ofa_1_5_kernel 20120101-0200 daily build status

This email was generated automatically, please do not reply

git_url: git://git.openfabrics.org/ofed_1_5/linux-2.6.git
git_branch: ofed_kernel_1_5

Common build parameters:   --with-ipoib-mod --with-sdp-mod --with-user_mad-mod
--with-user_access-mod --with-mthca-mod --with-mlx4-mod --with-mlx4_en-mod --with-core-mod
--with-addr_trans-mod --with-rds-mod --with-cxgb3-mod --with-cxgb4-mod --with-srp-mod
--with-nes-mod 

Passed:
Passed on i686 with 2.6.32-24-generic-pae
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.30
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.31
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.32
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.32-131.0.15.el6
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.33
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.36
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.35
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.34
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.32-71.el6

Failed:
Build failed on x86_64 with
linux-2.6.18-238.el5
Log:
/home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_5_kernel-20120101-0200_linux-2.6.18-238.el5_x86_64_check/net/rds/af_rds.c:
In function
'rds_getsockopt':
/home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_5_kernel-20120101-0200_linux-2.6.18-238.el5_x86_64_check/net/rds/af_rds.c:299:
(Continue reading)

ofa_1_5_kernel 20120102-0200 daily build status

This email was generated automatically, please do not reply

git_url: git://git.openfabrics.org/ofed_1_5/linux-2.6.git
git_branch: ofed_kernel_1_5

Common build parameters:   --with-ipoib-mod --with-sdp-mod --with-user_mad-mod
--with-user_access-mod --with-mthca-mod --with-mlx4-mod --with-mlx4_en-mod --with-core-mod
--with-addr_trans-mod --with-rds-mod --with-cxgb3-mod --with-cxgb4-mod --with-srp-mod
--with-nes-mod 

Passed:
Passed on i686 with 2.6.32-24-generic-pae
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.32
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.31
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.30
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.32-131.0.15.el6
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.33
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.34
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.35
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.36
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.32-71.el6

Failed:
Build failed on x86_64 with
linux-2.6.18-238.el5
Log:
/home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_5_kernel-20120102-0200_linux-2.6.18-238.el5_x86_64_check/net/rds/af_rds.c:
In function
'rds_getsockopt':
/home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_5_kernel-20120102-0200_linux-2.6.18-238.el5_x86_64_check/net/rds/af_rds.c:299:
(Continue reading)

ofa_1_5_kernel 20120103-0200 daily build status

This email was generated automatically, please do not reply

git_url: git://git.openfabrics.org/ofed_1_5/linux-2.6.git
git_branch: ofed_kernel_1_5

Common build parameters:   --with-ipoib-mod --with-sdp-mod --with-user_mad-mod
--with-user_access-mod --with-mthca-mod --with-mlx4-mod --with-mlx4_en-mod --with-core-mod
--with-addr_trans-mod --with-rds-mod --with-cxgb3-mod --with-cxgb4-mod --with-srp-mod
--with-nes-mod 

Passed:
Passed on i686 with 2.6.32-24-generic-pae
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.30
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.31
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.32
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.32-131.0.15.el6
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.33
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.34
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.36
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.35
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.32-71.el6

Failed:
Build failed on x86_64 with
linux-2.6.18-238.el5
Log:
/home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_5_kernel-20120103-0200_linux-2.6.18-238.el5_x86_64_check/net/rds/af_rds.c:
In function
'rds_getsockopt':
/home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_5_kernel-20120103-0200_linux-2.6.18-238.el5_x86_64_check/net/rds/af_rds.c:299:
(Continue reading)

Tziporet Koren | 3 Jan 14:29 2012

Re: EWG/OFED meeting minutes for today (Dec 13, 2011)

Vlad is looking at this
I think we should have a discussion on this in our next EWG meeting

Tziporet

-----Original Message-----
From: ewg-bounces@...
[mailto:ewg-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Steve Wise
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 5:22 PM
To: edward.mascarenhas@...
Cc: ewg@...
Subject: Re: [ewg] EWG/OFED meeting minutes for today (Dec 13, 2011)

On 12/22/2011 02:26 PM, Edward Mascarenhas wrote:
>> There is a suggestion from Eduard from Qlogic to have the backports ad different branches and not as today.
>> He will start a mail thread on his suggestion.
>
> The attached file in pdf format has the proposal. It is also inlined 
> in text below so its easier to comment on. The pdf has 2 diagrams 
> which should make it easier to understand the changes that are proposed.
>
> Comments are welcome.
>
> - Edward

I like this approach.   I would also do the same thing with kernel_addons so that each branch is just a specific backport.

What are there any disadvantages to your proposal?

Did you get a chance to investigate the other backport projects from this thread?  https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/9/327
(Continue reading)

ofa_1_5_kernel 20120104-0200 daily build status

This email was generated automatically, please do not reply

git_url: git://git.openfabrics.org/ofed_1_5/linux-2.6.git
git_branch: ofed_kernel_1_5

Common build parameters:   --with-ipoib-mod --with-sdp-mod --with-user_mad-mod
--with-user_access-mod --with-mthca-mod --with-mlx4-mod --with-mlx4_en-mod --with-core-mod
--with-addr_trans-mod --with-rds-mod --with-cxgb3-mod --with-cxgb4-mod --with-srp-mod
--with-nes-mod 

Passed:
Passed on i686 with 2.6.32-24-generic-pae
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.32
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.30
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.31
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.32-131.0.15.el6
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.33
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.34
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.32-71.el6
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.35
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.36

Failed:
Build failed on x86_64 with
linux-2.6.18-238.el5
Log:
/home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_5_kernel-20120104-0200_linux-2.6.18-238.el5_x86_64_check/net/rds/af_rds.c:
In function
'rds_getsockopt':
/home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_5_kernel-20120104-0200_linux-2.6.18-238.el5_x86_64_check/net/rds/af_rds.c:299:
(Continue reading)

