Frank Lahm | 1 Aug 2011 14:57

Re: contrib directory

2011/7/29 HAT <hat <at> fa2.so-net.ne.jp>:
> Why are not three files included in tarball?
>
> contrib/misc/make-casetable.pl
> contrib/misc/make-precompose.h.pl
> contrib/wireshark/cnid.lua

oversight.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Got Input?   Slashdot Needs You.
Take our quick survey online.  Come on, we don't ask for help often.
Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey
Frank Lahm | 1 Aug 2011 14:58

Re: htmldocs

Hi,

2011/7/29 HAT <hat <at> fa2.so-net.ne.jp>:
> Old netatalk included htmldocs.

What is "htmldocs" ? Where was it "included" ?

-f

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Got Input?   Slashdot Needs You.
Take our quick survey online.  Come on, we don't ask for help often.
Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey
HAT | 1 Aug 2011 15:18
Picon
Gravatar

Re: htmldocs

>Frank Lahm <franklahm <at> googlemail.com> Mon, 1 Aug 2011 14:58:47 +0200
> Hi,
> 
> 2011/7/29 HAT <hat <at> fa2.so-net.ne.jp>:
>> Old netatalk included htmldocs.
> 
> What is "htmldocs" ? Where was it "included" ?

# tar zxvf netatalk-2.0.3.tar.gz
# cd netatalk-2.0.3/doc/htmldocs/
# ls
AppleVolumes.default.5.html  atalkd.8.html       netatalk.conf.5.html
Netatalk-Manual.html         atalkd.conf.5.html  netatalk.css
achfile.1.html               cnid_dbd.8.html     netatalkconfig.1.html
acleandir.1.html             cnid_index.1.html   pap.1.html
aecho.1.html                 cnid_metad.8.html   papd.8.html
afile.1.html                 configuration.html  papd.conf.5.html
afpd.8.html                  getzones.1.html     papstatus.8.html
afpd.conf.5.html             index.html          pr01.html
afppasswd.1.html             installation.html   printer.css
apple_cp.1.html              intro.html          psf.8.html
apple_mv.1.html              man-pages.html      psorder.1.html
apple_rm.1.html              manual-index.html   timelord.8.html
asip-status.pl.1.html        megatron.1.html     timeout.1.html
atalk.4.html                 nbp.1.html          uniconv.1.html
atalk_aton.3.html            nbp_name.3.html     upgrade.html

--

-- 
HAT

(Continue reading)

Frank Lahm | 1 Aug 2011 15:25

Re: htmldocs

2011/8/1 HAT <hat <at> fa2.so-net.ne.jp>:
>>Frank Lahm <franklahm <at> googlemail.com> Mon, 1 Aug 2011 14:58:47 +0200
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2011/7/29 HAT <hat <at> fa2.so-net.ne.jp>:
>>> Old netatalk included htmldocs.
>>
>> What is "htmldocs" ? Where was it "included" ?
>
> # tar zxvf netatalk-2.0.3.tar.gz
> # cd netatalk-2.0.3/doc/htmldocs/
> # ls
> AppleVolumes.default.5.html  atalkd.8.html       netatalk.conf.5.html
> Netatalk-Manual.html         atalkd.conf.5.html  netatalk.css
> achfile.1.html               cnid_dbd.8.html     netatalkconfig.1.html
> acleandir.1.html             cnid_index.1.html   pap.1.html
> aecho.1.html                 cnid_metad.8.html   papd.8.html
> afile.1.html                 configuration.html  papd.conf.5.html
> afpd.8.html                  getzones.1.html     papstatus.8.html
> afpd.conf.5.html             index.html          pr01.html
> afppasswd.1.html             installation.html   printer.css
> apple_cp.1.html              intro.html          psf.8.html
> apple_mv.1.html              man-pages.html      psorder.1.html
> apple_rm.1.html              manual-index.html   timelord.8.html
> asip-status.pl.1.html        megatron.1.html     timeout.1.html
> atalk.4.html                 nbp.1.html          uniconv.1.html
> atalk_aton.3.html            nbp_name.3.html     upgrade.html

Never noticed that.

(Continue reading)

Frank Lahm | 1 Aug 2011 15:30

Re: branch-netatalk-2-1

2011/7/30 Andrew Morgan <morgan <at> orst.edu>:
> On Sat, 30 Jul 2011, Frank Lahm wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> 2011/7/30 Andrew Morgan <morgan <at> orst.edu>:
>>>
>>> Here is the patch.  I applied this to my local install of 2.1.5 and it
>>> works
>>> perfectly.
>>
>> is this a diff of the commit in the 2-2 branch ?
>
> Yes.  As far as I could tell, it was the only change between 2.1.5's DHX2
> and the one from git master.

Done.

-f

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Got Input?   Slashdot Needs You.
Take our quick survey online.  Come on, we don't ask for help often.
Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey
_______________________________________________
Netatalk-devel mailing list
Netatalk-devel <at> lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/netatalk-devel
(Continue reading)

Hauke Fath | 2 Aug 2011 09:14
Picon

Re: Netatalk 2.2.0 is available

At 17:31 Uhr +0200 27.7.2011, Frank Lahm wrote:
>Earyl adopters are encouraged to upgrade their systems
>to 2.2.0.

