Mike Hertrick | 3 Oct 2011 21:48

[updatedevices.pl] Problem Discovering IP Blocks with SNMPv3

Apologies if this exact problem was already addressed in a submitted bug or if it’s been fixed in 0.9.10.  I’ve yet to upgrade from 0.9.9 to 0.9.10.

 

When I run `./updatedevices.pl -d -v3 --sec-name snmpv3user --sec-level authNoPriv --auth-proto SHA --auth-pass snmpv3pass -I -B 10.0.0.0/8` I get:

 

DEBUG - Device::get_snmp_session: Trying SNMPv3 session with 10.0.0.1

SNMP::Info::new() Failed to Create Session.  at /usr/local/netdot/lib/Netdot/Model/Device.pm line 3498

ERROR - Device::get_snmp_session: 10.0.0.1: SNMPv3 failed

 

…for all devices.

 

However, I can discover the SNMPv3 devices fine with `-H` instead of `-B` .  The `-B` works fine for SNMPv1/2c.

 

 

Was this problem already found and addressed in 0.9.10?  If not, I’ll submit a bug report.  Yes, I’m actively trying to fix it; but that doesn’t mean I’ll succeed.

 

Apologies for this e-mail in advance; I had to use Microsoft LookOut to send it.

 

Regards,

Mike Hertrick

<div>
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">Apologies if this exact problem was already addressed in a submitted bug or if it&rsquo;s been fixed in 0.9.10.&nbsp; I&rsquo;ve yet to upgrade from 0.9.9 to 0.9.10.<p></p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><p>&nbsp;</p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">When I run `./updatedevices.pl -d -v3 --sec-name snmpv3user --sec-level authNoPriv --auth-proto SHA --auth-pass snmpv3pass -I -B 10.0.0.0/8` I get:<p></p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><p>&nbsp;</p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">DEBUG - Device::get_snmp_session: Trying SNMPv3 session with 10.0.0.1<p></p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">SNMP::Info::new() Failed to Create Session.&nbsp; at /usr/local/netdot/lib/Netdot/Model/Device.pm line 3498<p></p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">ERROR - Device::get_snmp_session: 10.0.0.1: SNMPv3 failed<p></p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><p>&nbsp;</p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&hellip;for all devices.<p></p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><p>&nbsp;</p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">However, I can discover the SNMPv3 devices fine with `-H` instead of `-B` .&nbsp; The `-B` works fine for SNMPv1/2c.<p></p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><p>&nbsp;</p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><p>&nbsp;</p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Was this problem already found and addressed in 0.9.10?&nbsp; If not, I&rsquo;ll submit a bug report.&nbsp; Yes, I&rsquo;m actively trying to fix it; but that doesn&rsquo;t mean I&rsquo;ll succeed.<p></p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><p>&nbsp;</p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Apologies for this e-mail in advance; I had to use Microsoft LookOut to send it.<p></p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><p>&nbsp;</p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Regards,<p></p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Mike Hertrick<p></p></p>
</div>
</div>
Mike Hertrick | 3 Oct 2011 21:59

Re: [updatedevices.pl] Problem Discovering IP Blocks with SNMPv3

Is this my bug?  https://osl.uoregon.edu/redmine/issues/809

 

What does the history mean?  Target version changed from 0.9.10 to 1.0?  Set to fixed 5 months ago?  Bottom line, will 0.9.10 fix this?

 

 

 

From: netdot-users-bounces-enmH3VQuy58TdiDXHA71Hg@public.gmane.org [mailto:netdot-users-bounces-enmH3VQuy58TdiDXHA71Hg@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Mike Hertrick
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 3:48 PM
To: netdot-users-enmH3VQuy58TdiDXHA71Hg@public.gmane.org
Subject: [Netdot-users] [updatedevices.pl] Problem Discovering IP Blocks with SNMPv3

 

Apologies if this exact problem was already addressed in a submitted bug or if it’s been fixed in 0.9.10.  I’ve yet to upgrade from 0.9.9 to 0.9.10.

