Douglas Hussey | 1 Oct 2009 03:49
Picon

rpm build question

I am using Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.


I need to rebuild the latest net-snmp-5.5 (rebuild the RPM) . However, after the rpm build process I only end up with: 

net-snmp-5.5-1.x86_64.rpm
net-snmp-debuginfo-5.5-1.x86_64.rpm
net-snmp-devel-5.5-1.x86_64.rpm
net-snmp-perlmods-5.5-1.x86_64.rpm


I need utils and libs. How do I build those packages? These are needed for Red Hat. 

I believe in the spec that it detects the correct platform, from the spec:

# ugly RHEL detector
# SuSE build service defines rhel_version, RHEL itself defines nothing
%if 0%{?rhel_version}
%define rhel %{?rhel_version}
%else
%define is_rhel %(grep "Red Hat Enterprise Linux" /etc/redhat-release &>/dev/null && echo 1 || echo 0)
%if %{is_rhel}
%define rhel %(sed </etc/redhat-release -e 's/.*release \\(.\\).*/\\1/'  )
%endif
%endif


Thanks for the help in this matter. 

~Doug
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12, 2009. Register now&#33;
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users <at> lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
Dave Shield | 1 Oct 2009 09:37
Picon
Favicon

Re: rpm build question

2009/10/1 Douglas Hussey <avaalak <at> gmail.com>:
> I am using Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.
> I need to rebuild the latest net-snmp-5.5 (rebuild the RPM) . However, after
> the rpm build process I only end up with:
> net-snmp-5.5-1.x86_64.rpm
> net-snmp-debuginfo-5.5-1.x86_64.rpm
> net-snmp-devel-5.5-1.x86_64.rpm
> net-snmp-perlmods-5.5-1.x86_64.rpm

That's correct - the Net-SNMP binary RPM-based distribution essentially
bundles all of the core functionality into a single RPM (i.e. net-snmp).
This covers what some other distributions (e.g. Fedora/RedHat) divide
between multiple RPMs.

> I need utils and libs. How do I build those packages?
> These are needed for Red Hat.

They are not available as separate RPM packages when using the Net-SNMP
RPM configuration.   However the core net-snmp RPM spec includes the line

    Provides: net-snmp-libs, net-snmp-utils

So the core net-snmp RPM should be recognised by RedHat-based systems
as covering the functionality of these two RPMs as well.

Try
    rpm -q --provides -p net-snmp-5.5-1.x86_64.rpm

which should report this as such.
Installing our RPM should work fine.

Dave

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12, 2009. Register now&#33;
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users <at> lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

Robin Bowes | 1 Oct 2009 11:38
Favicon

Re: rpm build question

On 01/10/09 08:37, Dave Shield wrote:
> 
> That's correct - the Net-SNMP binary RPM-based distribution essentially
> bundles all of the core functionality into a single RPM (i.e. net-snmp).
> This covers what some other distributions (e.g. Fedora/RedHat) divide
> between multiple RPMs.
> 

Was there a particular reason for using a different packaging structure
to the one used by Redhat-flavour distros? Or did it just evolve separately?

Just curious...

R.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12, 2009. Register now&#33;
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users <at> lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

Dave Shield | 1 Oct 2009 12:11
Picon
Favicon

Re: rpm build question

2009/10/1 Robin Bowes <robin-lists <at> robinbowes.com>:
>> That's correct - the Net-SNMP binary RPM-based distribution essentially
>> bundles all of the core functionality into a single RPM (i.e. net-snmp).
>> This covers what some other distributions (e.g. Fedora/RedHat) divide
>> between multiple RPMs.
>>
>
> Was there a particular reason for using a different packaging structure
> to the one used by Redhat-flavour distros? Or did it just evolve separately?

Traditionally, we've tended to view the Net-SNMP project as a single entity.
So we started out (I think) by providing a simple RPM of the whole thing,
followed (very quickly) by splitting the tools and the development elements
into separate packages.
  Support for the perl modules came a little while later, as a separate RPM.

I believe that at when we started, RedHat was still shipping the UCD version.
so the RPM names were different anyway.   And of course the RedHat/Fedora
structure and naming conventions are different from the SuSE/Ubuntu ones.
(And there may well be other alternatives as well).

We're happy to try to make our binaries compatible with other vendor
provided distributions.   But I'm not sure there'd be much benefit from
trying to mimic them exactly - particularly given the range of systems that
we attempt to support.

Dave

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12, 2009. Register now&#33;
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users <at> lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

tony | 1 Oct 2009 13:01
Gravatar

Restart Failed Applications

Hi,

I have setup a process watch for httpd in my snmpd config

proc  httpd 10 1

with

procfix httpd /sbin/service httpd restart

to run after it finds no running processes.

I stop httpd is states an error:

[root <at> server ~]# snmpwalk -v 1 -c public localhost prTable
UCD-SNMP-MIB::prIndex.1 = INTEGER: 1
UCD-SNMP-MIB::prIndex.2 = INTEGER: 2
UCD-SNMP-MIB::prNames.1 = STRING: sshd
UCD-SNMP-MIB::prNames.2 = STRING: httpd
UCD-SNMP-MIB::prMin.1 = INTEGER: 1
UCD-SNMP-MIB::prMin.2 = INTEGER: 0
UCD-SNMP-MIB::prMax.1 = INTEGER: 10
UCD-SNMP-MIB::prMax.2 = INTEGER: 0
UCD-SNMP-MIB::prCount.1 = INTEGER: 3
UCD-SNMP-MIB::prCount.2 = INTEGER: 0
UCD-SNMP-MIB::prErrorFlag.1 = INTEGER: noError(0)
UCD-SNMP-MIB::prErrorFlag.2 = INTEGER: error(1)
UCD-SNMP-MIB::prErrMessage.1 = STRING:
UCD-SNMP-MIB::prErrMessage.2 = STRING: No httpd process running.
UCD-SNMP-MIB::prErrFix.1 = INTEGER: noError(0)
UCD-SNMP-MIB::prErrFix.2 = INTEGER: noError(0)
UCD-SNMP-MIB::prErrFixCmd.1 = STRING:
UCD-SNMP-MIB::prErrFixCmd.2 = STRING: /sbin/service httpd restart

so from readin i then need to set: UCD-SNMP-MIB::prErrFix.2 = INTEGER:  
noError(0)

to 1

with:

[root <at> server ~]# snmpset -v 1 -c public localhost prErrFix.2 i 1
Error in packet.
Reason: (noSuchName) There is no such variable name in this MIB.
Failed object: UCD-SNMP-MIB::prErrFix.2

i guess im doing something wrong :) but cant see what and would really  
appreciate some help.

Thankyou in advance for your replies :)

Kind Regards

Tony

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12, 2009. Register now&#33;
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users <at> lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

Dave Shield | 1 Oct 2009 13:36
Picon
Favicon

Re: Restart Failed Applications

2009/10/1  <tony <at> specialistdevelopment.com>:
> [root <at> server ~]# snmpset -v 1 -c public localhost prErrFix.2 i 1
> Error in packet.
> Reason: (noSuchName) There is no such variable name in this MIB.
> Failed object: UCD-SNMP-MIB::prErrFix.2
>
> i guess im doing something wrong :) but cant see what and would really
> appreciate some help.

Please see the FAQ entry
    Why can't I set any variables in the MIB?
        (http://www.net-snmp.org/wiki/index.php/FAQ:Applications_12)

In particular, note the last sentence of this entry.

