Dynamically Loadable Zones for BIND

Steve Bourg | 2 Aug 2006 00:42

Follow-up to bind-9.4.0a6 and resolver.c error

I have just taken an interest in Bind w/ pgsql support.  Given the problem 
with bind-9.4.0a6, what is my best option to deploying this capability? 
Should I patch against Bind 9.2x?  The DLZ patch states that it should be 
used against 9.2.2 but the current releases available are 9.2.6 and 
9.2.7b1.  Would the patch work correctly with these builds?

Steve Bourg

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV

Graeme Fowler | 2 Aug 2006 00:46

Re: Follow-up to bind-9.4.0a6 and resolver.c error

On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 15:42 -0700, Steve Bourg wrote:
> I have just taken an interest in Bind w/ pgsql support.  Given the problem 
> with bind-9.4.0a6, what is my best option to deploying this capability? 
> Should I patch against Bind 9.2x?  The DLZ patch states that it should be 
> used against 9.2.2 but the current releases available are 9.2.6 and 
> 9.2.7b1.  Would the patch work correctly with these builds?

http://projects.navynet.it/

The patch there works against 9.3.2, which (being the current stable
release) gives you the best of all possible worlds. Although it's
"unofficial", I believe Rob has given it his blessing...

Graeme

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV

Rob Butler | 2 Aug 2006 04:33

Picon

Re: Follow-up to bind-9.4.0a6 and resolver.c error

Yes, it is "blessed".

--- Graeme Fowler <graeme <at> graemef.net> wrote:

> On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 15:42 -0700, Steve Bourg
> wrote:
> > I have just taken an interest in Bind w/ pgsql
> support.  Given the problem 
> > with bind-9.4.0a6, what is my best option to
> deploying this capability? 
> > Should I patch against Bind 9.2x?  The DLZ patch
> states that it should be 
> > used against 9.2.2 but the current releases
> available are 9.2.6 and 
> > 9.2.7b1.  Would the patch work correctly with
> these builds?
> 
> http://projects.navynet.it/
> 
> The patch there works against 9.3.2, which (being
> the current stable
> release) gives you the best of all possible worlds.
> Although it's
> "unofficial", I believe Rob has given it his
> blessing...
> 
> Graeme
> 
> 
>

(Continue reading)

Steve Bourg | 2 Aug 2006 05:45

Re: Follow-up to bind-9.4.0a6 and resolver.c error

Excellent.  I have patched against 9.3.2 and my first attempt to test it 
succeeded.

Thanks so much,

Steve Bourg

On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Rob Butler wrote:

> Yes, it is "blessed".
>
> --- Graeme Fowler <graeme <at> graemef.net> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 15:42 -0700, Steve Bourg
>> wrote:
>>> I have just taken an interest in Bind w/ pgsql
>> support.  Given the problem
>>> with bind-9.4.0a6, what is my best option to
>> deploying this capability?
>>> Should I patch against Bind 9.2x?  The DLZ patch
>> states that it should be
>>> used against 9.2.2 but the current releases
>> available are 9.2.6 and
>>> 9.2.7b1.  Would the patch work correctly with
>> these builds?
>>
>> http://projects.navynet.it/
>>
>> The patch there works against 9.3.2, which (being
>> the current stable

(Continue reading)

Ronald Wiplinger | 8 Aug 2006 01:11

(Bind 9.3.2) with dlz: REQUIRE (module...)

I tried to use BIND 9.3.2 with the patch for dlz. The compilation had no 
error, but when I start named the following error will be logged:

Aug  7 11:52:02 pegasus named[30132]: starting BIND 9.3.2 -t 
/var/lib/named -u named
Aug  7 11:52:02 pegasus named[30132]: found 1 CPU, using 1 worker thread
Aug  7 11:52:02 pegasus named[30132]: log.c:1428: REQUIRE(module->id < 
lctx->module_count) failed
Aug  7 11:52:02 pegasus named[30132]: exiting (due to assertion failure)

I could not find anything with Google about that.

I tried than to use 9.3.2 without the patch and come to this result:
Aug  7 17:31:49 pegasus named[25692]: starting BIND 9.3.2 -t 
/var/lib/named -u named
Aug  7 17:31:49 pegasus named[25692]: found 1 CPU, using 1 worker thread
Aug  7 17:31:49 pegasus named[25692]: loading configuration from 
'/etc/named.conf'
Aug  7 17:31:49 pegasus named[25692]: set maximum open files to -1: 
permission denied
Aug  7 17:31:49 pegasus named[25692]: listening on IPv6 interfaces, port 53
Aug  7 17:31:49 pegasus named[25692]: listening on IPv4 interface lo, 
127.0.0.1#53
Aug  7 17:31:49 pegasus named[25692]: listening on IPv4 interface eth0, 
220.133.88.226#53
Aug  7 17:31:49 pegasus named[25692]: command channel listening on 
127.0.0.1#953
Aug  7 17:31:49 pegasus named[25692]: couldn't open pid file 
'/usr/local/var/run/named.pid': No such file or directory
Aug  7 17:31:49 pegasus named[25692]: exiting (due to early fatal error)

(Continue reading)

Rob Butler | 8 Aug 2006 16:50

Picon

Re: (Bind 9.3.2) with dlz: REQUIRE (module...)

Ronald,

What version of the DLZ patch are you using and where
did you get it from.  For Bind 9.3.2 you should use
the DLZ patch from here: http://projects.navynet.it/

I believe your question on the PID file was already
answered on the bind-user's mailing list.

Rob

--- Ronald Wiplinger <ronald <at> elmit.com> wrote:

> I tried to use BIND 9.3.2 with the patch for dlz.
> The compilation had no 
> error, but when I start named the following error
> will be logged:
> 
> Aug  7 11:52:02 pegasus named[30132]: starting BIND
> 9.3.2 -t 
> /var/lib/named -u named
> Aug  7 11:52:02 pegasus named[30132]: found 1 CPU,
> using 1 worker thread
> Aug  7 11:52:02 pegasus named[30132]: log.c:1428:
> REQUIRE(module->id < 
> lctx->module_count) failed
> Aug  7 11:52:02 pegasus named[30132]: exiting (due
> to assertion failure)
> 
>

(Continue reading)

Ronald Wiplinger | 10 Aug 2006 04:49

Picon

Re: (Bind 9.3.2) with dlz: REQUIRE (module...)

>Ronald,
>
>What version of the DLZ patch are you using and where
>did you get it from.  For Bind 9.3.2 you should use
>the DLZ patch from here: http://projects.navynet.it/
>

Rob,

thanks for looking at this.

I tried it again, below is the history file for that part:
1036  cp bind-9.3.2.tar.gz bind-new
1037  cp ctrix_dlz_9.3.2-1.patch bind-new
1038  cd bind-new
1039  ls
1040  tar -xvzf bind-9.3.2.tar.gz
1041  ls
1042  more ctrix_dlz_9.3.2-1.patch
1043  mv bind-9.3.2  bind-9.3.2-orig
1044  ls
1045  patch -p0 <ctrix_dlz_9.3.2-1.patch
1046  ls
1047  cd bind-9.3.2-orig/
1048  ls
1049  ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --mandir=\$${prefix}/share/man 
--infodir=\$${prefix}/share/info --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var 
--enable-threads  --with-libtool --enable-shared --enable-static 
--with-openssl=/usr --with-gnu-ld  --enable-ipv6  --with-dlz-mysql 
--with-dlz-bdb --with-dlz-filesystem --with-dlz-stub

(Continue reading)

Rob Butler | 10 Aug 2006 05:02

Picon

Re: (Bind 9.3.2) with dlz: REQUIRE (module...)

Ronald,

Can you try this on a 32 bit machine?  I'm wondering
if this might be the result of some enlarged data type
due to the 64 bit OS.

Rob

--- Ronald Wiplinger <ronaldlists <at> hotmail.com> wrote:

> >Ronald,
> >
> >What version of the DLZ patch are you using and
> where
> >did you get it from.  For Bind 9.3.2 you should use
> >the DLZ patch from here:
> http://projects.navynet.it/
> >
> 
> Rob,
> 
> thanks for looking at this.
> 
> 
> I tried it again, below is the history file for that
> part:
> 1036  cp bind-9.3.2.tar.gz bind-new
> 1037  cp ctrix_dlz_9.3.2-1.patch bind-new
> 1038  cd bind-new
> 1039  ls

(Continue reading)

Ronald Wiplinger | 10 Aug 2006 05:55

Picon

Re: (Bind 9.3.2) with dlz: REQUIRE (module...)

>Ronald,
>
>Can you try this on a 32 bit machine?  I'm wondering
>if this might be the result of some enlarged data type
>due to the 64 bit OS.
>

I do not have any 32 bit machine anymore available.

bye

Ronald

>Rob
>
>--- Ronald Wiplinger <ronaldlists <at> hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >Ronald,
> > >
> > >What version of the DLZ patch are you using and
> > where
> > >did you get it from.  For Bind 9.3.2 you should use
> > >the DLZ patch from here:
> > http://projects.navynet.it/
> > >
> >
> > Rob,
> >
> > thanks for looking at this.
> >

(Continue reading)

bind-dlz | 10 Aug 2006 17:35

Picon

Re: (Bind 9.3.2) with dlz: REQUIRE (module...)

