Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts General Mailing List

Greg Freemyer | 1 Feb 2006 01:27

Re: reviving the ALE NW meetings

On 1/31/06, Geoffrey <esoteric@...> wrote:
> So it appears we have a new location for the NW meetings.  It is very
> close to the I75-I285 interchange, off Interstate North Parkway.
>
> That being said, we're polling the list to find out who would attend,
> and what night is best for them.
>
> So, let us know.
>
> --
> Until later, Geoffrey

That is certainly more convenient for me than Emory or Kennesaw was.

I doubt if I come every month but any night Mon-Thur works for me.

Greg
--
Greg Freemyer
The Norcross Group
Forensics for the 21st Century

headers

Greg Freemyer | 1 Feb 2006 01:35

Re: Putting wifi in the house

On 1/31/06, Sean Kilpatrick <drifter@...> wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 January 2006 12:16, James P. Kinney III wrote:
> | The FBI told me they were "too busy to concern themselves with this
> | unless there were financial damages above $10,000".
> |
> | So if a neighbor is surfing for kiddie porn on your wireless network,
> | the FBI won't do squat unless there is some serious $$ involved.
>
> That may well have been the case a few years back, say when Clinton
> was in the White House. With "W" in the WH the rules have changed. The
> FBI now seems more interested in chasing down porn peddlers and dope
> dealers than legit terrorists. They seem willing to leave _that_ task to
> the NSA. :(
>
> Sean

Actually I understand that the FBI now has anti-terrorism as its
primary focus.  porn and drugs have dropped in priority.  Obviously
the local police and GBI should still be interested.

Greg
--
Greg Freemyer
The Norcross Group
Forensics for the 21st Century

headers

J. D. | 1 Feb 2006 02:04

Re: Putting wifi in the house

The

> FBI now seems more interested in chasing down porn peddlers and dope
> dealers than legit terrorists.

Legit terrorists, now there are two words you don't see together very often... I'm sure I know what you meant but I just couldn't resist. ;)

J. D.

_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
Ale@...
http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale

headers

hbbs | 1 Feb 2006 02:38

Re: Putting wifi in the house

Wresting the thread back on topic...

Do I understand that IPsec is not for the CPU-challenged?  Is a K7/700 w/128MB and no X over/underkill?

Jeff
 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "J. D." <jdonline@...>
>  The
> 
> > > FBI now seems more interested in chasing down porn peddlers and dope
> > > dealers than legit terrorists.
> 
> 
>     Legit terrorists, now there are two words you don't see together very
> often... I'm sure I know what you meant but I just couldn't resist. ;)
> 
> J. D.
>

From: J. D. <jdonline@...>
Subject: Re: [ale] Putting wifi in the house
Date: 2006-02-01 01:04:51 GMT

The

> FBI now seems more interested in chasing down porn peddlers and dope
> dealers than legit terrorists.

Legit terrorists, now there are two words you don't see together very often... I'm sure I know what you meant but I just couldn't resist. ;)

J. D.

_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
Ale@...
http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale

_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
Ale@...
http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale

headers

Philip Polstra | 1 Feb 2006 02:54

Re: reviving the ALE NW meetings

I would try to attend. Tuesdays and Thursdays are definitely out for me since I teach at KSU those nights.

I'd be willing to offer my flight school at the Cherokee County airport for a meeting place, but I suspect this wouldn't be as convienent as somewhere closer in.

On 1/31/06, Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:

On 1/31/06, Geoffrey <esoteric <at> 3times25.net> wrote:
> So it appears we have a new location for the NW meetings. It is very
> close to the I75-I285 interchange, off Interstate North Parkway.
>
> That being said, we're polling the list to find out who would attend,
> and what night is best for them.
>
> So, let us know.
>
> --
> Until later, Geoffrey

That is certainly more convenient for me than Emory or Kennesaw was.

I doubt if I come every month but any night Mon-Thur works for me.

Greg
--
Greg Freemyer
The Norcross Group
Forensics for the 21st Century
_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
Ale-S6NtOCTnm14@public.gmane.org
http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale

_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
Ale@...
http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale

headers

William Bagwell | 1 Feb 2006 02:57

Re: reviving the ALE NW meetings

On Tuesday 31 January 2006 07:27 pm, Greg Freemyer wrote:

> That is certainly more convenient for me than Emory or Kennesaw was.
>
> I doubt if I come every month but any night Mon-Thur works for me.