Dave

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12, 2009. Register now&#33;
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users <at> lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

tony | 1 Oct 2009 13:44
Gravatar

Re: Restart Failed Applications

Thnaks Dave... another case of RTFM :)

Tony

Quoting Dave Shield <D.T.Shield <at> liverpool.ac.uk>:

> 2009/10/1  <tony <at> specialistdevelopment.com>:
>> [root <at> server ~]# snmpset -v 1 -c public localhost prErrFix.2 i 1
>> Error in packet.
>> Reason: (noSuchName) There is no such variable name in this MIB.
>> Failed object: UCD-SNMP-MIB::prErrFix.2
>>
>> i guess im doing something wrong :) but cant see what and would really
>> appreciate some help.
>
> Please see the FAQ entry
>     Why can't I set any variables in the MIB?
>         (http://www.net-snmp.org/wiki/index.php/FAQ:Applications_12)
>
> In particular, note the last sentence of this entry.
>
> Dave
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12, 2009. Register now&#33;
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users <at> lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

Flowers, Rob (NIH/CIT) [E] | 1 Oct 2009 13:42
Picon

HP-UX 11.11 Swap reporting still bugged

I’m running net-snmp 5.4.2.1 on HP-UX 11.11 and I’m still running into the issue that is reporting a negative value for available swap.  It was noted that it had been patched and fixed but I’m still getting the issue:

 

UCD-SNMP-MIB::memIndex.0 = INTEGER: 0

UCD-SNMP-MIB::memErrorName.0 = STRING: swap

UCD-SNMP-MIB::memTotalSwap.0 = INTEGER: 28901376 kB

UCD-SNMP-MIB::memAvailSwap.0 = INTEGER: -4 kB

UCD-SNMP-MIB::memTotalReal.0 = INTEGER: 33518592 kB

UCD-SNMP-MIB::memAvailReal.0 = INTEGER: 23127884 kB

UCD-SNMP-MIB::memTotalSwapTXT.0 = INTEGER: 186140 kB

UCD-SNMP-MIB::memAvailSwapTXT.0 = INTEGER: 6480 kB

UCD-SNMP-MIB::memTotalRealTXT.0 = INTEGER: 89928 kB

UCD-SNMP-MIB::memAvailRealTXT.0 = INTEGER: 5056 kB

UCD-SNMP-MIB::memMinimumSwap.0 = INTEGER: 16000 kB

UCD-SNMP-MIB::memUsedSwapTXT.0 = INTEGER: 6480 kB

UCD-SNMP-MIB::memUsedRealTXT.0 = INTEGER: 5056 kB

UCD-SNMP-MIB::memSwapError.0 = INTEGER: error(1)

UCD-SNMP-MIB::memSwapErrorMsg.0 = STRING: Running out of swap space (-2)

UCD-SNMP-MIB::dskIndex.1 = INTEGER: 1

UCD-SNMP-MIB::dskPath.1 = STRING: /

UCD-SNMP-MIB::dskDevice.1 = STRING: /dev/vg00/lvol3

UCD-SNMP-MIB::dskMinimum.1 = INTEGER: 500000

UCD-SNMP-MIB::dskMinPercent.1 = INTEGER: -1

UCD-SNMP-MIB::dskTotal.1 = INTEGER: 229376

UCD-SNMP-MIB::dskAvail.1 = INTEGER: 48632

UCD-SNMP-MIB::dskUsed.1 = INTEGER: 180416

UCD-SNMP-MIB::dskPercent.1 = INTEGER: 79

UCD-SNMP-MIB::dskPercentNode.1 = INTEGER: 63

UCD-SNMP-MIB::dskErrorFlag.1 = INTEGER: error(1)

UCD-SNMP-MIB::dskErrorMsg.1 = STRING: /: less than 500000 free (= 48632)

UCD-SNMP-MIB::laIndex.1 = INTEGER: 1

UCD-SNMP-MIB::laIndex.2 = INTEGER: 2

UCD-SNMP-MIB::laIndex.3 = INTEGER: 3

UCD-SNMP-MIB::laNames.1 = STRING: Load-1

UCD-SNMP-MIB::laNames.2 = STRING: Load-5

UCD-SNMP-MIB::laNames.3 = STRING: Load-15

UCD-SNMP-MIB::laLoad.1 = STRING: 0.01

UCD-SNMP-MIB::laLoad.2 = STRING: 0.00

UCD-SNMP-MIB::laLoad.3 = STRING: 0.00

UCD-SNMP-MIB::laConfig.1 = STRING: 12.00

UCD-SNMP-MIB::laConfig.2 = STRING: 12.00

UCD-SNMP-MIB::laConfig.3 = STRING: 10.00

UCD-SNMP-MIB::laLoadInt.1 = INTEGER: 0

UCD-SNMP-MIB::laLoadInt.2 = INTEGER: 0

UCD-SNMP-MIB::laLoadInt.3 = INTEGER: 0

UCD-SNMP-MIB::laLoadFloat.1 = Opaque: Float: 0.006745

UCD-SNMP-MIB::laLoadFloat.2 = Opaque: Float: 0.003645

UCD-SNMP-MIB::laLoadFloat.3 = Opaque: Float: 0.003349

UCD-SNMP-MIB::laErrorFlag.1 = INTEGER: noError(0)

UCD-SNMP-MIB::laErrorFlag.2 = INTEGER: noError(0)

UCD-SNMP-MIB::laErrorFlag.3 = INTEGER: noError(0)

UCD-SNMP-MIB::laErrMessage.1 = STRING:

UCD-SNMP-MIB::laErrMessage.2 = STRING:

UCD-SNMP-MIB::laErrMessage.3 = STRING:

UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssIndex.0 = INTEGER: 1

UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssErrorName.0 = STRING: systemStats

UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssSwapIn.0 = INTEGER: 0 kB

UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssSwapOut.0 = INTEGER: 0 kB

UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssIOSent.0 = INTEGER: 0 blocks/s

UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssIOReceive.0 = INTEGER: 0 blocks/s

UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssSysInterrupts.0 = INTEGER: 2988 interrupts/s

UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssSysContext.0 = INTEGER: 286 switches/s

UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuUser.0 = INTEGER: 0

UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuSystem.0 = INTEGER: 0

UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuIdle.0 = INTEGER: 98

UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuRawUser.0 = Counter32: 1043916

UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuRawNice.0 = Counter32: 110878

UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuRawSystem.0 = Counter32: 3333871

UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuRawIdle.0 = Counter32: 961728675

UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuRawWait.0 = Counter32: 1993015

UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuRawKernel.0 = Counter32: 1340856

UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuRawInterrupt.0 = Counter32: 0

UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssIORawSent.0 = Counter32: 0

UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssIORawReceived.0 = Counter32: 0

UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssRawInterrupts.0 = Counter32: 1802749526

UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssRawContexts.0 = Counter32: 3057748477

UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuRawSoftIRQ.0 = Counter32: 0

UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssRawSwapIn.0 = Counter32: 0

UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssRawSwapOut.0 = Counter32: 0

UCD-DLMOD-MIB::dlmodNextIndex.0 = INTEGER: 1

UCD-SNMP-MIB::fileIndex.1 = INTEGER: 1

UCD-SNMP-MIB::fileName.1 = STRING: /var/adm/messages

UCD-SNMP-MIB::fileSize.1 = INTEGER: 10 kB

UCD-SNMP-MIB::fileMax.1 = INTEGER: 20000000 kB

UCD-SNMP-MIB::fileErrorFlag.1 = INTEGER: noError(0)

UCD-SNMP-MIB::fileErrorMsg.1 = STRING:

UCD-SNMP-MIB::logMatchMaxEntries.0 = INTEGER: 50

UCD-SNMP-MIB::versionIndex.0 = INTEGER: 1

UCD-SNMP-MIB::versionTag.0 = STRING: 5.4.2.1

UCD-SNMP-MIB::versionDate.0 = STRING: $Date: 2006-09-14 17:48:50 -0700 (Thu, 14 Sep 2006) $

UCD-SNMP-MIB::versionCDate.0 = STRING: Thu Oct  1 07:34:39 2009

UCD-SNMP-MIB::versionIdent.0 = STRING: $Id: versioninfo.c 15220 2006-09-15 00:48:50Z tanders

 $

UCD-SNMP-MIB::versionConfigureOptions.0 = STRING: '--disable-embedded-perl'

UCD-SNMP-MIB::versionClearCache.0 = INTEGER: 0

UCD-SNMP-MIB::versionUpdateConfig.0 = INTEGER: 0

UCD-SNMP-MIB::versionRestartAgent.0 = INTEGER: 0

UCD-SNMP-MIB::versionSavePersistentData.0 = INTEGER: 0

UCD-SNMP-MIB::versionDoDebugging.0 = INTEGER: 0

UCD-SNMP-MIB::snmperrIndex.0 = INTEGER: 0

UCD-SNMP-MIB::snmperrNames.0 = STRING: snmp

UCD-SNMP-MIB::snmperrErrorFlag.0 = INTEGER: noError(0)

UCD-SNMP-MIB::snmperrErrMessage.0 = STRING:

 

Robert L. Flowers

Unix System Administrator

National Institute of Health

Center for Information Technology

12 South Drive

Bldg 12b Rm 2N207

Bethesda, MD  20892

301-402-4117

flowersr <at> mail.nih.gov

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12, 2009. Register now&#33;
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users <at> lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
Robin Bowes | 1 Oct 2009 15:16
Favicon

Re: rpm build question

On 01/10/09 11:11, Dave Shield wrote:
> I believe that at when we started, RedHat was still shipping the UCD version.
> so the RPM names were different anyway.   And of course the RedHat/Fedora
> structure and naming conventions are different from the SuSE/Ubuntu ones.
> (And there may well be other alternatives as well).

Yes, this is a problem when trying to provide a single, cross-platform
solution. Athough, Ubuntu will require .debs rather than .rpms.

> We're happy to try to make our binaries compatible with other vendor
> provided distributions.   But I'm not sure there'd be much benefit from
> trying to mimic them exactly - particularly given the range of systems that
> we attempt to support.

The benefit of using the same/similar packaging as a given distribution
is that it makes it easier for the vendor(s) to integrate your app into
their distribution.

It also makes it easier for users to use a later version of your app on
a platform where the vendor only distributes an earlier version, as it
will be a drop-in replacement rather then requiring any integration work.

I've hit this problem with other apps, eg. MySQL. Redhat bundle &
distribute MySQL in a particular way that is different to the RPMs
distributed by MySQL. I wanted to use the Percona HighPerf patches, but
their RPMs are also in the format used by MySQL rather than RedHat so
integrating them was a pain. I ended up using the RedHat .spec file and
updating it to the later version of MySQL that Percona use and applying
all their patches. This sort of thing can be avoided if the same
distribution format is used by both application developers & vendors.

R.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12, 2009. Register now&#33;
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users <at> lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

Hiroaki Ohno | 1 Oct 2009 19:23
Picon

different libnetsnmp*.so.15.1.2 but working as same

Hi, Net-SNMP users,

I'm checking my original table handlers implementation
that is working on the other embedded Linux platforms.
The handlers are implemented under mibgroup directory of compile machine,
and I collect libnetsnmp*.so.15.1.2 to extract them at the embedded 
platform.

I found out that there are two types of  libnetsnmp*.so.15.1.2 which are 
depended
on the making stages, "make" and "make install."

"make" gives libnetsnmp*.so.15.1.2 under some .libs/ directories.

"make install" after "make" gives same shared objects under the destination 
directories
specified by configure options.

Though both of these *.so.15.1.2 work fine on the embedded Linux platform,
there are a lot of binary level difference between them if compared.

Then Makefile tells me these differences are automatically created by 
"libtool" while
executing "make install".

What is the binary level of change of libnetsnmp*.15.1.2 caused by libtool?
Why both of them work as common if they are different each other?

Which one is better to be involved into the actual embedded platform?
I ordinary have used "make install" version of them, but if "make" only 
version
is capable of using enough without any problems, I will never do "make 
install" for
cross development because of avoiding the waist of time.

Thanks for your kind help in advance.

Hiroaki

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12, 2009. Register now&#33;
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users <at> lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users


Gmane