On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Rob Butler wrote:
> Can you try this on a 32 bit machine?  I'm wondering
> if this might be the result of some enlarged data type
> due to the 64 bit OS.

I've just compiled bind-9.3.2 with the DLZ patch applied and without the 
"--with-dlz-bdb" option on a amd64 box and it started fine and answering 
requests. Ronald, which compiler version are you using? gcc-4.0.3 over 
here...

Oh, and for the PID problem: it's --localstatedir you've got to set, 
IIRC.

And, out of curiosity: why do you have to specify

    --with-gnu-ld    <-- SuSE 10 is a GNU system, not?
    --with-libtool   <-- same as above
    --enable-shared  <-- default
    --enable-static  <-- default

...if they are default, why bother?

Christian.
--

-- 
BOFH excuse #200:

The monitor needs another box of pixels.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?

(Continue reading)

Group

gmane.network.dns.bind9.dlz.

Project Web Page

Dynamically Loadable Zones for BIND

Search Archive

Page

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Articles in period: 41

August 2006

Language

Change language

Options

Current view: Threads only / Showing only 20 lines / Not hiding cited text.
Change to All messages, whole messages, or hide cited text.

Post a message
NNTP Newsgroup
Classic Gmane web interface
XML

XML

RSS Feed
List Information

About Gmane

Recent entries

DLZ LDAP users, help with testing? (4 Mar 2013)
Non-authoritative answer (26 Feb 2013)
decrement reference (17 Feb 2013)
What determines what zones get passed to DLZ? (5 Nov 2012)
dns master-slave transfer (29 Oct 2012)
dlz-bdbhpt-dynamic - a dlopen bdbhpt DLZ driver (16 Jul 2012)
DLZ with cacher (4 Jul 2012)
DLZ with MySQL backend and DDNS (2 Jul 2012)
help (30 Mar 2012)
dlz ignores connection to postgres database (21 Mar 2012)
PgBouncer and Bind DLZ (6 Mar 2012)
Problems in compiling bind (23 Feb 2012)
Dig only returns results after multiple attempts (named-sdb using dlz) (4 Feb 2012)
Postgres driver unable to find available connection after searching 30 (21 Jan 2012)
About "mysql driver unable to return result set for findzone query" (15 Nov 2011)
About dlz for bind-view (21 Oct 2011)
About an absolute DLZ backend (19 Oct 2011)
contributed DLZ drivers fail to compile in 9.8.1 (7 Sep 2011)
Invitation to connect on LinkedIn (7 Sep 2011)
mysql dlz centos error "extra input text" (23 Aug 2011)
MySQL concerns ... ? (14 Jul 2011)

Archives

5	March 2013
2	February 2013
2	November 2012
2	October 2012
17	July 2012
10	March 2012
9	February 2012
6	January 2012
1	November 2011
6	October 2011
2	September 2011
5	August 2011
3	July 2011
3	May 2011
10	April 2011
4	March 2011
2	February 2011
2	January 2011
4	December 2010
6	November 2010
7	October 2010
6	September 2010
8	August 2010
4	July 2010
2	June 2010
11	April 2010
1	March 2010
15	January 2010
3	December 2009
20	November 2009
5	October 2009
12	September 2009
5	August 2009
8	July 2009
5	June 2009
47	May 2009
2	April 2009
19	March 2009
7	February 2009
23	January 2009
2	November 2008
1	October 2008
16	September 2008
31	July 2008
2	June 2008
25	May 2008
31	April 2008
19	March 2008
52	February 2008
19	January 2008
25	December 2007
28	November 2007
8	October 2007
26	September 2007
14	August 2007
20	July 2007
3	June 2007
16	May 2007
22	April 2007
24	February 2007
20	January 2007
16	December 2006
38	November 2006
45	October 2006
23	September 2006
41	August 2006
37	July 2006
46	June 2006
16	May 2006
42	April 2006
12	March 2006
38	February 2006
31	January 2006
14	December 2005
17	November 2005
54	October 2005
25	September 2005
54	August 2005
17	July 2005
23	June 2005
3	May 2005
23	April 2005
56	March 2005
24	February 2005
37	January 2005
18	December 2004
33	November 2004
33	October 2004
59	September 2004
65	August 2004
76	July 2004
51	June 2004
32	May 2004
18	April 2004
124	March 2004
53	February 2004
21	January 2004
18	December 2003
51	November 2003
49	October 2003
18	September 2003
14	August 2003
5	July 2003
19	June 2003
39	May 2003
13	April 2003
8	March 2003
5	February 2003

Design

Zawodny | Right Menu | Left Menu

Your Own Design

Paste the URL of your CSS below. Download CSS template