headers
Alfie | 3 Aug 2004 21:46

Problem with e-mail forwarding?

I'm wondering if anyone else is having trouble receiving
e-mail from their member account, ie- <user> <at> members.opennic.glue
or <user> <at> members.opennic.unrated.net.

--

-- 
Violence isn't cool now that everyone is doing it.
######################################################################
This is the discussion list for the Open Network Information
Center.  You can unsubscribe by sending an email containing the words
"unsubscribe discuss" in the body of the message to
"majordomo <at> opennic.glue" or "majordomo <at> opennic.unrated.net".
######################################################################
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Dennis Carr | 3 Aug 2004 23:40

A quick and dirty way of changing IP addresses?

I'm about to be changing IP addresses as Speakeasy issues a dedicated line 
to my home.  In this event, everything that exists for one of currently 
two IP addresses will naturally have to be reset to the new IPs.

Does anyone have a quick and easy way of doing this?  I suppose I could 
also do sed, but would rather not....

-Dennis
.fur

######################################################################
This is the discussion list for the Open Network Information
Center.  You can unsubscribe by sending an email containing the words
"unsubscribe discuss" in the body of the message to
"majordomo <at> opennic.glue" or "majordomo <at> opennic.unrated.net".
######################################################################
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Jeff Taylor | 6 Aug 2004 21:10
Favicon

Re: A quick and dirty way of changing IP addresses?

I generally put the name of the server in my configs, rather than the 
actual IP address.  Then the only change needed is to update your hosts 
file.  Doesn't help you much for changing files the first time, but 
simplifies future changes.

Dennis Carr wrote:

> I'm about to be changing IP addresses as Speakeasy issues a dedicated line 
> to my home.  In this event, everything that exists for one of currently 
> two IP addresses will naturally have to be reset to the new IPs.
> 
> Does anyone have a quick and easy way of doing this?  I suppose I could 
> also do sed, but would rather not....
> 
> -Dennis
> .fur
> 
> ######################################################################
> This is the discussion list for the Open Network Information
> Center.  You can unsubscribe by sending an email containing the words
> "unsubscribe discuss" in the body of the message to
> "majordomo <at> opennic.glue" or "majordomo <at> opennic.unrated.net".
> ######################################################################
######################################################################
This is the discussion list for the Open Network Information
Center.  You can unsubscribe by sending an email containing the words
"unsubscribe discuss" in the body of the message to
"majordomo <at> opennic.glue" or "majordomo <at> opennic.unrated.net".
######################################################################
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Dennis Carr | 9 Aug 2004 02:09

.oss and .indy

Noticed that the status page on opennic.geek is showing these root servers 
offline.  Any need for somebody to fill in the blanks?

-Dennis 
.fur

######################################################################
This is the discussion list for the Open Network Information
Center.  You can unsubscribe by sending an email containing the words
"unsubscribe discuss" in the body of the message to
"majordomo <at> opennic.glue" or "majordomo <at> opennic.unrated.net".
######################################################################
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Pierre Abbat | 15 Aug 2004 01:35

cannot resolve .gov

I'm running a name server which is slaved from some of the Tier 1 OpenNIC 
nameservers. I cannot resolve anything in .gov. I went to the site and found 
a Tier 2 nameserver (the one I was using was stale) and put it into 
resolv.conf. It can resolve .gov. Here are the results I get from .gov 
queries:

nameserver 192.168.25.1
nameserver 68.15.165.12
search ixazon.lan
phma <at> blackcat:~/lojban$ host www.cdc.gov 192.168.25.1
Nameserver littlecat not responding
www.cdc.gov A record not found at littlecat, try again
phma <at> blackcat:~/lojban$ host www.cdc.gov 192.168.25.1
www.cdc.gov A record not found at littlecat, server failure
phma <at> blackcat:~/lojban$ host www.cdc.gov 68.15.165.12
www.cdc.gov             CNAME   web987.cdc.gov.edgesuite.net
web987.cdc.gov.edgesuite.net    CNAME   a989.gc.akamai.net
a989.gc.akamai.net      A       199.77.203.17
a989.gc.akamai.net      A       199.77.203.22
phma <at> blackcat:~/lojban$ host -t ns gov. 192.168.25.1
gov                     NS      g3.nstld.com
gov                     NS      l3.nstld.com
gov                     NS      m3.nstld.com
gov                     NS      a3.nstld.com
gov                     NS      b3.nstld.com
gov                     NS      c3.nstld.com
gov                     NS      d3.nstld.com
gov                     NS      e3.nstld.com
gov                     NS      f3.nstld.com
phma <at> blackcat:~/lojban$ host -t ns gov. 68.15.165.12
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 11 comments |
headers
Jon Radel | 15 Aug 2004 04:46

Re: cannot resolve .gov


Pierre Abbat wrote:

> I'm running a name server which is slaved from some of the Tier 1 OpenNIC 
> nameservers. I cannot resolve anything in .gov. I went to the site and found 
> a Tier 2 nameserver (the one I was using was stale) and put it into 
> resolv.conf. It can resolve .gov. Here are the results I get from .gov 
> queries:

Make sure the Tier 1 OpenNIC nameservers you're slaving off of actually 
are Tier 1 OpenNIC nameservers:

1)  Check the serial number of the root zone your server is using; it 
should be a very recent date.

2)  Check the list of servers you slave off of against the list on the 
web site.

If you're suffering from the same problem I went through, you'll find 
you're slaving off of a server which is no longer serving current 
OpenNIC data, but which is happy to lie about it and give you an old 
zone file which has the old root servers for .gov.  Which, so far as I 
can tell, were taken out of service on 10 Jul 2004.

--Jon Radel
jon <at> radel.com
######################################################################
This is the discussion list for the Open Network Information
Center.  You can unsubscribe by sending an email containing the words
"unsubscribe discuss" in the body of the message to
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 10 comments |
headers
vido | 15 Aug 2004 07:52

Experimental migration

Hello everybody,

I hereby inform you that I'm going to attempt the migration of one of my
Opennic DNS servers from bind to djbdns, today.

By the way, if you have previous experience of such a migration, 
please share it.

Regards,

--

-- 
Augustin Vidovic                        http://augustin.vidovic.org
"Nous sommes tous quelque chose de naissance, musicien ou assassin,
 mais il faut apprendre le maniement de la harpe ou du couteau."
######################################################################
This is the discussion list for the Open Network Information
Center.  You can unsubscribe by sending an email containing the words
"unsubscribe discuss" in the body of the message to
"majordomo <at> opennic.glue" or "majordomo <at> opennic.unrated.net".
######################################################################
Permalink | Reply | 5 comments |
headers
Aaron J. Angel | 15 Aug 2004 16:05

RE: Experimental migration

Don't let me stop you, but I would personally advise against it.  Read some
of his publishing on "the IPv6 mess" where he states there's no transition
plan--completely false, or A6 and DNAME records--simply because he doesn't
understand proper use of A6 records, he removes support for both.  The
examples he uses are obviously flawed, but he insists it would become
something of the norm.  Re: A6, the same is possible with CNAME records, but
do you see massive failures yet?  Besides, who cares if AOL's hostnames are
unresolveable?  And while he gives a fairly good analogy between MX and
IPv6, he takes almost every opportunity he gets to bash the IPv6 folks.  I'm
just not a big fan of djb.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: discuss-owner <at> opennic.unrated.net 
> [mailto:discuss-owner <at> opennic.unrated.net] On Behalf Of vido <at> ldh.org
> Sent: Sunday 15 August 2004 0:52
> To: discuss <at> opennic.unrated.net
> Subject: OpenNIC Discuss: Experimental migration
> 
> Hello everybody,
> 
> I hereby inform you that I'm going to attempt the migration 
> of one of my Opennic DNS servers from bind to djbdns, today.
> 
> By the way, if you have previous experience of such a 
> migration, please share it.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> -- 
> Augustin Vidovic                        http://augustin.vidovic.org
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |
headers
Brian | 15 Aug 2004 17:40

Re: Experimental migration

Aaron--

While djb does appear to be a pompous ass who is very unyielding on
any issue stance but his own, one shouldn't shortchange
his programming skills nor the underlying simplicity of design and
function of his programs.  There are several patches available for
djbdns which implement IPv6 functionality and work around the issues
you bring up.    

  --Brian

On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 09:05:40AM -0500, Aaron J. Angel wrote:
> Don't let me stop you, but I would personally advise against it.  Read some
> of his publishing on "the IPv6 mess" where he states there's no transition
> plan--completely false, or A6 and DNAME records--simply because he doesn't
> understand proper use of A6 records, he removes support for both.  The
> examples he uses are obviously flawed, but he insists it would become
> something of the norm.  Re: A6, the same is possible with CNAME records, but
> do you see massive failures yet?  Besides, who cares if AOL's hostnames are
> unresolveable?  And while he gives a fairly good analogy between MX and
> IPv6, he takes almost every opportunity he gets to bash the IPv6 folks.  I'm
> just not a big fan of djb.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: discuss-owner <at> opennic.unrated.net 
> > [mailto:discuss-owner <at> opennic.unrated.net] On Behalf Of vido <at> ldh.org
> > Sent: Sunday 15 August 2004 0:52
> > To: discuss <at> opennic.unrated.net
> > Subject: OpenNIC Discuss: Experimental migration
> >
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
Aaron J. Angel | 15 Aug 2004 17:57

RE: Experimental migration

Well gee, I was trying to be polite.  (-: 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: discuss-owner <at> opennic.unrated.net 
> [mailto:discuss-owner <at> opennic.unrated.net] On Behalf Of Brian
> Sent: Sunday 15 August 2004 10:41
> To: discuss <at> opennic.unrated.net
> Subject: Re: OpenNIC Discuss: Experimental migration
> 
> Aaron--
> 
> While djb does appear to be a pompous ass who is very 
> unyielding on any issue stance but his own, one shouldn't 
> shortchange his programming skills nor the underlying 
> simplicity of design and function of his programs.  There are 
> several patches available for djbdns which implement IPv6 
> functionality and work around the issues
> you bring up.    
> 
>   --Brian
> 
> On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 09:05:40AM -0500, Aaron J. Angel wrote:
> > Don't let me stop you, but I would personally advise 
> against it.  Read 
> > some of his publishing on "the IPv6 mess" where he states 
> there's no 
> > transition plan--completely false, or A6 and DNAME records--simply 
> > because he doesn't understand proper use of A6 records, he removes 
> > support for both.  The examples he uses are obviously 
> flawed, but he
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |

Gmane