Favicon

Re: 10.04 upgrade

Hi,

I'm writing my thesis, using Sun's OpenOffice 3.2. I had to remove the
default OO 3.1 in 9.04 as it had bug which wasn't allowing me to add
notes to documents. I followed the instructions in
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1404156 to install... install
is OK and I have the functionality I need...

Did anyone find any problems upgrading in this scenario? I can't risk
losing lots of work and time finding out that OOO.3.2 is broken after I
upgrade to 10.04

Cheers

Joseph

On 30/4/2010, "Anton Xuereb" <mewt.reaper@...> wrote:

>The release notes are somewhat bitter sweet, seems like they released a
>whole load of bugs..
>
>http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/1004
>
>On 04/30/2010 01:59 PM, Andrew Cilia wrote:
>> I had no probs in upgrading. VMWARE patched and now fine, VPN's fine,
>> gnome fine, evolution still crashing.  All normal. Seeing that nothing
>> feels that much different is all the more reason for me to look at the
>> release notes and see what I got myself into I suppose.
>>
>>
(Continue reading)

paul morley | 1 May 2010 09:23
Favicon

Re: 10.04 upgrade

If its any help, I been using OpenOffice 3.2 (now build 9483) with a
Customized Ubuntu 9.04 since it first came out and it has worked great
with no problems.

Good luck with your exams,
Paul

markhamj@... wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm writing my thesis, using Sun's OpenOffice 3.2. I had to remove the
> default OO 3.1 in 9.04 as it had bug which wasn't allowing me to add
> notes to documents. I followed the instructions in
> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1404156 to install... install
> is OK and I have the functionality I need...
>
> Did anyone find any problems upgrading in this scenario? I can't risk
> losing lots of work and time finding out that OOO.3.2 is broken after I
> upgrade to 10.04
>
> Cheers
>
> Joseph
>
> On 30/4/2010, "Anton Xuereb" <mewt.reaper@...> wrote:
>
>   
>> The release notes are somewhat bitter sweet, seems like they released a
>> whole load of bugs..
>>
(Continue reading)

Anton Xuereb | 1 May 2010 09:37
Picon
Gravatar

Re: 10.04 upgrade

The appropriate answer is don't. Don't risk anything before your exam..there will be plenty of time afterwards

Gl

M

On 1 May 2010 09:23, "paul morley" <paulmorley-SZJVxxmnPUheoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org> wrote:

If its any help, I been using OpenOffice 3.2 (now build 9483) with a
Customized Ubuntu 9.04 since it first came out and it has worked great
with no problems.

Good luck with your exams,
Paul



markhamj-SZJVxxmnPUheoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm writing my thesis, using Sun's OpenOffice 3.2. I had to re...

_______________________________________________
MLUG-list mailing list
MLUG-list@...
http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
Keith Vassallo | 1 May 2010 10:56

Re: 10.04 upgrade

Agreed.

If you have a looming deadline, there are things far more important than upgrading Ubuntu! Besides, by the time you decide to upgrade things may have stabilized.

K

On 01 May 2010, at 09:37, Anton Xuereb <mewt.reaper-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:

The appropriate answer is don't. Don't risk anything before your exam..there will be plenty of time afterwards

Gl

M

On 1 May 2010 09:23, "paul morley" <paulmorley-SZJVxxmnPUheoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org> wrote:

If its any help, I been using OpenOffice 3.2 (now build 9483) with a
Customized Ubuntu 9.04 since it first came out and it has worked great
with no problems.

Good luck with your exams,
Paul



markhamj-SZJVxxmnPUheoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm writing my thesis, using Sun's OpenOffice 3.2. I had to re...

_______________________________________________
MLUG-list mailing list
MLUG-list-Xh+NVF5n0LJfAicPTznUKg@public.gmane.org
http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
_______________________________________________
MLUG-list mailing list
MLUG-list@...
http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
Alan Muscat | 1 May 2010 11:39
Picon

Re: 10.04 upgrade

Hi Joe,

I've been using 3.2 since Paul Morley told us about it. I have found no problems so far however I agree with everyone else don't upgrade while you are working on something so critical.

Alan.