 

When I run `./updatedevices.pl -d -v3 --sec-name snmpv3user --sec-level authNoPriv --auth-proto SHA --auth-pass snmpv3pass -I -B 10.0.0.0/8` I get:

 

DEBUG - Device::get_snmp_session: Trying SNMPv3 session with 10.0.0.1

SNMP::Info::new() Failed to Create Session.  at /usr/local/netdot/lib/Netdot/Model/Device.pm line 3498

ERROR - Device::get_snmp_session: 10.0.0.1: SNMPv3 failed

 

…for all devices.

 

However, I can discover the SNMPv3 devices fine with `-H` instead of `-B` .  The `-B` works fine for SNMPv1/2c.

 

 

Was this problem already found and addressed in 0.9.10?  If not, I’ll submit a bug report.  Yes, I’m actively trying to fix it; but that doesn’t mean I’ll succeed.

 

Apologies for this e-mail in advance; I had to use Microsoft LookOut to send it.

 

Regards,

Mike Hertrick

<div>
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Is this my bug?&nbsp; <a href="https://osl.uoregon.edu/redmine/issues/809">
https://osl.uoregon.edu/redmine/issues/809</a><p></p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span><p>&nbsp;</p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>What does the history mean?&nbsp; Target version changed from 0.9.10 to 1.0?&nbsp; Set to fixed 5 months ago?&nbsp; Bottom line, will 0.9.10 fix this?<p></p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span><p>&nbsp;</p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span><p>&nbsp;</p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span><p>&nbsp;</p></span></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>From:</span><span> netdot-users-bounces@... [mailto:netdot-users-bounces@...]
On Behalf Of Mike Hertrick<br>Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 3:48 PM<br>To: netdot-users@...<br>Subject: [Netdot-users] [updatedevices.pl] Problem Discovering IP Blocks with SNMPv3<p></p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><p>&nbsp;</p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Apologies if this exact problem was already addressed in a submitted bug or if it&rsquo;s been fixed in 0.9.10.&nbsp; I&rsquo;ve yet to upgrade from 0.9.9 to 0.9.10.<p></p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><p>&nbsp;</p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">When I run `./updatedevices.pl -d -v3 --sec-name snmpv3user --sec-level authNoPriv --auth-proto SHA --auth-pass snmpv3pass -I -B 10.0.0.0/8` I get:<p></p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><p>&nbsp;</p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">DEBUG - Device::get_snmp_session: Trying SNMPv3 session with 10.0.0.1<p></p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">SNMP::Info::new() Failed to Create Session.&nbsp; at /usr/local/netdot/lib/Netdot/Model/Device.pm line 3498<p></p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">ERROR - Device::get_snmp_session: 10.0.0.1: SNMPv3 failed<p></p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><p>&nbsp;</p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&hellip;for all devices.<p></p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><p>&nbsp;</p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">However, I can discover the SNMPv3 devices fine with `-H` instead of `-B` .&nbsp; The `-B` works fine for SNMPv1/2c.<p></p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><p>&nbsp;</p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><p>&nbsp;</p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Was this problem already found and addressed in 0.9.10?&nbsp; If not, I&rsquo;ll submit a bug report.&nbsp; Yes, I&rsquo;m actively trying to fix it; but that doesn&rsquo;t mean I&rsquo;ll succeed.<p></p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><p>&nbsp;</p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Apologies for this e-mail in advance; I had to use Microsoft LookOut to send it.<p></p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><p>&nbsp;</p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Regards,<p></p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Mike Hertrick<p></p></p>
</div>
</div>
Jaime Cabrera | 3 Oct 2011 23:18

topology graph

On netdot 0.9.10 I added all my switches. When clic on Topology Graph, only appears 3 switches, but I do not know why.

Any Sugestion?

regards,

--




Jaime R. C. Letona
Coordinador Redes y Comunicaciones
Departamento de Procesamiento de Datos


<div>
<p>On netdot 0.9.10 I added all my switches. When clic on Topology Graph, only appears 3 switches, but I do not know why.</p>
<div>Any Sugestion?</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>regards,<br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><br><br><br><br>Jaime R. C. Letona<br>Coordinador Redes y Comunicaciones<br>Departamento de Procesamiento de Datos<br><br><br>
</div>
</div>
Jaime Cabrera | 4 Oct 2011 17:43

Re: topology graph

Thanks, but my device in Site.conf  NMS_DEVICE => 'swrectoria.dominio', is the core switch, connected to that switch one switch called deppa, an deppa connected another 2 switches and so on. How can I configure properly this. all switches inserted via snmp are interconected.


Thanks for all advise.

regards,



2011/10/4 Drew Garrett <drew-qP6KY2A7o2BWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Netdot starts at a beginning device you listed in Site.conf. And will only show devices on your topology if they are connected in turn back to that one. Otherwise if you have switches that are completely separate, on links that aren't detected or isolated in some way, they will not appear.
Drew Garrett

On 10/03/2011 04:18 PM, Jaime Cabrera wrote:
On netdot 0.9.10 I added all my switches. When clic on Topology Graph, only appears 3 switches, but I do not know why.
Any Sugestion?

regards,

--




Jaime R. C. Letona
Coordinador Redes y Comunicaciones
Departamento de Procesamiento de Datos




_______________________________________________ Netdot-users mailing list Netdot-users-enmH3VQuy58TdiDXHA71Hg@public.gmane.org https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users



--




Jaime R. C. Letona
Coordinador Redes y Comunicaciones
Departamento de Procesamiento de Datos


<div>
<p>Thanks, but my device in Site.conf &nbsp;NMS_DEVICE =&gt; 'swrectoria.dominio', is the core switch, connected to that switch one switch called deppa, an deppa connected another 2 switches and so on. How can I configure properly this. all switches inserted via snmp are interconected.</p>
<div>

<br>
</div>
<div>Thanks for all advise.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>regards,</div>
<div>
<br><div>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2011/10/4 Drew Garrett <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:drew@...">drew@...</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote">

    

  <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    Netdot starts at a beginning device you listed in Site.conf. And
    will only show devices on your topology if they are connected in
    turn back to that one. Otherwise if you have switches that are
    completely separate, on links that aren't detected or isolated in
    some way, they will not appear.<br>Drew Garrett<div>
<div></div>
<div class="h5">
    <br>
    On 10/03/2011 04:18 PM, Jaime Cabrera wrote:
    </div>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div></div>
<div class="h5">On netdot 0.9.10 I added all my switches. When clic on
      Topology Graph, only appears 3 switches, but I do not know why.
      <div>Any Sugestion?</div>
      <div><br></div>
      <div>regards,<br clear="all"><div><br></div>
        -- <br><br><br><br><br>
        Jaime R. C. Letona<br>
        Coordinador Redes y Comunicaciones<br>
        Departamento de Procesamiento de Datos<br><br><br>
</div>
      <br><br>
</div>
</div>_______________________________________________
Netdot-users mailing list
<a href="mailto:Netdot-users@..." target="_blank">Netdot-users@...</a>
<a href="https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users" target="_blank">https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users</a>

    </blockquote>
  </div>

</blockquote>
</div>
<br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><br><br><br><br>Jaime R. C. Letona<br>

Coordinador Redes y Comunicaciones<br>Departamento de Procesamiento de Datos<br><br><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Carlos Vicente | 4 Oct 2011 17:58
Favicon

Re: topology graph

Hello Jaime,

Topology discovery in Netdot needs one or more of these sources of
information:

a) CDP or LLDP enabled on every device
b) Forwarding tables collected from switches
c) Spanning tree state from switches

So, if your devices are not providing one or more of these sources, then
Netdot cannot determine the topology correctly.

You can run the topology discovery process in debug mode to see more
details about what Netdot is trying to do.

As a last resort, you can set up the neighbor relationships manually
(look for the "Neighbor" column in the "Interfaces" section of the
devices in question).

cv

On 10/4/11 11:43 AM, Jaime Cabrera wrote:
> Thanks, but my device in Site.conf  NMS_DEVICE => 'swrectoria.dominio',
> is the core switch, connected to that switch one switch called deppa, an
> deppa connected another 2 switches and so on. How can I configure
> properly this. all switches inserted via snmp are interconected.
> 
> Thanks for all advise.
> 
> regards,
> 
> 
> 
> 2011/10/4 Drew Garrett <drew@... <mailto:drew@...>>
> 
>     Netdot starts at a beginning device you listed in Site.conf. And
>     will only show devices on your topology if they are connected in
>     turn back to that one. Otherwise if you have switches that are
>     completely separate, on links that aren't detected or isolated in
>     some way, they will not appear.
> 
>     Drew Garrett
> 
> 
>     On 10/03/2011 04:18 PM, Jaime Cabrera wrote:
>>     On netdot 0.9.10 I added all my switches. When clic on Topology
>>     Graph, only appears 3 switches, but I do not know why.
>>     Any Sugestion?
>>
>>     regards,
>>
>>     -- 
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     Jaime R. C. Letona
>>     Coordinador Redes y Comunicaciones
>>     Departamento de Procesamiento de Datos
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Netdot-users mailing list
>>     Netdot-users@... <mailto:Netdot-users@...>
>>     https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Jaime R. C. Letona
> Coordinador Redes y Comunicaciones
> Departamento de Procesamiento de Datos
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Netdot-users mailing list
> Netdot-users@...
> https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users

--

-- 
cv
Jaime Cabrera | 4 Oct 2011 18:50

Re: topology graph

Ok, thanks.
I will check in detail that.
Even, my cisco switches are running CDP surely.



2011/10/4 Carlos Vicente <cvicente-C0Jp+pLGbMOVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org>
Hello Jaime,

Topology discovery in Netdot needs one or more of these sources of
information:

a) CDP or LLDP enabled on every device
b) Forwarding tables collected from switches
c) Spanning tree state from switches

So, if your devices are not providing one or more of these sources, then
Netdot cannot determine the topology correctly.

You can run the topology discovery process in debug mode to see more
details about what Netdot is trying to do.

As a last resort, you can set up the neighbor relationships manually
(look for the "Neighbor" column in the "Interfaces" section of the
devices in question).

cv

On 10/4/11 11:43 AM, Jaime Cabrera wrote:
> Thanks, but my device in Site.conf  NMS_DEVICE => 'swrectoria.dominio',
> is the core switch, connected to that switch one switch called deppa, an
> deppa connected another 2 switches and so on. How can I configure
> properly this. all switches inserted via snmp are interconected.
>
> Thanks for all advise.
>
> regards,
>
>
>
> 2011/10/4 Drew Garrett <drew-qP6KY2A7o2BWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org <mailto:drew <at> cybercon.com>>
>
>     Netdot starts at a beginning device you listed in Site.conf. And
>     will only show devices on your topology if they are connected in
>     turn back to that one. Otherwise if you have switches that are
>     completely separate, on links that aren't detected or isolated in
>     some way, they will not appear.
>
>     Drew Garrett
>
>
>     On 10/03/2011 04:18 PM, Jaime Cabrera wrote:
>>     On netdot 0.9.10 I added all my switches. When clic on Topology
>>     Graph, only appears 3 switches, but I do not know why.
>>     Any Sugestion?
>>
>>     regards,
>>
>>     --
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     Jaime R. C. Letona
>>     Coordinador Redes y Comunicaciones
>>     Departamento de Procesamiento de Datos
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Netdot-users mailing list
>>     Netdot-users-enmH3VQuy58TdiDXHA71Hg@public.gmane.org <mailto:Netdot-users-enmH3VQuy58TdiDXHA71Hg@public.gmane.org>
>>     https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
>
> Jaime R. C. Letona
> Coordinador Redes y Comunicaciones
> Departamento de Procesamiento de Datos
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Netdot-users mailing list
> Netdot-users-enmH3VQuy5/YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.orgon.edu
> https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users


--
cv



--




Jaime R. C. Letona
Coordinador Redes y Comunicaciones
Departamento de Procesamiento de Datos


<div><div>
<div>Ok, thanks.</div>
<div>I will check in detail that.</div>
<div>Even, my cisco switches are running CDP surely.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">2011/10/4 Carlos Vicente <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:cvicente@...">cvicente@...</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote">Hello Jaime,<br><br>
Topology discovery in Netdot needs one or more of these sources of<br>
information:<br><br>
a) CDP or LLDP enabled on every device<br>
b) Forwarding tables collected from switches<br>
c) Spanning tree state from switches<br><br>
So, if your devices are not providing one or more of these sources, then<br>
Netdot cannot determine the topology correctly.<br><br>
You can run the topology discovery process in debug mode to see more<br>
details about what Netdot is trying to do.<br><br>
As a last resort, you can set up the neighbor relationships manually<br>
(look for the "Neighbor" column in the "Interfaces" section of the<br>
devices in question).<br><br>
cv<br><div class="im">
<br>
On 10/4/11 11:43 AM, Jaime Cabrera wrote:<br>
&gt; Thanks, but my device in Site.conf &nbsp;NMS_DEVICE =&gt; 'swrectoria.dominio',<br>
&gt; is the core switch, connected to that switch one switch called deppa, an<br>
&gt; deppa connected another 2 switches and so on. How can I configure<br>
&gt; properly this. all switches inserted via snmp are interconected.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Thanks for all advise.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; regards,<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
</div>&gt; 2011/10/4 Drew Garrett &lt;<a href="mailto:drew@...">drew@...</a> &lt;mailto:<a href="mailto:drew@...">drew <at> cybercon.com</a>&gt;&gt;<br><div class="im">&gt;<br>
&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; Netdot starts at a beginning device you listed in Site.conf. And<br>
&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; will only show devices on your topology if they are connected in<br>
&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; turn back to that one. Otherwise if you have switches that are<br>
&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; completely separate, on links that aren't detected or isolated in<br>
&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; some way, they will not appear.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; Drew Garrett<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; On 10/03/2011 04:18 PM, Jaime Cabrera wrote:<br>
&gt;&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; On netdot 0.9.10 I added all my switches. When clic on Topology<br>
&gt;&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; Graph, only appears 3 switches, but I do not know why.<br>
&gt;&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; Any Sugestion?<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; regards,<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; --<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
</div>
<div class="im">&gt;&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; Jaime R. C. Letona<br>
&gt;&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; Coordinador Redes y Comunicaciones<br>
&gt;&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; Departamento de Procesamiento de Datos<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; _______________________________________________<br>
&gt;&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; Netdot-users mailing list<br>
</div>&gt;&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="mailto:Netdot-users@...">Netdot-users@...</a> &lt;mailto:<a href="mailto:Netdot-users <at> osl.uoregon.edu">Netdot-users@...</a>&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users" target="_blank">https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users</a><br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; --<br><div>
<div></div>
<div class="h5">&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Jaime R. C. Letona<br>
&gt; Coordinador Redes y Comunicaciones<br>
&gt; Departamento de Procesamiento de Datos<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; _______________________________________________<br>
&gt; Netdot-users mailing list<br>
&gt; <a href="mailto:Netdot-users@...">Netdot-users@...on.edu</a><br>
&gt; <a href="https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users" target="_blank">https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users</a><br><br><br>
--<br>
</div>
</div>cv<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><br><br><br><br>Jaime R. C. Letona<br>

Coordinador Redes y Comunicaciones<br>Departamento de Procesamiento de Datos<br><br><br>
</div></div>
Carlos Vicente | 5 Oct 2011 15:44
Favicon

Re: [updatedevices.pl] Problem Discovering IP Blocks with SNMPv3

Hi Mike,

On 10/3/11 3:59 PM, Mike Hertrick wrote:
> Is this my bug?  https://osl.uoregon.edu/redmine/issues/809
> 

I believe so, yes.

> 
> What does the history mean?  Target version changed from 0.9.10 to 1.0? 
> Set to fixed 5 months ago?  Bottom line, will 0.9.10 fix this?
> 

The target version for the fix was 1.0. So no, the fix is not in 0.9.10.
The reason being that at the time I was not planning on releasing any
more versions from the 0.9 branch.

I have just merged that fix into the 0.9 branch. If you don't want to
wait for the next release of 0.9, you can get the latest copy from the
Git repository:

	git clone git://netdot.uoregon.edu/netdot.git
	cd netdot
	git checkout netdot-0.9
	make install
	[restart Apache]

cv
Jaime Cabrera | 5 Oct 2011 23:23

manual in detail

Good Afternoon.

I have a question, is there another manual of netdot where definitios or user manual exist?
I tell that, because there are many options in the different menus of netdot and I would like to use properly. Is available that kind of info?

regards,


--




Jaime R. C. Letona
Coordinador Redes y Comunicaciones
Departamento de Procesamiento de Datos


<div>
<p>Good Afternoon.</p>
<div>I have a question, is there another manual of netdot where definitios or user manual exist?</div>
<div>I tell that, because there are many options in the different menus of netdot and I would like to use properly. Is available that kind of info?</div>

<div><br></div>
<div>regards,</div>
<div>
<br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><br><br><br><br>
Jaime R. C. Letona<br>Coordinador Redes y Comunicaciones<br>Departamento de Procesamiento de Datos<br><br><br>
</div>
</div>
Jaime Cabrera | 5 Oct 2011 23:28

cdp

I have checked the cisco cdp configuration in my main switches, the sh cdp command:


RI_M6_1_1#sh cdp
Global CDP information:
Sending CDP packets every 60 seconds
Sending a holdtime value of 180 seconds
Sending CDPv2 advertisements is enabled

but, graph topology doesn't work for me, the contiguos switches are the same cdp configuration, but not appear on graphic.
The topology graphic use only CDP?
Is neccesary to set another options in switch to do that?

regards,

--




Jaime R. C. Letona
Coordinador Redes y Comunicaciones
Departamento de Procesamiento de Datos


<div>
<p>I have checked the cisco cdp configuration in my main switches, the sh cdp command:</p>
<div>
<br><div>
<div>
<div>RI_M6_1_1#sh cdp</div>
<div>Global CDP information:</div>
<div>
<span class="Apple-tab-span">	</span>Sending CDP packets every 60 seconds</div>

<div>
<span class="Apple-tab-span">	</span>Sending a holdtime value of 180 seconds</div>
<div>
<span class="Apple-tab-span">	</span>Sending CDPv2 advertisements is enabled</div>

</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>but, graph topology doesn't work for me, the contiguos switches are the same cdp configuration, but not appear on graphic.</div>
<div>The topology graphic use only CDP?</div>
<div>Is neccesary to set another options in switch to do that?</div>

<div><br></div>
<div>regards,</div>
<div><br></div>-- <br><br><br><br><br>Jaime R. C. Letona<br>

Coordinador Redes y Comunicaciones<br>Departamento de Procesamiento de Datos<br><br><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Carlos Vicente | 6 Oct 2011 03:29
Favicon

Re: cdp

Jaime,

Please run topology discovery in debugging mode. We can then see what is
going on exactly.

cv

On 10/5/11 5:28 PM, Jaime Cabrera wrote:
> I have checked the cisco cdp configuration in my main switches, the sh
> cdp command:
> 
> RI_M6_1_1#sh cdp
> Global CDP information:
> Sending CDP packets every 60 seconds
> Sending a holdtime value of 180 seconds
> Sending CDPv2 advertisements is enabled
> 
> but, graph topology doesn't work for me, the contiguos switches are the
> same cdp configuration, but not appear on graphic.
> The topology graphic use only CDP?
> Is neccesary to set another options in switch to do that?
> 
> regards,
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Jaime R. C. Letona
> Coordinador Redes y Comunicaciones
> Departamento de Procesamiento de Datos
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Netdot-users mailing list
> Netdot-users@...
> https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users

--

-- 
cv

Gmane