headers
Duane Brantley | 11 Mar 2003 22:54
Picon

Re: Meeting this Thursday - Intermediate to Advanced networking?

I'll take a copy, if you don't mind.

Thanks,
Duane

On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 15:08, Syleniel wrote:
> I vote Aye :)
> BTW, if anyone wants a copy of the notes from the Basic Linux Admin talk
> from the week before Thanksgiving, I typed up a copy. I was bored here at
> work.
> 
> Syleniel
> 
> And it was said by Newton Hammet-->
> > So moved and 2nd I vote "Aye".
> >
> > On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 22:28, Jim Parkhurst wrote:
> >> Second.
> >>
> >> Bill Hawk wrote:
> >>
> >> > Move to accept.
> >> >
> >> > On Sunday 08 December 2002 3:30 pm, Jim Westbrook wrote:
> >> > > Well, if the secretary would get off his duff and post the minutes
> >> ... oh, that's me.  Dang.  We did spend some time discussing
> >> subnetting and masquerade/NAT, and routing as it applies to these.
> >> > >
> >> > > JimW
> >> > >
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |
headers
Duane Brantley | 11 Mar 2003 23:34
Picon

Re: Meeting this Thursday - Intermediate to Advanced networking?

I'll take a copy too.

Thanks,
Duane

On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 16:09, Newton Hammet wrote:
> Syleniel,
> 
>    I would love a copy. either email or whatever means is most
> convenient for you.
> 
> Regards, Newton
> 
> 
> On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 15:08, Syleniel wrote:
> > I vote Aye :)
> > BTW, if anyone wants a copy of the notes from the Basic Linux Admin talk
> > from the week before Thanksgiving, I typed up a copy. I was bored here at
> > work.
> > 
> > Syleniel
> > 
> > And it was said by Newton Hammet-->
> > > So moved and 2nd I vote "Aye".
> > >
> > > On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 22:28, Jim Parkhurst wrote:
> > >> Second.
> > >>
> > >> Bill Hawk wrote:
> > >>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Kevin E. Ivey | 24 Mar 2003 01:12

Re: Advice sought on new system

Robert Parkhurst wrote:
> 
> As much as I would love to say that you have no idea what you're talking
> about and think of you as one of those damn ignorant intel fans that
> would follow intel wherever they went, you're right.  The hotter CPU's
> do make AMD less attractive.  
Robert Parkhurst wrote:
> 
> As much as I would love to say that you have no idea what you're talking
> about and think of you as one of those damn ignorant intel fans that
> would follow intel wherever they went, you're right.  The hotter CPU's
> do make AMD less attractive.  

The K6-II and -III 450/550 chips run very cool and will survive just
fine after a fan failure.

The newer Duron copper based CPUs are almost a waste of a heat sink. 
Cool, that is.

My Cyrix MII 333 runs hotter than all of the chips I've used since and
it is still kicking and just as reliable as ever.

In other words, as long as the chip is reliable and x86 compatible, who
cares how hot it runs?

Get the biggest damn heatsink you can find and forget about it...

keVIn
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 15 comments |
headers
Robert Wideman | 1 Mar 2003 01:56
Picon

RE: xmms

>> Any Playstation-2 Linux kernel hackers on this list?  I recently
>> made some
>> patches to the kernel, and have been working pretty heavily on developing
>> under this environment.  I wonder if there's a local scene for this sort
>> of thing.  (Austin seems to be lacking recreational developer scenes,
>> despite it being a tech town _and_ a university town.)
>>
>> It appears there's a vector unit programming competition coming up, for a
>> 16k graphics demonstration.  I've got a pretty good grasp of the PS2
>> vector hardware and very intimate knowledge of the ps2-specific portions
>> of the mips linux kernel, particularly with regard to the ps2dma,
>> ps2event, and ps2vpu sources.  I haven't quite hit the documentation on
>> the graphics synthesizer yet, though that will happen soon.
>>
>> If anyone's interested in working with me, or kicking back and forth
>> ideas, fire me an e-mail.  I'll be pretty active in development until my
>> current project ends, in the middle of march.

I have read through the docs on the PS2 site and from what it reads it is a
kernel/environment burnt to a cdr.  Is this correct?  If so i am not really
interested in doing that.
I am interested but i am not a hacker on it.  I just primarily want a PS2
Linux Server, :)

Rob
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Pavan Tumati | 1 Mar 2003 02:24

RE: xmms


On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Robert Wideman wrote:

> I have read through the docs on the PS2 site and from what it reads it is a
> kernel/environment burnt to a cdr.  Is this correct?  If so i am not really
> interested in doing that.
> I am interested but i am not a hacker on it.  I just primarily want a PS2
> Linux Server, :)

No.  There is a boot DVD that boots up and writes a default kernel to one
of the PS2 memory cards.  You eventually boot the system up using the
combination of the DVD and the kernel image on the memory card.  You
typically recompile the kernel and place the new image on the memory card
when you want different features.  I typically place modules on the hard
disk, and have a small kernel that features all of the changes I made.

--

-- 
Pavan Tumati (ptumati@..., http://www.csoft.net/~ptumati)
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Dirk Ouellette | 1 Mar 2003 17:29
Picon

Bad nic's

Ive set up IPCop v.1.2 on a new box for my daughter. Everything seems to
be fine 
as I've set it to the same ip's as my own for testing thru my attbi
connection, but I can't ping their box [ the one that goes into their
home eventually] and the new IPCop box. I can see that the red
{outgoing} nic is receiving info from the attbi modem and I can ping the
IPCop box from within itself, but I can't ping either attbi.com ,
yahoo.com on the outside network, nor my daughter's box on the interior
network. Could  both exterior and interior nic's on the IPCop box be
bad? When I hook my daughter's box to my home network it's nic works
fine.
Dirk
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Don Mulvey | 1 Mar 2003 19:32
Picon
Favicon

Re: Bad nic's


Dirk,

Have you tried pinging with the IP address?  Might be resolv problem.  If
pinging 64.58.79.230  works but pinging yahoo.com doesn't then your problem
rests with the name server config.

Don
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Dirk Ouellette | 1 Mar 2003 23:47
Picon

Re: Bad nic's

On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 10:32, Don Mulvey wrote:
> 
> Dirk,
> 
> Have you tried pinging with the IP address?  Might be resolv problem.  If
> pinging 64.58.79.230  works but pinging yahoo.com doesn't then your problem
> rests with the name server config.
> 
> Don

It's DHCP on the attbi side.It has the same setup is my currently
working IPCop machine. When I switch machines, it won't work.
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
d oxford | 2 Mar 2003 04:17
Picon

c/r to r and vise versa

John Deardorf (hope I spelled it right) I am off on a tangent trying to
learn elisp.

One come you spoke to the group about one of the elisp function that you
modified to change a carage return cr to a return.  The purpose was to
translate dos text to unix text.

Would you give us a reminder as to what function you modified?

ox
Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |
headers
Jim Westbrook | 2 Mar 2003 05:42
Picon

Re: c/r to r and vise versa

I'm not sure if you're looking for something within an editor or just a way
to convert a static file.  If the latter, try dos2unix and unix2dox.

JimW

d oxford wrote:

> John Deardorf (hope I spelled it right) I am off on a tangent trying to
> learn elisp.
>
> One come you spoke to the group about one of the elisp function that you
> modified to change a carage return cr to a return.  The purpose was to
> translate dos text to unix text.
>
> Would you give us a reminder as to what function you modified?
>
> ox
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: alg-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: alg-help@...
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |

Gmane