2 Aug 2008 06:44
Re: Administrative Note: Auto Responders
(Continue reading)Thanks! Carl Perry wrote: > Greetings from your Friendly Mailing List Administrator - > > I usually don't put my foot down when it comes to mailing list > netiquette stuff, but there have been a rash of auto-responders hitting > the list participants of recent. > > I completely understand vacation notification auto-responders. However, > the current rash have been anti-spam ones that don't even adhere to RFC > specifications. > > So: here's the foot coming down. If you have one of these anti-spam > auto-responders on your mail account, add an exception rule for alg or > risk being administratively blocked from the list. > > If you see an auto-responder being stupid (especially if it's in a > foreign language), please forward the message to alg-admin@... > or alg-technical-admin@... (depending on what list it sourced > from) and I'll take care of it. > > Thanks for your time! > -Carl > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > ALG-technical mailing list http://austinlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/alg-technical
Thanks!
Carl Perry wrote:
> Greetings from your Friendly Mailing List Administrator -
>
> I usually don't put my foot down when it comes to mailing list
> netiquette stuff, but there have been a rash of auto-responders hitting
> the list participants of recent.
>
> I completely understand vacation notification auto-responders. However,
> the current rash have been anti-spam ones that don't even adhere to RFC
> specifications.
>
> So: here's the foot coming down. If you have one of these anti-spam
> auto-responders on your mail account, add an exception rule for alg or
> risk being administratively blocked from the list.
>
> If you see an auto-responder being stupid (especially if it's in a
> foreign language), please forward the message to
RSS Feed