On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 02:55 +0100, markhamj-SZJVxxmnPUheoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org wrote:
Hi, I'm writing my thesis, using Sun's OpenOffice 3.2. I had to remove the default OO 3.1 in 9.04 as it had bug which wasn't allowing me to add notes to documents. I followed the instructions in http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1404156 to install... install is OK and I have the functionality I need... Did anyone find any problems upgrading in this scenario? I can't risk losing lots of work and time finding out that OOO.3.2 is broken after I upgrade to 10.04 Cheers Joseph On 30/4/2010, "Anton Xuereb" <mewt.reaper-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: >The release notes are somewhat bitter sweet, seems like they released a >whole load of bugs.. > >http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/1004 > >On 04/30/2010 01:59 PM, Andrew Cilia wrote: >> I had no probs in upgrading. VMWARE patched and now fine, VPN's fine, >> gnome fine, evolution still crashing. All normal. Seeing that nothing >> feels that much different is all the more reason for me to look at the >> release notes and see what I got myself into I suppose. >> >> >> On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 02:13 +0200, Anton Xuereb wrote: >>> ok 10.04 first impressions.. >>> >>> >>> i want my 9.10 back! >>> >>> >>> now! >>> >>> On 30 April 2010 00:04, Anton Xuereb <mewt.reaper-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org >>> <mailto:mewt.reaper <at> gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> upgrade process changes them again...changing them manually worked >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 29 April 2010 23:26, Rodrick Borg <borgrodrick-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org >>> <mailto:borgrodrick-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>> wrote: >>> >>> I dunno if I understood you problem exactly but to change the >>> download server: >>> >>> go to Systems -> Administration _> Software Sources >>> >>> Then change download from to a new mirror... (You can click >>> Other -> Select Best Server) >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Anton Xuereb >>> <mewt.reaper-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org <mailto:mewt.reaper-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hey guys, >>> >>> >>> >>> Im trying to do a dist-upgrade to teh latest ubuntu >>> version, unfortunately the automatic updater >>> (update-manager) changes the sources.list file to point >>> to the central ubuntu mirror which as you can guess atm, >>> is slower than watching paint dry. >>> >>> >>> >>> Is there some way of forcing it to use a different mirror >>> for the upgrade ? I'd like to be ready at 2am tops. >>> >>> >>> >>> M >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> MLUG-list mailing list >>> MLUG-list <at> linux.org.mt <mailto:MLUG-list-Xh+NVF5n0LJfAicPTznUKg@public.gmane.org> >>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> MLUG-list mailing list >>> MLUG-list <at> linux.org.mt <mailto:MLUG-list-Xh+NVF5n0LJfAicPTznUKg@public.gmane.org> >>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> MLUG-list mailing list >>> MLUG-list-Xh+NVF5n0LIEbZ0PF+XxCw@public.gmane.orgmt <mailto:MLUG-list <at> linux.org.mt> >>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >>> >> >> >> The information contained in this email is confidential and may be >> privileged. It is intended for the addressee only, if you are not the >> intended recipient please notify the sender and delete the email >> immediately. The contents of this email must not be disclosed or >> copied without the senders consent. >> We cannot accept any responsibility for viruses. >> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual >> sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the >> view of Philip Toledo Limited >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> MLUG-list mailing list >> MLUG-list-Xh+NVF5n0LJfAicPTznUKg@public.gmane.org >> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >> > > > _______________________________________________ MLUG-list mailing list MLUG-list-Xh+NVF5n0LJfAicPTznUKg@public.gmane.org http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
_______________________________________________
MLUG-list mailing list
MLUG-list@...
http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
Jean Azzopardi | 1 May 2010 11:50
Picon

Re: 10.04 upgrade

Aye, I wouldn't upgrade now, the servers are still being hit hard. And
I don't get why they changed the UI. Shuttleworth said that it was due
to some new features coming further along the line, but as it is, it
just looks out of place. Change for change's sake.

Arch Linux ftw.