Trying to connect to a 2.2.0 afpd running on NetBSD/sparc -current from a
System 7.6.1 Mac gives me a repeated

[...]
Aug 02 09:05:41.230808 afpd[10757] {cnid_dbd.c:375} (D10:CNID): transmit:
connecting to cnid_dbd ...
Aug 02 09:05:41.232040 afpd[10757] {cnid_dbd.c:239} (D5:CNID): init_tsock:
BEGIN. Opening volume '/u2/small_systems', CNID Server: -setuplog/4700
Aug 02 09:05:41.268557 afpd[10757] {cnid_dbd.c:85} (E:Default):
tsock_getfd: getaddrinfo: CNID server -setuplog:4700 : No address
associated with hostname

after which the volume gets mounted read-only.

I have observed before that afpd will grab an ip6 address, and not look at
ip4, if ip6 is available at all. Is this a related problem?

Any tips on where to look closer?

	hauke

(Just in case anybody feels like pointing out 7.6.1 were obsolete: MacOS X
10.6 does not connect at all, here.)

--
"It's never straight up and down"     (DEVO)
(Continue reading)

Adam Retter | 6 Aug 2011 17:21
Gravatar

afpd core dumps on oi_151 with Lion - Netatalk 2.2.0

I am using OpenIndiana 151 and have very easily built and installed
Netatalk 2.2.0, I can start Netatalk and all the daemons appear to be
running, however when I connect to the server from MacOSX lion afpd is
core dumping.

Would it help you guys if I sent you the core file? and can anyone
give me any advice on getting this working?

--

-- 
Adam Retter

skype: adam.retter
tweet: adamretter
http://www.adamretter.org.uk

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BlackBerry&reg; DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA
The must-attend event for mobile developers. Connect with experts. 
Get tools for creating Super Apps. See the latest technologies.
Sessions, hands-on labs, demos & much more. Register early & save!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-blackberry-1
Laura Müller | 9 Aug 2011 08:00
Picon
Favicon

netatalk 2.2.0 bug report

Hello!

A few days ago I set up a test system with netatalk 2.2.0 based on debian testing AMD64 (latest build) and discovered a nasty bug that took me 2 sleepless nights to track down.

Description:
Connecting to an acl enabled volume using the same user that is logged in on the client, the volume is write protected. Both client and server are part of an OD domain.

Solution:
In etc/afpd/dircache.c the function dircache_init() doesn't initialize rootParent.d_rights_cache so that the default value of 0 gets used and check_acl_access never calculates proper access rights.

Adding the line

rootParent.d_rights_cache = 0xffffffff;

to dircache_init() resolved the issue. I checked latest source code via sourceforge.net and was astounded to see that even the newest version is affected.

Regards,

Laura Müller

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model 
configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and 
the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a free 
download at:  http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Netatalk-devel mailing list
Netatalk-devel <at> lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/netatalk-devel
Frank Lahm | 9 Aug 2011 15:14

Re: netatalk 2.2.0 bug report

Hi Laura,

2011/8/9 Laura Müller <Laura-Mueller <at> uni-duesseldorf.de>:
> A few days ago I set up a test system with netatalk 2.2.0 based on debian
> testing AMD64 (latest build) and discovered a nasty bug that took me 2
> sleepless nights to track down.
> Description:
> Connecting to an acl enabled volume using the same user that is logged in on
> the client, the volume is write protected. Both client and server are part
> of an OD domain.
> Solution:
> In etc/afpd/dircache.c the function dircache_init() doesn't
> initialize rootParent.d_rights_cache so that the default value of 0 gets
> used and check_acl_access never calculates proper access rights.
> Adding the line
> rootParent.d_rights_cache = 0xffffffff;
> to dircache_init() resolved the issue. I checked latest source code via
> sourceforge.net and was astounded to see that even the newest version is
> affected.

thanks a lot for tracking this down! I hope working your way through
the ACL code was not too much of a pain! ;)

-f

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model 
configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and 
the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a free 
download at:  http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Netatalk-devel mailing list
Netatalk-devel <at> lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/netatalk-devel
Maurice R Volaski | 18 Aug 2011 19:46
Favicon

Re: [BUG?] Netatalk is not honoring the parent zfs permissions

>2011/7/29 Maurice R Volaski <maurice.volaski <at> einstein.yu.edu>:
>> I'm quite confused now. On Sourceforge
>> 
>>(http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3374367&group_id=8642&at
>>id
>> =108642), you said you couldn't reproduce this behavior. Are you now
>> suggesting it worked as I reported and that this is expected?
>
>Don't know. No time to dig into this now.

I'm OK for now. When I removed the ACL and switched to trivial
permissions, Netatalk started working perfectly. However, the bug report
should be re-opened, so you don't forget :)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system, 
user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take 
the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the 
tools developers use with it. http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-d2d-2

Gmane