Brian E Carpenter | 1 Oct 2010 02:11
Picon

Re: I-D Action:draft-azinger-scalable-addressing-00.txt

Gert,

On 2010-10-01 09:51, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 09:37:23AM -0700, Tony Li wrote:
>> So if you have N entries then your network admins won't bother to make them work?
>>
>> Seems to me like you need new network admins.
> 
> What exactly can the network admin do here?
> 
> Let me try to illustrate this with a specific example.  No complex policies
> for now, just focusing on "shortest path to destination".
> 
> 
> There's a source prefix S1 that is routed via ISP 1, and a source prefix 
> S2 that is routed via ISP 2 (both prefixes coming from the respective 
> ISP's PA space, so BCP 38 filters will require that source address 
> selection automatically selects egress ISP).
> 
> Destination prefix D1 is connected to peer of ISP 1, while destination
> prefix D2 is connected to something 20 hops behind ISP 2 (assuming that
> "20 hops" means "more latency, less bandwidth", for the simplicity of
> the model).
> 
>     +--- S1 === ISP 1 === ISP X ======== D1 ---+
>   source         (*)                         destination
>     +--- S2 === ISP 2 --- ISP A, B, C -- D2 ---+
> 
(Continue reading)

Doug Barton | 3 Oct 2010 22:55
Picon
Favicon

www.freebsd.org


FYI. Some non-IPv6-related bits have been snipped.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: IPv6 usage of www.freebsd.org
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 22:31:18 +0200
From: Wolfram Schneider <wosch <at> FreeBSD.org>

Hi,

I checked the current IPv6 usage of our homepage www.freebsd.org

In the last 30 days we had 5.32 million page views. Many are from web
crawlers (bots) and other automated scripts (nagios, curl, libfetch).
Apparently, 2.73 millions page views (51.5%) are from humans (or your
cat ;-)

1.35% of the page view are IPv6. For the bots it is much higher: 4.8%

-Wolfram

--

-- 
Wolfram Schneider <wosch <at> FreeBSD.org> http://wolfram.schneider.org

Eric Vyncke (evyncke | 4 Oct 2010 20:42
Picon
Favicon

Re: IPv6 brokenness in Norway, March 2010

Tore,

 

If still run your measurement, would you mind sharing an update ?

 

Thanks in advance

 

-éric

 

Steinar H. Gunderson | 4 Oct 2010 23:24
Picon
Favicon

Re: IPv6 brokenness in Norway, March 2010

Den 4. oktober 2010 20:42 skrev Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
<evyncke <at> cisco.com> følgende:
> If still run your measurement, would you mind sharing an update ?

You can find Tore's measurements at http://www.fud.no/ipv6/, updated every day.

/* Steinar */
--

-- 
Software Engineer, Google Switzerland

Tore Anderson | 5 Oct 2010 08:19

Re: IPv6 brokenness in Norway

* Eric Vyncke (evyncke)

> If still run your measurement, would you mind sharing an update ?

Hi,

as Steinar has already pointed out, you can see the daily stats on my
web site at <http://fud.no/ipv6>.  There hasn't been too many things
going on since spring, but I can try to sum up some key points:

- Brokenness percentage is currently at slightly above 0.05%.  This is
unfortunately considered by my customers participating in the experiment
as too high to deploy dual-stack, especially as there currently are no
Norwegian ISPs that provides IPv6 to end users.

- As I noted in the last post to the list, Opera fixed their web browser
in March.  This had a very positive impact on the brokenness, which is
very clearly visible in the graphs.  At the moment there's so few users
of older broken Opera versions that the brokenness they cause is barely
distinguishable from statistical noise.

- Mac OS X is currently the biggest contributor to the brokenness, by
far.  The brokenness percentage drops by 70-80% when disregarding all
hits from Mac OS X.  As I've noted earlier, a fix for this is likely to
be included in OS X 10.6.5 which is currently available in beta
versions.  I doubt, however, that (close to) all OS X related brokenness
will vanish overnight - there are still many users of OS X 10.4 and 10.5
out there who won't be able to install the update.
Nevertheless I'm certain that the release of 10.6.5 will have a positive
impact, and it will be exciting to see exactly how large.

- The brokenness decreased significantly during the summer months.
One explanation for this is that the publicly run student dormitories
tends to empty out then, and they are the single largest network
contributor to the brokenness issue (currently accounting for about 35%)
as they discard all 6to4 traffic in their firewalls, thus exacerbating
the OS X/Opera problems significantly.  Several other enterprises and
governmental networks do the same thing, but the student village network
is much larger (in terms of end-user count) than any other 6to4-hostile
network in Norway at the moment.

That's all I could think of right now...

Best regards,
--

-- 
Tore Anderson
Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
Tel: +47 21 54 41 27

Eric Vyncke (evyncke | 5 Oct 2010 09:07
Picon
Favicon

RE: IPv6 brokenness in Norway

Tore

Thanks for the additional explanations and for running this statistics and explaining how you do it.

Just tossing an idea in the air: several content providers are indeed reluctant to go direct with a AAAA for
their site for the reasons below. 

Therefore, it would be useful if there was a web site such yours where any webmaster could go, register its
customer name, copy & paste some code in their HTML pages and get detailed statistics about brokenness of
its own audience after a couple of days.

In the same way as done by Andrew at http://testv6.stdio.be but with you measurement

-éric

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tore Anderson [mailto:tore.anderson <at> redpill-linpro.com]
> Sent: mardi 5 octobre 2010 8:19
> To: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
> Cc: ipv6-ops <at> lists.cluenet.de
> Subject: Re: IPv6 brokenness in Norway
> 
> * Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
> 
> > If still run your measurement, would you mind sharing an update ?
> 
> Hi,
> 
> as Steinar has already pointed out, you can see the daily stats on my
> web site at <http://fud.no/ipv6>.  There hasn't been too many things
> going on since spring, but I can try to sum up some key points:
> 
> - Brokenness percentage is currently at slightly above 0.05%.  This is
> unfortunately considered by my customers participating in the experiment
> as too high to deploy dual-stack, especially as there currently are no
> Norwegian ISPs that provides IPv6 to end users.
> 
> - As I noted in the last post to the list, Opera fixed their web browser
> in March.  This had a very positive impact on the brokenness, which is
> very clearly visible in the graphs.  At the moment there's so few users
> of older broken Opera versions that the brokenness they cause is barely
> distinguishable from statistical noise.
> 
> - Mac OS X is currently the biggest contributor to the brokenness, by
> far.  The brokenness percentage drops by 70-80% when disregarding all
> hits from Mac OS X.  As I've noted earlier, a fix for this is likely to
> be included in OS X 10.6.5 which is currently available in beta
> versions.  I doubt, however, that (close to) all OS X related brokenness
> will vanish overnight - there are still many users of OS X 10.4 and 10.5
> out there who won't be able to install the update.
> Nevertheless I'm certain that the release of 10.6.5 will have a positive
> impact, and it will be exciting to see exactly how large.
> 
> - The brokenness decreased significantly during the summer months.
> One explanation for this is that the publicly run student dormitories
> tends to empty out then, and they are the single largest network
> contributor to the brokenness issue (currently accounting for about 35%)
> as they discard all 6to4 traffic in their firewalls, thus exacerbating
> the OS X/Opera problems significantly.  Several other enterprises and
> governmental networks do the same thing, but the student village network
> is much larger (in terms of end-user count) than any other 6to4-hostile
> network in Norway at the moment.
> 
> That's all I could think of right now...
> 
> Best regards,
> --
> Tore Anderson
> Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
> Tel: +47 21 54 41 27

Tore Anderson | 5 Oct 2010 14:21

Re: IPv6 brokenness in Norway

* Eric Vyncke (evyncke)

> Therefore, it would be useful if there was a web site such yours
> where any webmaster could go, register its customer name, copy &
> paste some code in their HTML pages and get detailed statistics about
> brokenness of its own audience after a couple of days.

I'm sure many people would find that useful, however I don't have enough
time or resources to undertake such a project myself, I'm afraid.

Best regards,
--

-- 
Tore Anderson
Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
Tel: +47 21 54 41 27

Mike Hyde | 5 Oct 2010 16:44

Re: IPv6 brokenness in Norway

Just wondering, are your DNS servers set to respond to AAAA requests when it is sourced from an IPv4 address?

On Oct 5, 2010, at 1:19 AM, Tore Anderson wrote:

> * Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
> 
>> If still run your measurement, would you mind sharing an update ?
> 
> Hi,
> 
> as Steinar has already pointed out, you can see the daily stats on my
> web site at <http://fud.no/ipv6>.  There hasn't been too many things
> going on since spring, but I can try to sum up some key points:
> 
> - Brokenness percentage is currently at slightly above 0.05%.  This is
> unfortunately considered by my customers participating in the experiment
> as too high to deploy dual-stack, especially as there currently are no
> Norwegian ISPs that provides IPv6 to end users.
> 
> - As I noted in the last post to the list, Opera fixed their web browser
> in March.  This had a very positive impact on the brokenness, which is
> very clearly visible in the graphs.  At the moment there's so few users
> of older broken Opera versions that the brokenness they cause is barely
> distinguishable from statistical noise.
> 
> - Mac OS X is currently the biggest contributor to the brokenness, by
> far.  The brokenness percentage drops by 70-80% when disregarding all
> hits from Mac OS X.  As I've noted earlier, a fix for this is likely to
> be included in OS X 10.6.5 which is currently available in beta
> versions.  I doubt, however, that (close to) all OS X related brokenness
> will vanish overnight - there are still many users of OS X 10.4 and 10.5
> out there who won't be able to install the update.
> Nevertheless I'm certain that the release of 10.6.5 will have a positive
> impact, and it will be exciting to see exactly how large.
> 
> - The brokenness decreased significantly during the summer months.
> One explanation for this is that the publicly run student dormitories
> tends to empty out then, and they are the single largest network
> contributor to the brokenness issue (currently accounting for about 35%)
> as they discard all 6to4 traffic in their firewalls, thus exacerbating
> the OS X/Opera problems significantly.  Several other enterprises and
> governmental networks do the same thing, but the student village network
> is much larger (in terms of end-user count) than any other 6to4-hostile
> network in Norway at the moment.
> 
> That's all I could think of right now...
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Tore Anderson
> Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
> Tel: +47 21 54 41 27

Tore Anderson | 5 Oct 2010 19:21

Re: IPv6 brokenness in Norway

* Mike Hyde

> Just wondering, are your DNS servers set to respond to AAAA requests
> when it is sourced from an IPv4 address?

They do.  There's no masking of AAAA responses to any queriers.

BR,
--

-- 
Tore Anderson
Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
Tel: +47 21 54 41 27

Christof Meerwald | 5 Oct 2010 22:00
Favicon

Re: IPv6 brokenness in Norway

On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 08:19:06 +0200, Tore Anderson wrote:
[...]
> - As I noted in the last post to the list, Opera fixed their web browser
> in March.

Opera have just released a 10.63 RC with more IPv6 fixes for
Linux/Mac, see
http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/2010/10/05/opera-10-63-release-candidate
(the fix in March was only for the Windows version).

Christof

--

-- 

http://cmeerw.org                              sip:cmeerw at cmeerw.org
mailto:cmeerw at cmeerw.org                   xmpp:cmeerw at cmeerw.org


Gmane