Vladimir Sokolovsky | 4 Jan 16:28 2012
Picon

Re: EWG/OFED meeting minutes for today (Dec 13, 2011)

On 12/29/2011 05:21 PM, Steve Wise wrote:
> On 12/22/2011 02:26 PM, Edward Mascarenhas wrote:
>>> There is a suggestion from Eduard from Qlogic to have the backports ad different branches and not as today.
>>> He will start a mail thread on his suggestion.
>>
>> The attached file in pdf format has the proposal. It is also inlined in
>> text below so its easier to comment on. The pdf has 2 diagrams which
>> should make it easier to understand the changes that are proposed.
>>
>> Comments are welcome.
>>
>> - Edward
>
> I like this approach. I would also do the same thing with kernel_addons so that each branch is just a
specific backport.
>
> What are there any disadvantages to your proposal?
>
> Did you get a chance to investigate the other backport projects from this thread? https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/9/327
>
> Steve.
>

Hi Edward,
The main disadvantage of this proposal is that it will require much more time for the maintenance, which is a
show stopper, IMHO:
Any update in the main tree will require to checkout every branch with backports and make specific changes.
In addition, a lot of backports can be shared by the different kernels/Distros and it is easily
maintainable today. The suggested approach will lead to
spending more work on backports as they will be developed separately.
(Continue reading)

Edward Mascarenhas | 5 Jan 01:30 2012

Re: EWG/OFED meeting minutes for today (Dec 13, 2011)

Hi Vladimir and Steve,

Thanks for your comments.
See below.

- Edward
--

>
> Hi Edward,
> The main disadvantage of this proposal is that it will require much more time for the maintenance, which is
a show stopper, IMHO:
> Any update in the main tree will require to checkout every branch with backports and make specific changes.

The proposed development method does have some additional steps which
will need to be performed by the individual developers prior to sending
in a pull request:
        * if the change is applicable to all backport branches, the
          developer will create a commit in the master (or fixes)
          branch. This commit will contain actual code changes rather
          then a patch file. Once the commit has been made in the
          master (or fixes) branch, the developer will have to merge
          the new commit to applicable backports. Effectively, this is
          done with two commands (executed per backport branch) - "git
          checkout <branch>" and "git merge master". This is easily
          scriptable. The result of the above process can be one of
          two possibilities:
                1. The commit merges cleanly to all backport branches -
                in this case, the developer is ready to send the pull
                request.
(Continue reading)

ofa_1_5_kernel 20120105-0200 daily build status

This email was generated automatically, please do not reply

git_url: git://git.openfabrics.org/ofed_1_5/linux-2.6.git
git_branch: ofed_kernel_1_5

Common build parameters:   --with-ipoib-mod --with-sdp-mod --with-user_mad-mod
--with-user_access-mod --with-mthca-mod --with-mlx4-mod --with-mlx4_en-mod --with-core-mod
--with-addr_trans-mod --with-rds-mod --with-cxgb3-mod --with-cxgb4-mod --with-srp-mod
--with-nes-mod 

Passed:
Passed on i686 with 2.6.32-24-generic-pae
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.31
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.30
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.32
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.32-131.0.15.el6
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.33
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.35
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.34
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.32-71.el6
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.36

Failed:
Build failed on x86_64 with
linux-2.6.18-238.el5
Log:
/home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_5_kernel-20120105-0200_linux-2.6.18-238.el5_x86_64_check/net/rds/af_rds.c:
In function
'rds_getsockopt':
/home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_5_kernel-20120105-0200_linux-2.6.18-238.el5_x86_64_check/net/rds/af_rds.c:299:
(Continue reading)

Edward Mascarenhas | 6 Jan 00:47 2012

Re: EWG/OFED meeting minutes for today (Dec 13, 2011)


On 12/29/2011 07:21 AM, Steve Wise wrote:
> On 12/22/2011 02:26 PM, Edward Mascarenhas wrote:
>>> There is a suggestion from Eduard from Qlogic to have the backports ad different branches and not as today.
>>> He will start a mail thread on his suggestion.
>>
>> The attached file in pdf format has the proposal. It is also inlined in
>> text below so its easier to comment on. The pdf has 2 diagrams which
>> should make it easier to understand the changes that are proposed.
>>
>> Comments are welcome.
>>
>> - Edward
>
> I like this approach.   I would also do the same thing with kernel_addons so that each branch is just a
specific backport.
>
> What are there any disadvantages to your proposal?
>
> Did you get a chance to investigate the other backport projects from this thread?  https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/9/327
>

Some of us have been reviewing this work.
We don't see how this could be used with distro kernels (which we would
need for OFED).

Edward

> Steve.
>
(Continue reading)

ofa_1_5_kernel 20120106-0200 daily build status

This email was generated automatically, please do not reply

git_url: git://git.openfabrics.org/ofed_1_5/linux-2.6.git
git_branch: ofed_kernel_1_5

Common build parameters:   --with-ipoib-mod --with-sdp-mod --with-user_mad-mod
--with-user_access-mod --with-mthca-mod --with-mlx4-mod --with-mlx4_en-mod --with-core-mod
--with-addr_trans-mod --with-rds-mod --with-cxgb3-mod --with-cxgb4-mod --with-srp-mod
--with-nes-mod 

Passed:
Passed on i686 with 2.6.32-24-generic-pae
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.31
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.32
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.30
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.32-131.0.15.el6
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.34
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.35
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.33
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.32-71.el6
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.36
Passed on x86_64 with linux-2.6.18-238.el5

Failed:

Gmane