamming operators want to lure comelec into going to the
backup plan so that necessary dagdag-bawas can happen in the backup
plan.

ala, 24 ba

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Junix Gaspar <junixophobia@...> wrote:
> Anybody just bought a signal jamming device lately?
>
> Well a lot of politicos did!!!
>
> http://www.gmanews.tv/story/182973/comelec-takes-up-jamming-threat-at-en-banc-meeting
>
> _________________________________________________
> Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
> http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
> Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
>
_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph

_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:53 PM,  <fooler.mail@...> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> These jamming devices only works for wireless protocols (eg. GSM GPRS). Comelec have the option to use
kawasaki protocol to transport signed data to the next level :->
For a moment there you had me look it up on google. <__<

>
> fooler.
> ----------
> Sent via Nokia Email Client thru a Nokia Phone
>
> ------Original Message------
> From: John Homer H Alvero <johnhomer@...>
> To: "Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Technical Discussion List" <plug@...>
> Date: Tuesday, February 2, 2010 3:37:17 PM GMT+0800
> Subject: Re: [plug] Code Review & SysAdmin of Election 2010 Computers
>
> according to comelec, there is a backup plan in case transmission thru
> cell carriers is not possible (jammed signals including). but they
> will not divulge what this backup plan is.
>
> maybe, these jamming operators want to lure comelec into going to the
> backup plan so that necessary dagdag-bawas can happen in the backup
> plan.
>
> ala, 24 ba
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Junix Gaspar <junixophobia@...> wrote:
>> Anybody just bought a signal jamming device lately?
>>
>> Well a lot of politicos did!!!
>>
>> http://www.gmanews.tv/story/182973/comelec-takes-up-jamming-threat-at-en-banc-meeting
>>
>> _________________________________________________
>> Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
>> http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
>> Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
>>
> _________________________________________________
> Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
> http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
> Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
>
> _________________________________________________
> Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
> http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
> Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
>

--

-- 
This email is:    [ ] actionable   [ ] fyi        [ ] social
Response needed:  [ ] yes          [ ] up to you  [ ] no
Time-sensitive:   [ ] immediate    [ ] soon       [ ] none
_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph

They probably took a clue from IPoAC (RFC 1149). ;)

On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 2:47 AM, Mark David Dumlao <madumlao <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:53 PM,  <fooler.mail <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> These jamming devices only works for wireless protocols (eg. GSM GPRS). Comelec have the option to use
kawasaki protocol to transport signed data to the next level :->
> For a moment there you had me look it up on google. <__<
>
>>
>> fooler.
>> ----------
>> Sent via Nokia Email Client thru a Nokia Phone
>>
>> ------Original Message------
>> From: John Homer H Alvero <johnhomer <at> gmail.com>
>> To: "Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Technical Discussion List" <plug <at> lists.linux.org.ph>
>> Date: Tuesday, February 2, 2010 3:37:17 PM GMT+0800
>> Subject: Re: [plug] Code Review & SysAdmin of Election 2010 Computers
>>
>> according to comelec, there is a backup plan in case transmission thru
>> cell carriers is not possible (jammed signals including). but they
>> will not divulge what this backup plan is.
>>
>> maybe, these jamming operators want to lure comelec into going to the
>> backup plan so that necessary dagdag-bawas can happen in the backup
>> plan.
>>
>> ala, 24 ba
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Junix Gaspar <junixophobia <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Anybody just bought a signal jamming device lately?
>>>
>>> Well a lot of politicos did!!!
>>>
>>> http://www.gmanews.tv/story/182973/comelec-takes-up-jamming-threat-at-en-banc-meeting
>>>
>>> _________________________________________________
>>> Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
>>> http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
>>> Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
>>>
>> _________________________________________________
>> Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
>> http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
>> Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
>>
>> _________________________________________________
>> Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
>> http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
>> Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
>>
>
>
>
> --
> This email is:    [ ] actionable   [ ] fyi        [ ] social
> Response needed:  [ ] yes          [ ] up to you  [ ] no
> Time-sensitive:   [ ] immediate    [ ] soon       [ ] none
> _________________________________________________
> Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
> http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
> Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
>

--

-- 
Eric Manuel Pareja (eric.pareja <at> gmail.com) LPIC-2
Coordinator for Technology / Senior Linux Trainer
National Telehealth Center, University of the Philippines Manila
Philippines
International Open Source Network - ASEAN+3
PGP/GPG Key 0xB82E42D9
"Ang mundo ay aklat, at iisang pahina lamang ang nababasa ng hindi
naglalakbay." - San Agustin
 わかよたれぞ　つねならむ
_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
Hello Holden,

One possible way of using the jammers for cheating is to trigger
comelec to use "back up" plan and do cheating while in "back up" plan
mode.

again, we dont know what this backup plan is.

On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Holden Hao <holdenhao@...> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:53 PM, <fooler.mail@...> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> These jamming devices only works for wireless protocols (eg. GSM GPRS).
>> Comelec have the option to use kawasaki protocol to transport signed data to
>> the next level :->
>
> They work at a the protocol level?  And not through signal disruption?
> Interesting.
>
> I am not sure though how the jammers can be used for cheating.  What they
> can do is to disrupt and delay the counting.
>
> For the moment, I think the best way to cheat would be to do it at the lower
> level of the process.  That is, to install a hacked firmware that will
> display the results that you want during counting time.  And when no one is
> looking revert the firmware to the authentic one and then stuff the machines
> with the ballots that would reflect the outcome if it is audited.  This can
> not be done on a wide scale.  But this scenario can be applied on a
> provincial level.  The cheater just needs to have full control of the
> territory to do the deed.  Another Maguindanao, perhaps?  BTW, this scenario
> can only play out with some support from Comelec and Smartmatic.
>
> Any other ideas?
>
>
>
> Holden
>
>
> _________________________________________________
> Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
> http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
> Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
>
_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph

Mon	Tue	Wed	Thu	Fri	Sat	Sun

1	2	3	4	5	6	7
8	9	10	11	12	13	14
15	16	17	18	19	20	21
22	23	24	25	26	27	28

16	January 2012
13	December 2011
35	November 2011
38	October 2011
109	September 2011
68	August 2011
90	July 2011
66	June 2011
41	May 2011
69	April 2011
124	March 2011
139	February 2011
145	January 2011
104	December 2010
27	November 2010
58	October 2010
105	September 2010
79	August 2010
84	July 2010
74	June 2010
38	May 2010
41	April 2010
60	March 2010
86	February 2010
95	January 2010
32	December 2009
107	November 2009
384	October 2009
96	September 2009
45	August 2009
257	July 2009
149	June 2009
143	May 2009
376	April 2009
278	March 2009
139	February 2009
143	January 2009
137	December 2008
149	November 2008
189	October 2008
248	September 2008
180	August 2008
341	July 2008
353	June 2008
350	May 2008
282	April 2008
305	March 2008
347	February 2008
250	January 2008
360	December 2007
336	November 2007
538	October 2007
437	September 2007
448	August 2007
501	July 2007
430	June 2007
432	May 2007
430	April 2007
628	March 2007
541	February 2007
347	January 2007
556	December 2006
341	November 2006
528	October 2006
644	September 2006
528	August 2006
650	July 2006
508	June 2006
544	May 2006
437	April 2006
618	March 2006
936	February 2006
729	January 2006
392	December 2005
370	November 2005
484	October 2005
681	September 2005
498	August 2005
371	July 2005
574	June 2005
433	May 2005
866	April 2005
730	March 2005
355	February 2005
435	January 2005
470	December 2004
542	November 2004
589	October 2004
732	September 2004
539	August 2004
777	July 2004
430	June 2004
372	May 2004
518	April 2004
418	March 2004
556	February 2004
309	January 2004
238	December 2003
648	November 2003
464	October 2003
160	September 2003
1	September 2002
1	August 2002
1	June 2002

Re: Code Review & SysAdmin of Election 2010 Computers

Re: Code Review & SysAdmin of Election 2010 Computers

Re: Code Review & SysAdmin of Election 2010 Computers

E-RPTS

Re: E-RPTS

Re: Code Review

Re: Code Review

Re: Code Review

Re: Code Review

Re: Code Review