Re: inconsistencies in smokeping_config documentation ***Targets*** section
<mgd <at> interbaun.com>
2011-12-01 23:29:30 GMT
Thank you, Greg
Yes, I ended up defining all my parent alerts in one line in the Targets file:
Then, for each target, I defined alerts uniquely, such as:
menu = SquarePE
title = SquarePE
host = 22.214.171.124
alerts = bigloss
menu = CubeCE
title = CubeCE
host = 126.96.36.199
alerts = rttdetectcube
But, as you suggest, I could also have created a dummy or do nothing
alert and assigned that to Targets for which I do not need email alerts.
Quoting Gregory Sloop <gregs <at> sloop.net>:
> See comments following...
> mic> At the beginning of the ***Targets***, just after the statement
> mic> beginning with "The following variables can be set in this section:",
> mic> the "alerts" are described as:
> mic> A comma separated list of alerts to check for this target. The alerts
> mic> have to be setup in the Alerts section. Alerts are inherited by child
> mic> nodes. Use an empty alerts definition to remove inherited alerts from
> mic> the current target and its children.
> mic> Then in the Level 1 section that follows a few sentences later, it is
> mic> written for alerts that:
> mic> Comma separated list of alert names
> mic> This variable inherits its value from the parent section if
> mic> nothing is specified here.
> mic> So, the first statement says that "use an empty alert definition to
> mic> remove inherited alerts from the current target and its children".
> mic> Then in the section for configured targets it says: "This variable
> mic> inherits its value from the parent section if nothing is specified
> mic> here". These two statements clash, only one can be true. So, what is
> mic> the true statement?
> [Provided I understand your question...]
> I think what it's saying is:
> If you leave a child section without any *explicitly* defined alerts, it
> will get the alerts from its parent.
> If you want to cancel/remove an alert for a child section, then define an
> "empty" alert with the same name in the child and you don't get that
> alert from the parent. If there are other alerts, you'll get those.
> [And I'm pretty sure it works that way. I don't have any currently
> configured child sections using this, but did one a while back and it
> functioned as specified here - at least IIRC it did. I was using
> 2.4.something - but I haven't heard of any different behavior in
> smokeping-users mailing list
> smokeping-users <at> lists.oetiker.ch
smokeping-users mailing list
smokeping-users <at> lists.oetiker.ch