headers
rybka52 | 27 Aug 2009 18:29
Picon
Favicon

Re: Unexpected Behavior in Simscan 1.4.0 When Scanning Messages with Multiple Recipients

ok, but why sometimes it works and sometimes it not.
after few hours research i found mails for ie. 3 users, 1 user spam=no but 
all no spam chcek, another time my test for these same addresses - result 
correct: two times scan, one time without.
why that happend ??

Regards
Rybka

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tren Blackburn" <tren@...>
To: <simscan@...>
Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 6:25 PM
Subject: RE: [simscan] Unexpected Behavior in Simscan 1.4.0 When Scanning 
Messages with Multiple Recipients

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but if an email has multiple recipients,
it does not go through individual spamc-user settings:

http://www.qmailwiki.org/index.php/Simscan/Guide#Multiple_Recipient_Prob
lem_with_Per_User_simscan_option

It just uses the global default. If I'm misunderstand, then I apologize.

Regards,

Tren

> -----Original Message-----
> From: marlowe [mailto:marlowe@...]
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
up | 29 Aug 2009 22:57
Picon

Re: 2 basic questions


Is this list active?  I saw no replies to this in two weeks.  Very simple 
question:

If I want to reject spam as defined by the per-domain options in 
/var/qmail/control/simcontrol, so I use:

--enable-spam on or not?  What is the difference between having that 
option off, and --enable-spam-passthru=y?  I have those both set to yes, 
as well as --enable-per-domain=y, because we want high scoring spam 
rejected at the SMTP level, but modest scoring spam tagged as spam by SA, 
but passed through to the user for further processing.

Right now we have all of those set to yes, and while rejection is working, 
we're not seeing any spam that scores between SA's config and simscan's 
config coming in at all and we have no clue what's happening to it.

On Sun, 16 Aug 2009, up <at> 3.am wrote:

>
> I've been running simscan for years, but in building it from FreeBSD ports 
> for a new system, I find myself confused by these config options:
>
> --enable-spam-passthru=y
>
> Looks simple enough, but what I want to do is reject Spam higher than hits 
> found in /var/qmail/control/simcontrol (--enable-per-domain=y), but pass 
> through lower scoring everything, including SA tagged SPAM higher than hits 
> defined in SA's local.cf.  I did not use --enable-spam-hits, since it appears 
> that that option overrides per-domain by hard coding the hits.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
up | 31 Aug 2009 16:06
Picon

Re: Re: 2 basic questions


(Hoping that on a Monday, somebody with a clue reads and responds to 
this).  Ok, I tried reinstalling simscan 1.4.0 from FreeBSD ports, this 
time withOUT --enable-spam, but with per-domain and passthrough on.  As a 
feared, this just meant that SpamAssassin no longer appeared in the 
headers at all.

I then reinstalled it again, with --enable-spam=yes, per-domain and 
passthrough, but while simscan appears to be rejecting spam fine, it's NOT 
passing spam higher than SA's "required_score" (6.0) but lower than 
simscan's "spam_hits" (12.0).  I have no idea what's happening to that 
spam (6.0-11.9), but I assume it's being rejected, although for all I know 
it's being deleted.  This used to work fine on an older server running an 
older version of simscan.

Can somebody clue me in to what the correct options are?  Or is 
passthrough simply broken in this version of simscan?

TIA,

On Sat, 29 Aug 2009, up <at> 3.am wrote:

>
> Is this list active?  I saw no replies to this in two weeks.  Very simple 
> question:
>
> If I want to reject spam as defined by the per-domain options in 
> /var/qmail/control/simcontrol, so I use:
>
> --enable-spam on or not?  What is the difference between having that option
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane