1 Sep 2009 05:08
Re: unpack_smb_acl unknown error, + rsync maintainability
Matt McCutchen <matt <at> mattmccutchen.net>
2009-09-01 03:08:18 GMT
2009-09-01 03:08:18 GMT
On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 16:59 -0500, Mike Bombich wrote: > Regardless, rsync shouldn't be converting uuid to uid/gid for Mac OS > X, it's unnecessary. This is really a question of whether Mac users expect users/groups to be preserved by uid/gid or by uuid. Are you saying it makes more sense to preserve by uuid? What would --numeric-ids do? More broadly, I don't think it's a scalable approach to continue adding ad-hoc workarounds to rsync for the quirks of various filesystems. It would be better to have a filesystem-specific component that exposes all the metadata it knows about as named attributes (gvfs-info does something like this) and let the core file-copy tool focus on efficiently transferring and flexibly manipulating that representation. But such extensible design seems to be uncharacteristic of the current rsync codebase. Maybe it would be better to pursue this idea in a new tool along the lines of rZync and superlifter. -- Matt -- -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
RSS Feed