1 Mar 2007 01:00
Re: qmail Patch Repository
Kyle Wheeler <kyle-qmail <at> memoryhole.net>
2007-03-01 00:00:24 GMT
2007-03-01 00:00:24 GMT
On Wednesday, February 28 at 05:17 PM, quoth Uncle George: > Is there some reason why you cant have a switch-o-matic style of running > the piece of the package? I'm not sure I understand you. Is there a reason why I don't want to run qmail-smtpd --with-smtp-auth? Is there a reason I don't want to patch qmail with ./patcher --with-smtp-auth? No, strictly speaking there is no reason why you CAN'T do just about anything. But whether something is possible and whether something is a good idea and whether something is preferred are all very different things. I *prefer* something that works exclusively with patches. If that's ./patcher --with-foo or an interactive script, I don't really care which. I think the usability of the interactive script is nicer, but it's not a make-or-break point. But I also very strongly don't want to run the various parts of the qmail package with umpteen zillion switch arguments. ~Kyle -- -- The government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion. -- US Treaty with Tripoly, 1797
RSS Feed