Re: Re: Question [#2157030]

Dear XO Customer:

Thank you submitting your request to XO Communications.  Please note that the address you have entered is no
longer valid.  You can reach XO Customer Care by submitting your request at
http://www.xo.com/contact/care/  or by calling our customer service department at 1-888-575-6398 and
selecting the appropriate options.

We thank you for your business and look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,
Customer Care
XO Communications

----- <samba samba.org> Wrote -----
I have corrected your document.

--

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: Trust between Samba 3 and Win2000 Server

Damir Dezeljin schrieb:
> Hi.
> 
> Our local network is based on Linux server + Samba 3 + OpenLDAP for
> authentication and other services. Win98 SE, Win2k and WinXP
> are accessing the Samba server.
> 
> Our head quarter requested that we establish an VPN tunnel to their
> network. They want to use file sharing between connected LANs.
> Unfortunately they are running Win2000 Standard Server with AD based
> domain controller (I don't know if in native or compatible mode).
> 
> 
> Is there a way to make a two way trust between networks with my
> configuration? Additionally I would like to prevent their Administrators
> (and similar users) to have Administrative / Operator access on my
> network. Is this possible? If not ... is there any concern of allowing
> remote Administrator to access ONLY the Samba server (can the remote
> Administrator execute some RPC commands on my Samba server)?
> 
> Any suggestion (please don't tell me to migrate to Windows server ;) )?
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Dezo
> 
> 
> 
Hi Damir,
is see no special reason why a trust shouldnt work,

Re: Re: Windows User Admin Tool error

Jim C. schrieb:
>> I've got a Fedora Core 2 box running Samba smbd version 3.0.7-2.FC2.
>> I've set it up as a Domain master for a new domain.
>> I setup a Win2K Server box and had it join the domain.
>> I made an "administrator" user,
>> I mapped the groups via:
>> net groupmap modify ntgroup="Domain Admins" unixgroup=admins
>> net groupmap modify ntgroup="Domain Users" unixgroup=users
>> I made the "administrator" the admin user in the smb.conf:
>> admin users = administrator
>> I can login to the domain, using the administrator, create files
>> in the admin's home dir, etc.
>> Now I want to use svrtools (actually, I want my Windows admin to
>> be able to use them). I got the svrtools.exe as per the Samba
>> docs, installed them on the Win2K box, and executed the User Admin Tool.
>> It shows the list of users that the samba box has defined.
>> I double click oun any user, and get this message:
>> "The specified procedure could not be found."
> 
> 
> I've also been trying to get these tools to work for as long as I've 
> been messing with Samba (5-6 years now?) and no dice.   What are the 
> requirements for this to function?  I always get "A device attached to 
> the system is not functioning" when I try to use user manager for domains.
> 
> 
> Jim C.
Hi srvmgr and usmgr work , but i do not recommand to use srvmgr...but it 
works
depending to your pass auth ( ldap...smppasswd ) you have to set

Re: Samba Add Machine Script

Over here I'm using:

add machine script = /usr/sbin/useradd -c Machine -d /dev/null  \
-g machines -s /bin/false %u

It works for me, though currently still using local UNIX & Samba databases.  
Don't know why you have to use %u seeing as %m is the NetBIOS machine name 
but it works.

Adrian Hicks

On 30 October 2004 am 01:07, Corral, Randy wrote:
> All,
>
> Currently we are running Samba 3.0.7 on Solaris 8 and we are
> experiencing a problem that the user system are not being added
> automatically with the add machine script:
>
> /usr/sbin/useradd -g machines -d /dev/null -s /bin/false %m
>
> If we run it manually it works.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Randy Corral
> Information Systems
> Brooks Automation
> Phoenix, Arizona

Re: samba.schema question

On Sat, 2004-10-30 at 07:24, Misty Stanley-Jones wrote:
> I see in samba.schema that it is possible to have multiple SambaDomainName 
> entries for a dn.  However I don't see how this does any good because you 
> must only have one sambaSID entry per user.  Is there any way to associate 
> more than one sambaSID with a dn, so that a user would be authorized to log 
> into more than one domain without a trust relationship?  If it's not possible 
> now, is it in the works for the future?

No, and not in the future.  My feeling is that we have sufficient
complexity, before we go beyond what MS supports in this kind of thing. 
There be dragons!

In all seriousness, what is wrong with a trusted domain setup?  Or move
all your machines into a single domain, which is the pattern in the post
Win2k Microsoft world.

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                 abartlet <at> samba.org
Authentication Developer, Samba Team            http://samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College   abartlet <at> hawkerc.net

--

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

samba v3.0.7 and Suse firewall

Hello,
   I am setting up a suse linux v9.1 host to provide file and print 
services to a mix of os/2 and windows clients. In this case windows is not 
a problem. I am running into difficulty getting the os/2 clients to see 
the resources on the linux server.
   The main problem is the firewall. Without the firewall os/2 hosts have 
no problem with accessing resources. With the firewall the hosts cannot 
access the server.
   There seems to be some problem related to ARP. The os/2 hosts broadcast 
a request to a nameserver (x.x.x.255) looking for the resource. Without 
the firewall there is an exchange of arp data; with the firewall, the 
packets are blocked.
   What port is the firewall blocking? In the Suse firewall config file 
there is:
FW_SERVICES_EXT_TCP="139 445 760 http https imap imaps nfs smtp ssh"
FW_SERVICES_EXT_UDP="137 138 760 788:799 nfs 111"
   Yet when I attempt to access the linux server, I find this in the 
messages log:

Oct 31 16:52:34 sma-server2 kernel: SFW2-DROP-BCASTe IN=eth1 OUT= 
MAC=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:00:03:ff:29:24:34:08:00 SRC=192.168.69.201 
DST=192.168.69.255 LEN=78 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=140 PROTO=UDP 
SPT=137 DPT=137 LEN=58

   00:03:ff:29:24:34/192.168.69.201 is the MAC/IP of the host requesting 
info. The firewall dropped the broadcast packet even though the firewall 
is configured to allow it. Am I reading the logs correctly?

--

-- 
jmm dash list (at) sohnen-moe (dot) com

Re: samba 3.0.7 and os/2

greg wrote:

 >  >Does a firewall normally mess with arp?
 >
 > In a typical setup,  yes.  Layer 3 devices usually will not forward 
arps (or any broadcast traffic for that matter)  received on an interface 
out the others.   You would have to use proxy arping on the firewall or 
similar if you required this to happen.   The better way to go about it I 
suspect is to use a WINS service.
 >
   May be. What is proxy arp'ing?
   But that does not really answer my question which, upon reflection, may 
not have been clear.
   What port is the firewall blocking? In the Suse firewall config file 
there is:
FW_SERVICES_EXT_TCP="139 445 760 http https imap imaps nfs smtp ssh"
FW_SERVICES_EXT_UDP="137 138 760 788:799 nfs 111"

   Yet when I attempt to access the linux server, I find this in the 
messages log:
Oct 31 16:52:34 sma-server2 kernel: SFW2-DROP-BCASTe IN=eth1 OUT= 
MAC=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:00:03:ff:29:24:34:08:00 SRC=192.168.69.201 
DST=192.168.69.255 LEN=78 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=140 PROTO=UDP 
SPT=137 DPT=137 LEN=58

   00:03:ff:29:24:34/192.168.69.201 is the MAC/IP of the host requesting 
info. The firewall dropped the broadcast packet even though the firewall 
is configured to allow it. Am I reading the logs correctly?

--

-- 

$B!|Bg8x3+!*;d$N%;%_%L!<%I$b$"$k$g!z(B

ƒZƒ‹ƒtƒtƒHƒg‚ðƒAƒbƒv‚µ‚¿‚á‚¢‚Ü‚µ‚½š
ƒMƒŠƒMƒŠ‚Ì‚¿‚å‚Á‚Æ‚g‚ȉ摜‚à‚ ‚é‚Ì‚Å
‚º‚ÐŒ©‚É—ˆ‚Ä‚­‚¾‚³‚¢‚ˁô
http://www.eyc.jp/~apple/?id=c2FtYmFAc2FtYmEub3Jn

--

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

SuSE9.1 Hylafax 4.1.8-21

Dear all,

    I have recently installed a machine with the above mentioned
configuration. The machine will be a fax-server. It will only receive
(at the moment) faxes and store them on its hard-drive.

    the problem is that all the faxes that I receive are either
black pages or they are white pages with a black thick stripe
horizontaly.

    Can someone please give me a hand with this??

Tons of thanks!
Chris
--

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Samba help

Hi,
I have a network in my room with three computers right now, two connected to a Lynksys router, that router is
connected to a wider network, then to the internet.
The three computers i have in my room are:
laptop running Windows Server 2003, connected to a wireless router
desktop running Windows Server 2003, connected to the router in my room
desktop running Mandrake 9.2 connected to the router in my room
i'm trying to get my mandrake 9.2 to run a samba server that will allow my two windows 2003 computers to access
shares on it.  i do not have a domain controller, just a small home network with a few routers.  i am having alot
of trouble getting the samba server to work correctly.  First, when i use LinNeighborhood, i can see all my
other windows computers on my network.  When i open Network Places on my windows 2003 computers, i cannot
see my mandrake machine shares.  however, if i go to Entire Network/Microsoft Windows Network i see my
workgroup name (MSHOME) but i also see an additional workgroup named MDKGROUP. When i open MDKGROUP it
says "unable to open mdkgroup, you might not have permission blah blah" but earlier, i COULD open it, and
when i did i saw a Samba Server vsomething.something(LOCALHOST).  and when i opened that, i say the folder
on the mandrake box that i was sharing, b
 ut when i tried to open it, it gave me an error saying i didnt have permission. i'm very confused
 and cant seem to even browse my mandrake shares.  im also confused as to why there is a MDKGROUP workgroup,
when i specified "workgroup = MSHOME" in my smb.conf.  can someone PLEASE help me? thanks in advance
-zak  hellraiserr0 <at> yahoo.com

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
--

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba