headers
Jared Wiltshire | 1 Jul 2005 02:34
Picon

samba executable has not been built with plugin support

I recently compiled the latest stable version of Samba on a Linus 2.4xsystem...

When I run smbclient and some of the other binarys (cant remember which 
ones) they give a message - "This samba executable has not been built with 
plugin support, not probing". They seem to work though -

===================

[root <at> smoothwall root]# smbclient
This samba executable has not been built with plugin support, not probing
This samba executable has not been built with plugin support, not probing
This samba executable has not been built with plugin support, not probing
This samba executable has not been built with plugin support, not probing
This samba executable has not been built with plugin support, not probing
This samba executable has not been built with plugin support, not probing
This samba executable has not been built with plugin support, not probing
This samba executable has not been built with plugin support, not probing
This samba executable has not been built with plugin support, not probing
This samba executable has not been built with plugin support, not probing
This samba executable has not been built with plugin support, not probing
This samba executable has not been built with plugin support, not probing
This samba executable has not been built with plugin support, not probing
This samba executable has not been built with plugin support, not probing
This samba executable has not been built with plugin support, not probing
This samba executable has not been built with plugin support, not probing
This samba executable has not been built with plugin support, not probing
This samba executable has not been built with plugin support, not probing
This samba executable has not been built with plugin support, not probing
This samba executable has not been built with plugin support, not probing
Usage: [-?|--help] [--usage] [-R|--name-resolve NAME-RESOLVE-ORDER]
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Michael Brown | 1 Jul 2005 03:48

Re: McAfee 8 incompatible with Samba


Try excluding the samba shares from McAfee, and run clam antivirus with
the samba-vscan vfs module local to the samba boxen.  Clam AV is up to
par with McAfee as far as novel vx/malware sigs.

You can find that here:
http://www.clamav.net
http://www.openantivirus.org/projects.php

Hope this helps.

Dragan Krnic wrote:
> I've parsed a whole year's worth of postings in this group
> and didn't find any previous reference to the problem.
> 
> Since I've updated McAfee to version 8 many applications
> which open file chooser dialogs report "Access denied"
> when trying to open a Samba share, including the users's
> own home directory.
> 
> At installation one can choose to exclude some apps from
> the shield, e.g. Lotus Notes, but if I have to exclude
> MS Internet Explorer, which is the app for many web apps,
> then the very purpose of a virus shield is defeated.
> 
> Is there some better way to configure such problems out?
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Beast | 1 Jul 2005 05:18

Re: Samba interface for administrative tools

Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Beast wrote:
> 
> 
>>>The XMLrpc piece would require both client and server piece.
>>
>>That just my bare example to use 'standard' protocol instead 
>>of proprietary protocol.
> 
> 
> Understood.  But if we document and implement the protocol
> it becomes more open.  There are no IP issues that prevent
> us from using MS-RPC.
> 

You are correct. User/developer should not care about how they 
communicate as long as there is standard API to do something. libmsrpc 
is the answer.
Pardon my ignorance :-(

-- 

--beast

--

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Gerald (Jerry) Carter | 1 Jul 2005 05:24
Picon
Favicon

Re: Samba interface for administrative tools


Beast wrote:

> You are correct. User/developer should not care about how they
> communicate as long as there is standard API to do something. 
> libmsrpc is the answer.  Pardon my ignorance :-(

Well I'm not trying to beat you into submission :-)
Just looking for all the possible angles on various
technical solutions.  Thanks for the feedback.

cheers, jerry
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Beast | 1 Jul 2005 06:24

Re: does anyone use the enumports command for anything useful ?

Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> I'm just wondering if we should remove this enum ports command
> altogether.  Ports are a consemtic concept in Samba for the
> most port since the printer is really tied to the queue name.
> But before I think about this anymore is there anyone actually
> using enumports for something other than
> 
> 	#!/bi/sh
> 
> 	echo "LPT1:"
> 	echo "LPT2:"
> 	echo "LPT3:"

No, never use it.
Also, is there any reason why not drop some paramater in smb.conf which 
has a synonym? I found arround 15 synonyms.

Next is to reduce the number of parameter, it still scared me :-)

-- 

--beast

--

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Beast | 1 Jul 2005 06:29

Find out machine type


Given everything stored on ldap and tdb file, is there any way to obtain 
machine type (eg. Windows NT workstation, Server, PDC, BDC) without 
looking into broadcast network?

-- 

--beast

--

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Michael Gasch | 1 Jul 2005 08:23
Picon

Re: Current domain conflicts with remote domain

my suggestion:

delete all tdb files
rejoin the domain as BDC (with correct workgroup entry)
try again

greez

Marcelin Patrick NDJILA NDJILA wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> 
> Im running Openldap 2.2.15 and samba 3.0.5 on a RedHat 9.0 machine.
> 
> (My NT Domain name is : DOMIAN1, Redhat Server name is REDHATPC)
> 
> I have domain master = no on the Redhat Linux machine. 
> 
> Objective is to migrate the users from NT 4 to samba.
> 
> 
> 
> When I run the command,  
> 
> Net rpc vampire –S NT_SERVER_NAME –Uadministrator%password
> 
> 
> 
> I get the error, 
>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Michael Gasch | 1 Jul 2005 08:25
Picon

Re: file permission / ACL problems with Office files

hi,

although we don't have the problem with windows workstations please have 
a look at thread

[Samba] Mac OSX breaking POSIX rights with SMB/CIFS

btw: i have the same setup like you have

greez

-- 
Michael Gasch
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
Department of Human Evolution
Deutscher Platz 6
D-04103 Leipzig
Germany

Phone: 49 (0)341 - 3550 137
--

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Michael Gasch | 1 Jul 2005 08:27
Picon

Re: winbind creating duplicate users

what are your relevant smb.conf entries?

greez

Ian Clancy wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> I'm having a problem with winbind creating 2 entries for some of my 
> users that really wrecking my head ;-/ .
> My situation is as follows :
> I have a typical Samba (3.0.14a)/LDAP setup. I have a trusted domain 
> (another Samba/LDAP setup) and use winbind to map the users from the 
> foreign domain, with the UID to SID mappings stored in LDAP . This works 
> very well.
> The relevant part of my nsswitch.conf file is as follows :
> 
> passwd:     files ldap winbind
> shadow:     files ldap winbind
> group:      files ldap winbind
> 
> When i 'getent passwd' on a domain member server the following are listed:
> 1.) local user accounts
> 2.) accounts resolved via LDAP (UID 5'000+)
> 3.) winbind resolved accounts from the foreign domain (i.e. 
> FDOMAIN+user) UID = 10'000 +
> 
> This was all working fine for a while. However, recently i noticed that 
> winbind began storing additional UID to SID mappings for members of the 
> local domain in LDAP.
> So when i ran e.g. 'getent passwd | grep brightstop'  i would get 2 
> entries for the 1 user account, 1 resolved from LDAP, the other from
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Sascha | 1 Jul 2005 08:33
Picon
Favicon

Delay after some time...

Hi list!

We have a problem with our samba server (version
3.0.14a-1 running on SuSE Enterprise OS). After some
time of inactivity (about 15 min) the clients get some
delay when they reconnect to a share. When the want to
open a document it takes about 5-10 secs until it
opens. After first reconnect everything work fine.

Which parameter could i change to fix this problem?
I already tried deadtime, keepalive, SO_KEEPALIVE and
serval other. 

Server hardware: Intel Xeon 2,8 GHz, 2,5 GB RAM, 2
giga nics and SAN hdd.

server:~ # hdparm -Tt /dev/sdb

/dev/sdb:
 Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in  0.20 seconds
=640.00 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  0.78 seconds =
82.05 MB/sec

Here is my config.

[global]
        workgroup = test
        netbios name = server
#       server string = server
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane