Arun Mehta | 1 Nov 2009 12:43
Picon
Gravatar

Kashmir prepaid ban

http://sify.com/news/Are-we-all-militants-ask-Kashmir-39-s-pre-paid-mobile-subscribers-news-National-jk5qucigbhh.html

I don't really get why the government is more worried about prepaid
than postpaid mobile connections. Is it easier for the terrorists to
get the former than the latter? In that case, would it not be simpler
just to tighten the norms for obtaining and renewing prepaid
connections? Or, make postpaid so much cheaper than prepaid, so that
the few who continue to insist of prepaid can be watched more closely?

Arun Mehta

Are we all militants, ask Kashmir's pre-paid mobile subscribers
2009-10-31 16:20:00

/Srinagar, Oct 31 (IANS) A wave of anger has swept through Jammu and
Kashmir with the central government deciding to ban pre-paid mobile
connections in the state from Sunday due to security concerns. Most
angry are youths.

Even as the Kashmir government has promised to take up the issue with
the centre, the 'walk and talk' generation in the state is furious
that it has been clubbed with terrorists who misused pre-paid
connections.

'Are we militants?' Shahid Khan, a student, asked in anger and
frustration. 'Are millions of pre-paid connection subscribers
terrorists?' he asked.

The decision to snap this service has resulted in total chaos among subscribers.

(Continue reading)

Vickram Crishna | 1 Nov 2009 12:56
Picon
Favicon

Re: Mesh

>
>From: Banibrata Dutta <banibrata.dutta@...>
>To: india-gii@...
>Sent: Sun, 1 November, 2009 0:40:36
>Subject: Re: [india-gii] Mesh
>
>
>VoIP service is not all that difficult to deploy depending on what level of service one feels is required.
Heck it is possible to create non-telco networks capable of carrying voice if that is all that one is trying
to do.
>>
>
>
>Sure. But, I doubt that was the main point, in support of mesh networks... VoIP was an example, and not the
one that is least important. Today, we probably take it for granted, and sometimes even shun it, but for
people who are starved in every form, even a jitter ridden, crackling, delay-laden, patchy voice, is
still better than none at all. 

Test results from a recent simulation on an 11 Mbps mesh:

[Based on this example we can estimate the number of VOIP calls the mesh can support is 40/(average number of
hops).  For example with an average of 4 hops 10 simultaneous calls can be supported.]

Actually, Banibrata, the first objective is in fact to seamlessly interconnect global telephony to poor
world networks, at the highest possible voice quality. Ken is not quite correct when he outlines the
alternatives: yes, it is possible (and not very difficult) to set up Asterisk with a GSM radio card or
dongle on a PC, and offer telephony services in poor areas, but adding billing to those networks would be
humongously expensive (probably not worth the trouble, given the potential for billing to go awry just as
it does in the real world, and not billing would create all kinds of new social problems aside from being
ultimately unsustainable), and of course, broadcasting at GSM frequencies would bring the telco
(Continue reading)

ken | 1 Nov 2009 14:55

Re: Mesh

Vickram Crishna wrote:

> Test results from a recent simulation on an 11 Mbps mesh:
> 
> [Based on this example we can estimate the number of VOIP calls the
> mesh can support is 40/(average number of hops).  For example with an
> average of 4 hops 10 simultaneous calls can be supported.]

Can you tell me what kind of loading this system was facing as far as 
data is concerned or is this on a completely unused network?

In a relatively small urban environment this could be overwhelmed in 
cases where an emergency occurs or any other event where the populace 
feels the need to place calls.

This contrasts to some of the more robust access points which are 
capable of carrying several times that number. On the upper end of that 
scale it is my understanding that some of Alvarion's equipment can carry 
hundreds of concurrent calls. And yes, I do understand that Alvarion 
equipment is prohibitively expensive for deployments in many areas of 
the world.

> Actually, Banibrata, the first objective is in fact to seamlessly
> interconnect global telephony to poor world networks, at the highest
> possible voice quality.

Not from my perspective.

If we look at the need for people to communicate using voice, a fair 
percentage of these calls are intracity. In fact, depending on how far 
(Continue reading)

Satish Jha | 2 Nov 2009 00:21
Picon

Re: Kashmir prepaid ban

Someone goofed up again.. at a cost to our national security.. If 4 million people are upset about something, it will be foolhardy to do that. And only a bureaucrat can do such things.. However, when was it last they did anything without a direction from their political masters?
 
Why would MMS let such an alienating move be even considered? How would he inspire confidence in the population in the valley when such a move follows close on the heals of direct overtures made days ago?
 
If prepaid connections are easier to get, then its an admission of administrative failure or an inability to govern. Why can't they establish the same standards as postpaid connections for issuing prepaid phones as well?
 
Why can't hey use technology and create applications that allow them to monitor the veracity of information provided while making every effort to not inconvenience the citizen?
 
Then again, in the past 60 years all our bright boys, who comprise the executive in India, have not yet managed to design a decent arrival and departure form. These have been changed every now and then and the information sought and space provided for leaves one wondering if we can even imitate.
 
The fate of H1N1 form is no different. These are changed every few weeks and will hardly meet the expectations I would have from a young student in Katha Khazana, a school in the middle of south Delhi slums.
 
It is in the nature of our bureaucracy to bring most things down to the lowest common denominator where buck is passed around to one who is left with little choice in the matter.
 
One would think dealing with sensitive situation that obtains in J&K will always require serious discussions and consensus building and always include the concurrence of the key leaders who can carry the majority with them and socialise a decision before taking it. But it may not be surprising if they are looking for wrong role models that have enough fire power to dampen their diplomatic instincts across the Atlantic.


 
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Arun Mehta <arun.mehta <at> gmail.com> wrote:
http://sify.com/news/Are-we-all-militants-ask-Kashmir-39-s-pre-paid-mobile-subscribers-news-National-jk5qucigbhh.html

I don't really get why the government is more worried about prepaid
 

--
Watch OLPC at Katha on : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n57KOQZ27Iw
Contribute to OLPC India for Katha and other schools on Paypal: Account olpc.katha-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     india-gii@...
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     india-gii-unsubscribe@...

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/india-gii
ken | 2 Nov 2009 16:23

[IP] Press release HongKong: now 100/100 Mbps <at> US$13/month

This is the bar set by the competition. We will meet it or pay the price 
of decreased economic vitality.

http://reg.hkbn.net/ctigroup_admin/files_upload/PR_MGM_E99.pdf

For Immediate Release

HKBN: “AWESOME SPEED. FOR EVERYONE”

100Mbps broadband at US$13/month

(Hong Kong, 1 November 2009) Hong Kong Broadband Network Ltd (“HKBN”),
a wholly owned subsidiary of City Telecom (HK) Limited (HKSE: 1137,
NASDAQ: CTEL), today announces breakthrough “AWESOME SPEED. FOR
EVERYONE” - 100Mbps broadband service at US$13/month (HK$99/month).

Some cars earn “SuperCar” status by their sheer performance but are
priced beyond the mass. At HKBN, we have shattered this affordability
barrier by delivering a “SuperCar” class symmetric 100Mbps broadband
service at a mass market price. Anyone who stays within our 1.62
million households’ network coverage, including all our existing
391,000 broadband users are eligible to invite a friend to join our
bb100 service for 24 months for price of HK$99 (US$13)/month each.

At this monthly fee level, the cost per Mbps for HKBN’s 100Mbps
broadband service is just US$0.06 (HK$0.50), which is AWESOME World
Class leading value. Furthermore, with our unique Speed Guarantee of
80% local bandwidth and unparalleled performance in massively
multiplayer online role-playing games, we are delivering on one of our
core purposes “To experience the joy of advancing and applying
telecommunications technology for the benefit of the public”.

Mr. William Yeung, Chief Executive Officer of HKBN said, “With at
least 32% of Internet users in Hong Kong still suffering from
broadband services below 10Mbps1, Hong Kong is lagging behind Korea
and Japan in terms of Fibre-To-The-Home’s Penetration2, and is only
classed as “Comfortably enjoying today’s applications” in terms of
Broadband Development3. Being the second largest broadband service
provider, we have a duty to improve Hong Kong’s Global standings.
Given our exceptional word-of-mouth, our launch of “AWESOME SPEED. FOR
EVERYONE” is not just about competition, but also dedicated to
applying telecommunications technology for the benefit of public,
making Ultra High Speed Broadband Access the norm in Hong Kong.”

For video highlights of Hong Kong Press event, with full Television
Campaign, please refer
to www.youtube.com.hk/HKBNatUtube

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     india-gii@...
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     india-gii-unsubscribe@...

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/india-gii

Suresh Ramasubramanian | 2 Nov 2009 16:38
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: [IP] Press release HongKong: now 100/100 Mbps <at> US$13/month

My colleague is a hkbn customer

This 100 mbit is only for traffic within hk only (I assume hkix peers)

-- 
srs (blackberry)

-----Original Message-----
From: ken <ken <at> new-isp.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 10:23:42 
To: <india-gii <at> lists.cpsr.org>
Subject: [india-gii] [IP] Press release HongKong: now 100/100 Mbps  <at> 
 US$13/month

This is the bar set by the competition. We will meet it or pay the price 
of decreased economic vitality.

http://reg.hkbn.net/ctigroup_admin/files_upload/PR_MGM_E99.pdf


For Immediate Release

HKBN: “AWESOME SPEED. FOR EVERYONE”

100Mbps broadband at US$13/month

(Hong Kong, 1 November 2009) Hong Kong Broadband Network Ltd (“HKBN”),
a wholly owned subsidiary of City Telecom (HK) Limited (HKSE: 1137,
NASDAQ: CTEL), today announces breakthrough “AWESOME SPEED. FOR
EVERYONE” - 100Mbps broadband service at US$13/month (HK$99/month).

Some cars earn “SuperCar” status by their sheer performance but are
priced beyond the mass. At HKBN, we have shattered this affordability
barrier by delivering a “SuperCar” class symmetric 100Mbps broadband
service at a mass market price. Anyone who stays within our 1.62
million households’ network coverage, including all our existing
391,000 broadband users are eligible to invite a friend to join our
bb100 service for 24 months for price of HK$99 (US$13)/month each.

At this monthly fee level, the cost per Mbps for HKBN’s 100Mbps
broadband service is just US$0.06 (HK$0.50), which is AWESOME World
Class leading value. Furthermore, with our unique Speed Guarantee of
80% local bandwidth and unparalleled performance in massively
multiplayer online role-playing games, we are delivering on one of our
core purposes “To experience the joy of advancing and applying
telecommunications technology for the benefit of the public”.

Mr. William Yeung, Chief Executive Officer of HKBN said, “With at
least 32% of Internet users in Hong Kong still suffering from
broadband services below 10Mbps1, Hong Kong is lagging behind Korea
and Japan in terms of Fibre-To-The-Home’s Penetration2, and is only
classed as “Comfortably enjoying today’s applications” in terms of
Broadband Development3. Being the second largest broadband service
provider, we have a duty to improve Hong Kong’s Global standings.
Given our exceptional word-of-mouth, our launch of “AWESOME SPEED. FOR
EVERYONE” is not just about competition, but also dedicated to
applying telecommunications technology for the benefit of public,
making Ultra High Speed Broadband Access the norm in Hong Kong.”

For video highlights of Hong Kong Press event, with full Television
Campaign, please refer
to www.youtube.com.hk/HKBNatUtube


____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     india-gii <at> lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     india-gii-unsubscribe <at> lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/india-gii

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     india-gii <at> lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     india-gii-unsubscribe <at> lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/india-gii
Vickram Crishna | 3 Nov 2009 03:14
Picon
Favicon

Re: [IP] Press release HongKong: now 100/100 Mbps <at> US$13/month

----- Original Message ----
> From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <suresh <at> hserus..net>
> To: india-gii@...
> Sent: Mon, 2 November, 2009 21:08:27
> Subject: Re: [india-gii] [IP] Press release HongKong: now 100/100 Mbps  <at> US$13/month
> 
> My colleague is a hkbn customer
> 
> This 100 mbit is only for traffic within hk only (I assume hkix peers)
> 

So if an Akamai server is located in HK, peering at hkix (unbelievable it wouldn't) does that mean a large
chunk of 'real' Internet resource would also be available at 100mbit? Ditto for other methods of local archiving/mirroring.

Assume the answer is yes, logically, a powerful true "awesome" broadband service is effectively a
combination of an HKBN type service and massive local mirror/archive, leaving only
unmirrored/archived resources to be accessed off the wider Net through backbones, potentially
reducing both choke and overall cost. Which is not a very awesome task, as Ken points out, and would be worth
treating as the 'bar' to meet. 

However, that is only the technical part of the situation.

In the meantime, much more technical conversations continue at the mesh potato dev list. 

One argument that has been mentioned here before, but perhaps not taken very seriously, is the potential
for an HK type solution to be traduced by local 'regulation'. In mainland China, one sentiment towards
regulation is expressed in the story referenced at this link :
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8329217.stm, which is about an appeal made by a Chinese
government official to the Melbourne Film Festival organisers, asking for control on film content (an
Uighur documentary) displayed at the Festival, and also about similar requests made at the Frankfurt
Book Festival (two writers at a symposium). Obviously, I am not suggesting a discussion here about
Chinese political views on particular dissenters, but about the approach.

In India, now, the latest Draconian law/rules would make it difficult for an Akamai to operate sensibly,
while the situation is very grey for Google-type searches and email traffic. In other so-called
democracies, including the US, limits to cyber-freedom take other forms, including takedowns of
Indymedia-type servers and so on. 

We are fortunate on this list to be able to understand and discuss issues on both sides of the divide:
technical and philosophical. I don't know if we have, though, been a spark for converting such
discussions to practical action. That consideration (cause and effect) need not limit our dialogue,
though.   
 Vickram
http://communicall.wordpress.com
http://vvcrishna.wordpress.com

> -- 
> srs (blackberry)
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ken 
> Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 10:23:42 
> To: 
> Subject: [india-gii] [IP] Press release HongKong: now 100/100 Mbps  <at> 
> US$13/month
> 
> This is the bar set by the competition. We will meet it or pay the price 
> of decreased economic vitality.
> 
> http://reg.hkbn.net/ctigroup_admin/files_upload/PR_MGM_E99.pdf 
> 
> For Immediate Release
> 
> HKBN: “AWESOME SPEED. FOR EVERYONE”
> 
> 100Mbps broadband at US$13/month
> 
> (Hong Kong, 1 November 2009) Hong Kong Broadband Network Ltd (“HKBN”),
> a wholly owned subsidiary of City Telecom (HK) Limited (HKSE: 1137,
> NASDAQ: CTEL), today announces breakthrough “AWESOME SPEED. FOR
> EVERYONE” - 100Mbps broadband service at US$13/month (HK$99/month).
> 
> Some cars earn “SuperCar” status by their sheer performance but are
> priced beyond the mass. At HKBN, we have shattered this affordability
> barrier by delivering a “SuperCar” class symmetric 100Mbps broadband
> service at a mass market price.. Anyone who stays within our 1.62
> million households’ network coverage, including all our existing
> 391,000 broadband users are eligible to invite a friend to join our
> bb100 service for 24 months for price of HK$99 (US$13)/month each.
> 
> At this monthly fee level, the cost per Mbps for HKBN’s 100Mbps
> broadband service is just US$0.06 (HK$0.50), which is AWESOME World
> Class leading value. Furthermore, with our unique Speed Guarantee of
> 80% local bandwidth and unparalleled performance in massively
> multiplayer online role-playing games, we are delivering on one of our
> core purposes “To experience the joy of advancing and applying
> telecommunications technology for the benefit of the public”.
> 
> Mr. William Yeung, Chief Executive Officer of HKBN said, “With at
> least 32% of Internet users in Hong Kong still suffering from
> broadband services below 10Mbps1, Hong Kong is lagging behind Korea
> and Japan in terms of Fibre-To-The-Home’s Penetration2, and is only
> classed as “Comfortably enjoying today’s applications” in terms of
> Broadband Development3. Being the second largest broadband service
> provider, we have a duty to improve Hong Kong’s Global standings.
> Given our exceptional word-of-mouth, our launch of “AWESOME SPEED. FOR
> EVERYONE” is not just about competition, but also dedicated to
> applying telecommunications technology for the benefit of public,
> making Ultra High Speed Broadband Access the norm in Hong Kong.”
> 
> For video highlights of Hong Kong Press event, with full Television
> Campaign, please refer
> to www.youtube.com.hk/HKBNatUtube
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     india-gii@...
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>     india-gii-unsubscribe@...
> 
> For all list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists..cpsr.org/lists/info/india-gii 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     india-gii@...
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>     india-gii-unsubscribe@...
> 
> For all list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/india-gii

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     india-gii@...
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     india-gii-unsubscribe@...

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/india-gii

Suresh Ramasubramanian | 3 Nov 2009 03:53
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: [IP] Press release HongKong: now 100/100 Mbps

Vickram Crishna [03/11/09 02:14 +0000]:
>
>So if an Akamai server is located in HK, peering at hkix (unbelievable it
>wouldn't) does that mean a large chunk of 'real' Internet resource would
>also be available at 100mbit? Ditto for other methods of local
>archiving/mirroring.
>

In theory yes - in practice - it'd still be damned fast but slightly slower
because not all the content would (possibly) be akamaized. Same point
you're making but it bears repeating. You've immediately seen the magic
this situation is capable of.
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     india-gii@...
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     india-gii-unsubscribe@...

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/india-gii

ken | 3 Nov 2009 09:49

Re: [IP] Press release HongKong: now 100/100 Mbps <at> US$13/month

Inline, please...

Vickram Crishna wrote:

> So if an Akamai server is located in HK, peering at hkix
> (unbelievable it wouldn't) does that mean a large chunk of 'real'
> Internet resource would also be available at 100mbit? Ditto for other
> methods of local archiving/mirroring.

Even better, what is the total volume of information that would likely 
to be accessed by the general Indian population on a regular basis?

For the purposes of this aspect of this discussion, let's separate out 
the kinds of information which are static resources, (and could easily 
be cached) data that needs to be kept current that is international in 
nature, and bits that are national but are time sensitive, such as a 
VoIP session.

In the first instance, all information that is generated in India 
(newspapers, government access, distance education, etc.) could be 
easily and cheaply cached while being connected to the Indian network.

The second group of data sets do require international access but if we 
look at what is being requested (Yahoo, Google, NYT, etc) the total 
amount of bandwidth required is a subset of the greater whole. In this 
we need to understand that the need to most people in India to access 
Swedish language websites is relatively small (as would be the case in 
Africa) the total amount of international access required could be 
dramatically reduced - and this is a huge part of the overall expense.

In the third case, we are looking at what will overwhelmingly be 
intra-network communications (leaving aside international telephone 
which could easily be filtered out if required by government or to 
reduce costs. In this subset of connectivity the actual cost is trivial.

But in order for this type of network to work there has to be large 
enough pipes to carry what needs to be contained on the network - 
including the cached information, which would be substantial.

