Reminder to Gentoo Users: Unstable build 60080

Toad wrote:
> Unstable build 60080 is now available. The snapshots are updating. You
> may want to update your start-freenet.sh from a tarball.
>
> Changes:
> * Main change: as per
>   http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4879883.html ,
>   we now set -XX:MaxDirectMemorySize=128M (maybe it should be higher).
>   This should help prevent the node becoming nonresponsive due to
>   running out of direct memory space.

By the way, for those of you using the Gentoo ebuild, don't forget to
append the -XX:MaxDirectMemorySize=128M to your JAVA_OPTIONS variable in
the /etc/conf.d/freenet file.

Student needs Help

Hello everybody

Whenever I try downloading anything it gives me route not found error. I am using the 5076 version. Do you
think this problem was sloved in the 5077 version.

I am asking this question because I am working on a project and need to download the new source code if it has
been changed drastically and would fix the route not found errors.

Waiting fot your earnest reply

Thanking You
Reena Godhia

sf ssh issues?

Eclipse had an error updating, I tried csv via ssh to see what happened and got the following:

 <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at> 
 <at>        WARNING: POSSIBLE DNS SPOOFING DETECTED!           <at> 
 <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at> 
The DSA host key for cvs.freenet.sourceforge.net has changed,
and the key for the according IP address 66.35.250.209
is unknown. This could either mean that
DNS SPOOFING is happening or the IP address for the host
and its host key have changed at the same time.
 <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at> 
 <at>     WARNING: REMOTE HOST IDENTIFICATION HAS CHANGED!      <at> 
 <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at> 
IT IS POSSIBLE THAT SOMEONE IS DOING SOMETHING NASTY!
Someone could be eavesdropping on you right now (man-in-the-middle attack)!
It is also possible that the DSA host key has just been changed.
The fingerprint for the DSA key sent by the remote host is
4c:68:03:d4:5c:58:a6:1d:9d:17:13:24:14:48:ba:99.
Please contact your system administrator.
Add correct host key in /home/knoppix/.ssh/known_hosts to get rid of this message.
Offending key in /home/knoppix/.ssh/known_hosts:4
DSA host key for cvs.freenet.sourceforge.net has changed and you have requested strict checking.
Host key verification failed.
cvs [status aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if any)

Anyone else seeing anything like this?

Ed

Re: Node nonresponsiveness after some time caused by toomuch memory usage??

>My interpretation: the node is really slow because it's got too much
>memory allocated and garbage collection is not freeing up any space. In
>other words, a space leak is causing the node to stop responding.
>
>There is only one problem with this theory:
>SEC Apr 30, 2004 9:59:45 PM (freenet.node.Main, YThread-2243, MINOR):
>dump of interesting objects after gc in checkpoint:
>Memory used: 114460856
>Total allocated memory: 353718272
>
>So what the fsck is causing these pauses?!

Try increasing the size of the direct memory pool and see if it helps.
additionally, run the node with -Xloggc:gclog.txt and see what appears in
that file.

/N

no name for the child: PAgM

i've been searching for the name of the "PAgM" part of the public ssk key.
as it turns out neither the fred sourcecode nor any doc or any freenet-related sourcecode i have seems to
give this thing a name. all label it as "the PAgM part", "the PAgM string" or similar.
key type, routing key, crypto key, document name - everythings there, but what's that PAgM called?
(or, if it has no name, perhaps a short description why it is "PAgM", maybe then a name can be made for it)

Re: rate limiting

On Friday 30 April 2004 03:38, Chip wrote:
> Still quite a few DNF and RNF (more DNF these days than RNF)
> Wait awhile after the request, try again at random times and most things
> arrive.

That describes my experience these days (with both 5077 & 60079).
One more point to raise MaxHTL.

Is there some idea how to measure the routing quality (path folding)?

good byte

p.s. 

Re: Re: 0.6/Re: Web Interface link choices for 0.6

On Thursday 29 April 2004 21:11, Jonathan Howard wrote:
> How about not checking for updated at all.
> Auto-update bookmark when the user successfully retrieves the new page.
> (or an active link of the sites, [something more than the metadata])
>
> This doesn't sound hard to implement, don't know without digging deeper
> in the code though.

