andre | 7 May 2010 16:20
Picon

Please Help

Hello,

I am hereby requesting help from you in the form of:

Data or a Link on your website / blog /etc to:

http://www.emailcontact.co.za

thanks and have a great weekend!

Andre

_______________________________________________
IOZ mailing list
IOZ@...
http://lists.internet.org.za/mailman/listinfo/ioz

Daniel Schroder | 7 May 2010 17:23
Picon

Re: Please Help

On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 4:20 PM,  <andre@...> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am hereby requesting help from you in the form of:
>
> Data or a Link on your website / blog /etc to:
>
> http://www.emailcontact.co.za
>
> thanks and have a great weekend!
>
> Andre
>

   you opportunistic bas^^^^hful person.....

_______________________________________________
IOZ mailing list
IOZ@...
http://lists.internet.org.za/mailman/listinfo/ioz

andre | 7 May 2010 17:27
Picon

Re: Please Help

Daniel Schroder said on Friday 07 May 2010 :
> > I am hereby requesting help from you in the form of:
> >
> > Data or a Link on your website / blog /etc to:
> >
> > http://www.emailcontact.co.za
> >
> > thanks and have a great weekend!
> >
>    you opportunistic bas^^^^hful person.....
> 
anything to further the cause of placing email marketers in 
touch with each other *grin*

thanks to everyone that helped my databse grow from 200 
to over a thousand in less than an hour :)

will edit and move the addy's around between inside and
outside interfaces during next week

thanks!

andre

_______________________________________________
IOZ mailing list
IOZ@...
http://lists.internet.org.za/mailman/listinfo/ioz

(Continue reading)

Aragon Gouveia | 13 May 2010 01:27

.de TLD glitch "shuts down" German internet

http://www.thelocal.de/sci-tech/20100512-27149.html

_______________________________________________
IOZ mailing list
IOZ@...
http://lists.internet.org.za/mailman/listinfo/ioz

Alan Levin | 18 May 2010 15:55
Picon
Favicon

Fwd: INET Cape Town 2010 - Monday, May 24

Hi,

Excuse the cross post, we have many open places left and we have arranged great weather for Gauties and a
special accommodation. 

This event is once off! On Monday! 
Register at http://isoc.org.za  - there will be remote participation too. 

ISOC-ZA have organized the INET 2010 conference with ISP's in mind. I believe that the content is going to be
most useful for planners, and those handling ISP strategy and we extend this invitation to all ISPA
members, staff and customers. 

Special double-discount on the hotel accommodation so those that want to come from Joburg or anywhere else
in the country, bring your partners who will stay free. Special weekend rate (it is a 5* hotel for only)
R1,480 per night for 2, incl B&B.  Weather forecast looks sunny and warm!

Hope to see you next week,

Sincerely

Alan Levin
ISOC-ZA - 2010 Chairman
--------------------

Details
--------------------------------------------
Date: Monday May 24 - 8am registration - 5pm 

Venue: Le-Vendome, 20 London Road, Sea Point (Map: http://snipurl.com/vhc6k)

(Continue reading)

Mark Slingsby | 19 May 2010 06:32
Picon
Favicon

Re: Fwd: INET Cape Town 2010 - Monday, May 24

I'll see you there!

Mark Slingsby

Sent from RSAWEB Hosted Zimbra Email Service

On May 18, 2010, at 4:04 PM, Alan Levin <alan@...>  
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Excuse the cross post, we have many open places left and we have  
> arranged great weather for Gauties and a special accommodation.
>
> This event is once off! On Monday!
> Register at http://isoc.org.za  - there will be remote participation  
> too.
>
> ISOC-ZA have organized the INET 2010 conference with ISP's in mind.  
> I believe that the content is going to be most useful for planners,  
> and those handling ISP strategy and we extend this invitation to all  
> ISPA members, staff and customers.
>
> Special double-discount on the hotel accommodation so those that  
> want to come from Joburg or anywhere else in the country, bring your  
> partners who will stay free. Special weekend rate (it is a 5* hotel  
> for only) R1,480 per night for 2, incl B&B.  Weather forecast looks  
> sunny and warm!
>
> Hope to see you next week,
(Continue reading)

Phillip de Wet | 24 May 2010 13:46
Picon

DKIM meets DNS

I send out a tiny amount of bulk mail, in the form of a newsletter five days a week, but I'm determined to do so as
responsibly as possible. I've been led to believe that DKIM is a good thing, so I'm trying to implement it.
But Hetzner, which hosts my domains, tells me their DNS servers can't support the 128-bit keys because TXT
fields are limited to 100 characters.

Knowing considerably less than bugger-all about either DNS or DKIM, I'd love to hear that the Grand
Assembled ZA Elders think. DKIM: good thing/bad thing? Is there a valid reason, say stability, to limit
the length of DNS entries?

Phillip

_______________________________________________
IOZ mailing list
IOZ@...
http://lists.internet.org.za/mailman/listinfo/ioz

Andrew Lewis | 24 May 2010 14:17

Re: DKIM meets DNS


Hello Phillip,

You can fit a 128-bit public key and the necessary peripheral information into 100 characters. This is,
however, much smaller than the key should be.

Presumably the nameserver software (or something layered on top of it) that Hetzner is using imposes this
limitation and that is probably valid reason enough.

I'd consider it a nice thing to have but you may ultimately find it not particularly useful to you.

--

-- 
Andrew Lewis <andrew@...>

 _______________________________________
/ Personifiers of the world, unite! You \
| have nothing to lose but Mr. Dignity! |
\ -- Bernadette Bosky                   /
 ---------------------------------------
        \   ^__^
         \  (oo)\_______
            (__)\       )\/\
                ||----w |
                ||     ||

_______________________________________________
IOZ mailing list
IOZ@...
http://lists.internet.org.za/mailman/listinfo/ioz

(Continue reading)

Picon
Gravatar

Re: DKIM meets DNS

From: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1464
RFC 1464 says the server implementations place a limit, this is not an 
RFC requirement.

    5. Restrictions

    Some DNS server implementations place limits on the size or number of
    TXT records associated with a particular owner.  Certain
    implementations may not support TXT records at all.

Having said that, more and more people are using DKIM, especially with 
large profile players like google and microsoft  supporting it, this 
means that awareness and penetration will over time increase.

There has been much debate on this list in the past about using the TXT 
record for something other than what it was originally intended (this 
was around SPF) though I do feel that there are fewer and fewer people 
using this record for anything other than SPF or DKIM...

On 24/05/2010 12:46, Phillip de Wet wrote:
> I send out a tiny amount of bulk mail, in the form of a newsletter five days a week, but I'm determined to do so
as responsibly as possible. I've been led to believe that DKIM is a good thing, so I'm trying to implement
it. But Hetzner, which hosts my domains, tells me their DNS servers can't support the 128-bit keys because
TXT fields are limited to 100 characters.
>
> Knowing considerably less than bugger-all about either DNS or DKIM, I'd love to hear that the Grand
Assembled ZA Elders think. DKIM: good thing/bad thing? Is there a valid reason, say stability, to limit
the length of DNS entries?
>
> Phillip
(Continue reading)

Colin Alston | 25 May 2010 19:29

co.za SERVFAIL

I may be slightly whacked on painkillers right now but does anyone
know what's going on with co.za? I'm randomly getting SERVFAIL
responses...

[root <at> coffee etc]# dig  <at> 4.2.2.2 co.za

; <<>> DiG 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-4.P1.el5 <<>>  <at> 4.2.2.2 co.za
; (1 server found)
;; global options:  printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 45308
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;co.za.                         IN      A

;; Query time: 330 msec
;; SERVER: 4.2.2.2#53(4.2.2.2)
;; WHEN: Tue May 25 21:34:19 2010
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 23

[root <at> coffee etc]# dig  <at> 4.2.2.1 co.za

; <<>> DiG 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-4.P1.el5 <<>>  <at> 4.2.2.1 co.za
; (1 server found)
;; global options:  printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 29788
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

(Continue reading)


Gmane