> Assume the answer is yes, logically, a powerful true "awesome"
> broadband service is effectively a combination of an HKBN type
> service and massive local mirror/archive, leaving only
> unmirrored/archived resources to be accessed off the wider Net
> through backbones, potentially reducing both choke and overall cost.
> Which is not a very awesome task, as Ken points out, and would be
> worth treating as the 'bar' to meet.

Damn, and I took all that space above to say the same thing. ;-)

> However, that is only the technical part of the situation.
> 
> In the meantime, much more technical conversations continue at the
> mesh potato dev list.
> 
> One argument that has been mentioned here before, but perhaps not
> taken very seriously, is the potential for an HK type solution to be
> traduced by local 'regulation'. In mainland China, one sentiment
> towards regulation is expressed in the story referenced at this link
> : http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8329217.stm, which is about
> an appeal made by a Chinese government official to the Melbourne Film
> Festival organisers, asking for control on film content (an Uighur
> documentary) displayed at the Festival, and also about similar
> requests made at the Frankfurt Book Festival (two writers at a
> symposium). Obviously, I am not suggesting a discussion here about
> Chinese political views on particular dissenters, but about the
> approach.

While this is a problem, there is also the reality that the world is 
moving to a time when the deluge of information will soon outstrip any 
government's ability to control, filter, or censor it.

Here is a specific example...
http://tinyurl.com/yzjzl8f

As quoted from the above link,

"In Utah, the National Security Agency is building a $2 billion storage 
facility that will house and analyze all forms of electronic 
communication...a potential yottabyte of everyone's (formerly) personal 
data. So how big is a yottabyte? CrunchGear puts it well:

     There are a thousand gigabytes in a terabyte, a thousand terabytes 
in a petabyte, a thousand petabytes in an exabyte, a thousand exabytes 
in a zettabyte, and a thousand zettabytes in a yottabyte. In other 
words, a yottabyte is 1,000,000,000,000,000GB."

If we assume that users create content faster than it can be collected, 
stored, and indexed today, and we assume that the rate that content is 
being created will continue to outstrip technology's ability to process 
it, there is bound to be an eventual breakdown in any government's 
ability to control this flow of information.

You can tell them I said so.

> In India, now, the latest Draconian law/rules would make it difficult
> for an Akamai to operate sensibly, while the situation is very grey
> for Google-type searches and email traffic. In other so-called
> democracies, including the US, limits to cyber-freedom take other
> forms, including takedowns of Indymedia-type servers and so on.

Strangely, this will probably be the front line of the battle that will 
reduce government's ability to regulate this aspect of our lives. While 
we saw the Iranian government slam the door shut on its population, the 
next time this is tried I believe the task will be even more difficult.

When the dam springs a leak it is possible to stick some bureaucrat's 
finger in the leak and plug it. When the dam springs a billion leaks, 
spread out across the better part of a continent, it is amazing how fast 
the bureaucracy runs out of fingers.

> We are fortunate on this list to be able to understand and discuss
> issues on both sides of the divide: technical and philosophical. I
> don't know if we have, though, been a spark for converting such
> discussions to practical action. That consideration (cause and
> effect) need not limit our dialogue, though. 

We are indeed fortunate.

It should also be pointed out that it may not be our job to actually 
affect change directly, we, instead, may be the foundation for the next 
generation to learn from our discourse and carry this battle forward.

In countries that do not have the resources to squander we may also be 
able to build the networks that will create massive shifts in how day to 
day lives are run - but only if we keep this philosophy in the forefront 
and make sure that whatever we plan implements this design.

In short (kind of late for that in retrospect) let's make sure we think 
ahead of the curve, not behind.

