Richard Lamb | 30 Aug 17:58 2015
Picon

Re: dns rrl is now implemented in windows dns

very nice.  love the dane support.  thank you Kumar and co. -Rick


On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Mehmet Akcin <mehmet <at> akcin.net> wrote:
Along with many other new functions which were suggested by many <at> ietf , windns users list, icann meeting etc ;)

Kudos to WinDNS team! Kumar, Prasad n many others for hard work

Many new cool features team added can be found at

https://technet.microsoft.com/en-US/library/dn765484.aspx

Unknown record support ( thanks to jabley )
DANE ( like 20+ people )
Ipv6 root-hints
RRL ( vixie and others )

Questions? Recommendations? Join windns- users list and just ask

http://lists.cloudapp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/windns-users

Mehmet

<div>
<div dir="ltr">very nice. &nbsp;love the dane support. &nbsp;thank you Kumar and co. -Rick<div><br></div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Mehmet Akcin <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:mehmet@..." target="_blank">mehmet <at> akcin.net</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote">Along with many other new functions which were suggested by many  <at>  ietf , windns users list, icann meeting etc ;)<br><br>
Kudos to WinDNS team! Kumar, Prasad n many others for hard work<br><br>
Many new cool features team added can be found at<br><br><a href="https://technet.microsoft.com/en-US/library/dn765484.aspx" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://technet.microsoft.com/en-US/library/dn765484.aspx</a><br><br>
Unknown record support ( thanks to jabley )<br>
DANE ( like 20+ people )<br>
Ipv6 root-hints<br>
RRL ( vixie and others )<br><br>
Questions? Recommendations? Join windns- users list and just ask<br><br><a href="http://lists.cloudapp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/windns-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.cloudapp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/windns-users</a><br><span class="HOEnZb"><br>
Mehmet<br></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">
<br>
&gt; On Aug 28, 2015, at 21:13, Paul Vixie &lt;<a href="mailto:paul <at> redbarn.org">paul@...</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; <a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/teamdhcp/archive/2015/08/28/response-rate-limiting-in-windows-dns-server.aspx" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://blogs.technet.com/b/teamdhcp/archive/2015/08/28/response-rate-limiting-in-windows-dns-server.aspx</a><br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; --<br>
&gt; Paul Vixie<br>
&gt; _______________________________________________<br>
&gt; dns-operations mailing list<br>
&gt; <a href="mailto:dns-operations@...">dns-operations <at> lists.dns-oarc.net</a><br>
&gt; <a href="https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations</a><br>
&gt; dns-jobs mailing list<br>
&gt; <a href="https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs</a><br><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
dns-operations mailing list<br><a href="mailto:dns-operations@...">dns-operations <at> lists.dns-oarc.net</a><br><a href="https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations%0Adns-jobs" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations<br>
dns-jobs</a> mailing list<br><a href="https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs</a><br>
</div></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
Paul Vixie | 29 Aug 06:13 2015

dns rrl is now implemented in windows dns

http://blogs.technet.com/b/teamdhcp/archive/2015/08/28/response-rate-limiting-in-windows-dns-server.aspx

--

-- 
Paul Vixie
Roland Dobbins | 26 Aug 12:01 2015
Picon

Re: A dns-proxy for DNS over HTTP(s)

On 26 Aug 2015, at 2:31, Ralf Weber wrote:

> I don't think this is the case any more.

Nothing much has changed, from the defender's standpoint.  DNS 
reflection/amplification attacks are as prevalent  and effective as 
ever; it's just that SSDP, ntp, and others are even more popular.

> DNS server scale to million of requests per second on normal hardware 
> I have not yet heard of a web server scaling to that.

Concur 100%.

Nobody is thinking about this with QUIC/HTTP 2, and it looks as if 
nobody (except us, heh) is thinking about this with the DNS, either.

-----------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@...>
Stephane Bortzmeyer | 25 Aug 09:24 2015
Picon

For DNSSEC

Very good rebuttal of a famous FUD about DNSSEC. Useful if your
stakeholders are concerned and asked you questions about this FUD :

http://blog.easydns.org/2015/08/06/for-dnssec/

There are unfortunately some technical errors, I let the experts here
find them :-)
David Keogh | 24 Aug 17:05 2015
Picon

BT DNS Request Volumes

Hello,

I'm seeing a large drop in volume of DNS queries originated from AS2856. Is BT having DNS resolver issues?