On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Keith Vassallo <keithv@...> wrote:
> Agreed.
> If you have a looming deadline, there are things far more important than
> upgrading Ubuntu! Besides, by the time you decide to upgrade things may have
> stabilized.
> K
> On 01 May 2010, at 09:37, Anton Xuereb <mewt.reaper@...> wrote:
>
> The appropriate answer is don't. Don't risk anything before your exam..there
> will be plenty of time afterwards
>
> Gl
>
> M
>
> On 1 May 2010 09:23, "paul morley" <paulmorley@...> wrote:
>
> If its any help, I been using OpenOffice 3.2 (now build 9483) with a
> Customized Ubuntu 9.04 since it first came out and it has worked great
> with no problems.
>
> Good luck with your exams,
> Paul
>
>
> markhamj@... wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm writing my thesis, using Sun's OpenOffice 3.2. I had to re...
>
> _______________________________________________
> MLUG-list mailing list
> MLUG-list@...
> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>
> _______________________________________________
> MLUG-list mailing list
> MLUG-list@...
> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>
>
Andrew Cilia | 1 May 2010 12:55
Picon

Re: 10.04 upgrade

Hi Joseph,
    I can't say that I got much out of the upgrade. So, at this point in your thesis, why bother?

If it ain't broke,  don't fix it.


On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 02:55 +0100, markhamj-SZJVxxmnPUheoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org wrote:
Hi, I'm writing my thesis, using Sun's OpenOffice 3.2. I had to remove the default OO 3.1 in 9.04 as it had bug which wasn't allowing me to add notes to documents. I followed the instructions in http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1404156 to install... install is OK and I have the functionality I need... Did anyone find any problems upgrading in this scenario? I can't risk losing lots of work and time finding out that OOO.3.2 is broken after I upgrade to 10.04 Cheers Joseph On 30/4/2010, "Anton Xuereb" <mewt.reaper-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: >The release notes are somewhat bitter sweet, seems like they released a >whole load of bugs.. > >http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/1004 > >On 04/30/2010 01:59 PM, Andrew Cilia wrote: >> I had no probs in upgrading. VMWARE patched and now fine, VPN's fine, >> gnome fine, evolution still crashing. All normal. Seeing that nothing >> feels that much different is all the more reason for me to look at the >> release notes and see what I got myself into I suppose. >> >> >> On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 02:13 +0200, Anton Xuereb wrote: >>> ok 10.04 first impressions.. >>> >>> >>> i want my 9.10 back! >>> >>> >>> now! >>> >>> On 30 April 2010 00:04, Anton Xuereb <mewt.reaper-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org >>> <mailto:mewt.reaper-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>> wrote: >>> >>> upgrade process changes them again...changing them manually worked >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 29 April 2010 23:26, Rodrick Borg <borgrodrick-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org >>> <mailto:borgrodrick-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>> wrote: >>> >>> I dunno if I understood you problem exactly but to change the >>> download server: >>> >>> go to Systems -> Administration _> Software Sources >>> >>> Then change download from to a new mirror... (You can click >>> Other -> Select Best Server) >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Anton Xuereb >>> <mewt.reaper-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org <mailto:mewt.reaper-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hey guys, >>> >>> >>> >>> Im trying to do a dist-upgrade to teh latest ubuntu >>> version, unfortunately the automatic updater >>> (update-manager) changes the sources.list file to point >>> to the central ubuntu mirror which as you can guess atm, >>> is slower than watching paint dry. >>> >>> >>> >>> Is there some way of forcing it to use a different mirror >>> for the upgrade ? I'd like to be ready at 2am tops. >>> >>> >>> >>> M >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> MLUG-list mailing list >>> MLUG-list-Xh+NVF5n0LJfAicPTznUKg@public.gmane.org <mailto:MLUG-list-Xh+NVF5n0LJfAicPTznUKg@public.gmane.org> >>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> MLUG-list mailing list >>> MLUG-list-Xh+NVF5n0LJfAicPTznUKg@public.gmane.org <mailto:MLUG-list-Xh+NVF5n0LJfAicPTznUKg@public.gmane.org> >>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> MLUG-list mailing list >>> MLUG-list-Xh+NVF5n0LJfAicPTznUKg@public.gmane.org <mailto:MLUG-list-Xh+NVF5n0LJfAicPTznUKg@public.gmane.org> >>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >>> >> >> >> The information contained in this email is confidential and may be >> privileged. It is intended for the addressee only, if you are not the >> intended recipient please notify the sender and delete the email >> immediately. The contents of this email must not be disclosed or >> copied without the senders consent. >> We cannot accept any responsibility for viruses. >> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual >> sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the >> view of Philip Toledo Limited >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> MLUG-list mailing list >> MLUG-list-Xh+NVF5n0LJfAicPTznUKg@public.gmane.org >> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >> > > > _______________________________________________ MLUG-list mailing list MLUG-list-Xh+NVF5n0LJfAicPTznUKg@public.gmane.org http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list


The information contained in this email is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee only, if you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender and delete the email immediately. The contents of this email must not be disclosed or copied without the senders consent.
We cannot accept any responsibility for viruses.
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the view of Philip Toledo Limited

_______________________________________________
MLUG-list mailing list
MLUG-list@...
http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
Anton Xuereb | 1 May 2010 22:01
Picon
Gravatar

Re: 10.04 upgrade

AHHHH Kill me, 10.04 is seriously touching the bottom for me.

No splash screen on boot (got a corrupted one the first boot, black screen since then)
Alt+tab is really slow, freezing video running while it does it.
Video flickers when changing volume using keyboard media keys.
Disk performance is much worse, opening nautilus takes a good 5 seconds.

Re-installed video driver, changed nothing.
Ext4 regression seems to be quite bad.

Any help or ideas before i chuck everything out of the window ? Cos im on the brink of madness :/

M

On 05/01/2010 12:55 PM, Andrew Cilia wrote:
Hi Joseph,
    I can't say that I got much out of the upgrade. So, at this point in your thesis, why bother?

If it ain't broke,  don't fix it.


On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 02:55 +0100, markhamj-SZJVxxmnPUheoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org wrote:
Hi, I'm writing my thesis, using Sun's OpenOffice 3.2. I had to remove the default OO 3.1 in 9.04 as it had bug which wasn't allowing me to add notes to documents. I followed the instructions in http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1404156 to install... install is OK and I have the functionality I need... Did anyone find any problems upgrading in this scenario? I can't risk losing lots of work and time finding out that OOO.3.2 is broken after I upgrade to 10.04 Cheers Joseph On 30/4/2010, "Anton Xuereb" <mewt.reaper-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: >The release notes are somewhat bitter sweet, seems like they released a >whole load of bugs.. > >http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/1004 > >On 04/30/2010 01:59 PM, Andrew Cilia wrote: >> I had no probs in upgrading. VMWARE patched and now fine, VPN's fine, >> gnome fine, evolution still crashing. All normal. Seeing that nothing >> feels that much different is all the more reason for me to look at the >> release notes and see what I got myself into I suppose. >> >> >> On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 02:13 +0200, Anton Xuereb wrote: >>> ok 10.04 first impressions.. >>> >>> >>> i want my 9.10 back! >>> >>> >>> now! >>> >>> On 30 April 2010 00:04, Anton Xuereb <mewt.reaper-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org >>> <mailto:mewt.reaper-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>> wrote: >>> >>> upgrade process changes them again...changing them manually worked >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 29 April 2010 23:26, Rodrick Borg <borgrodrick-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org >>> <mailto:borgrodrick-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>> wrote: >>> >>> I dunno if I understood you problem exactly but to change the >>> download server: >>> >>> go to Systems -> Administration _> Software Sources >>> >>> Then change download from to a new mirror... (You can click >>> Other -> Select Best Server) >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Anton Xuereb >>> <mewt.reaper-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org <mailto:mewt.reaper-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hey guys, >>> >>> >>> >>> Im trying to do a dist-upgrade to teh latest ubuntu >>> version, unfortunately the automatic updater >>> (update-manager) changes the sources.list file to point >>> to the central ubuntu mirror which as you can guess atm, >>> is slower than watching paint dry. >>> >>> >>> >>> Is there some way of forcing it to use a different mirror >>> for the upgrade ? I'd like to be ready at 2am tops. >>> >>> >>> >>> M >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> MLUG-list mailing list >>> MLUG-list-Xh+NVF5n0LJfAicPTznUKg@public.gmane.org <mailto:MLUG-list-Xh+NVF5n0LJfAicPTznUKg@public.gmane.org> >>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> MLUG-list mailing list >>> MLUG-list-Xh+NVF5n0LJfAicPTznUKg@public.gmane.org <mailto:MLUG-list-Xh+NVF5n0LJfAicPTznUKg@public.gmane.org> >>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> MLUG-list mailing list >>> MLUG-list-Xh+NVF5n0LJfAicPTznUKg@public.gmane.org <mailto:MLUG-list-Xh+NVF5n0LJfAicPTznUKg@public.gmane.org> >>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >>> >> >> >> The information contained in this email is confidential and may be >> privileged. It is intended for the addressee only, if you are not the >> intended recipient please notify the sender and delete the email >> immediately. The contents of this email must not be disclosed or >> copied without the senders consent. >> We cannot accept any responsibility for viruses. >> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual >> sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the >> view of Philip Toledo Limited >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> MLUG-list mailing list >> MLUG-list-Xh+NVF5n0LJfAicPTznUKg@public.gmane.org >> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >> > > > _______________________________________________ MLUG-list mailing list MLUG-list-Xh+NVF5n0LJfAicPTznUKg@public.gmane.org http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list


The information contained in this email is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee only, if you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender and delete the email immediately. The contents of this email must not be disclosed or copied without the senders consent.
We cannot accept any responsibility for viruses.
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the view of Philip Toledo Limited

_______________________________________________ MLUG-list mailing list MLUG-list-Xh+NVF5n0LJfAicPTznUKg@public.gmane.org http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list

_______________________________________________
MLUG-list mailing list
MLUG-list@...
http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
Jean Azzopardi | 1 May 2010 22:18
Picon

Re: 10.04 upgrade

Ditch it and get Windows 7.

Oh, wait. I mean Arch Linux :P
Srsly, I doubt ext4 regression would give you all that problem. My
best guess is that some stuff didn't get updated while some did. My
dad got the same problem when he upgraded to Karmic. While everything
upgraded, the graphics drivers didn't, and I had to do some fishing
around.

I'd recommend a fresh installation. Or Windows 7. (incidentally, I've
been getting 1 BSOD a month :|)

On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Anton Xuereb <mewt.reaper@...> wrote:
> AHHHH Kill me, 10.04 is seriously touching the bottom for me.
>
> No splash screen on boot (got a corrupted one the first boot, black screen
> since then)
> Alt+tab is really slow, freezing video running while it does it.
> Video flickers when changing volume using keyboard media keys.
> Disk performance is much worse, opening nautilus takes a good 5 seconds.
>
> Re-installed video driver, changed nothing.
> Ext4 regression seems to be quite bad.
>
> Any help or ideas before i chuck everything out of the window ? Cos im on
> the brink of madness :/
>
> M
>
> On 05/01/2010 12:55 PM, Andrew Cilia wrote:
>
> Hi Joseph,
>     I can't say that I got much out of the upgrade. So, at this point in
> your thesis, why bother?
>
> If it ain't broke,  don't fix it.
>
>
> On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 02:55 +0100, markhamj@... wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm writing my thesis, using Sun's OpenOffice 3.2. I had to remove the
> default OO 3.1 in 9.04 as it had bug which wasn't allowing me to add
> notes to documents. I followed the instructions in
> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1404156 to install... install
> is OK and I have the functionality I need...
>
> Did anyone find any problems upgrading in this scenario? I can't risk
> losing lots of work and time finding out that OOO.3.2 is broken after I
> upgrade to 10.04
>
> Cheers
>
> Joseph
>
> On 30/4/2010, "Anton Xuereb" <mewt.reaper@...> wrote:
>
>>The release notes are somewhat bitter sweet, seems like they released a
>>whole load of bugs..
>>
>>http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/1004
>>
>>On 04/30/2010 01:59 PM, Andrew Cilia wrote:
>>> I had no probs in upgrading. VMWARE patched and now fine, VPN's fine,
>>> gnome fine, evolution still crashing.  All normal. Seeing that nothing
>>> feels that much different is all the more reason for me to look at the
>>> release notes and see what I got myself into I suppose.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 02:13 +0200, Anton Xuereb wrote:
>>>> ok 10.04 first impressions..
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> i want my 9.10 back!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> now!
>>>>
>>>> On 30 April 2010 00:04, Anton Xuereb <mewt.reaper@...
>>>> <mailto:mewt.reaper@...>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     upgrade process changes them again...changing them manually worked
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     On 29 April 2010 23:26, Rodrick Borg <borgrodrick@...
>>>>     <mailto:borgrodrick@...>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         I dunno if I understood you problem exactly but to change the
>>>>         download server:
>>>>
>>>>         go to Systems -> Administration _> Software Sources
>>>>
>>>>         Then change download from to a new mirror... (You can click
>>>>         Other -> Select Best Server)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Anton Xuereb
>>>>         <mewt.reaper@...
<mailto:mewt.reaper@...>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>             Hey guys,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>             Im trying to do a dist-upgrade to teh latest ubuntu
>>>>             version, unfortunately the automatic updater
>>>>             (update-manager) changes the sources.list file to point
>>>>             to the central ubuntu mirror which as you can guess atm,
>>>>             is slower than watching paint dry.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>             Is there some way of forcing it to use a different mirror
>>>>             for the upgrade ? I'd like to be ready at 2am tops.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>             M
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>             _______________________________________________
>>>>             MLUG-list mailing list
>>>>             MLUG-list@... <mailto:MLUG-list@...>
>>>>             http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>>         MLUG-list mailing list
>>>>         MLUG-list@... <mailto:MLUG-list@...>
>>>>         http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> MLUG-list mailing list
>>>> MLUG-list@...  <mailto:MLUG-list@...>
>>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The information contained in this email is confidential and may be
>>> privileged. It is intended for the addressee only, if you are not the
>>> intended recipient please notify the sender and delete the email
>>> immediately. The contents of this email must not be disclosed or
>>> copied without the senders consent.
>>> We cannot accept any responsibility for viruses.
>>> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
>>> sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the
>>> view of Philip Toledo Limited
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MLUG-list mailing list
>>> MLUG-list@...
>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>>
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> MLUG-list mailing list
> MLUG-list@...
> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>
>
> The information contained in this email is confidential and may be
> privileged. It is intended for the addressee only, if you are not the
> intended recipient please notify the sender and delete the email
> immediately. The contents of this email must not be disclosed or copied
> without the senders consent.
> We cannot accept any responsibility for viruses.
> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
> except where the sender specifically states them to be the view of Philip
> Toledo Limited
>
> _______________________________________________
> MLUG-list mailing list
> MLUG-list@...
> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MLUG-list mailing list
> MLUG-list@...
> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>
>
Anton Xuereb | 1 May 2010 22:26
Picon
Gravatar

Re: 10.04 upgrade

I'm pining for arch atm...

