Jim McNamara | 1 May 02:34 2008
Picon

Re: tcpdump/wireshark don't see my ethernet card



On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Guy Harris <guy-FrUbXkNCsVf2fBVCVOL8/A@public.gmane.org> wrote:

On Apr 28, 2008, at 3:47 PM, Jim McNamara wrote:

Hello all. I've taken some time to search your list archives, and didn't easily find what I was looking for. I have a brand new HP dv9820us laptop. The ethernet card is built in, and the whole motherboard has the nvidia chipset. I'm running Debian Sid with the 2.6.24-1 kernel which was part of the default Debian install. The installer found the ethernet card without issue, and correctly inserts the 'forcedeth' module to use it. The card works fine for generic activities like wired internet access, but neither the tcpdump software nor wireshark sees the card as a possible interface.

...which means this isn't a Wireshark issue, it's either a libpcap issue or a Linux issue.
I forgot to include the libpcap info - here it is:

jim <at> jimslaptop:~$ dpkg --list|grep libpcap
ii  libpcap0.7                           0.7.2-9                          System interface for user-level packet captu
ii  libpcap0.8                           0.9.8-3                          system interface for user-level packet captu
ii  libpcap0.8-dev                       0.9.8-3                          development library and header files for lib



tcpdump:
jimslaptop:/home/jim# tcpdump -ieth0
tcpdump: bind: Network is down

wireshark (as root):
The capture session could not be initiated (bind: Network is down).

Linux issue.

Does "ifconfig eth0" report that the interface is up?

jim <at> jimslaptop:~$ /sbin/ifconfig eth0
eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:1e:68:2f:f8:1b
          inet addr:192.168.68.118  Bcast:192.168.68.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
          inet6 addr: fe80::21e:68ff:fe2f:f81b/64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:13990 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:9703 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
          RX bytes:16263328 (15.5 MiB)  TX bytes:1227641 (1.1 MiB)
          Interrupt:252 Base address:0x6000
 


If so, this is some mysterious Linux networking stack weirdness wherein said networking stack is using a definition of "down" with which I was not previously acquainted.

If not, presumably you have to configure the interface "up" before you can capture on it.

Debian Sid had a new version of wireshark hit the repositories between when I posted and when you replied. I didn't notice any difference in the libpcap or tcpdump files, but I did see a new version of wireshark being installed. Now wireshark works, and so does tcpdump.

Sorry to have wasted this list's time with something that was completely outside your control.

Peace and Thanks,
Jim
 

<div>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Guy Harris &lt;<a href="mailto:guy@...">guy@...</a>&gt; wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote">
<div class="Ih2E3d">
<br>
On Apr 28, 2008, at 3:47 PM, Jim McNamara wrote:<br><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote">
Hello all. I've taken some time to search your list archives, and didn't easily find what I was looking for. I have a brand new HP dv9820us laptop. The ethernet card is built in, and the whole motherboard has the nvidia chipset. I'm running Debian Sid with the 2.6.24-1 kernel which was part of the default Debian install. The installer found the ethernet card without issue, and correctly inserts the 'forcedeth' module to use it. The card works fine for generic activities like wired internet access, but neither the tcpdump software nor wireshark sees the card as a possible interface.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
...which means this isn't a Wireshark issue, it's either a libpcap issue or a Linux issue.<br>
</blockquote>
<div>I forgot to include the libpcap info - here it is:<br><br>jim <at> jimslaptop:~$ dpkg --list|grep libpcap<br>
ii&nbsp; libpcap0.7&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 0.7.2-9&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; System interface for user-level packet captu<br>ii&nbsp; libpcap0.8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 0.9.8-3&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; system interface for user-level packet captu<br>
ii&nbsp; libpcap0.8-dev&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 0.9.8-3&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; development library and header files for lib<br><br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote">
<div class="Ih2E3d">
<br><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote">
tcpdump:<br>
jimslaptop:/home/jim# tcpdump -ieth0<br>
tcpdump: bind: Network is down<br><br>
wireshark (as root):<br>
The capture session could not be initiated (bind: Network is down).<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
Linux issue.<br><br>
Does "ifconfig eth0" report that the interface is up?</blockquote>
<div>
<br>jim <at> jimslaptop:~$ /sbin/ifconfig eth0<br>eth0&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Link encap:Ethernet&nbsp; HWaddr 00:1e:68:2f:f8:1b<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; inet addr:<a href="http://192.168.68.118">192.168.68.118</a>&nbsp; Bcast:<a href="http://192.168.68.255">192.168.68.255</a>&nbsp; Mask:<a href="http://255.255.255.0">255.255.255.0</a><br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; inet6 addr: fe80::21e:68ff:fe2f:f81b/64 Scope:Link<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST&nbsp; MTU:1500&nbsp; Metric:1<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; RX packets:13990 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; TX packets:9703 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; RX bytes:16263328 (15.5 MiB)&nbsp; TX bytes:1227641 (1.1 MiB)<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Interrupt:252 Base address:0x6000<br>&nbsp;</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote">
<br><br>
If so, this is some mysterious Linux networking stack weirdness wherein said networking stack is using a definition of "down" with which I was not previously acquainted.<br><br>
If not, presumably you have to configure the interface "up" before you can capture on it.</blockquote>
<div>
<br>Debian Sid had a new version of wireshark hit the repositories between when I posted and when you replied. I didn't notice any difference in the libpcap or tcpdump files, but I did see a new version of wireshark being installed. Now wireshark works, and so does tcpdump. <br><br>Sorry to have wasted this list's time with something that was completely outside your control. <br><br>Peace and Thanks,<br>Jim<br>&nbsp;</div>
</div>
<br>
</div>
Sake Blok | 1 May 08:41 2008
Picon

Re: Wireshark 1.0 unable to dissect DICOM capture

On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 01:19:09PM -0400, Bob Woods wrote:
> Attached is a small DICOM echo capture, for some reason Wireshark 1.0 is
> unable to dissect it.  Any ideas?

Well, I took a look at the dicom dissector (epan/dissectors/packet-dcm.c)
and in the heuristics to determine if a packet can be dissected as dicom
are the following checks:

  if (10 > (tlen = tvb_reported_length(tvb))     /* not long enough */
      || 1 != (pdu = tvb_get_guint8(tvb, 0))     /* look for the start */
      || 1 != (vers = tvb_get_ntohs(tvb, 6)))    /* not version 1 */
      dcm_data->valid = FALSE;

Looking at your trace file, the first packet is only 6 bytes in size, 
so the check will fail. The dicom dissector expects at least 10 bytes in 
the first packet.

Either the dicom dissector is not aware of all the protocol variations
*or* the conversation you captured is not following the dicom specification.

If you are sure that the conversation is indeed dicom, you might want
to file a bug-report on http://bugzilla.wireshark.org 

Please attach the capture file and as much information that you can 
find about what application created this conversation (preferably with
a dicom protocol version, if that can be found in the documentation
of the application).

That way we might be able to implement the support for it in the future.

Cheers,
   Sake
Tennis Smith | 1 May 18:58 2008

Dumping only UDP payload

Hi,

 

I’m testing a protocol that is encapsulated in udp.  So, I want to capture only the udp payload without any ip or udp headers. It needs to be the entire udp payload as well, not a partial capture.

 

Can that be done with ‘tshark’?

 

Thanks,

-T

<div>

<div class="Section1">

<p class="MsoNormal">Hi,<p></p></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><p>&nbsp;</p></p>

<p class="MsoNormal">I&rsquo;m testing a protocol that is encapsulated in udp. &nbsp;So,
I want to capture only the udp payload without any ip or udp headers. It needs
to be the entire udp payload as well, not a partial capture.<p></p></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><p>&nbsp;</p></p>

<p class="MsoNormal">Can that be done with &lsquo;tshark&rsquo;? <p></p></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><p>&nbsp;</p></p>

<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks,<p></p></p>

<p class="MsoNormal">-T <p></p></p>

</div>

</div>
Guy Harris | 1 May 20:12 2008
Picon

Re: Dumping only UDP payload


On May 1, 2008, at 9:58 AM, Tennis Smith wrote:

> I’m testing a protocol that is encapsulated in udp.  So, I want to  
> capture only the udp payload without any ip or udp headers. It needs  
> to be the entire udp payload as well, not a partial capture.
>
> Can that be done with ‘tshark’?

No:

	1) there is no DLT_ value for "UDP only";

	2) the packet capture mechanism *Shark uses (libpcap/WinPcap and the  
OS mechanisms they use) has no provision for not capturing arbitrary  
sets of headers - you get what the driver hands you.

However, I also don't see why you'd need to capture only the UDP  
payload; the mere fact that the protocol is encapsulated in UDP  
doesn't impose any such requirement.
Guy Harris | 1 May 20:14 2008
Picon

Re: tcpdump/wireshark don't see my ethernet card


On Apr 30, 2008, at 5:34 PM, Jim McNamara wrote:

> Debian Sid had a new version of wireshark hit the repositories  
> between when I posted and when you replied. I didn't notice any  
> difference in the libpcap or tcpdump files, but I did see a new  
> version of wireshark being installed. Now wireshark works, and so  
> does tcpdump.

I suspect *something* else got installed as a result of the update(s)  
you installed, as Wireshark doesn't affect what tcpdump sees.
Sake Blok | 1 May 20:26 2008
Picon

Re: Dumping only UDP payload

On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 11:58:05AM -0500, Tennis Smith wrote:
> 
> I'm testing a protocol that is encapsulated in udp.  So, I want to
> capture only the udp payload without any ip or udp headers. It needs to
> be the entire udp payload as well, not a partial capture.

If I understand you correctly, you want to extract the payload of
an UDP conversation and save it in a file?

> Can that be done with 'tshark'? 

No, but I wrote a little perl script that does that, have a look at:

http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/200611/msg00133.html

Does that suit your needs?

Cheers,
    Sake
Tennis Smith | 1 May 20:33 2008

Re: Dumping only UDP payload


> Can that be done with 'tshark'? 

No, but I wrote a little perl script that does that, have a look at:
[TNS>] OK.

http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/200611/msg00133.html

Does that suit your needs?
[TNS>] Looks promising. :)  Thanks. I"ll have a look at it.

Cheers,
    Sake
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@...
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users

E Rajasekharan-A20741 | 1 May 21:27 2008

Is it possible to back-up packet captures in defined time interval...

Hi,
 
    I am capturing packets during Bulk Call scenario.
    Once the capture file reaches a certain size limit, the wireshark displays out of memory error and existing capture also goes off.
 
    Is there any way to store the captures periodically in to a predefined files, (ex). i want wireshark to store the captures for every hour in a file.
    Is that possible ? 
 
Regards,
Raj
 
 
<div>
<div><span class="181222019-01052008">Hi,</span></div>
<div>
<span class="181222019-01052008"></span>&nbsp;</div>
<div><span class="181222019-01052008">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; I 
am capturing packets during Bulk Call scenario.</span></div>
<div><span class="181222019-01052008">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Once the capture file reaches a certain size limit, the wireshark 
displays out of memory error and existing capture also goes 
off.</span></div>
<div>
<span class="181222019-01052008"></span>&nbsp;</div>
<div>
<span class="181222019-01052008"></span><span class="181222019-01052008">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Is there any way to store the captures 
periodically&nbsp;in to a predefined files, (ex). i want wireshark to store the 
captures for every hour in a file.</span>
</div>
<div><span class="181222019-01052008">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Is that possible ?&nbsp;</span></div>
<div>
<span class="181222019-01052008"></span>&nbsp;</div>
<div><span class="181222019-01052008">Regards,</span></div>
<div><span class="181222019-01052008">Raj</span></div>
<div>
<span class="181222019-01052008"></span>&nbsp;</div>
<div><span class="181222019-01052008">&nbsp;</span></div>
</div>
Barry Constantine | 1 May 21:32 2008

Re: Is it possible to back-up packet captures indefined time interval...

Go to Capture -> Options -> Use Multiple Files.

 

There are lot’s of settings for the rolling buffer you are seeking.

 

-Barry

 

From: wireshark-users-bounces-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A@public.gmane.org [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of E Rajasekharan-A20741
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 3:28 PM
To: Wireshark-users-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A@public.gmane.org
Subject: [Wireshark-users] Is it possible to back-up packet captures indefined time interval...

 

Hi,

 

    I am capturing packets during Bulk Call scenario.

    Once the capture file reaches a certain size limit, the wireshark displays out of memory error and existing capture also goes off.

 

    Is there any way to store the captures periodically in to a predefined files, (ex). i want wireshark to store the captures for every hour in a file.

    Is that possible ? 

 

Regards,

Raj

 

 

<div>

<div class="Section1">

<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Go to Capture -&gt; Options -&gt; Use
Multiple Files.<p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span><p>&nbsp;</p></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span>There are lot&rsquo;s of settings for the
rolling buffer you are seeking.<p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span><p>&nbsp;</p></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span>-Barry<p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span><p>&nbsp;</p></span></p>

<div>

<div class="MsoNormal" align="center"><span>

</span></div>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span>From:</span><span>
wireshark-users-bounces@...
[mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@...] <span>On Behalf Of </span>E Rajasekharan-A20741<br><span>Sent:</span> Thursday, May 01, 2008 3:28
PM<br><span>To:</span> Wireshark-users@...<br><span>Subject:</span> [Wireshark-users] Is it
possible to back-up packet captures indefined time interval...</span><p></p></p>

</div>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span><p>&nbsp;</p></span></p>

<div>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Hi,</span><p></p></p>

</div>

<div>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span>&nbsp;<p></p></span></p>

</div>

<div>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span><span>I am capturing packets during Bulk
Call scenario.</span><p></p></p>

</div>

<div>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span><span>Once the capture file reaches a
certain size limit, the wireshark displays out of memory error and existing
capture also goes off.</span><p></p></p>

</div>

<div>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span>&nbsp;<p></p></span></p>

</div>

<div>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Is there any way to store the captures
periodically&nbsp;in to a predefined files, (ex). i want wireshark to store the
captures for every hour in a file.</span><p></p></p>

</div>

<div>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Is that possible ?&nbsp;</span><p></p></p>

</div>

<div>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span>&nbsp;<p></p></span></p>

</div>

<div>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Regards,</span><p></p></p>

</div>

<div>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Raj</span><p></p></p>

</div>

<div>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span>&nbsp;<p></p></span></p>

</div>

<div>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span>&nbsp;<p></p></span></p>

</div>

</div>

</div>
E Rajasekharan-A20741 | 1 May 21:39 2008

Re: Is it possible to back-up packet capturesindefined time interval...

Thanks !
That is a great help.
Was looking at all other settings...
 
Raj

From: wireshark-users-bounces-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A@public.gmane.org [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Barry Constantine
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 3:33 PM
To: Community support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Is it possible to back-up packet capturesindefined time interval...

Go to Capture -> Options -> Use Multiple Files.

 

There are lot’s of settings for the rolling buffer you are seeking.

 

-Barry

 

From: wireshark-users-bounces-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A@public.gmane.org [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of E Rajasekharan-A20741
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 3:28 PM
To: Wireshark-users-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A@public.gmane.org
Subject: [Wireshark-users] Is it possible to back-up packet captures indefined time interval...

 

Hi,

 

    I am capturing packets during Bulk Call scenario.

    Once the capture file reaches a certain size limit, the wireshark displays out of memory error and existing capture also goes off.

 

    Is there any way to store the captures periodically in to a predefined files, (ex). i want wireshark to store the captures for every hour in a file.

    Is that possible ? 

 

Regards,

Raj

 

 

<div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span class="852203919-01052008">Thanks !</span></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span class="852203919-01052008">That is a great help.</span></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span class="852203919-01052008">Was looking at all other settings... </span></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left">
<span class="852203919-01052008"></span>&nbsp;</div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span class="852203919-01052008">Raj</span></div>
<br><div class="OutlookMessageHeader" lang="en-us" dir="ltr" align="left">
From: wireshark-users-bounces@... 
[mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Barry 
Constantine<br>Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 3:33 PM<br>To: 
Community support list for Wireshark<br>Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Is 
it possible to back-up packet capturesindefined time 
interval...<br><br>
</div>
<div></div>
<div class="Section1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Go to Capture -&gt; 
Options -&gt; Use Multiple Files.<p></p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span><p>&nbsp;</p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>There are lot&rsquo;s of 
settings for the rolling buffer you are seeking.<p></p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span><p>&nbsp;</p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>-Barry<p></p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span><p>&nbsp;</p></span></p>
<div>
<div class="MsoNormal" align="center"><span>
</span></div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>From:</span><span> 
wireshark-users-bounces@... 
[mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@...] <span>On Behalf Of </span>E 
Rajasekharan-A20741<br><span>Sent:</span> 
Thursday, May 01, 2008 3:28 PM<br><span>To:</span> 
Wireshark-users@...<br><span>Subject:</span> [Wireshark-users] Is it possible 
to back-up packet captures indefined time 
interval...</span><p></p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span><p>&nbsp;</p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Hi,</span><p></p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>&nbsp;<p></p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span><span>I am capturing packets 
during Bulk Call scenario.</span><p></p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span><span>Once the capture file 
reaches a certain size limit, the wireshark displays out of memory error and 
existing capture also goes off.</span><p></p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>&nbsp;<p></p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Is there any way 
to store the captures periodically&nbsp;in to a predefined files, (ex). i want 
wireshark to store the captures for every hour in a 
file.</span><p></p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Is that 
possible ?&nbsp;</span><p></p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>&nbsp;<p></p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Regards,</span><p></p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Raj</span><p></p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>&nbsp;<p></p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>&nbsp;<p></p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>

Gmane