Check out my photos on Facebook

facebook

Soumyadipta De has:
11 friends
0 photos
0 notes
0 wall posts
0 groups

Check out my photos on Facebook

Hi jdev <at> jabber.org,

I set up a Facebook profile where I can post my pictures, videos and events and I want to add you as a friend so you can see it. First, you need to join Facebook! Once you join, you can also create your own profile.

Thanks,
Soumyadipta

To sign up for Facebook, follow the link below:

http://www.facebook.com/p.php?i=618585920&k=Z3FTY3PXV52NUDC1RB5UX4&r

See who else has invited you to Facebook:

Syed Hammad Ahmed
507 friends
3 photos

Mike Mendel
11 friends

Leonardo Vanegas
257 friends
25 photos

jdev <at> jabber.org was invited to join Facebook by Soumyadipta De. If you do not wish to receive this type of email from Facebook in the future, please click here to unsubscribe.
Facebook's offices are located at 1601 S. California Ave., Palo Alto, CA 94304

_______________________________________________
JDev mailing list
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
Unsubscribe: JDev-unsubscribe <at> jabber.org
_______________________________________________

headers

Jonathan Dickinson | 3 Aug 22:21

Re: Check out my photos on Facebook

Seems a little desperate/lonely... Opted out from Facebook notifications - shouldn't happen again.

From: Soumyadipta De <invite+m~hw3mwi <at> facebookmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2009 12:06 PM
To: Jdev <at> jabber.org <jdev <at> jabber.org>
Subject: [jdev] Check out my photos on Facebook

facebook

Soumyadipta De has:
11 friends
0 photos
0 notes
0 wall posts
0 groups

Check out my photos on Facebook

Hi jdev <at> jabber.org,

I set up a Facebook profile where I can post my pictures, videos and events and I want to add you as a friend so you can see it. First, you need to join Facebook! Once you join, you can also create your own profile.

Thanks,
Soumyadipta

To sign up for Facebook, follow the link below:

http://www.facebook.com/p.php?i=618585920&k=Z3FTY3PXV52NUDC1RB5UX4&r

See who else has invited you to Facebook:

Syed Hammad Ahmed
507 friends
3 photos

Mike Mendel
11 friends

Leonardo Vanegas
257 friends
25 photos

jdev <at> jabber.org was invited to join Facebook by Soumyadipta De. If you do not wish to receive this type of email from Facebook in the future, please click here to unsubscribe.
Facebook's offices are located at 1601 S. California Ave., Palo Alto, CA 94304

_______________________________________________
JDev mailing list
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
Unsubscribe: JDev-unsubscribe <at> jabber.org
_______________________________________________

headers

Ilya Braude | 12 Aug 20:41

PubSub spec clarification

I am looking closely at the XEP-0060 spec's feature listings: 
http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0060.html#registrar-features

Should '#manage-subscription' be '#manage-subscriptions' (note the extra 
's' in the end) the following?

<var>
  <name>http://jabber.org/protocol/pubsub#manage-subscription</name>
  <desc>Node owners may manage subscriptions.</desc>
  <doc>XEP-0060</doc>
</var>

Ilya
_______________________________________________
JDev mailing list
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
Unsubscribe: JDev-unsubscribe <at> jabber.org
_______________________________________________

headers

Peter Saint-Andre | 12 Aug 20:59

Re: PubSub spec clarification


On 8/12/09 12:41 PM, Ilya Braude wrote:
> I am looking closely at the XEP-0060 spec's feature listings:
> http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0060.html#registrar-features
> 
> Should '#manage-subscription' be '#manage-subscriptions' (note the extra
> 's' in the end) the following?
> 
> <var>
>  <name>http://jabber.org/protocol/pubsub#manage-subscription</name>
>  <desc>Node owners may manage subscriptions.</desc>
>  <doc>XEP-0060</doc>
> </var>

Correct. Fixed in my working copy.

Peter

--
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

headers

Peter Saint-Andre | 13 Aug 18:42

[Fwd: [Members] Board and Council Elections]


FYI.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [Members] Board and Council Elections
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:42:05 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter <at> stpeter.im>
Reply-To: XSF Members <members <at> xmpp.org>
To: XSF Members <members <at> xmpp.org>

In the member meeting last week, we decided on the following schedule
for the upcoming Board and Council elections:

Now - September 11: accept candidates via
http://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Board_and_Council_Elections_2009

September 14 - 30: proxy voting via memberbot

October 1: hold official member meeting in
xmpp:foundation <at> conference.jabber.org

I shall blog about this at http://blog.xmpp.org/ on August 31 or
thereabouts.