Regards,
David
<div><div dir="ltr">Hello,<div><br></div>
<div>I'm seeing a large drop in volume of DNS queries originated from AS2856. Is BT having DNS resolver issues?</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Regards,</div>
<div>David</div>
</div></div>
Julie Hedlund | 24 Aug 16:26 2015
Picon

REMINDER: Call for Participation -- ICANN DNSSEC Workshop at ICANN 54 in Dublin, Ireland

REMINDER: Call for Participation -- ICANN DNSSEC Workshop at ICANN 54 in Dublin, Ireland

 

The DNSSEC Deployment Initiative and the Internet Society Deploy360 Programme, in cooperation with the ICANN Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC), are planning a DNSSEC Workshop at the ICANN 54 meeting on 21 October in Dublin, Ireland.  The DNSSEC Workshop has been a part of ICANN meetings for several years and has provided a forum for both experienced and new people to meet, present and discuss current and future DNSSEC deployments.  For reference, the most recent session was held at the ICANN meeting in Buenos Aires, Argentina on 24 June 2015. The presentations and transcripts are available at: https://buenosaires53.icann.org/en/schedule/wed-dnssec  

 

At ICANN 54 we are particularly interested in live demonstrations of uses of DNSSEC or DANE.  Examples might include:

 

* Email clients and servers using DNSSEC, OPENPGPKEY, or S/MIME for secure email.

* Tools for automating the generation of DNSSEC/DANE records.

* Services for monitoring or managing DNSSEC signing or validation.

* Tools or services for using DNSSEC/DANE along with other existing protocols and 

  services such as SSH, XMPP, SMTP, S/MIME or PGP/GPG.

* Innovative uses of APIs to do something new and different using DNSSEC/DANE.

* S/MIME and Microsoft Outlook integration with active directory.

 

Our interest is to provide current examples of the state of development and to show real-world examples of how DNSSEC and DANE related innovation can be used to increase the overall security of the Internet.

 

We are open to presentations and demonstrations related to any topic associated with DNSSEC and DANE.  Examples of the types of topics we are seeking include:

 

1.  DNSSEC activities in Europe 

 

For this panel we are seeking participation from those who have been involved in DNSSEC deployment in Europe and also from those who have not deployed DNSSEC but who have a keen interest in the challenges and benefits of deployment.  In particular, we will consider the following questions:  Are you interested in reporting on DNSSEC validation of your ISPs? What can DNSSEC do for you? What doesn't it do?  What are the internal tradeoffs to implementing DNSSEC? What did you learn in your deployment of DNSSEC?  We are interested in presentations from both people involved with the signing of domains and people involved with the deployment of DNSSEC-validating DNS resolvers.

 

2.  Potential impacts of Root Key Rollover

 

Given many concerns about the need to do a Root Key Rollover, we would like to bring together a panel of people who can talk about what the potential impacts may be to ISPs, equipment providers and end users, and also what can be done to potentially mitigate those issues. In particular, we are seeking participation from vendors, ISPs, and the community that will be affected by distribution of new root keys.  We would like to be able to offer suggestions out of this panel to the wider technical community.  If you have a specific concern about the Root Key Rollover, or believe you have a method or solution to help address impacts, we would like to hear from you.

 

3.  Implementing DNSSEC validation at Internet Service Providers (ISPs)

 

Internet Service Providers (ISPs) play a critical role by enabling DNSSEC validation for the caching DNS resolvers used by their customers.  We have now seen massive rollouts of DNSSEC validation within large North American ISPs and at ISPs around the world.  We are interested in presentations on topics such as: 

* Can you describe your experiences with negative Trust Anchors and operational realities?

* What does an ISP need to do to prepare its network for implementing DNSSEC validation?  

* How does an ISP need to prepare its support staff and technical staff for the rollout of DNSSEC validation?  

* What measurements are available about the degree of DNSSEC validation currently deployed?  

* What tools are available to help an ISP deploy DNSSEC validation?

* What are the practical server-sizing impacts of enabling DNSSEC validation on ISP DNS Resolvers (ex. cost, memory, CPU, bandwidth, technical support, etc.)?

 

4. The operational realities of running DNSSEC

 

Now that DNSSEC has become an operational norm for many registries, registrars, and ISPs, what have we learned about how we manage DNSSEC? What is the best practice around key rollovers? How often do you review your disaster recovery procedures? Is there operational familiarity within your customer support teams? What operational statistics have we gathered about DNSSEC? Are there experiences being documented in the form of best practices, or something similar, for transfer of signed zones?

