Julian Mehnle | 1 Jun 2007 03:36
Gravatar

openspf.org "Why?" page API documentation


Hi all,

I officially documented the API of the openspf.org "Why?" page[1]:

  http://www.openspf.org/Why/API

I also added a reference to the API docs to the "Why?" page itself in order 
to raise awareness that the "Why?" page can be reused by anyone.

References:
 1. http://www.openspf.org/Why

spf-discuss | 3 Jun 2007 06:00
Favicon

SPF Mail Summary Report

                    iMail News Gateway Server v3.1                    
          (c) Copyright 1996-2005 Santronics Software, Inc.           

                        Mail Forum Statistics                         
                Date Range : 26 May 2007 - 31 May 2007
                Report Date: 03 Jun 2007

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Summary:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Total Forums          : 2
Total Messages        : 26
Total Participants    : 10
Total Vendor Postings : 0
Total Mail/No Replies : 5  (19%)
          6+ Days Old : 3    4+ Days Old: 0
          2+ Days Old : 2    1 Day Old  : 0
Busiest Posting Hour  : 11pm  (4 msgs)
Busiest Posting Day   : Sunday  (9 msgs)

+-[ Hourly Posting Pattern ]----------------------+
|                                               * |
|                                               * |
|                                               * |
| *                     *                   *   * |
| *                     *                   *   * |
| *                     *   *   * *         *   * |
| *                     *   *   * *         *   * |
| *                     *   *   * *         *   * |
(Continue reading)

spf-discuss | 10 Jun 2007 06:00
Favicon

SPF Mail Summary Report

                    iMail News Gateway Server v3.1                    
          (c) Copyright 1996-2005 Santronics Software, Inc.           

                        Mail Forum Statistics                         
                Date Range : 03 Jun 2007 - 08 Jun 2007
                Report Date: 10 Jun 2007

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Summary:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Total Forums          : 2
Total Messages        : 14
Total Participants    : 10
Total Vendor Postings : 0
Total Mail/No Replies : 3  (21%)
          6+ Days Old : 1    4+ Days Old: 0
          2+ Days Old : 1    1 Day Old  : 1
Busiest Posting Hour  : 11am  (8 msgs)
Busiest Posting Day   : Thursday  (7 msgs)

+-[ Hourly Posting Pattern ]----------------------+
|                       *                         |
|                       *                         |
|                       *                         |
|                       *                         |
|                       *                         |
|                       *                         |
|                       *                         |
|                       *                         |
(Continue reading)

Per Jessen | 13 Jun 2007 08:48
Picon
Favicon

Need some help understanding this situation

This list does not seem very active, but I'll try it anyway - 

we are an email filtering service so we "sit" in between our customer
and people that want to send them email.  (we obviously use MX
redirection).

We have a situation where "adjoli.de" wants to send a perfectly legit
newsletter to my customer, but is being rejected by the customer
mail-server due to our servers not being listed by the SPF record
for "adjoli.de": 

"v=spf1 ip4:194.29.239.0/28 ?all"

The customers mailserver is smart hosted by a provider, nothing unusual
about it.  The question is - is it _right_ to plainly reject the email
from "adjoli.de" when the spf evaluation says "Neutral" ? 

/Per Jessen, Zürich

-------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Graham Beneke | 13 Jun 2007 09:07
Picon

Re: Need some help understanding this situation

Per Jessen wrote:
> This list does not seem very active, but I'll try it anyway - 

You would be better off asking your question on [spf-help] and you will
probably get a quicker response.

> we are an email filtering service so we "sit" in between our customer
> and people that want to send them email.  (we obviously use MX
> redirection).

Are you handling all of your clients mail? Or are there other routes to
the customers mail server that would not travel through your filtering
service?

> The customers mailserver is smart hosted by a provider, nothing unusual
> about it.  The question is - is it _right_ to plainly reject the email
> from "adjoli.de" when the spf evaluation says "Neutral" ?

No this is not correct. But this action would indicate that the
customers server is running some sort of filtering of its own which i
would think completely unnecessary if your filtering service is running
effectively.

-------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735
(Continue reading)

Per Jessen | 13 Jun 2007 09:46
Picon
Favicon

Re: Need some help understanding this situation

Graham Beneke wrote:

> Per Jessen wrote:
>> This list does not seem very active, but I'll try it anyway -
> 
> You would be better off asking your question on [spf-help] and you
> will probably get a quicker response.

Thanks Graham - I didn't know that one. 

>> we are an email filtering service so we "sit" in between our customer
>> and people that want to send them email.  (we obviously use MX
>> redirection).
> 
> Are you handling all of your clients mail? Or are there other routes
> to the customers mail server that would not travel through your
> filtering service?

No, we will be handling all of the customers email.

>> The customers mailserver is smart hosted by a provider, nothing
>> unusual about it.  The question is - is it _right_ to plainly reject
>> the email from "adjoli.de" when the spf evaluation says "Neutral" ?
> 
> No this is not correct. But this action would indicate that the
> customers server is running some sort of filtering of its own which i
> would think completely unnecessary if your filtering service is
> running effectively.

I completely agree, but I have very little influence on it.  The
(Continue reading)

Julian Mehnle | 13 Jun 2007 09:57
Gravatar

Re: Need some help understanding this situation


Per Jessen wrote:
> we are an email filtering service so we "sit" in between our customer
> and people that want to send them email.  (we obviously use MX
> redirection).
>
> We have a situation where "adjoli.de" wants to send a perfectly legit
> newsletter to my customer, but is being rejected by the customer
> mail-server due to our servers not being listed by the SPF record
> for "adjoli.de":
>
> "v=spf1 ip4:194.29.239.0/28 ?all"
>
> The customers mailserver is smart hosted by a provider, nothing unusual
> about it.  The question is - is it _right_ to plainly reject the email
> from "adjoli.de" when the spf evaluation says "Neutral" ?

Two solutions:

 A. Either you rewrite the envelope sender for all mail you forward to them
    to a different domain -- one that belongs to _you_.  E.g.: you receive
    a message with MAIL FROM:<user <at> adjoli.de> for your customer.  When you
    forward it to your customer, instead of repeating the MAIL FROM:<user <at> 
    adjoli.de>, you say something like MAIL FROM:<user+adjoli.de <at> spamchek.
    ch>.  (In fact, this is a bit more complicated if you want it to be
    secure -- see SRS AKA Sender Rewriting Scheme[1,2].)

 B. Or your customer exempts mail forwarded to them by you from their SPF
    checks.  If they choose to do that, it would be good if _you_ then did
    the SPF checks for them (don't know whether you already do).
(Continue reading)

Per Jessen | 13 Jun 2007 10:09
Picon
Favicon

Re: Re: Need some help understanding this situation

Julian Mehnle wrote:

>  B. Or your customer exempts mail forwarded to them by you from their
>  SPF checks.  If they choose to do that, it would be good if _you_
>  then did the SPF checks for them (don't know whether you already do).

Yeah, we already do the SPF checking - we just accept a "Neutral"
result. 

/Per Jessen, Zürich

--

-- 
http://www.spamchek.com/ - your spam is our business

-------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Scott Kitterman | 13 Jun 2007 14:25

Re: Need some help understanding this situation

On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:48:52 +0200 Per Jessen <per <at> computer.org> wrote:
>This list does not seem very active, but I'll try it anyway - 
>
>we are an email filtering service so we "sit" in between our customer
>and people that want to send them email.  (we obviously use MX
>redirection).
>
>We have a situation where "adjoli.de" wants to send a perfectly legit
>newsletter to my customer, but is being rejected by the customer
>mail-server due to our servers not being listed by the SPF record
>for "adjoli.de": 
>
>"v=spf1 ip4:194.29.239.0/28 ?all"
>
>The customers mailserver is smart hosted by a provider, nothing unusual
>about it.  The question is - is it _right_ to plainly reject the email
>from "adjoli.de" when the spf evaluation says "Neutral" ? 
>
RFC 4408 is very clear on this.  Neutral MUST be treated the same as None, 
so unless they are also rejecting mail from domains with no SPF record 
(this would not be likely at all), what they are doing is clearly NOT right.

Julian is correct about they two general solutions for this kind of problem.

Scott K

-------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
(Continue reading)

Meng Weng Wong | 13 Jun 2007 21:07
Picon
Favicon
Gravatar

domain whitelists?

Hey everyone,

Can you name some domain whitelists, please?

Back when we were first coming up with SPF, one of the big objections was "okay, so the spammers will just go and register lots of throwaway domains and publish SPF records for those domains and then what?"

Our answer to that objection was "yes, that is part of the plan, when they do that, we will use domain whitelists and blacklists, I mean, blocklists, to distinguish between the good domains and the bad domains."

So now I am asking: Can anybody out there point me at some good domain whitelists?

I have been quietly collecting all the DNSBLs, DNSWLs, RHSBLs, RHSWLs, and URIBLs that I can find.

I have started with lists such as:
- websites that TrustE has certified
- websites that have gone through VeriSign's SSL certificate due diligence checks
- domains from my personal addressbooks
- hostnames from the Fortune 2000
- trusted-forwarder.org
- dnswl.org
- URIBL's whitelist
- LashBack's whitelist
- Return Path Sender Score Certified

I have fed the above lists into http://www.karmasphere.com.  Karmasphere's job is to aggregate all the reputation sources out there, and provide a single point of access to them.  There are experimental plugins available for Postfix, Exim, Sendmail, etc.

Now I am actively hunting for new domain blacklists and whitelists.  I am particularly keen to collect whitelists.  SPF + domain whitelisting is a great tool for helping fight false positives.

I am hungry for more.

If folks out there would like to contribute their own domain whitelists, there's an upload-publishing interface available at the Karmasphere website.  Or you can just tell me the rsync or http syndication URL, if one is available, and I can download it directly.

cheers
meng




Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735

Gmane