1 Aug 2006 23:03
Re: Software patent
P.L.Hayes <paul <at> wolfbone.ath.cx>
2006-08-01 21:03:32 GMT
2006-08-01 21:03:32 GMT
Alex Hudson <home <at> alexhudson.com> writes: > On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 13:58 +0100, Ian Lynch wrote: >> Is there no lobbying process? This is a good example of why software >> patents are a nonsense so fighting this one with a high public profile >> would illustrate the point and provide a case that would help in any >> future battles in the EU. > > I don't believe there is, simply because it's supposed to be a matter of > fact. > > Until it's come up on esp <at> cenet, you've not even really got something to > campaign about anyway :/ > If this is the one, it's been there a while already: http://v3.espacenet.com/textdoc?DB=EPODOC&IDX=EP1192615&F=0 http://gauss.ffii.org/PatentView/EP1192615 Ian doesn't seem to be interested in third party opposition and I don't blame him but it looks to me as though the EPO is going to disallow this despicable patent anyway.
RSS Feed