 

5.  DANE and DNSSEC application automation

 

For DNSSEC to reach massive deployment levels it is clear that a higher level of automation is required than is currently available. There also is strong interest for DANE usage within web transactions as well as for securing email and Voice-over-IP (VoIP). We are seeking presentations  on topics such as:

* What tools, systems and services are available to help automate DNSSEC key management?

* Can you provide an analysis of current tools/services and identify gaps?

* Where are the best opportunities for automation within DNSSEC signing and validation processes?

* What are the costs and benefits of different approaches to automation?

* What are some of the new and innovative uses of DANE and other DNSSEC applications in new areas or industries?

* What tools and services are now available that can support DANE usage?

* How soon could DANE and other DNSSEC applications become a deployable reality?

* How can the industry use DANE and other DNSSEC applications as a mechanism for creating a more secure Internet?

 

We would be particularly interested in any live demonstrations of DNSSEC / DANE application automation and services.  For example, a demonstration of the actual process of setting up a site with a certificate stored in a TLSA record that correctly validates would be welcome.  Demonstrations of new tools that make the setup of DNSSEC or DANE more automated would also be welcome.

 

6.  When unexpected DNSSEC events occur

 

What have we learned from some of the operational outages that we have seen over the past 18 months? Are there lessons that we can pass on to those just about to implement DNSSEC? How do you manage dissemination of information about the outage? What have you learned about communications planning? Do you have a route to ISPs and registrars? How do you liaise with your CERT community?

  

7.  DNSSEC and DANE in the enterprise

 

Enterprises can play a critical role in both providing DNSSEC validation to their internal networks and also through signing of the domains owned by the enterprise. We are seeking presentations from enterprises that have implemented DNSSEC on validation and/or signing processes and can address questions such as:

* What are the benefits to enterprises of rolling out DNSSEC validation? And how do they do so?

* What are the challenges to deployment for these organizations and how could DANE and other DNSSEC applications address those challenges?

* How should an enterprise best prepare its IT staff and network to implement DNSSEC?

* What tools and systems are available to assist enterprises in the deployment of DNSSEC?

* How can the DANE protocol be used within an enterprise to bring a higher level of security to transactions using SSL/TLS certificates?

 

8. Hardware Security Modules (HSMs) use cases and innovation

 

We are interested in demonstrations of HSMs, presentations of HSM-related innovations and real world use cases of HSMs and key management. 

  

In addition, we welcome suggestions for additional topics.

 

If you are interested in participating, please send a brief (1-2 sentence) description of your proposed presentation to dnssec-dublin-pYXoxzOOsG8@public.gmane.org ASAP or no later than *Monday, 31 August 2015.*

 

We hope that you can join us.

 

Thank you,

 

Julie Hedlund

 

On behalf of the DNSSEC Workshop Program Committee:

Mark Elkins, DNS/ZACR

Cath Goulding, Nominet UK

Jean Robert Hountomey, AfricaCERT

Jacques Latour, .CA

Xiaodong Lee, CNNIC

Luciano Minuchin, NIC.AR

Russ Mundy, Parsons

Ondřej Surý, CZ.NIC

Yoshiro Yoneya, JPRS

Dan York, Internet Society

 

Attachment (smime.p7s): application/pkcs7-signature, 6830 bytes
<div><span><div>
<div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">REMINDER: Call for Participation -- ICANN DNSSEC Workshop at ICANN 54 in Dublin, Ireland</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span>&nbsp;</span></p></div>
<div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">The DNSSEC Deployment Initiative and the Internet Society Deploy360 Programme, in cooperation with the ICANN Security&nbsp;and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC), are planning a DNSSEC Workshop
 at&nbsp;the ICANN 54 meeting on 21 October in Dublin, Ireland.&nbsp;&nbsp;The DNSSEC&nbsp;Workshop has been a part of ICANN meetings for several years and has&nbsp;provided a forum for both experienced and new people to meet, present and&nbsp;discuss current and future DNSSEC deployments.&nbsp;&nbsp;For
 reference, the most&nbsp;recent&nbsp;session was held at the ICANN meeting in Buenos Aires, Argentina on 24 June 2015. The presentations and transcripts are available&nbsp;at:&nbsp;<a href="https://buenosaires53.icann.org/en/schedule/wed-dnssec">https://buenosaires53.icann.org/en/schedule/wed-dnssec</a>.&nbsp;</span><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;<p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span>&nbsp;</span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span>At ICANN 54 we are particularly interested in live demonstrations of uses of DNSSEC or DANE. &nbsp;Examples might include:<p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span>&nbsp;</span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span><span>* Email clients and servers using DNSSEC,&nbsp;</span><span></span><span>OPENPGPKEY,
 or S/MIME</span><span>&nbsp;</span><span></span><span>for
 secure email.<p></p></span></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span>* Tools for automating the generation of DNSSEC/DANE records.<p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span>* Services for monitoring or managing DNSSEC signing or validation.<p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span>* Tools or services for using DNSSEC/DANE along with other existing protocols and&nbsp;<p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span><span>&nbsp; services such as SSH,&nbsp;</span><span>XMPP, SMTP, S/MIME</span><span>&nbsp;or
 PGP/GPG.<p></p></span></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span>* Innovative uses of APIs to do something new and different using DNSSEC/DANE.<p></p></span></p></div>
</div>
</div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span>* S/MIME and Microsoft Outlook integration with active directory.</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div>
<div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span>&nbsp;</span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span>Our interest is to provide current examples of the state of development and to show real-world examples of how DNSSEC and DANE&nbsp;</span><span>related
 innovation&nbsp;</span><span></span><span>can be used to increase the overall security of the
 Internet.<p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span>&nbsp;</span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">We are open to presentations and demonstrations related to any topic associated with DNSSEC and DANE. &nbsp;Examples of the types of topics we are seeking include:</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">&nbsp;</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">1.&nbsp;&nbsp;DNSSEC activities in Europe&nbsp;</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">&nbsp;</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span><span lang="EN-GB">For this panel we are seeking participation from those who have been&nbsp;involved in DNSSEC deployment in Europe
 and also from those who have not deployed DNSSEC but who have a keen&nbsp;interest in the challenges and benefits of deployment. &nbsp;In particular, we will consider the following questions: &nbsp;Are you interested in r</span><span lang="EN-GB">eporting
 on DNSSEC&nbsp;</span><span lang="EN-GB">validation</span><span lang="EN-GB">&nbsp;of&nbsp;</span><span lang="EN-GB">your&nbsp;</span><span lang="EN-GB">ISPs?&nbsp;</span><span lang="EN-GB"></span><span lang="EN-GB">What
 can DNSSEC do for you? What doesn't it do? &nbsp;What are the internal tradeoffs to implementing DNSSEC? What did you learn in your deployment of DNSSEC? &nbsp;We are interested in presentations from both people involved with the signing of domains and people involved
 with the deployment of DNSSEC-validating DNS resolvers.</span></span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">&nbsp;</span><p></p></p>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span>2.&nbsp;&nbsp;Potential impacts of Root Key Rollover<p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">&nbsp;</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Given many concerns about the need to do a Root Key Rollover, we would like to bring together a panel of people who can talk about what the potential impacts may be to ISPs, equipment providers
 and end users, and also what can be done to potentially mitigate those issues.&nbsp;In particular, we are seeking participation from vendors, ISPs, and&nbsp;the community that will be affected by distribution of new root keys. &nbsp;We would like to be able to offer suggestions
 out of this panel to the wider technical community. &nbsp;If you have a specific concern about the Root Key Rollover, or believe you have a method or solution to help address impacts, we would like to hear from you.</span></p></div>
</div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span>&nbsp;</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div>
<div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">3. &nbsp;Implementing DNSSEC validation at Internet Service Providers (ISPs)</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span>&nbsp;</span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Internet Service Providers (ISPs) play a critical role by enabling DNSSEC validation for the caching DNS resolvers used by their customers. &nbsp;We have now seen massive rollouts of DNSSEC validation
 within large North American ISPs and at ISPs around the world. &nbsp;We are interested in presentations on topics such as:&nbsp;</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">* Can you describe your experiences with negative Trust Anchors and operational realities?</span><span lang="EN-GB"><p></p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">* What does an ISP need to do to prepare its network for implementing DNSSEC validation? &nbsp;</span><span><p></p></span></p>
</div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">* How does an ISP need to prepare its support staff and technical staff for the rollout of DNSSEC validation? &nbsp;</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">* What measurements are available about the degree of DNSSEC validation currently deployed? &nbsp;</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">* What tools are available to help an ISP deploy DNSSEC validation?</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">* What are the practical server-sizing impacts of enabling DNSSEC validation on ISP DNS Resolvers (ex. cost, memory, CPU, bandwidth, technical support, etc.)?</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
</div>
<div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">&nbsp;</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">4. The operational realities of running DNSSEC</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">&nbsp;</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Now that DNSSEC has become an operational norm for many registries,&nbsp;registrars, and ISPs, what have we learned about how we manage DNSSEC?&nbsp;What is the best practice around key rollovers?
 How often do you review your&nbsp;disaster recovery procedures? Is there operational familiarity within your&nbsp;customer support teams? What operational statistics have we&nbsp;gathered about DNSSEC? Are there experiences being documented in the form&nbsp;of best practices,
 or something similar, for transfer of signed zones?</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">&nbsp;</span><p></p></p>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">5. &nbsp;DANE and DNSSEC application automation</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">&nbsp;</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">For DNSSEC to reach massive deployment levels it is clear that a higher level of automation is required than is currently available.&nbsp;</span><span>There
 also is strong interest for DANE usage within web transactions as well as for securing email and Voice-over-IP (VoIP). We are seeking presentations&nbsp;&nbsp;on topics such as:</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">* What tools, systems and services are available to help automate DNSSEC key management?</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">* Can you provide an analysis of current tools/services and identify gaps?</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">* Where are the best opportunities for automation within DNSSEC signing and validation processes?</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">* What are the costs and benefits of different approaches to automation?</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">* What are some of the new and innovative uses of DANE and other DNSSEC applications in new areas or industries?</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">* What tools and services are now available that can support DANE usage?</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">* How soon could DANE and other DNSSEC applications become a deployable reality?</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">* How can the industry use DANE and other DNSSEC applications as a mechanism for creating a more secure Internet?</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">&nbsp;</span><p></p></p>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">We would be particularly interested in any live demonstrations of DNSSEC / DANE application automation and services. &nbsp;For example, a demonstration of the actual process of setting up a site
 with a certificate stored in a TLSA record that correctly validates would be welcome. &nbsp;Demonstrations of new tools that make the setup of DNSSEC or DANE more automated would also be welcome.</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">&nbsp;</span><p></p></p>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">6. &nbsp;When unexpected DNSSEC events occur</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">&nbsp;</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">What have we learned from some of the operational outages that we have&nbsp;seen over the past 18 months? Are there lessons that we can pass on to&nbsp;those just about to implement DNSSEC? How do
 you manage dissemination of&nbsp;information about the outage? What have you learned about communications&nbsp;planning? Do you have a route to ISPs and registrars? How do you liaise&nbsp;with your CERT community?</span></p></div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">&nbsp;</span><span>&nbsp;</span><p></p></p>
</div>
<div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">7. &nbsp;DNSSEC and DANE in the enterprise</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">&nbsp;</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Enterprises can play a critical role in both providing DNSSEC validation to their internal networks and also through signing of the domains owned by the enterprise. We are seeking presentations
 from enterprises that have implemented DNSSEC on validation and/or signing processes and can address questions such as:</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">* What are the benefits to enterprises of rolling out DNSSEC validation? And how do they do so?</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">* What are the challenges to deployment for these organizations and how could DANE and other DNSSEC applications address those challenges?</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">* How should an enterprise best prepare its IT staff and network to implement DNSSEC?</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">* What tools and systems are available to assist enterprises in the deployment of DNSSEC?</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">* How can the DANE protocol be used within an enterprise to bring a higher level of security to transactions using SSL/TLS certificates?</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">&nbsp;</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span>8. Hardware Security Modules (HSMs) use cases and innovation<p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">&nbsp;</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">We are interested in demonstrations of HSMs, presentations of HSM-related innovations and real world use cases of HSMs and key management.</span><span>&nbsp;<p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">In addition, we welcome suggestions for additional topics.</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">&nbsp;</span><p></p></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">If you are interested in participating, please send a brief (1-2 sentence)&nbsp;description of your proposed presentation&nbsp;to</span><span lang="EN-GB">&nbsp;</span><a href="mailto:dnssec-dublin@..." class="">dnssec-dublin@...</a>&nbsp;ASAP or no later than *Monday, 31 August 2015.*</p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">&nbsp;</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">We hope that you can join us.</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">&nbsp;</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Thank you,</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">&nbsp;</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Julie Hedlund</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">&nbsp;</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">On behalf of the DNSSEC Workshop Program Committee:</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Mark Elkins,&nbsp;DNS/ZACR</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Cath Goulding, Nominet UK</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Jean Robert Hountomey, AfricaCERT</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Jacques Latour, .CA</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Xiaodong Lee, CNNIC</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Luciano Minuchin, NIC.AR</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Russ Mundy, Parsons</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Ond&#345;ej Sur&yacute;, CZ.NIC</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Yoshiro Yoneya, JPRS</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Dan York, Internet Society</span><span><p></p></span></p></div>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span>&nbsp;</span></p></div>
</div>
</div>
</div></span></div>
Terry Manderson | 11 Aug 22:42 2015
Picon

Re: So many DS records for icann.org

Morishita-san,

It does seem strange at face value.

But all is under control. :)

We are taking a very methodical approach for moving the ICANN.ORG zone
from an old set of DNSSEC infrastructure to new infrastructure due to the
tango with registry locks and also in light of the (global political?)
importance of the ICANN.ORG zone right now.

That move results in some DS bloat for the time being.

Cheers
Terry

On 11/08/2015 11:56 pm, Yasuhiro Orange Morishita <yasuhiro@...>
wrote:
>
>Hello,
>
>I've found so many DS records for icann.org <http://icann.org> in org
>zone.
>It seems to be strange.
>
>$ dig +short icann.org <http://icann.org> ds
>41334 7 1 49D712CF7A8984B7545FDC7E69D7372782339B3A
>18060 7 2 6BE021818B9F10ED981A03ACBF74F01E31FB15C58680AD0C4BAA464B
>F37A7523
>17248 7 1 88151C40E4673E7023E6AD1902A8AE055F3DDF61
>41643 7 2 B8AB67D895E62087F0C5FC5A1A941C67A18E4B096F6C622AEFAE30DD
>7B1EA199
>17248 7 2 885CF8A6CF35FD5C619E1D48B59AFB23063BBA9FEC52FF25F99094CB
>A10910A2
>32134 7 2 6C321409786B95BEEE60E6D42F3713ACC3A9B5D18442091A792FBDD1
>EA8E4655
>41643 7 1 93358DB22E956A451EB5AE8D2EC39526CA6A87B9
>18060 7 1 04CF77A76FD328458005D2B35E416F209A3420A0
>41334 7 2 C299FAF7D6F9BCB310200ECF2EA216A2E83F7ACB15C8D72D79641FA8
>DFACF9A9
>32134 7 1 3D54D51109645E8315F59790B920323D361B065F
>
>There are ten (five sets) DS records.
>But valid DS are only two (one set), key id = 18060.
>
><http://dnsviz.net/d/icann.org/VcnJ3Q/dnssec/>
>
>-- Orange
>_______________________________________________
>dns-operations mailing list
>dns-operations@...
>https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
>dns-jobs mailing list
>https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
>
>
>
Attachment (smime.p7s): application/pkcs7-signature, 8 KiB
Morishita-san,

It does seem strange at face value.

But all is under control. :)

We are taking a very methodical approach for moving the ICANN.ORG zone
from an old set of DNSSEC infrastructure to new infrastructure due to the
tango with registry locks and also in light of the (global political?)
importance of the ICANN.ORG zone right now.

That move results in some DS bloat for the time being.

Cheers
Terry

On 11/08/2015 11:56 pm, Yasuhiro Orange Morishita <yasuhiro@...>
wrote:
>
>Hello,
>
>I've found so many DS records for icann.org <http://icann.org> in org
>zone.
>It seems to be strange.
>
>$ dig +short icann.org <http://icann.org> ds
>41334 7 1 49D712CF7A8984B7545FDC7E69D7372782339B3A
>18060 7 2 6BE021818B9F10ED981A03ACBF74F01E31FB15C58680AD0C4BAA464B
>F37A7523
>17248 7 1 88151C40E4673E7023E6AD1902A8AE055F3DDF61
>41643 7 2 B8AB67D895E62087F0C5FC5A1A941C67A18E4B096F6C622AEFAE30DD
>7B1EA199
>17248 7 2 885CF8A6CF35FD5C619E1D48B59AFB23063BBA9FEC52FF25F99094CB
>A10910A2
>32134 7 2 6C321409786B95BEEE60E6D42F3713ACC3A9B5D18442091A792FBDD1
>EA8E4655
>41643 7 1 93358DB22E956A451EB5AE8D2EC39526CA6A87B9
>18060 7 1 04CF77A76FD328458005D2B35E416F209A3420A0
>41334 7 2 C299FAF7D6F9BCB310200ECF2EA216A2E83F7ACB15C8D72D79641FA8
>DFACF9A9
>32134 7 1 3D54D51109645E8315F59790B920323D361B065F
>
>There are ten (five sets) DS records.
>But valid DS are only two (one set), key id = 18060.
>
><http://dnsviz.net/d/icann.org/VcnJ3Q/dnssec/>
>
>-- Orange
>_______________________________________________
>dns-operations mailing list
>dns-operations@...
>https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
>dns-jobs mailing list
>https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
>
>
>
"Davey(宋林健)" | 17 Aug 08:39 2015
Picon

Identifier and naming system for IoT

Hi colleagues, 

I’m attending a symposium about identifier and naming for Industry Internet(IoT?). 
There are presentations about ONS and Handle system for future naming. I have 
a feeling that I’m missing a lot. Are ONS and Handle system still popular 
in industry or academy?  To me web of things is more friendly and often heard around.

Anyone who are familiar with this who can give me some clue, Thanks!

Best regards,
Davey

---------------------------

<div>
<div class="">Hi colleagues,&nbsp;</div>
<div class=""><br class=""></div>
<div class="">I&rsquo;m attending a symposium about identifier and naming for Industry Internet(IoT?).&nbsp;</div>
<div class="">There are presentations about ONS and Handle system for future naming. I have&nbsp;</div>
<div class="">a feeling that I&rsquo;m missing a lot. Are ONS and Handle system still popular&nbsp;</div>
<div class="">in industry or academy? &nbsp;To me web of things is more friendly and often heard around.</div>
<div class=""><br class=""></div>
<div class="">Anyone who are familiar with this who can give me some clue, Thanks!</div>
<div class=""><br class=""></div>
<div class="">Best regards,</div>
<div class="">Davey</div>
<br class=""><div apple-content-edited="true" class="">
<div class="">
<div class="">---------------------------</div>
<div class="">Davey Song(&#23435;&#26519;&#20581;)<br class="">BII Lab<br class=""><a href="mailto:ljsong@..." class="">ljsong@...</a><br class=""><br class=""><br class="">
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br class="">
</div>
Davey Song | 14 Aug 12:33 2015
Picon

Yeti DNS Workshop 2015-10-31 (Pre-IETF 94)

Dear Colleagues,

We are going to be holding a Yeti DNS workshop before IETF 94 in
Yokohama.

 Date:      2015-10-31 (Saturday before IETF 94)
 Time:      10:00-16:00 (to be confirmed)
 Location:  Pacifico Yokohama (IETF venue, to be confirmed)

It will be a half-day workshop, covering the status of the project at
that time. We expect reports on the project status from the
coordinators, discussion of experiments and other findings, as well as
both detailed and high-level plans. Topics outside of the Yeti DNS
project itself are also appropriate, if they are about related to the
work and future DNS Root service. A full agenda will be published in advance.

RSVP: Please reply offline let us (coordinators-wehuVKRraNcqGPbXn8fGxh2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org) know 
if you are planning on attending. Also do please send any topic 
suggestions or other proposals. 

Note that while this is Halloween, costumes are optional.