dont have the guts to waste time on it with pure maths coming up :/

On 05/01/2010 10:18 PM, Jean Azzopardi wrote:
> Ditch it and get Windows 7.
>
> Oh, wait. I mean Arch Linux :P
> Srsly, I doubt ext4 regression would give you all that problem. My
> best guess is that some stuff didn't get updated while some did. My
> dad got the same problem when he upgraded to Karmic. While everything
> upgraded, the graphics drivers didn't, and I had to do some fishing
> around.
>
> I'd recommend a fresh installation. Or Windows 7. (incidentally, I've
> been getting 1 BSOD a month :|)
>
> On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Anton Xuereb<mewt.reaper@...>  wrote:
>    
>> AHHHH Kill me, 10.04 is seriously touching the bottom for me.
>>
>> No splash screen on boot (got a corrupted one the first boot, black screen
>> since then)
>> Alt+tab is really slow, freezing video running while it does it.
>> Video flickers when changing volume using keyboard media keys.
>> Disk performance is much worse, opening nautilus takes a good 5 seconds.
>>
>> Re-installed video driver, changed nothing.
>> Ext4 regression seems to be quite bad.
>>
>> Any help or ideas before i chuck everything out of the window ? Cos im on
>> the brink of madness :/
>>
>> M
>>
>> On 05/01/2010 12:55 PM, Andrew Cilia wrote:
>>
>> Hi Joseph,
>>      I can't say that I got much out of the upgrade. So, at this point in
>> your thesis, why bother?
>>
>> If it ain't broke,  don't fix it.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 02:55 +0100, markhamj@... wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm writing my thesis, using Sun's OpenOffice 3.2. I had to remove the
>> default OO 3.1 in 9.04 as it had bug which wasn't allowing me to add
>> notes to documents. I followed the instructions in
>> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1404156 to install... install
>> is OK and I have the functionality I need...
>>
>> Did anyone find any problems upgrading in this scenario? I can't risk
>> losing lots of work and time finding out that OOO.3.2 is broken after I
>> upgrade to 10.04
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Joseph
>>
>> On 30/4/2010, "Anton Xuereb"<mewt.reaper@...>  wrote:
>>
>>      
>>> The release notes are somewhat bitter sweet, seems like they released a
>>> whole load of bugs..
>>>
>>> http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/1004
>>>
>>> On 04/30/2010 01:59 PM, Andrew Cilia wrote:
>>>        
>>>> I had no probs in upgrading. VMWARE patched and now fine, VPN's fine,
>>>> gnome fine, evolution still crashing.  All normal. Seeing that nothing
>>>> feels that much different is all the more reason for me to look at the
>>>> release notes and see what I got myself into I suppose.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 02:13 +0200, Anton Xuereb wrote:
>>>>          
>>>>> ok 10.04 first impressions..
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> i want my 9.10 back!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> now!
>>>>>
>>>>> On 30 April 2010 00:04, Anton Xuereb<mewt.reaper@...
>>>>> <mailto:mewt.reaper@...>>  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>      upgrade process changes them again...changing them manually worked
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>      On 29 April 2010 23:26, Rodrick Borg<borgrodrick@...
>>>>>      <mailto:borgrodrick@...>>  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>          I dunno if I understood you problem exactly but to change the
>>>>>          download server:
>>>>>
>>>>>          go to Systems ->  Administration _>  Software Sources
>>>>>
>>>>>          Then change download from to a new mirror... (You can click
>>>>>          Other ->  Select Best Server)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>          On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Anton Xuereb
>>>>>         
<mewt.reaper@...<mailto:mewt.reaper@...>>
 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>              Hey guys,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>              Im trying to do a dist-upgrade to teh latest ubuntu
>>>>>              version, unfortunately the automatic updater
>>>>>              (update-manager) changes the sources.list file to point
>>>>>              to the central ubuntu mirror which as you can guess atm,
>>>>>              is slower than watching paint dry.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>              Is there some way of forcing it to use a different mirror
>>>>>              for the upgrade ? I'd like to be ready at 2am tops.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>              M
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>              _______________________________________________
>>>>>              MLUG-list mailing list
>>>>>              MLUG-list@...<mailto:MLUG-list@...>
>>>>>              http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>          _______________________________________________
>>>>>          MLUG-list mailing list
>>>>>          MLUG-list@...<mailto:MLUG-list@...>
>>>>>          http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> MLUG-list mailing list
>>>>> MLUG-list@...<mailto:MLUG-list@...>
>>>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>>>>
>>>>>            
>>>>
>>>> The information contained in this email is confidential and may be
>>>> privileged. It is intended for the addressee only, if you are not the
>>>> intended recipient please notify the sender and delete the email
>>>> immediately. The contents of this email must not be disclosed or
>>>> copied without the senders consent.
>>>> We cannot accept any responsibility for viruses.
>>>> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
>>>> sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the
>>>> view of Philip Toledo Limited
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> MLUG-list mailing list
>>>> MLUG-list@...
>>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>>>
>>>>          
>>>
>>>
>>>        
>> _______________________________________________
>> MLUG-list mailing list
>> MLUG-list@...
>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>
>>
>> The information contained in this email is confidential and may be
>> privileged. It is intended for the addressee only, if you are not the
>> intended recipient please notify the sender and delete the email
>> immediately. The contents of this email must not be disclosed or copied
>> without the senders consent.
>> We cannot accept any responsibility for viruses.
>> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
>> except where the sender specifically states them to be the view of Philip
>> Toledo Limited
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MLUG-list mailing list
>> MLUG-list@...
>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MLUG-list mailing list
>> MLUG-list@...
>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>
>>
>>      
> _______________________________________________
> MLUG-list mailing list
> MLUG-list@...
> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>    

Gmane