Slightly less convenient for me, but any night is fine and I will try to 
come as often as possible.
--

-- 
William

headers

James P. Kinney III | 1 Feb 2006 03:19

Re: Putting wifi in the house

On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 01:38 +0000, hbbs@... wrote:
> Wresting the thread back on topic...
> 
> Do I understand that IPsec is not for the CPU-challenged?  Is a K7/700 w/128MB and no X over/underkill?
> 
> Jeff

Depends on the client load (assuming thats your proposed head end). Many
commercial Firewall system with VPN have substantially weaker cpu's and
can handle 10 simultaneous VPN clients.

Since you are looking at 2-3 laptops hitting that K7 for VPN traffic,
you _should_ have no trouble. 

Like ssh, IPSEC uses a PKI system to initiate a connection (very compute
intensive) then passes over a key for a 2-way cipher that can
encrypt/decrypt quickly and enforces frequent key changes. I know the
initial key exchange happens through the PKI transmission process. I'm
pretty sure the following key changes do as well. So even if someone
sniffs data and brute forces a key for a sequence of packets, they can't
get the key for the next sequence from that brute force event.

--

-- 
James P. Kinney III          \Changing the mobile computing world/
CEO & Director of Engineering \          one Linux user         /
Local Net Solutions,LLC        \           at a time.          /
770-493-8244                    \.___________________________./
http://www.localnetsolutions.com

GPG ID: 829C6CA7 James P. Kinney III (M.S. Physics)
<jkinney@...>
Fingerprint = 3C9E 6366 54FC A3FE BA4D 0659 6190 ADC3 829C 6CA7

_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
Ale@...
http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale

headers

Richard Kolkovich | 1 Feb 2006 04:10

Re: reviving the ALE NW meetings

On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:36:26 -0500
Geoffrey <esoteric@...> wrote:

> So it appears we have a new location for the NW meetings.  It is very 
> close to the I75-I285 interchange, off Interstate North Parkway.
> 
> That being said, we're polling the list to find out who would attend, 
> and what night is best for them.
> 
> So, let us know.
> 

This is great for me, as I attend Southern Polytechnic and have class
until 7:15 on Thursdays.  I was balancing skipping early or missing out
on a few minutes of the meetings now that I am going to start
participating...this is much better.

--

-- 

Richard Kolkovich
sarumont@...

headers

Raylynn Knight | 1 Feb 2006 04:31

Re: reviving the ALE NW meetings

On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 16:36 -0500, Geoffrey wrote:
> So it appears we have a new location for the NW meetings.  It is very 
> close to the I75-I285 interchange, off Interstate North Parkway.
> 
> That being said, we're polling the list to find out who would attend, 
> and what night is best for them.
> 
> So, let us know.
> 
Recall that the Central meeting (when it was the only one) was located
at Home Depot HQ for a while (1 exit West of the new NW location?).  

I could make meetings in that area almost any week-night as long as they
started at 7:00 PM or after.  Traffic in that area would make an earlier
arrival difficult.  I'd also be willing to do presentations.

Ray Knight

headers

Ryan Fish | 1 Feb 2006 04:45

Re: TCP/IP routing on RHEL3 ES

There are no gateways specified in the ifcfg-ethX files so there shouldn’t be any confusion on that part.

I’m not sure why just restarting the network service isn’t accepting the changes and going about its business as I believe it should but I had to do the following:

1) route del default gw 192.168.3.1 (I had added this manually)

2) set the gateway to 209.168.x.x in /etc/sysconfig/network

3) reboot

When the box came back up everything was how it should be and IP traffic was routed properly again.

Any ideas why the reboot was necessary to get this to work right???

Thank you.

-Ryan

From: Jerry Yu [mailto:jjj863-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 2:54 PM
To: FishR-Bdlq13kUjeyLZ21kGMrzwg@public.gmane.org; Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts
Subject: Re: [ale] TCP/IP routing on RHEL3 ES

you may want to check ifcfg-eth? to see whether they have GATEWAY= specified. I've seen 'network' init script got confused (from where I stand) about which gw to use as default route, when GATEWAY= is speficied in multiple ifcfg-eth? files.

On 1/31/06, Ryan Fish <FishR-Bdlq13kUjeyLZ21kGMrzwg@public.gmane.org> wrote:

I recently had to move a public IP address from one web server to another in the same farm. Upon doing this I have experienced routing issues that I've been able to "fix" by manually adding the correct default gateways on each box. However, these entries will not remain in place after a reboot (as per normal) but I am unable to get traffic to route properly on either box if I add the proper gateway information to /etc/sysconfig/network.

Box A

Now only on 192.168.3.X network, Class C, GW 192.168.3.1

Formerly on 209.168.X.X network, Class C, GW 209.168.X.X

Without using "route add default gw 192.168.3.1 eth0" no GW is shown in the routing table however the traffic does appear to route properly. Why?

Unfortunately I have lost access to this box at this time as I made a change (set GW to 192.168.3.1 in /etc/sysconfig/network) and restarted the network (service network restart). I will have to head out to the DC to change things back soon…

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Box B

192.168.3.X network, Class C

Now also has 209.168.X.X, Class C, GW 209.168.X.X

I had to manually to do the following to get this box to route right after moving the public IP to it:

ip route del default via 192.168.3.1 dev eth0

route add default gw 209.168.X.X eth1

/etc/sysconfig/network still shows 192.168.3.1 as the gateway

What am I missing and/or doing wrong here? I've re-IP'd these boxes before without this type of trouble… My online searches haven't come up with much useful info either.

Hopefully what I just typed above makes some sort of sense.

Thank you in advance!

-Ryan

_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
Ale@...
http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale

317	May 2013
537	April 2013
519	March 2013
580	February 2013
637	January 2013
382	December 2012
518	November 2012
581	October 2012
349	September 2012
492	August 2012
527	July 2012
619	June 2012
685	May 2012
296	April 2012
514	March 2012
690	February 2012
762	January 2012
422	December 2011
436	November 2011
649	October 2011
440	September 2011
543	August 2011
458	July 2011
882	June 2011
830	May 2011
635	April 2011
951	March 2011
1132	February 2011
1002	January 2011
625	December 2010
716	November 2010
565	October 2010
790	September 2010
850	August 2010
874	July 2010
800	June 2010
758	May 2010
613	April 2010
812	March 2010
912	February 2010
646	January 2010
656	December 2009
682	November 2009
904	October 2009
584	September 2009
688	August 2009
936	July 2009
844	June 2009
711	May 2009
744	April 2009
562	March 2009
831	February 2009
869	January 2009
665	December 2008
506	November 2008
540	October 2008
537	September 2008
589	August 2008
645	July 2008
577	June 2008
691	May 2008
647	April 2008
549	March 2008
248	February 2008
483	January 2008
475	December 2007
510	November 2007
575	October 2007
501	September 2007
931	August 2007
760	July 2007
546	June 2007
541	May 2007
701	April 2007
765	March 2007
751	February 2007
592	January 2007
471	December 2006
550	November 2006
836	October 2006
798	September 2006
761	August 2006
709	July 2006
1123	June 2006
818	May 2006
726	April 2006
1144	March 2006
756	February 2006
667	January 2006
425	December 2005
460	November 2005
600	October 2005
656	September 2005
533	August 2005
443	July 2005
875	June 2005
1108	May 2005
801	April 2005
604	March 2005
977	February 2005
1395	January 2005
1004	December 2004
1132	November 2004
1102	October 2004
1041	September 2004
894	August 2004
819	July 2004
694	June 2004
1013	May 2004
1364	April 2004
1177	March 2004
1138	February 2004
1454	January 2004
1081	December 2003
1232	November 2003
1203	October 2003
1826	September 2003
1970	August 2003
1050	July 2003
1047	June 2003
1687	May 2003
1566	April 2003
1771	March 2003
2006	February 2003
1302	January 2003
14	December 2002
7	October 2002
1	December 2000
1	November 2000

Mon	Tue	Wed	Thu	Fri	Sat	Sun

		1	2	3	4	5
6	7	8	9	10	11	12
13	14	15	16	17	18	19
20	21	22	23	24	25	26
27	28