--Yeti DNS project coordinators

------------------------------

<div>
<div class="">
<div class="">Dear Colleagues,<br class=""><br class="">We are going to be holding a Yeti DNS workshop before IETF 94 in<br class="">Yokohama.<br class=""><br class="">&nbsp;Date: &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2015-10-31 (Saturday before IETF 94)<br class="">&nbsp;Time: &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;10:00-16:00 (to be confirmed)<br class="">&nbsp;Location: &nbsp;Pacifico Yokohama (IETF venue, to be confirmed)<br class=""><br class="">It will be a half-day workshop, covering the status of the project at<br class="">that time. We expect reports on the project status from the<br class="">coordinators, discussion of experiments and other findings, as well as<br class="">both detailed and high-level plans. Topics outside of the Yeti DNS<br class="">project itself are also appropriate, if they are about related to the<br class="">work and future DNS Root service. A full agenda will be published in advance.<br class=""><br class="">RSVP: Please reply offline let us (<a href="mailto:coordinators@..." class="">coordinators@...</a>)&nbsp;know&nbsp;</div>
<div class="">if you are planning on attending.&nbsp;Also do please send any topic&nbsp;</div>
<div class="">suggestions or other proposals.&nbsp;<br class=""><br class="">Note that while this is Halloween, costumes are optional.</div>
<div class=""><br class=""></div>
<div class="">--Yeti DNS project coordinators</div>
</div>
<div class=""><br class=""></div>
<div apple-content-edited="true" class="">
<div class="">
<div class="">------------------------------</div>
<div class="">Davey Song(&#23435;&#26519;&#20581;)<br class="">BII Lab<br class=""><a href="mailto:songlinjian@..." class="">songlinjian@...</a><br class=""><br class="">
</div>
</div>
</div>

<br class="">
</div>
Edward Lewis | 12 Aug 03:13 2015
Picon

Live-streaming the Root Zone Key-Signing Key Ceremony 22

FYI,

(Apologies if you see duplicates of this message.)

ICANN, as the IANA Functions Operator, will be live-streaming the Root Zone
Key-Signing Key Ceremony (number 22) on Thursday, August 13.  The "main"
ceremony that day is scheduled to begin at 2000UTC.

(This is an activity related to DNSSEC.)

For more information about the event see:

     https://www.iana.org/dnssec/ceremonies/22

On Thursday there will be two cermonies as listed on that web page.

The first ceremnoy will rotate cryptographic officer duties, basically, a
change in some of the trusted community representatives participating in
the key ceremonies.

The second ceremony (the "main") will feature the introduction of two new
Hardware Security Modules.  This is the ceremony that will start at 2000
UTC.

Please see the above link for more information.  The live-streaming link
is at the bottom of the page.  (https://icann.adobeconnect.com/kskceremony)

Attachment (smime.p7s): application/pkcs7-signature, 6226 bytes
FYI,

(Apologies if you see duplicates of this message.)

ICANN, as the IANA Functions Operator, will be live-streaming the Root Zone
Key-Signing Key Ceremony (number 22) on Thursday, August 13.  The "main"
ceremony that day is scheduled to begin at 2000UTC.

(This is an activity related to DNSSEC.)

For more information about the event see:

     https://www.iana.org/dnssec/ceremonies/22

On Thursday there will be two cermonies as listed on that web page.

The first ceremnoy will rotate cryptographic officer duties, basically, a
change in some of the trusted community representatives participating in
the key ceremonies.

The second ceremony (the "main") will feature the introduction of two new
Hardware Security Modules.  This is the ceremony that will start at 2000
UTC.

Please see the above link for more information.  The live-streaming link
is at the bottom of the page.  (https://icann.adobeconnect.com/kskceremony)

Yasuhiro Orange Morishita | 11 Aug 15:31 2015
Picon

So many DS records for icann.org

Hello,

I've found so many DS records for icann.org in org zone.
It seems to be strange.

$ dig +short icann.org ds
41334 7 1 49D712CF7A8984B7545FDC7E69D7372782339B3A
18060 7 2 6BE021818B9F10ED981A03ACBF74F01E31FB15C58680AD0C4BAA464B
F37A7523
17248 7 1 88151C40E4673E7023E6AD1902A8AE055F3DDF61
41643 7 2 B8AB67D895E62087F0C5FC5A1A941C67A18E4B096F6C622AEFAE30DD
7B1EA199
17248 7 2 885CF8A6CF35FD5C619E1D48B59AFB23063BBA9FEC52FF25F99094CB
A10910A2
32134 7 2 6C321409786B95BEEE60E6D42F3713ACC3A9B5D18442091A792FBDD1
EA8E4655
41643 7 1 93358DB22E956A451EB5AE8D2EC39526CA6A87B9
18060 7 1 04CF77A76FD328458005D2B35E416F209A3420A0
41334 7 2 C299FAF7D6F9BCB310200ECF2EA216A2E83F7ACB15C8D72D79641FA8
DFACF9A9
32134 7 1 3D54D51109645E8315F59790B920323D361B065F

There are ten (five sets) DS records.
But valid DS are only two (one set), key id = 18060.

<http://dnsviz.net/d/icann.org/VcnJ3Q/dnssec/>

-- Orange

Gmane