z | 19 Oct 2011 08:59
Picon

About an absolute DLZ backend

Hi, guys

DLZ is still new to me and I am not so sure if anyone is planning to
support an absolute DLZ, that said,
not only bind zone, but all the configurations are going to be moved
into the database, including options/views ...

It seems that it would become much easier for a web-based
administration, and more common for us to avoid to parse the original
*named.conf*.
Feel free to comment, thanks.

-- Alfred

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct
Graeme Fowler | 19 Oct 2011 10:36

Re: About an absolute DLZ backend

On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 14:59 +0800, z wrote:
> Feel free to comment, thanks.

I can't speak for Rob, but the fact that the Z in DLZ stands for "zone"
might give you a clue :)

If you want all of BIND's config in a database, you'll need to be asking
ISC about that. They run a couple of mailing lists for BIND, and accept
bugs/feature requests - all here:

http://www.isc.org/software/bind/news

Graeme

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct
z | 20 Oct 2011 03:16
Picon

Re: About an absolute DLZ backend

Hi, Graeme

Thanks for your nice cue and good advice. I understand the meaning of
DLZ, but it seems that DLZ is the only one designed for a DB backend
involved by BIND, so I asked here.

Anyway, I will also go ISC for some more checks. Thanks again.

-- Alfred

On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Graeme Fowler <graeme <at> graemef.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 14:59 +0800, z wrote:
>> Feel free to comment, thanks.
>
> I can't speak for Rob, but the fact that the Z in DLZ stands for "zone"
> might give you a clue :)
>
> If you want all of BIND's config in a database, you'll need to be asking
> ISC about that. They run a couple of mailing lists for BIND, and accept
> bugs/feature requests - all here:
>
> http://www.isc.org/software/bind/news
>
> Graeme
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
> definitive record of customers, application performance, security
> threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
(Continue reading)

z | 21 Oct 2011 05:12
Picon

About dlz for bind-view

Hi, guys

I am not sure if dlz has supported the $view$ index for a zone record
selecting.

For example:

view "Me" {
      match-clients { 127.0.0.1; };

      recursion no;

        dlz "Mysql zone" {
                database "mysql
                {host=127.0.0.1 dbname=dns ssl=false port=3306 user=root pass= }
                {select name from zones where name = '$zone$' limit 1}
                {select  ttl, type, priority , case when
lower(type)='txt' then concat('\"', data, '\"') when lower(type)='soa'
then concat_ws(' ', data, contact, serial, refresh, retry, expire,
minimum) else data end from records where zone_name='$zone$' and host
= '$record$' and view='Me'}
                {}
                {select ttl, type, host, priority , case when
lower(type)='txt' then concat('\"',data,'\"') else data end , contact
, serial, refresh, retry, expire, minimum from records where zone_name
= '$zone$' and view='Me'}
                {}";
        };

};
(Continue reading)

Evan Hunt | 21 Oct 2011 06:47

Re: About dlz for bind-view

> As we know, the $zone$ and $record$ are actually built-in, but are
> there anything like $view$? So that I do not need to specify the view
> name each time.

Sorry, no, %zone%, %record% and %client% is all.

--

-- 
Evan Hunt -- each <at> isc.org
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the
demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly.
Take a complimentary Learning <at> Cisco Self-Assessment and learn 
about Cisco certifications, training, and career opportunities. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/cisco-dev2dev
z | 21 Oct 2011 08:24
Picon

Re: About dlz for bind-view

Thanks for your reply. But, personally, a $view$ token would make me
comfortable. :)

-- Alf.

On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Evan Hunt <each <at> isc.org> wrote:
>> As we know, the $zone$ and $record$ are actually built-in, but are
>> there anything like $view$? So that I do not need to specify the view
>> name each time.
>
> Sorry, no, %zone%, %record% and %client% is all.
>
> --
> Evan Hunt -- each <at> isc.org
> Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the
> demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly.
> Take a complimentary Learning <at> Cisco Self-Assessment and learn
> about Cisco certifications, training, and career opportunities.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/cisco-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Bind-dlz-testers mailing list
> Bind-dlz-testers <at> lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bind-dlz-testers
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the
(Continue reading)


Gmane