headers
Linus Lüssing | 1 Feb 02:28
Picon

Re: New mails flag missing in maildir listing with IMAP?

Hi again,

Actually no, it does not seem to work, also for non-flat
layouts... the new mails count does not stay at 0 after a
restart of mutt. Don't know what I saw before.

This mail thread from 5 years ago sounds similar:
http://does-not-exist.org/mail-archives/mutt-dev/msg07456.html

Was this issue supposed to be fixed with any version between
1.5.13 and 1.5.21?

Cheers, Linus

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:58:34AM +0100, Linus Lüssing wrote:
> Hmm, okay, what I noticed is this:
> 
> The mailbox view (hitting 'c', then '?', then <TAB>) kind of
> works if I have a non-flat maildir layout (so having a maildir as
> something like .INBOX.Linus in the file system):
> 
> ~~~
>  2   271 imap://test:suprpassOver9000 <at> 127.0.0.1/Linus 
> ~~~
> 
> After opening that maildir the count then shows 0 instead of 271.
> And even after restarting mutt, this count remains 0 until a new
> email arrives.
> 
> However, it does not work for a flat maildir layout as I used to
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Michael Elkins | 1 Feb 03:28

Re: New mails flag missing in maildir listing with IMAP?

On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 02:28:53AM +0100, Linus Lüssing wrote:
>Hi again,
>
>Actually no, it does not seem to work, also for non-flat
>layouts... the new mails count does not stay at 0 after a
>restart of mutt. Don't know what I saw before.
>
>This mail thread from 5 years ago sounds similar:
>http://does-not-exist.org/mail-archives/mutt-dev/msg07456.html
>
>Was this issue supposed to be fixed with any version between
>1.5.13 and 1.5.21?

Yes, you may way to try 1.5.21.  The new mail detection code was 
cleaned up to make all the mailbox formats more uniform.
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Linus Lüssing | 1 Feb 23:22
Picon

Re: New mails flag missing in maildir listing with IMAP?

On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 06:28:32PM -0800, Michael Elkins wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 02:28:53AM +0100, Linus Lüssing wrote:
> >Hi again,
> >
> >Actually no, it does not seem to work, also for non-flat
> >layouts... the new mails count does not stay at 0 after a
> >restart of mutt. Don't know what I saw before.
> >
> >This mail thread from 5 years ago sounds similar:
> >http://does-not-exist.org/mail-archives/mutt-dev/msg07456.html
> >
> >Was this issue supposed to be fixed with any version between
> >1.5.13 and 1.5.21?
> 
> Yes, you may way to try 1.5.21.  The new mail detection code was
> cleaned up to make all the mailbox formats more uniform.
> 

Hi Michael,

Hmm, I tried 1.5.21 and also latest HEAD from the repository,
but I'm still having the same issue. With some 'hg bisect'ing I'm
having the same results as Bob 5 years ago, the behaviour changed
from 3837:26e3c34c9e66 on, "New new mail detection code. Now we use
UIDVALIDITY/UIDNEXT to detect whether" from Brendan Cully.

Reverting back to before this commit makes the new mail count in
the mailbox view stay at 0 after restarting mutt.

For the second issue, the missing 'N' flag in the browser view,
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
E. Prom | 5 Feb 01:23
Picon

Current mailbox as $record

Hello,

How can I make mutt to save outgoing mail to the currently opened
mailbox?

I tried several hooks, but none accepted the sequence "%b" (while
others, like "%a", worked fine).

Any idea?
Permalink | Reply | 5 comments |
headers
David J. Weller-Fahy | 5 Feb 04:58

Re: Current mailbox as $record

* E. Prom <e3prom <at> gmail.com> [2012-02-04 19:23 -0500]:
> How can I make mutt to save outgoing mail to the currently opened
> mailbox?

Try the following (from my muttrc):

#v+
folder-hook . "set record=^"	# sent mail gets saved in current mailbox
#v-

> I tried several hooks, but none accepted the sequence "%b" (while
> others, like "%a", worked fine).
> 
> Any idea?

Check Table 4.7 in the manual.

Regards,
--

-- 
dave [ please don't CC me ]
Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
Marcelo Luiz de Laia | 5 Feb 10:54
Picon

Re: Current mailbox as $record

On Sun, 05 Feb 2012, E. Prom wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> How can I make mutt to save outgoing mail to the currently opened
> mailbox?
> 
> I tried several hooks, but none accepted the sequence "%b" (while
> others, like "%a", worked fine).
> 
> Any idea?

There is an ideia in the previous message. But, I see that you are using
gmail. If you use gmail smtp, you could get outgoing messages
duplicated.

So, I sugget you to put this in a separate muttrc, like this:

~.mutt/gmail.muttrc

###
# gmail specific options
###

color status green default

set from      = "youruser <at> gmail.com"
set sendmail  = "/usr/bin/msmtp -a gmail" # if you use msmtp
#set sendmail  = "~/bin/mysendmail" # if you use sendmail
set mbox      = "+GMail/Inbox"
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Patrick Shanahan | 5 Feb 17:18
Picon

Re: List-Reply vs. Reply

* Patrick Shanahan <ptilopteri <at> gmail.com> [01-14-12 14:37]:
> I have used mutt for many years and have a quite convoluted ~/.muttrc due
> to many changes and update/upgrades.  Presently using mutt-1.5.21 on
> my openSUSE 11.2 x86_64 server via ssh.
> 
> Sometime in the recent past, maybe several months, I find that when trying
> to "Reply" to the poster in list mail rather than to the list, mutt replys
> to the list.  "R" and "L" seem to function the same for lists where I am
> subscribed.  The only way w/o directly entering the addressee to "Reply"
> to the individual is to use "G"roup and delete the cc: address.
> 
> What has changed recently that would cause this or conversly what might I
> have wrongly changed?
> 
> I have checked my "subscribed" and "list" entries and they haven't changed
> in over a year, long before I noticed my problem.

finally having some time on my hands, I have identified the ~/.muttrc
lines causing my concerns:  That "r" for "reply" and "L" for "list-reply"
both reply to the list rather than "r" to the mail author.  I have
commented out all lines beginning with "subscribed" and "list" and my mutt
now functions properly.  I don't understand this but am going to install
earlier builds of mutt (I have a few that were built specifically for
opensuse) until I find the culpret.

Any thoughts are very welcome.

tks,
--

-- 
(paka)Patrick Shanahan       Plainfield, Indiana, USA      HOG # US1244711
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Patrick Shanahan | 5 Feb 18:46
Picon

Re: List-Reply vs. Reply

* Patrick Shanahan <ptilopteri <at> gmail.com> [02-05-12 11:20]:
> * Patrick Shanahan <ptilopteri <at> gmail.com> [01-14-12 14:37]:

> > I have used mutt for many years and have a quite convoluted ~/.muttrc
> > due to many changes and update/upgrades.  Presently using mutt-1.5.21
> > on my openSUSE 11.2 x86_64 server via ssh.
> > 
> > Sometime in the recent past, maybe several months, I find that when
> > trying to "Reply" to the poster in list mail rather than to the list,
> > mutt replys to the list.  "R" and "L" seem to function the same for
> > lists where I am subscribed.  The only way w/o directly entering the
> > addressee to "Reply" to the individual is to use "G"roup and delete
> > the cc: address.
> > 
> > What has changed recently that would cause this or conversly what
> > might I have wrongly changed?
> > 
> > I have checked my "subscribed" and "list" entries and they haven't
> > changed in over a year, long before I noticed my problem.
> 
> finally having some time on my hands, I have identified the ~/.muttrc
> lines causing my concerns: That "r" for "reply" and "L" for "list-reply"
> both reply to the list rather than "r" to the mail author.  I have
> commented out all lines beginning with "subscribed" and "list" and my
> mutt now functions properly.  I don't understand this but am going to
> install earlier builds of mutt (I have a few that were built
> specifically for opensuse) until I find the culpret.
> 
> Any thoughts are very welcome.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Marcelo Luiz de Laia | 6 Feb 13:23
Picon

How to change profile on the fly?

Hi,

I have 3 profiles, like this: http://pastebin.com/kJWwPGYT

and 3 muttrc, like this: http://pastebin.com/1k1cHShC

This is my /home/user/bin/scripts/mymsmpt.gmail 

### script start here ###
#!/bin/bash
tee >(lbdb-fetchaddr -a)|/usr/bin/msmtp -a gmail $@
### script end here ###

In my muttrc I have:

source ~/.mutt/profile.gmail     # Profile default

unhook send-hook

send-hook . "source ~/.mutt/profile.gmail\n"# attribution='Hi %v!\n\nOn 
%{%a, %d %b %Y}, %n wrote:\n'"

send-hook ^(add1 <at> server1.org|add2 <at> server2.org|addn <at> servern.org)
'set mime_forward signature="~/.mutt/sig.list"'

send-hook
^(add1 <at> server1.org|add2 <at> server2.org|addn <at> servern.org)|('(.*)@ufvjm\.edu\.br')
"source ~/.mutt/profile.ufvjm\n"

What I need?
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 7 comments |
headers
Patrick Shanahan | 6 Feb 14:50
Picon

Re: How to change profile on the fly?

* Marcelo Luiz de Laia <marcelolaia <at> gmail.com> [02-06-12 07:26]:
> 
> When I was in my Gmail mbox, I need that all replaies is sent by gmail
> smtp. So, I need to set, on the fly, gmail profile and sig.

:source gmail.profile

> When I was in my Yahoo mbox,  I need that all replaies is sent by yahoo
> smtp. So, I need to set, on the fly, yahoo profile and sig.

:source yahoo.profile

> When I was in my Work mbox,  I need that all replaies is sent by work
> smtp. So, I need to set, on the fly, work profile and sig.

:source work.profile

--

-- 
(paka)Patrick Shanahan       Plainfield, Indiana, USA      HOG # US1244711
http://wahoo.no-ip.org        Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
http://en.opensuse.org                           openSUSE Community Member
Registered Linux User #207535                    @ http://linuxcounter.net
Permalink | Reply | 6 comments |

Gmane