[sylpheed:33112] Re: Set composed message title trough command line option

Hello,

On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:20:11 +0800
N M <oreshka.v.more <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi to all.
> How about to add useful command line option to set message title? It
> will be useful for use in scripts.
> For example:
> ~$ sylpheed --compose example <at> mail.mb --title Some\ Title

You can set subject, cc and body using mailto URL syntax:

$ sylpheed --compose "example <at> mail.mb?subject=Some Title&body=Body"

--

-- 
Hiroyuki Yamamoto <hiro-y <at> kcn.ne.jp>

[sylpheed:33113] Re: future of libsylph

Hello,

On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:51:03 +0200
Ricardo Mones <mones <at> debian.org> wrote:

>   After looking carefully at the 2.7.0 tarball to prepare the Debian
>   packages I must confess I don't understand why libsylph is now:
> 
>   - shipped as part of sylpheed as kind of private shared library
>   - with a lower version number and SONAME than current libsylph
>   - but with an expanded API in some files 
>   - and lacking the compose.h file
> 
>   Is libsylph going to disappear as a standalone tarball and being
>   released as part of sylpheed tarball?

I've made the internal libsylph shared library for plug-in support.

Currently, the internal one is incompatible with standalone
libsylph-1.x, so it is named as 'libsylph-0' (maybe it should be
libsylph-internal or something).

Eventually I want to unify both. I'm not sure how it should be
distributed yet (standalone or not).

--

-- 
Hiroyuki Yamamoto <hiro-y <at> kcn.ne.jp>

[sylpheed:33114] Search request

Hiro,
  In Search Messages, would it be possible to make the search term box the default focus?  It seems like it
should be.  I'm using Win32 version.  Thanks.

Gene Goldenfeld

[sylpheed-announce:00076] Sylpheed 2.7.1 released

Hello,

The stable version Sylpheed 2.7.1 (2.7.1-win32) has been released.

http://sylpheed.sraoss.jp/en/news.html
http://sylpheed.sraoss.jp/en/download.html

Changes from 2.7.0:

    * The feature to import and export .eml files was added.
    * Progress is displayed during import and export now.
    * The warning about non-exist plug-in directory was removed.
    * The comments within Content-Type header are handled now.
    * The order of signals emitted at moving messages was modified.
    * The sylpheed.spec file was fixed.

--

-- 
Hiroyuki Yamamoto <yamamoto@...>

Hello,

The stable version Sylpheed 2.7.1 (2.7.1-win32) has been released.

http://sylpheed.sraoss.jp/en/news.html
http://sylpheed.sraoss.jp/en/download.html

Changes from 2.7.0:

    * The feature to import and export .eml files was added.

[sylpheed:33116] Unicode characters in vcards

Dear friends

I have just begun to use Slypheed for a few months.

vcard support is the one of the nice features of Slypheed according to me. Unfortunately, I can not see
unicode characters in the names of vcards. Is it a bug or my mistake in settings?

OS : WinXP Pro SP3
Slypheed version : 2.7.1   

Thanks

HBB

[sylpheed:33117] Re: GnuPG is not installed properly and Windows version

Ahoi,

any news about that issue? 

On Thu, 21 May 2009 18:02:07 +0200, I wrote:

> i really like Sylpheed (2.6.0), but the only thing I can't get working
> is GnuPG-Support.
> 
> This is the warning:
> Warning
> GnuPG is not installed propery, or its version is too old. OpenPGP
> support disabled.
> 
> But it's installed and in the PATH.
> 
> C:\Program Files\Sylpheed>path
> PATH=C:\Program Files\PC Connectivity Solution\;C:\Windows\system32;C:
> \Windows;C :\Windows\System32\Wbem;C:\Program Files\QuickTime\QTSystem
> \;C:\Program Files\Co mmon Files\Roxio Shared\9.0\DLLShared\;C:\Windows
> \System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1. 0\;C:\Program Files\GNU\GnuPG\pub;C:
> \Program Files\Nmap;C:\Program Files\IDM Com puter Solutions\UltraEdit\
> 
> C:\Program Files\Sylpheed>gpg --version
> gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.9 (Gpg4win 1.1.4)
> Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later
> <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> This is free software: you are free
> to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent
> permitted by law.

[sylpheed:33118] My personal view about the future of Sylpheed.

Hi Hiroyuki-san,
hi sylpheed users,

I am just a long-time (and mostly happy) Sylpheed user, and I would
like to start a discussion about the future of our favourite Mail
User Agent out there.

The question is: how do I imagine Sylpheed 2.8?
Forgive the selfish post, it's just to start up some discussion.

Here's my vision:
 - Fix known bugs of course, for instance, the ones I am interested in
   are:
   http://www.sraoss.jp/pipermail/sylpheed/2009-June/002970.html
   http://www.sraoss.jp/pipermail/sylpheed/2009-July/003012.html

 - Composer overhaul: the message editor is the part I personally like
   less in Sylpheed: undo doesn't always work right, no colors during
   editing, no autoindent features. I know that an external editor can
   be invoked at any time, and I usually do that when I write complex
   emails with lists or simple ASCII pictures, but a more powerful
   editor could not be that hard to put in if we base it on
   GtkSourceView[1]. Do you have any opinion about that?

 - Store message-editing settings (autowrapping, spell language) for
   messages saved in Drafts, see:
   http://www.sraoss.jp/pipermail/sylpheed/2009-January/002788.html

- Mail filtering rules could be grouped, so we can change filter
  processing order more easily, let's say I want to have a "Mailing

[sylpheed:33119] Re: My personal view about the future of Sylpheed.

Antonio Ospite wrote:

> The question is: how do I imagine Sylpheed 2.8?
> Forgive the selfish post, it's just to start up some discussion.

Hello Antonio and all others,

well I just will add my 2c...

I really like Sylpheed and the way it works and looks. But I had an epiphany regarding how messaging-systems
in general should work, like mailclients or be it the SMS-application on your phone.

Putting sent mail into a folder named "Sent Mail" and keeping it separated from the mail you are answering is
not very intuitive and not a very logical way to do. I used this system for myself for the last fifteen years,
but in the meanwhile I think that's not a good idea. Keeping mail-conversations as "threads", which can be
moved as a whole between the folders is much better.

I don't know how much work it would be to offer at least an option to store mails like that, but I guess it could
be doable. Sylpheed already has mail-threads implemented, it's just the question where a sent mail is put
in the first place.

Best Regards,
Florian Pressler

--

-- 
Homepage: http://fp.ath.cx/                         PGP-keyID: C9FEDBA2

[sylpheed:33120] Re: My personal view about the future of Sylpheed.

On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:00:51 +0200
Nairolf Relsserp <airflow.2010 <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> Antonio Ospite wrote:
> 
> > The question is: how do I imagine Sylpheed 2.8?  Forgive the selfish
> > post, it's just to start up some discussion.
> 
> Hello Antonio and all others,
> 
> well I just will add my 2c...
> 
> I really like Sylpheed and the way it works and looks. But I had an
> epiphany regarding how messaging-systems in general should work, like
> mailclients or be it the SMS-application on your phone.
> 
> Putting sent mail into a folder named "Sent Mail" and keeping it
> separated from the mail you are answering is not very intuitive and
> not a very logical way to do. I used this system for myself for the
> last fifteen years, but in the meanwhile I think that's not a good
> idea. Keeping mail-conversations as "threads", which can be moved as a
> whole between the folders is much better.
> 

I agree.

> I don't know how much work it would be to offer at least an option to
> store mails like that, but I guess it could be doable. Sylpheed
> already has mail-threads implemented, it's just the question where a
> sent mail is put in the first place.

[sylpheed:33121] Small request

Win32 version

Another plea for a very small change: an option to suppress the
display of the New and Unread columns in the folder view. It is very
useful to display the total messages column but unnecessary to view
strings of zeros in the other two columns. Please consider making
this an option or allow sizing these two columns to zero.

Would others not find this useful and more attractive?

Thank you,
Bill