headers
Michael Wagner | 1 Nov 2009 12:43
Picon

Re: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable && urlview(1)

* Matthias Apitz <guru <at> unixarea.de> 31.10.2009
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I'm receiving mails from a bulletin board forum in form of the
> encoding 'Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable' and having URLs
> in the body as
> 
> 	This thread is located at:
> 	http://www.ubcbotanicalgarden.org/forums/showthread.php?t=3D47590&goto=3D=
> 	newpost
> 
> i.e. the sign '=' is encoded as =3D and the URL is broken, should be in
> the above case:
> 
> 	http://www.ubcbotanicalgarden.org/forums/showthread.php?t=47590&goto=newpost
> 
> Ofc, urlview(1) is unhappy and unable to offer the correct URL to send it
> to the browser. Any idea how to solve this, maybe with putting something
> in from of urlview(1) to pipe through before it goes to this....?

Hello Matthias,

in Debian there is a package called 'urlscan'. I think it's better than 
'urlview' because it can also handle messages which are 
quoted-printable. I tested it with links which include the '=3D' and 
without it and it always gaves the same side in my browser.

Package: urlscan
Priority: optional
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Matthias Apitz | 1 Nov 2009 15:06
Picon

Re: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable && urlview(1)

El día Sunday, November 01, 2009 a las 12:43:24PM +0100, Michael Wagner escribió:

> Hello Matthias,
> 
> in Debian there is a package called 'urlscan'. I think it's better than 
> 'urlview' because it can also handle messages which are 
> quoted-printable. I tested it with links which include the '=3D' and 
> without it and it always gaves the same side in my browser.
...

Thanks, Michael, I'm luckily not using Debian, but FreeBSD 8-CURRENT :-)
It seems that urlscan is not in its port collection.

	matthias
--

-- 
Matthias Apitz
t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211
e <guru <at> unixarea.de> - w http://www.unixarea.de/
Vote NO to EU The Lisbon Treaty: http://www.no-means-no.eu
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Brian Salter-Duke | 1 Nov 2009 21:20
Picon

Re: Checking for Attachments within mutt and vim

On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 07:46:44AM +0800, bill lam wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Nov 2009, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> > However, in the install instructions, what do you mean by:-
> > 
> > simple load CheckAttach.vba and source it using :so %.vba?
> > 
> > I have no idea what this means. Load it where and how? Source is where
> > and how?
> > 
> 
> try 
> 
> vim CheckAttach.vba
> :so %
> :q

Thanks. It would be good if that was explained in the docs.

> you may get help for vimball
> :help vba
> 
> -- 
> regards,
> ====================================================
> GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24
> gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3

--

-- 
"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you,
then you win."
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
bill lam | 2 Nov 2009 02:12
Picon

Re: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable && urlview(1)

On Sun, 01 Nov 2009, Michael Wagner wrote:
> in Debian there is a package called 'urlscan'. I think it's better than 

From email header, it seems that you are using squeeze/sid.
Apparently urlscan or its dependency is broken here in lenny.

--

-- 
regards,
====================================================
GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24
gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Louis-David Mitterrand | 2 Nov 2009 11:08

folder-hook for simple_search problem

Hi,

I have (among others) the following hooks in my .muttrc:

	folder-hook . set sort=threads strict_threads simple_search=\"~f %s | ~s %s\"
	folder-hook < set sort=date-received simple_search=\"~C %s | ~s %s\"

When I access the Sent (<) folder directly with "mutt -f '<'" the
folder-hook is applied.

However if I start with any other folder and change to '<' with 'c'	and
'<' then simple_search stays at the default (i.e the < hook is not
applied).

What am I doing wrong?

Thanks,
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Michael Williams | 2 Nov 2009 17:27
Picon
Picon

Change default "Re: your mail" subject when replying to blank subject

Hi,

Is it possible to change the default "Re: your mail" subject that mutt
uses when replying to emails that arrive without a subject to something
less, er, passive aggressive -- or something in another language?

Apologies if this is a FAQ, but it's rather difficult to Google, and I
can find no mention in the manual. 

-- Mike
Permalink | Reply | 11 comments |
headers
Monte Stevens | 2 Nov 2009 17:49
Picon
Favicon

Re: Change default "Re: your mail" subject when replying to blank

On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 04:27:14PM +0000, Michael Williams wrote:
> Is it possible to change the default "Re: your mail" subject that mutt
> uses when replying to emails that arrive without a subject to something
> less, er, passive aggressive -- or something in another language?

You can edit the source "send.c" file.  Look for:

  else if (!env->subject)
      env->subject = safe_strdup ("Re: your mail");

Change 'your mail' to 'whatever you like'; I use 'no subject'.

--

-- 
Monte
Permalink | Reply | 9 comments |
headers
Michael Williams | 2 Nov 2009 18:18
Picon
Picon

Re: Change default "Re: your mail" subject when replying to blank

On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 12:49:38PM -0400, Monte Stevens wrote:
> > Is it possible to change the default "Re: your mail" subject that
> > mutt uses when replying to emails that arrive without a subject to
> > something less, er, passive aggressive -- or something in another
> > language?
> 
> You can edit the source "send.c" file.  Look for:
> 
>   else if (!env->subject)
>       env->subject = safe_strdup ("Re: your mail");
> 
> Change 'your mail' to 'whatever you like'; I use 'no subject'.

Thanks, that works. 

Seems like the kind of thing that should be exposed to end user
configuration rather than requiring the user to edit source code. I have
raised a ticket: http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/3349.

-- Mike
Permalink | Reply | 8 comments |
headers
Jason Helfman | 2 Nov 2009 20:21

folder-hook with imap trouble

Hi,

I am not certain if I am doing this folder-hook correctly, however while in
the folder, I can see that my "sets" are being applied correctly, but when
composing a message, it isn't applying the attributes.

I want to have a different From address, and signature file apply to
when I am in a different folder.

I have mutt installed with compressed-folder patch and sidebar patch.

It doesn't appear that my hooks are working, however I don't know if I
am applying it correctly.

account-hook imaps://mail.server.com/ 'set imap_user=myuser imap_pass=mypassword'
folder-hook imaps://mail.server.com/INBOX.doc 'set signature=~/signature-doc from="Doc<doc <at> server.com>"'

Thanks,
Jason
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Christian Brabandt | 2 Nov 2009 21:19

Re: Checking for Attachments within mutt and vim

Hi Brian!

On Mo, 02 Nov 2009, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:

> 
> Thanks. It would be good if that was explained in the docs.

Thanks, I updated the installation instructions on the webpage.

regards,
Christian
--

-- 
:wq
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |

Gmane