Re: perdition 1.19-rc3 log_options_ssl_str() segv

On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 12:24:14PM -0400, Doug Shearer wrote:
> 
> I am new to this list.  We have been using perdition-1.17.1 for
> the better part of two years ... thank you!  We are running perdition
> on Solaris 9 and 10.  Some kind soul (can't remember who)
> posted source for mkdtemp and I was able to compile using gcc
> 3.4.6 from www.sunfreeware.com.
> 
> We have been bitten by the Thunderbird 3.1 to perdition SSL/TLS bug.
> I am trying to build and run perdition-1.19-rc3 ... so far  
> unsuccessfully.
> When run, perdition gives a segmentation fault.  Many thanks in  
> advance to
> anyone who can shed any light on this!
> 
> I built and installed vanessa_logger-0.0.10, vanessa_adt-0.0.9, and
> vanessa_socket-0.0.12.

Hi Doug,

sorry for letting this one slip through the cracks for the past week or so.
Nothing jumps out as being obvious there.
I will try and set up an Open Solaris environment and reproduce the
problem.

I'm not familiar with purify, but I suspect it might be able to shed some
light on this problem. If you happen to have a copy would you mind seeing
if it sheds any light on the problem?
______________________________________________
Perdition-users mailing list

Perdition fails to parse nis map

Hi there,

I just found a bug in latest perdition version in the nis backend. The 
syscal ypmatch is used with the wrong args. I just posted a bug to 
debian with a patch to fix this issue.

Here it is so, if you aggree, please merge it and we can have nis 
support back !

thanks,

Christophe

______________________________________________
Perdition-users mailing list
Perdition-users <at> vergenet.net
http://lists.vergenet.net/listinfo/perdition-users

Re: Perdition fails to parse nis map

______________________________________________
Perdition-users mailing list
Perdition-users <at> vergenet.net
http://lists.vergenet.net/listinfo/perdition-users

Re: Perdition fails to parse nis map

On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 01:34:15PM +0200, Christophe Ségui wrote:
> Debian bug report : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596102

Noted.

I have pushed your patch into the development tree and
it should appear in 1.19-rc4. I will also do something
about the Debian bug.

______________________________________________
Perdition-users mailing list
Perdition-users <at> vergenet.net
http://lists.vergenet.net/listinfo/perdition-users

perdition + imapproxyd

hi,

are there any issues when using imapproxyd in front of a perdition server?

thx
matthias

______________________________________________
Perdition-users mailing list
Perdition-users <at> vergenet.net
http://lists.vergenet.net/listinfo/perdition-users

Re: perdition + imapproxyd

On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 04:17:03PM +0200, Matthias Leopold wrote:
> hi,
> 
> are there any issues when using imapproxyd in front of a perdition server?

Hi,

I'm not aware of any issues reported here or elsewhere,
but I also don't have any first hand experience of that combination.

______________________________________________
Perdition-users mailing list
Perdition-users <at> vergenet.net
http://lists.vergenet.net/listinfo/perdition-users

Re: perdition + imapproxyd

Hi.

On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 16:17 +0200, Matthias Leopold wrote:
> hi,
> 
> are there any issues when using imapproxyd in front of a perdition server?
> 
> thx
> matthias
> 

It should work fine, I used the combination for several years in a quite
busy environment (up to thousands of simultaneous sessions) without any
problems. 

Best regards,

Janne Pikkarainen

______________________________________________
Perdition-users mailing list
Perdition-users <at> vergenet.net
http://lists.vergenet.net/listinfo/perdition-users

Re: perdition + imapproxyd

> Hi.
> 
> On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 16:17 +0200, Matthias Leopold wrote:
> > hi,
> > 
> > are there any issues when using imapproxyd in front of a perdition server?
> > 
> > thx
> > matthias
> > 
> 
> It should work fine, I used the combination for several years in a quite
> busy environment (up to thousands of simultaneous sessions) without any
> problems. 

We've been using this combination for years, too, on four webmail systems,
each having over a thousand simultaneous connects.

> Best regards,
> 
> Janne Pikkarainen

--
scott hollatz                                        net shollatz <at> d.UMn.eDu
information technology systems and services          tel +1 218 726 8851
university of minnesota duluth mn usa                fax +1 218 726 7674
                                                                         --
                                              "Asn aD ta zlAp em uT zt33rg"

______________________________________________
Perdition-users mailing list
Perdition-users <at> vergenet.net
http://lists.vergenet.net/listinfo/perdition-users

Re: perdition + imapproxyd

On 10/09/2010 07:47, Janne Pikkarainen wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 16:17 +0200, Matthias Leopold wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> are there any issues when using imapproxyd in front of a perdition server?

That's what we're running now for our webmail service and there are no 
issues that we've encountered.

Jon.
______________________________________________
Perdition-users mailing list
Perdition-users <at> vergenet.net
http://lists.vergenet.net/listinfo/perdition-users

[ANNOUNCE] perdition 1.19-rc4

Hi,

I'm happy to announce the release of perdition 1.19-rc4

Key changes:
* Fix parsing of NIS maps
* Fix a segmentation fault on start-up when the bind_address configuration
  option is used.
* Fix handling of the debug and quiet options when specified a configuration
  file
* Building without PAM libraries installed
* Documentation enhancements

A full change log is provided by the Mercurial repository
http://hg.vergenet.net/perdition/perdition/

Perdition 1.19-rc3 and the vanessa libraries that it depends on
are available from:
http://horms.net/linux/perdition/download/1.19-rc4/

Debian unstable packages have been uploaded to Debian.Org
and should be available in the Debian archive within 24 hours.
http://packages.debian.org/source/unstable/perdition

I will endeavour to get these new packages included in
testing and thus the up-coming Squeeze release.

Packages for various RPM based distributions are being built by the SUSE
build service and should be available shortly from
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/horms:/perdition/

______________________________________________
Perdition-users mailing list
Perdition-users <at> vergenet.net
http://lists.vergenet.net/listinfo/perdition-users