Peter

headers

Peter Saint-Andre | 26 Aug 22:31

wildcards vs. multiple certs


Recently I have been working with StartCom regarding the XMPP ICA, and
an issue has arisen regarding the representation of multiple domain
names (e.g., the bare domain and various subdomains) in certificates.
Traditionally we have allowed wildcards in the Class 1 certificates
issued by the ICA. However, more and more attacks have been observed in
the HTTP world with wildcard certs (cf. the recent Black Hat
conference). Although such attacks have not yet been observed in the
XMPP world, it is likely that we will end the practice of issuing Class
1 wildcard certificates (however they might be issued for Class 2 certs,
which require stronger validation of the requesting entity).

As a result, it is possible that admins might feel the need to request
multiple Class 1 certs in order to deploy an XMPP service (if they are
not able to obtain a Class 2 certificate). For example, at the
jabber.org service we might use one Class 1 certificate for the domain
name "jabber.org" and another Class 1 certificate for the domain name
"conference.jabber.org". This would require our XMPP server software to
present the "jabber.org" certificate when a peer server attempts to open
an s2s connection to the jabber.org domain, whereas it would present the
"conference.jabber.org" certificate when someone from a peer server
attempts to join a chatroom at the conference.jabber.org MUC service. I
do not know of any XMPP server software that can present two (or more)
different certs for s2s connections depending on the domain name
specified by the peer server.

How would current servers handle this? Do we really need to worry about
this problem, or shall we just tell administrators of XMPP services that
host multiple domain names to obtain Class 2 certificates (at least from
the XMPP ICA)? Clearly DNA [1] would help here but it's not close to done.

Peter

[1] http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/dna.html

headers

Justin Karneges | 26 Aug 22:39

Re: wildcards vs. multiple certs

On Wednesday 26 August 2009 13:31:13 Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> As a result, it is possible that admins might feel the need to request
> multiple Class 1 certs in order to deploy an XMPP service (if they are
> not able to obtain a Class 2 certificate). For example, at the
> jabber.org service we might use one Class 1 certificate for the domain
> name "jabber.org" and another Class 1 certificate for the domain name
> "conference.jabber.org". This would require our XMPP server software to
> present the "jabber.org" certificate when a peer server attempts to open
> an s2s connection to the jabber.org domain, whereas it would present the
> "conference.jabber.org" certificate when someone from a peer server
> attempts to join a chatroom at the conference.jabber.org MUC service. I
> do not know of any XMPP server software that can present two (or more)
> different certs for s2s connections depending on the domain name
> specified by the peer server.

You can put many names into one cert.  For a short set of domains, this ought 
to be practical.

-Justin
_______________________________________________
JDev mailing list
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
Unsubscribe: JDev-unsubscribe <at> jabber.org
_______________________________________________

headers

Stardock Technical Support | 26 Aug 22:40

[#EIU-300999]: wildcards vs. multiple certs

Jabber/XMPP software development list,
Your Ticket has been received and a member of our staff will review it and reply accordingly.

Important! Please be aware of the following criteria while utilizing Stardock's technical support system:

To expedite attention to your inquiry, refrain from submitting additional emails prior to receiving a response from our technical support staff.
Ensure the Ticket ID remains in the email's SUBJECT LINE at all times
Please allow up to two business days for a response.

You can always visit our forums and FAQ portions of our website for additional information found at:
http://www.stardock.com/forums
http://forums.wincustomize.com/
http://forums.impulsedriven.com/
http://esupport.stardock.com/index.php?_m=knowledgebase&_a=view

Listed below are details of this Ticket.

   Ticket ID: EIU-300999
   Subject: [jdev] wildcards vs. multiple certs
   Department: Support - General
   Priority: Received
   Status: Open

You can check the status or reply to this ticket online at: http://esupport.stardock.com/
   Email: jdev <at> jabber.org
   Password: 88268d2d

Please do let us know if we can assist you any further,

Stardock Corporation

_______________________________________________
JDev mailing list
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
Unsubscribe: JDev-unsubscribe <at> jabber.org
_______________________________________________

headers

Peter Saint-Andre | 26 Aug 22:50

Re: wildcards vs. multiple certs


On 8/26/09 2:39 PM, Justin Karneges wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 August 2009 13:31:13 Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> As a result, it is possible that admins might feel the need to request
>> multiple Class 1 certs in order to deploy an XMPP service (if they are
>> not able to obtain a Class 2 certificate). For example, at the
>> jabber.org service we might use one Class 1 certificate for the domain
>> name "jabber.org" and another Class 1 certificate for the domain name
>> "conference.jabber.org". This would require our XMPP server software to
>> present the "jabber.org" certificate when a peer server attempts to open
>> an s2s connection to the jabber.org domain, whereas it would present the
>> "conference.jabber.org" certificate when someone from a peer server
>> attempts to join a chatroom at the conference.jabber.org MUC service. I
>> do not know of any XMPP server software that can present two (or more)
>> different certs for s2s connections depending on the domain name
>> specified by the peer server.
> 
> You can put many names into one cert.  For a short set of domains, this ought 
> to be practical.

True, as long as your CA honors the CSR you provide. So perhaps this is
a non-issue...

Peter

--
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

headers

Philipp Hancke | 27 Aug 07:14

Re: wildcards vs. multiple certs

Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
[...]
> As a result, it is possible that admins might feel the need to request
> multiple Class 1 certs in order to deploy an XMPP service (if they are
> not able to obtain a Class 2 certificate). For example, at the
> jabber.org service we might use one Class 1 certificate for the domain
> name "jabber.org" and another Class 1 certificate for the domain name
> "conference.jabber.org". This would require our XMPP server software to
> present the "jabber.org" certificate when a peer server attempts to open
> an s2s connection to the jabber.org domain, whereas it would present the
> "conference.jabber.org" certificate when someone from a peer server
> attempts to join a chatroom at the conference.jabber.org MUC service. I
> do not know of any XMPP server software that can present two (or more)
> different certs for s2s connections depending on the domain name
> specified by the peer server.

This is how Matthias implemented s2s TLS in jabberd.

> How would current servers handle this? Do we really need to worry about

Nobody cares about the content of s2s certificates when connecting to a
remote domain. Therefore nobody bothers to present the right certificate.

philipp

_______________________________________________
JDev mailing list
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
Unsubscribe: JDev-unsubscribe <at> jabber.org
_______________________________________________

11	February 2012
27	January 2012
4	December 2011
12	November 2011
12	October 2011
10	September 2011
32	August 2011
2	July 2011
20	June 2011
9	May 2011
43	April 2011
22	March 2011
31	February 2011
23	January 2011
13	December 2010
80	November 2010
80	October 2010
31	September 2010
62	August 2010
35	July 2010
21	June 2010
41	May 2010
51	April 2010
67	March 2010
85	February 2010
40	January 2010
74	December 2009
66	November 2009
42	October 2009
24	September 2009
11	August 2009
22	July 2009
48	June 2009
33	May 2009
70	April 2009
176	March 2009
58	February 2009
62	January 2009
84	December 2008
137	November 2008
143	October 2008
185	September 2008
69	August 2008
155	July 2008
131	June 2008
197	May 2008
199	April 2008
249	March 2008
140	February 2008
135	January 2008
105	December 2007
60	November 2007
66	October 2007
71	September 2007
107	August 2007
75	July 2007
102	June 2007
97	May 2007
114	April 2007
125	March 2007
133	February 2007
121	January 2007
137	December 2006
178	November 2006
82	October 2006
109	September 2006
179	August 2006
165	July 2006
139	June 2006
225	May 2006
140	April 2006
283	March 2006
194	February 2006
228	January 2006
219	December 2005
242	November 2005
183	October 2005
286	September 2005
380	August 2005
178	July 2005
178	June 2005
179	May 2005
374	April 2005
231	March 2005
218	February 2005
216	January 2005
169	December 2004
159	November 2004
246	October 2004
231	September 2004
162	August 2004
129	July 2004
244	June 2004
132	May 2004
210	April 2004
233	March 2004
159	February 2004
238	January 2004
162	December 2003
358	November 2003
221	October 2003
315	September 2003
188	August 2003
310	July 2003
409	June 2003
189	May 2003
233	April 2003
137	March 2003
237	February 2003
381	January 2003
285	December 2002
361	November 2002
402	October 2002
228	September 2002
381	August 2002
431	July 2002
343	June 2002
301	May 2002
678	April 2002
439	March 2002
466	February 2002
521	January 2002
206	December 2001
230	November 2001
391	October 2001
411	September 2001
346	August 2001
247	July 2001
433	June 2001
775	May 2001
539	April 2001
508	March 2001
456	February 2001
529	January 2001
453	December 2000
500	November 2000
302	October 2000
334	September 2000
238	August 2000
205	July 2000
167	June 2000
136	May 2000
171	April 2000
128	March 2000
79	February 2000
213	January 2000
300	December 1999
104	November 1999
355	October 1999
285	September 1999
453	August 1999
1	May 1999
3	March 1999
1	January 1999
1	April 1998
5	March 1998

Mon	Tue	Wed	Thu	Fri	Sat	Sun

					1	2
3	4	5	6	7	8	9
10	11	12	13	14	15	16
17	18	19	20	21	22	23
24	25	26	27	28	29	30
31