Ok, this sound smart, indeed. It just creates some extra cross-link between 
fproxy (the thread successfully receiving SITE(num+n) with SITE(num) in the 
bookmark list) and the node&infolet thing.

grep'ing the source, the references to the bookmarks in stable are:
node/Node.java
node/http/infolets/DefaultInfolet.java
node/http/BookmarkManagerServlet.java

More intelligent than the programmer's strategy to put alchemy on top 
(n<=N && HTL <= h && retry <= R) ??? Then we don't need frost, fuqid etc. to 
clog up the network.

good byte

Re: Student needs Help

On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 19:25:01 -0700
reena godhia <godhia@...> wrote:

> Hello everybody
> 
> Whenever I try downloading anything it gives me 
> route not found error. I am using the 5076 version. 
> Do you think this problem was sloved in the 5077 
> version.

A _ton_ of stuff was fixed in the 5077 version, you should definitely
grab a copy of the new build. Here is Toad's list of fixes in 5077:

Stable build 5077 is now available. The snapshots have been updated.
All users of the stable branch should upgrade ASAP. This build has far
too many changes to list exhaustively (but I tried, you can see the
results in the commit comments). Some highlights:
* Fixed a HUGE bug which was preventing inserts from working at all
  well. This may well be responsible for much of Freenet's woes. It has
  been around at least since the native datastore rewrite..
* Major changes to how and to where we route - "bidirectional routing".
  Basically this means that the routing table is a superset of the set
  of connected nodes, and if a node is connected, we will try to route
  to it. Even if it is a transient. This should significantly improve
  performance and reduce the number of Route Not Found errors.
* Improved announcements
* Fixed a major rate limiting bug.
* Fixed many less significant bugs.
* New diagnostics and config options
* Substantial reduction in memory usage. Many leaks eliminated.

Re: sf ssh issues?

Same thing for me on Friday.  I guess something changed but how would we 
know?  For a while Friday I was getting /cvshome/CVSROOT not found, or 
something to that effect.  Perhaps they were backing up or something, and 
the cvs dirs were all offline.  It worked later on.

Now I just tried doing an update this morning and I got that error:
Cannot access /cvsroot/freenet/CVSROOT
No such file or directory

If anyone gets an answer from sf please post it.

On Friday 30 April 2004 10:38 pm, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> Eclipse had an error updating, I tried csv via ssh to see what happened
> and got the following:
>
>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at> 
>  <at>        WARNING: POSSIBLE DNS SPOOFING DETECTED!           <at> 
>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at> 
> The DSA host key for cvs.freenet.sourceforge.net has changed,
> and the key for the according IP address 66.35.250.209
> is unknown. This could either mean that
> DNS SPOOFING is happening or the IP address for the host
> and its host key have changed at the same time.
>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at> 
>  <at>     WARNING: REMOTE HOST IDENTIFICATION HAS CHANGED!      <at> 
>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at>  <at> 
> IT IS POSSIBLE THAT SOMEONE IS DOING SOMETHING NASTY!
> Someone could be eavesdropping on you right now (man-in-the-middle
> attack)! It is also possible that the DSA host key has just been changed.
> The fingerprint for the DSA key sent by the remote host is

Re: rate limiting

On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 07:21:29AM +0200, Martin Scheffler wrote:
> On Friday 30 April 2004 03:38, Chip wrote:
> > Still quite a few DNF and RNF (more DNF these days than RNF)
> > Wait awhile after the request, try again at random times and most things
> > arrive.
> 
> That describes my experience these days (with both 5077 & 60079).
> One more point to raise MaxHTL.

MaxHTL is probably not the problem. If the network was working better
fewer hops would be needed to find data. The main difficulty is probably
the interaction between rate limiting and routing, as always.
> 
> Is there some idea how to measure the routing quality (path folding)?

Several. One is push/pull tests.
> 
> good byte
> 
> p.s. 
--

-- 
Matthew J Toseland - toad@...
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl@...
http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl