Marty B | 1 Nov 2003 03:24
Picon

RE: LOTR marathon, Canadian info

Gene Pool wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Peter T. Chattaway wrote:
> 
> > Yow.  $50.94 per ticket, after service charges?  Ah well, they *are* for
> > three movies, two of which are long enough to be two movies each (thus
> > making it almost a four- or five-movie marathon), and on top of 
> > everything
> > else, this *is* a one-time event.  I suppose I shan't complain ...  :)
> 
> I was about to write that I want to go and would have to talk with Tina
> about it...  But I don't think I'd be able to convince her to spend that
> much on it.  I don't know if I could convince *myself* to spend that 
> much
> on it.

Oh come on. That's only like $80 USD right? ;)

MArtyB

Picon

Re: LOTR marathon, Canadian info

>>>Yow.  $50.94 per ticket, after service charges?

> Oh come on. That's only like $80 USD right? ;)

If that were true, I'd probably go on a massive CD buying frenzy :)

Jeremy Ladan

renee altson | 1 Nov 2003 15:46

RE: renee--mike yaconelli

yes.
i know his wife very well. we are friends.
i wrote about him in my blog. sorry to pimp, i'm just feeling out of words.

http://www.ianua.org/

James Ladan | 2 Nov 2003 04:46
Picon

RE: LOTR marathon, Canadian info

> From: The Voice Of Objective Truth [mailto:vox@...]
> 
> >>>Yow.  $50.94 per ticket, after service charges?
> 
> > Oh come on. That's only like $80 USD right? ;)
> 
> If that were true, I'd probably go on a massive CD buying frenzy :)

I think he meant the price of two tickets was $80USD.  (Actually more
like $75USD.)

Picon

Re: LOTR marathon, Canadian info

> I think he meant the price of two tickets was $80USD.  (Actually more
> like $75USD.)

Oh, you're probably right.

Jeremy Ladan

Andrew Irwin | 2 Nov 2003 06:40
Picon
Favicon

Re: LOTR marathon, Canadian info

On 1 Nov 2003 at 23:11, The Voice Of Objective Truth wrote:

> > I think he meant the price of two tickets was $80USD.  (Actually
> > more like $75USD.)
> 

Our church is going to show the extended DVD's of 1 
then 2 on the Monday and Tuesday with a Data 
projector and then go to the opening on Wednesday.

$14NZD = $6USD

:-P

Andrew Irwin

The Average person thinks he isn't
**************************************************


Picon

Re: LOTR marathon, Canadian info

> Our church is going to show the extended DVD's of 1 
> then 2 on the Monday and Tuesday with a Data 
> projector and then go to the opening on Wednesday.

Actually, I'm the one running this event at my church... I should get 
planning :) One reason I can live without the marathon.

Jeremy Ladan

Bruce Geerdes | 3 Nov 2003 15:18
Picon
Favicon

Matrix, the Apocalypse

http://tmatt.gospelcom.net/column/2003/10/29/

> From: Prof. Terry Mattingly <tmatt@...>
> Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 01:00:07 -0500
> Subject: [tmattingly-weekly] 10/29: Matrix, the Apocalypse
> 
> This column was syndicated by Scripps Howard News Service on 10/29/2003
> 
> Anyone looking for the "Matrix" movies at a video store knows to seek the
> digital mythologies shelved under "science fiction."
> 
> That will have to do, since there isn't a space labeled "apocalyptic."
> 
> "These movies are truly that ambitious," said the Rev. Chris Seay,
> co-author of "The Gospel Reloaded," about faith and "The Matrix"
> phenomenon. "This story reads more like the Book of Revelation more than
> it does your normal sci-fi thriller. Everything has this other layer of
> meaning. ... You have to wrestle with all that symbolism and philosophy if
> you take these movies seriously."
> 
> That statement may sound ridiculous to most clergy, said Seay, pastor of
> the young Ecclesia congregation in urban Houston. But anyone who studies
> Hollywood knows that the Nov. 5 release of "The Matrix Revolutions" will
> be an event of biblical proportions to millions.
> 
> The numbers are staggering. The final movie in the trilogy will open --
> zero hour is 9 a.m. in New York City -- on almost 20,000 movie screens in
> 60-plus nations. Meanwhile, Forbes estimates gross revenue for "The
> Matrix" and "The Matrix Reloaded" is almost $2 billion, when ticket sales
> are combined with videogames, music, DVDs and other merchandise.
(Continue reading)

Peter T. Chattaway | 4 Nov 2003 01:48
Picon
Picon

the matrix revolutions (and yes, there be a few spoilers here!)

*** (To repeat, yes, there be a few SPOILERS here.) ***

The epic conclusion to the epic trilogy ...

... in which Neo goes deep into Mordor while everyone else fights a battle
elsewhere just to buy him some time.  (Oops, wrong trilogy, though, well,
that *is* kind of what happens.)

... in which Neo goes one-to-one against Darth Vader yet again already,
despite doing so already in the previous installments, and despite the
fact that the repetition of these battles is beginning to get a little
dull, because This Time He Means Business, And You Can Tell Because There
Are Choral Voices On The Soundtrack, while everyone else fights a battle
elsewhere just to buy him some time.  (Oops, wrong trilogy, though, well,
that *is* kind of what happens.)

... in which the potential of the original _Matrix_ is squandered on dark,
dark, dark imagery and dark, dark, dark themes with very, very, very
little in the way of, oh, redemptive material.  In the first two films,
the Matrix, while admittedly artificial, was also a bright, sunny, welcome
respite from the grim and dreary 'real world'; but in the new film, pretty
much *every*thing is depressing to look at (not only Zion, but also the
Matrix, because the viral Agent Smith has pretty much taken it over).  
True, we do get two shots of the beautiful sky in this film (one
simulated, one not), but these do not serve as relief so much as they make
us think, "Um, but what are we supposed to *do* with these images? Where
do we *go* from here?"  Basically, one of these sky-shots hints at
something that remains unattainable so long as the sky is scorched, while
the other ... well, it just leaves us thinking of the ending of
_Pleasantville_, where everything *looks* resolved but *feels* unresolved
(Continue reading)

Marty B | 4 Nov 2003 02:11
Picon

D'oh! Groening was kidding (was RE: Fox nearly sued itself over 'Simps

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A44898-2003Oct30.html

The Simpsons vs. Fox News 

Doh! "The Simpsons" creator Matt Groening may have crossed the line with 
his comment last week to National Public Radio's Terry Gross that Fox 
media empire almost sued itself. (Now that takes some talent!) 

The story goes that Fox News Channel execs were none too thrilled last 
year when the wildly popular cartoon, which is on Fox Broadcasting, 
featured a fake news ticker mocking the station's conservative rep. The 
headlines included gems such as: "Do Democrats Cause Cancer? . . . 
Study: 92 percent of Democrats are gay . . . JFK posthumously joins 
Republican Party . . ." 

"Fox fought against it and said that they would sue the show," Groening 
told Gross. "And we called their bluff because we didn't think that 
Rupert Murdoch would pay for Fox to sue itself. So we got away with it," 
he said, proud of the accomplishment. 

Fox News, however, denies reports that they ever threatened to sue. "We 
were all scratching our heads and thought it was hysterical," spokesman 
Rob Zimmerman told us yesterday. "It's not the first time we've been 
spoofed, you know." 

Maybe not, but Groening told Gross during the interview that ". . . Now 
Fox has a new rule that we can't do those little fake news crawls on the 
bottom of the screen in a cartoon because it might confuse the viewers 
into thinking it's real news." 

(Continue reading)


Gmane