Ken

Vickram
> http://communicall.wordpress.com
> http://vvcrishna.wordpress.com
> 
>> -- 
>> srs (blackberry)
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ken 
>> Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 10:23:42 
>> To: 
>> Subject: [india-gii] [IP] Press release HongKong: now 100/100 Mbps  <at> 
>> US$13/month
>>
>> This is the bar set by the competition. We will meet it or pay the price 
>> of decreased economic vitality.
>>
>> http://reg.hkbn.net/ctigroup_admin/files_upload/PR_MGM_E99.pdf 
>>
>> For Immediate Release
>>
>> HKBN: “AWESOME SPEED. FOR EVERYONE”
>>
>> 100Mbps broadband at US$13/month
>>
>> (Hong Kong, 1 November 2009) Hong Kong Broadband Network Ltd (“HKBN”),
>> a wholly owned subsidiary of City Telecom (HK) Limited (HKSE: 1137,
>> NASDAQ: CTEL), today announces breakthrough “AWESOME SPEED. FOR
>> EVERYONE” - 100Mbps broadband service at US$13/month (HK$99/month).
>>
>> Some cars earn “SuperCar” status by their sheer performance but are
>> priced beyond the mass. At HKBN, we have shattered this affordability
>> barrier by delivering a “SuperCar” class symmetric 100Mbps broadband
>> service at a mass market price.. Anyone who stays within our 1.62
>> million households’ network coverage, including all our existing
>> 391,000 broadband users are eligible to invite a friend to join our
>> bb100 service for 24 months for price of HK$99 (US$13)/month each.
>>
>> At this monthly fee level, the cost per Mbps for HKBN’s 100Mbps
>> broadband service is just US$0.06 (HK$0.50), which is AWESOME World
>> Class leading value. Furthermore, with our unique Speed Guarantee of
>> 80% local bandwidth and unparalleled performance in massively
>> multiplayer online role-playing games, we are delivering on one of our
>> core purposes “To experience the joy of advancing and applying
>> telecommunications technology for the benefit of the public”.
>>
>> Mr. William Yeung, Chief Executive Officer of HKBN said, “With at
>> least 32% of Internet users in Hong Kong still suffering from
>> broadband services below 10Mbps1, Hong Kong is lagging behind Korea
>> and Japan in terms of Fibre-To-The-Home’s Penetration2, and is only
>> classed as “Comfortably enjoying today’s applications” in terms of
>> Broadband Development3. Being the second largest broadband service
>> provider, we have a duty to improve Hong Kong’s Global standings.
>> Given our exceptional word-of-mouth, our launch of “AWESOME SPEED. FOR
>> EVERYONE” is not just about competition, but also dedicated to
>> applying telecommunications technology for the benefit of public,
>> making Ultra High Speed Broadband Access the norm in Hong Kong.”
>>
>> For video highlights of Hong Kong Press event, with full Television
>> Campaign, please refer
>> to www.youtube.com.hk/HKBNatUtube
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>     india-gii@...
>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>>     india-gii-unsubscribe@...
>>
>> For all list information and functions, see:
>>     http://lists..cpsr.org/lists/info/india-gii 
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>     india-gii@...
>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>>     india-gii-unsubscribe@...
>>
>> For all list information and functions, see:
>>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/india-gii
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      india-gii@...
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>      india-gii-unsubscribe@...
> 
> For all list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/india-gii
> 

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     india-gii@...
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     india-gii-unsubscribe@...

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/india-gii

Srini RamaKrishnan | 3 Nov 2009 10:42
Picon
Gravatar

Re: [IP] Press release HongKong: now 100/100 Mbps

On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 3:53 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian
<suresh@...> wrote:
> Vickram Crishna [03/11/09 02:14 +0000]:
>>
>> So if an Akamai server is located in HK, peering at hkix (unbelievable it
>> wouldn't) does that mean a large chunk of 'real' Internet resource would
>> also be available at 100mbit? Ditto for other methods of local
>> archiving/mirroring.
>>
>
> In theory yes - in practice - it'd still be damned fast but slightly slower
> because not all the content would (possibly) be akamaized. Same point
> you're making but it bears repeating. You've immediately seen the magic
> this situation is capable of.

OTOH, doesn't this sort of break net neutrality?

Cheeni
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     india-gii@...
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     india-gii-unsubscribe@...

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/india-gii


Gmane