Re: Problems encountered on Windows building from a "source tarball"

Guy Harris wrote:
> Gerald Combs wrote:
> 
>> I'm in the process of moving the contents of airpdcap to epan/crypt.
>> Once that's done I'll add it to the distribution.
> 
> Some warnings from my build on OS X 10.4:

> 	airpdcap.c:1045: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is 
> always false

Fixed.

> 	In file included from airpdcap_wep.c:5:
> 	airpdcap_int.h:62: warning: malformed '#pragma pack' - ignored
> 	airpdcap_int.h:109: warning: malformed '#pragma pack' - ignored
> 
> Do those structures need "#pragma pack"?  If so, could the code be 
> changed not to require that?  Not all C compilers support "#pragma 
> pack", as far as I know, and even those that do apparently don't support 
> it in the same way, for example:

I doesn't look like it's required, as per your later messages.  I've
surrounded the "#pragma pack" sections with "#ifdef"s for the time being.

> 	1) Should all the crypt-XXX.[ch] files in the epan directory be moved 
> to the epan/crypt directory?

Yes.

Re: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 1287] Problem with capturing on an Accton EN1207D ethernet card

Ulf Lamping wrote:
> Stephen Fisher wrote:
>> Should we modify the installer so it won't install on Win98 (or will at 
>> least warn people that it's unsupported)?
>>   
> Since SVN 19776, the installer denies installation on Win95/98/ME - and 
> notes that Ethereal 0.99.0 was the last known version to work with 98.
> 
> I had the same idea about 8 weeks ago 
> 
> Maybe it's time for a new release - so at least this one get's out of 
> the door ...

There are a couple of vulnerabilities that have been found and fixed
since the past release as well.  I'll start making preparations for
another prerelease/release cycle.  Does anyone have time to work on the
major roadmap items (version checking, updating, or online help)?  I can
probably look at version checking.
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev <at> wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

Increasing buildbot trigger delay

Hi Gerald,

I've noticed a trend in which commits are grouped together within a short
timespan, eg. people committing a change in multiple steps. Currently the
buildbot takes a one minute delay before starting a build. This is usually
too short resulting in a two consecutive builds. Maybe it's a good idea to
extend the delay to 5 minutes, adding maybe a percent to the build time,
but cutting down on concatenated builds.

Thanx,
Jaap

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev <at> wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

Re: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 1287] Problem with capturing on an Accton EN1207D ethernet card

Hi,

The sourceforge entry should be modified as well, currently stating Win32
support across all versions.

Thanx,
Jaap

On Sun, 31 Dec 2006, Ulf Lamping wrote:

> Stephen Fisher wrote:
> > Should we modify the installer so it won't install on Win98 (or will at
> > least warn people that it's unsupported)?
> >
> Since SVN 19776, the installer denies installation on Win95/98/ME - and
> notes that Ethereal 0.99.0 was the last known version to work with 98.
>
> I had the same idea about 8 weeks ago 
>
> Maybe it's time for a new release - so at least this one get's out of
> the door ...
>
> Regards, ULFL
>

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev <at> wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

Re: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 1287] Problem with capturing on an Accton EN1207D ethernet card

Gerald Combs wrote:
> There are a couple of vulnerabilities that have been found and fixed
> since the past release as well.  I'll start making preparations for
> another prerelease/release cycle.  Does anyone have time to work on the
> major roadmap items (version checking, updating, or online help)?  I can
> probably look at version checking.
>   
... back from holidays and still a lot of things to do ...

I'm currently in the process of installing the MSVC 2005 Express Edition 
(the Platform SDK provides me some trouble). Once the MSVC 2005 build 
process is running, I will concentrate on the major road map items again.

The online help should be nearly ready - at least for Win32. I've added 
a Help button to most dialogs that made sense to me and the links to the 
guide are also ready. To enable it, uncomment the ENABLE_WSUG=USE (line 
356) and rebuild all. There's one thing left over: The buildbot is doing 
the "built docs" as the last step. Obviously, the docs must be generated 
at least before the "created package" step (maybe even before the 
compiling step). Gerald, could you please change this sequence in the 
Win32 buildbot? Then we can simply enable the setting in config.nmake. 
BTW: this requires everyone to set up the documentation build 
environment - or disable it in the config.nmake file.

The version checking and updating is a single item in my eyes. I've done 
some experiments with downloading a file from the internet (derived from 
the Win32 cygwin setup program) - downloading is already working good 
(maybe a progress bar should be added). I've also added some basic 
updating stuff - some data structures and some code, but this is far 
from complete. I'll check in this stuff (after some cleanup) so you can 

File ! Quit with unsaved data: Popup window has text selected

When doing File ! Quit (with unsaved data) using a recent SVN (GTK2) on 
Windows the 'Save capture file before program quit' pop-up Window has the two 
text lines selected (reverse-video).   Looks kinda weird.

Clicking on the text unselects the text.

Bill

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev <at> wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

wlan.fsc==correct/incorrect?

Is there a way to write a display filter based on wlan.fsc (Frame
check sequence) is correct/incorrect?
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev <at> wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

TLS decryption from master secret

Hi

There was somewhere in the mail list request to decrypt SSL/TLS from
knowledge of master secret but I can not find it now.
A would like only to update it that I am working on it now.

Tomas
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev <at> wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

Creating a Win32 installer with new plugin

Hi guys,

I have a slight problem. I've finished the work on my dissector and now
I want to be able to package it up into a win32 installer using nsis.
Only problem I'm having is when I go thru the packaging step, I just get
the original wireshark install, i.e. my dissector isn't in there!

What exactly do I need to do to get my dissector in there, I've added it
to the list of plugins in the packaging/nsis makefile, but no joy.

Cheers

This email and any files attached are intended for the addressee and may contain information of a
confidential nature. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that this email was sent to you in
error and you should not disclose, distribute, print, copy or make other use of this email or its
attachments. Such actions, in fact, may be unlawful. In compliance with the various Regulations and
Acts, General Dynamics UK Limited reserves the right to monitor (and examine for viruses) all emails and
email attachments, both inbound and outbound. Email communications and their attachments may not be
secure or error- or virus-free and the company does not accept liability or responsibility for such
matters or the consequences thereof. Registered Office: 100 New Bridge Street, London EC4V 6JA.
Registered in England and Wales No: 1911653.

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev <at> wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

Re: Creating a Win32 installer with new plugin

Hi,

Did you add it to both Makefile.nmake and wireshark.nsi?

Thanx,
Jaap

On Tue, 2 Jan 2007 Andrew.Martin <at> generaldynamics.uk.com wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> I have a slight problem. I've finished the work on my dissector and now
> I want to be able to package it up into a win32 installer using nsis.
> Only problem I'm having is when I go thru the packaging step, I just get
> the original wireshark install, i.e. my dissector isn't in there!
>
> What exactly do I need to do to get my dissector in there, I've added it
> to the list of plugins in the packaging/nsis makefile, but no joy.
>
> Cheers
>

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev <at> wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev