Felix E. Klee | 3 Sep 2004 00:19
Picon

[sylpheed:23357] The beep! How to turn it off?

Hi,

I just can't find it in the options: How do I turn off beeping after
receiving messages from all selected accounts?

Felix

PS: To contact me off list don't reply but send mail to "felix.klee" at
the domain "inka.de". Otherwise your email to me might get automatically
deleted!

Ian Bruce | 3 Sep 2004 09:47

[sylpheed:23358] Re: PATCH: encrypt-to-self

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 05:14:35 -0700
Ian Bruce <ian_bruce <at> fastmail.fm> wrote:

> Description:
> 
> This patch adds a per-account configuration option to self-encrypt
> messages to the same key selected for signing. The default behavior is
> unchanged.

Since nobody replied to this patch, should I assume that it was
rejected? Or is this not the proper venue for submitting patches?

I'm thinking of writing a patch to make sylpheed understand RFC-3156
compliant OpenPGP signatures. Is that likely to be accepted?

-- Ian Bruce

Hiroyuki Yamamoto | 3 Sep 2004 10:34
Picon

[sylpheed:23359] Re: PATCH: encrypt-to-self

Hello,

On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 00:47:28 -0700
Ian Bruce <ian_bruce <at> fastmail.fm> wrote:

> > Description:
> > 
> > This patch adds a per-account configuration option to self-encrypt
> > messages to the same key selected for signing. The default behavior
> > is unchanged.
> 
> Since nobody replied to this patch, should I assume that it was
> rejected? Or is this not the proper venue for submitting patches?

Sorry, I haven't had a time to look into your patch.

> I'm thinking of writing a patch to make sylpheed understand RFC-3156
> compliant OpenPGP signatures. Is that likely to be accepted?

Isn't it already implemented? Or do you mention something different?

--

-- 
Hiroyuki Yamamoto <hiro-y <at> kcn.ne.jp>
http://www.kcn.ne.jp/~hiro-y/index.cgi
http://sylpheed.good-day.net/ (Sylpheed)

Ian Bruce | 3 Sep 2004 17:18

[sylpheed:23360] Re: PATCH: encrypt-to-self

On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 17:34:50 +0900
Hiroyuki Yamamoto <hiro-y <at> kcn.ne.jp> wrote:

> > Since nobody replied to this patch, should I assume that it was
> > rejected? Or is this not the proper venue for submitting patches?
> 
> Sorry, I haven't had a time to look into your patch.

Understood. I think you will find that it's very short and simple; only
about 50 lines of new code.

> > I'm thinking of writing a patch to make sylpheed understand RFC-3156
> > compliant OpenPGP signatures. Is that likely to be accepted?
> 
> Isn't it already implemented? Or do you mention something different?

Please see here:

http://www.tmtm.org/cgi-bin/w3ml/sylpheed/msg/21996

-- Ian Bruce

Paul Dickson | 4 Sep 2004 14:53

[sylpheed:23361] Logging message delivery location

Is there an enablable option (or patch) that logs the folder and file
number of each message as it is downloaded in the Log file?

About once a day, fetchmail won't download a messages from my ISP due to
"invalid headers" (it just skips that file).  Sylpheed can download it,
but I can never find the message due to my having 100+ folders.  I'd
really like to inspect these messages to determine whether they are SPAM
(with truly invalid headers) or locking problems on my ISP's system.

	-Paul

Mark Ackerman | 8 Sep 2004 20:04
Picon
Favicon

[sylpheed:23362] why need to be su to install?


I need to put sylpheed on a server for which I have no root access.
There's no problem getting the sysadmins to install it, but I'd like
to make some changes to the code for my own customizations.  Can 
someone clue me into what is required as superuser in the installation
process?  If it's just starting daemons, that is an easy one to solve.

- Mark Ackerman

Alfons Hoogervorst | 8 Sep 2004 20:19
X-Face
Picon

[sylpheed:23364] Re: why need to be su to install?

Lo Mark,

On 08-09-04 (Wed) 14:04 -0400 Mark Ackerman wrote: 

| I need to put sylpheed on a server for which I have no root access.
| There's no problem getting the sysadmins to install it, but I'd like
| to make some changes to the code for my own customizations.  Can 
| someone clue me into what is required as superuser in the installation
| process?  If it's just starting daemons, that is an easy one to solve.

You can install it to any directory, including your home. Set up a
prefix like this:

	% configure --prefix=~/my_programs 

In that case sylpheed will be installed under ~/my_programs/bin.

Bye.

--

-- 
Ecuación algebraico sin solución posible,
a menos de poseer profundos conocimientos
en matemática - Revueltas (Ocho Por Radio)

Dennis Carr | 8 Sep 2004 20:20

[sylpheed:23365] Link error on English page

The link to Gustavo Silva's Debian page:

http://www.metainfo.org/kov/

...goes to a squatter's webpage with a popup, and appears to contain 
absolutely no information related to Sylpheed.

-Dennis Carr

Dennis Carr | 8 Sep 2004 20:12

[sylpheed:23363] Re: why need to be su to install?

On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Mark Ackerman wrote:

> Can 
> someone clue me into what is required as superuser in the installation
> process?

You must be root (or su to root) in order to 'make install', largely 
because most systems don't allow J. Random User to just put stuff in 
/{usr/{local/}}bin.  Though, I believe there are ways to get around this 
in the make process somewhere - if it only installs in your ~.

-Dennis Carr

Alfons Hoogervorst | 8 Sep 2004 20:32
X-Face
Picon

[sylpheed:23366] Re: Link error on English page

Lo Dennis,

On 08-09-04 (Wed) 11:20 -0700 Dennis Carr wrote: 

| The link to Gustavo Silva's Debian page:
| 
| http://www.metainfo.org/kov/
| 
| ...goes to a squatter's webpage with a popup, and appears to contain 
| absolutely no information related to Sylpheed.

The debian maintainer is / will be Ricardo Mones Lastra.

Bye.

--

-- 
Ecuación algebraico sin solución posible,
a menos de poseer profundos conocimientos
en matemática - Revueltas (Ocho Por Radio)


Gmane