30 Nov 2000 23:22
RE: Traceroute vs tracert
Also, note that windows tracert uses a 92 byte packet which some ISP's are filtering. I know that Global Crossing does. Can't tell ya how many times have had customers call up complaining that they their traces are dying only to have them trace from a router or a *nix box and it work fine. --chip -----Original Message----- Steele From: ale-bounces@... [mailto:ale-bounces <at> ale.org] On Behalf Of Joe Steele Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 6:05 PM To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts Subject: RE: [ale] Traceroute vs tracert On Saturday, November 29, 2003 11:18 AM, Robert L. Harris wrote: > > I know there's a difference in how Linux/Solaris/Unix traceroute works > versus how windows tracert uses concerning the protocol type, etc. > Anyone have a good link to this difference? Windows tracert only uses ICMP echo requests, whereas traceroute can either use UDP datagrams (by default) or ICMP echo requests (controlled by the -I option). Other than that, the two programs work similarly by incrementing the TTL field in order to elicit an ICMP "time exceeded" response from each host along the route. --Joe _______________________________________________ Ale mailing list(Continue reading)
RSS Feed