headers
Jerome.LABASTIE | 3 Aug 2005 17:59

new release ?

Hello,

I'd like to know approximatively when the new release of olsrd will be available.
For what I've seen in the cvs repository, there wil be a new plugin interface which make it possible to access
to any function or variable of olsrd from a plugin (including directly the olsrd header files in the
plugins). Am I right ?
I may have to test this before the end of august and I'm wondering if the cvs version is stable enough to make
some tests. I'm running olsrd on linux.

Thanks a lot for your answer
--
Jerome Labastie
Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
Andreas Tønnesen | 3 Aug 2005 18:09

Re: new release ?

Jerome,

We have not discussed any release date yet. 0.4.9 contains no
major bugs so we have been quite relaxed on 0.4.10.
But there are lots of updates, and you are correct about the
plugin interface, so I guess we'll start talking about a new
release soon.
The CVS code is usually stable enough for real life usage.
As of now there has not been any major changes for a while
AFAIK, and many people use the current version so I'd say
it's stable enough for usage/testing.
And as always, if you run into problems with the cvs version,
please let us know.

- Andreas

Jerome.LABASTIE <at> fr.thalesgroup.com wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I'd like to know approximatively when the new release of olsrd will be available.
> For what I've seen in the cvs repository, there wil be a new plugin interface which make it possible to
access to any function or variable of olsrd from a plugin (including directly the olsrd header files in the
plugins). Am I right ?
> I may have to test this before the end of august and I'm wondering if the cvs version is stable enough to make
some tests. I'm running olsrd on linux.
> 
> Thanks a lot for your answer
> --
> Jerome Labastie
> _______________________________________________
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Thomas Lopatic | 3 Aug 2005 18:10
Picon

Re: new release ?

Hi Jerome,

I think that, yes, the Linux version is currently stable enough for
testing. However, I doubt that 0.4.10 will be released before the end of
August. We've collected a couple of ideas at the What The Hack conference
that might be interesting to have in 0.4.10 (e.g. an incremental
implementation of the Dijkstra algorithm to reduce CPU load - the new
algorithm would take the existing routing table and only recalculate those
parts that are affected by topology changes instead of recalculating the
complete routing table from scratch), so I am afraid that 0.4.10 is
currently not very close. But the CVS version works reasonably well for
me.

-Thomas
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Thomas Lopatic | 3 Aug 2005 18:14

Re: new release ?

Hi Andreas,

[...]

> But there are lots of updates, and you are correct about the
> plugin interface, so I guess we'll start talking about a new
> release soon.

[...]

True. We really might want to try to shorten our release cycles a bit. It
probably does make sense to get the network simulation code running on
Windows, finish the TAS plugin, and then release 0.4.10.

Let's postpone any additional ideas and get this off our plate first. So,
yes, let's talk about a new release. :-)

-Thomas
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Andreas Tønnesen | 16 Aug 2005 18:21

Re: [OLSR-users] which Linux/Arm cross compiler for olsr 0.4.9


$arm-linux-gcc --version
2.95.2

- Andreas

Wilkins, Gary D (SELEX) (UK) wrote:
> Hi Andreas, thank you for your reply.
> 
> I went to the page you suggested, and there are a number of links, which one did you use?
> 
> arm-linux-cross.tar.bz2 14 Feb 2000 00:06:15
> arm-linux-cross-3.0.tar.bz2 12 Apr 2001 23:42:19
> cross-3.0.tar.bz2 20 Jul 2001 23:41:59
> cross-2.95.3.tar.bz2 20 Jul 2001 23:40:43
> 
> The latest one on that page is cross-3.0.tar.bz2, but I have already
> tried a later version (3.2), and this would not build the olsr code; so
> I am wondering if I have a corrupted gcc installation.
> 
> I will try the version you have used and hopefully the problem will be solved.
> 
> When trying to build for Windows CE I needed to install some updates
> libcfix.rar, libcfix1.rar and specs.rar; did you install any updates to the compiler?
> 
> Regards,
> Gary
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: olsr-users-bounces <at> olsr.org [mailto:olsr-users-bounces <at> olsr.org]On
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane