RE: 95-percentile on data aggregation
David Williams <dwilliams <at> nextweb.net>
2005-07-02 16:03:21 GMT
Ade,
Yes, there is a bug in the 95th calculation for aggregated values. I
submitted the bug report on this issue. See below for the bug report.
Your aggregated "total" 95th appears wrong because it is actually 95th(ds0)
+ 95th(ds1) instead of 95th(ds0+ds1). I have confirmed this. While usually
close, you will see some graphs where the aggregate 95th can actually exceed
the max reported on the same data.
Dave
Bug re
The following issue has been ASSIGNED.
======================================================================
http://bugs.cacti.net/view.php?id=490
======================================================================
Reported By: David Williams
Assigned To: iberry <at> raxnet.net
======================================================================
Project: Cacti
Issue ID: 490
Category: Templates (Graph, Data, Host)
Reproducibility: always
Severity: major
Priority: normal
Status: assigned
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 06-20-2005 12:30 EDT
Last Modified: 07-01-2005 14:42 EDT
======================================================================
Summary: 95th Percentile Total is calculated incorrectly
Description:
A graph template item using the value |95:bits:0:total:2| will generate a
95th percentile that is incorrect and potentially larger than the maximum
of the highest in+out on the graph.
Cacti is summing the ds0 95th and ds1 95th, instead of adding ds0+ds1,
then taking the 95th of that series of results.
======================================================================
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
06-20-05 12:30 David Williams New Issue
07-01-05 14:42 TheWitness Status new => assigned
07-01-05 14:42 TheWitness Assigned To =>
iberry <at> raxnet.net
======================================================================
-----Original Message-----
From: cacti-user-admin <at> lists.sourceforge.net
[mailto:cacti-user-admin <at> lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Ade Lovett
Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2005 12:44 AM
To: cacti-user <at> lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [cacti-user] 95-percentile on data aggregation
Hi there,
I've spent quite a few hours tearing my hair out over this one, looking
through the forums and mail list archives, for a solution to what would
appear to be a trivial problem.
Let's say that I have 2 (or more) circuits with one transit provider. I
can easily generate graphs to produce an aggregate graph summing up the
input/output over those links, I can also (using the builtin templates),
generate graphs with 95-pile figures for each circuit.
However, with my simple aggregate graph, it appears that the |95:...|
function is not being applied to the aggregate input/output, rather just
the last dataset of the aggregate.
So, I lay my head before the mercy of the assembled masses to ask what
*must* be an FAQ, but I cannot for the life of me find the answer :)
Given two input sources (for the sake of argument, let's make it easy
and call them Cisco interfaces), what magick must I incant in order to
get a 95-pile figure based on the aggregate of the input/output across
those two sources?
Cheers,
-aDe
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
cacti-user mailing list
cacti-user <at> lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cacti-user
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click