headers
Kumar Appaiah | 1 Jul 09:26
Picon

Messages tagged as Old ("O")

Dear Mutt Users,

My Mutt is 1.5.13. I have no issues with it, except that all of my
incoming mail (to my mboxes) are flagged as "O" instead of "N". And
when I read them, they are marked as read and it's all right. But why
are they marked with an "O" instead of an "N"? How do I find out?

Thanks!

Kumar
--

-- 
Kumar Appaiah,
462, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
Permalink | Reply | 5 comments |
headers
Kumar Appaiah | 1 Jul 09:42
Picon

Re: Messages tagged as Old ("O")

On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 12:56:11PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> Dear Mutt Users,
> 
> My Mutt is 1.5.13. I have no issues with it, except that all of my
> incoming mail (to my mboxes) are flagged as "O" instead of "N". And
> when I read them, they are marked as read and it's all right. But why
> are they marked with an "O" instead of an "N"? How do I find out?

Sorry, I realized that I had nomark_old set. Hence the problem.

Sorry again!

Kumar
--

-- 
Kumar Appaiah,
462, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |
headers
Kumar Appaiah | 1 Jul 10:05
Picon

Re: Messages tagged as Old ("O")

On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 01:12:29PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> Sorry, I realized that I had nomark_old set. Hence the problem.

But that wasn't the issue. All my incoming mails (delivered by
procmail to my mboxes) are marked "O". What else could the reason be?

Thanks.

Kumar
--

-- 
Kumar Appaiah,
462, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
Patrick Shanahan | 1 Jul 14:22
Picon

Re: Messages tagged as Old ("O")


* Kumar Appaiah <akumar <at> ee.iitm.ac.in> [07-01-07 03:59]:
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 01:12:29PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> > Sorry, I realized that I had nomark_old set. Hence the problem.
> 
> But that wasn't the issue. All my incoming mails (delivered by
> procmail to my mboxes) are marked "O". What else could the reason be?

You do not give enough information, but a guess:  You are running a
mail notification program.

Explanation: Mutt will remove the "N" flag or set it to "O" if the
directory containing subject file has been accessed, depending on your
settings.

You can stop the "O" flag by unsetting "mark_old", ie: unset mark_old,
but the "N" flag will still be removed by directory access.

--

-- 
Patrick Shanahan         Plainfield, Indiana, USA        HOG # US1244711
http://wahoo.no-ip.org     Photo Album:  http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
Registered Linux User #207535                    @ http://counter.li.org
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Alessio 'mOLOk' Bolognino | 1 Jul 16:01
Picon

Re: Messages tagged as Old ("O")

On Sun 2007-07-01 08:22 , Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Kumar Appaiah <akumar <at> ee.iitm.ac.in> [07-01-07 03:59]:
> > On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 01:12:29PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> > > Sorry, I realized that I had nomark_old set. Hence the problem.
> > 
> > But that wasn't the issue. All my incoming mails (delivered by
> > procmail to my mboxes) are marked "O". What else could the reason be?
> 
> 
> You do not give enough information, but a guess:  You are running a
> mail notification program.
> 
> Explanation: Mutt will remove the "N" flag or set it to "O" if the
> directory containing subject file has been accessed, depending on your
> settings.
> 
> You can stop the "O" flag by unsetting "mark_old", ie: unset mark_old,
> but the "N" flag will still be removed by directory access.

Or you may use check_mbox_size=yes (mutt => 1.5.15 IIRC)

--

-- 
Alessio 'mOLOk' Bolognino
Arch Linux Trusted User

Please send personal email to themolok <at> gmail.com

Public Key http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xFE0270FB
GPG Key ID = 1024D / FE0270FB 2007-04-11
Key Fingerprint = 9AF8 9011 F271 450D 59CF  2D7D 96C9 8F2A FE02 70FB
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Raffi Khatchadourian | 1 Jul 16:11
Picon
Gravatar

sidebar patch for mutt 1.5.16?

Does anyone have a working sidebar patch for mutt 1.15.16? The latest
posted on the sidebar website is for 1.15.15.
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Oliver Peter | 2 Jul 12:04
Picon

Re: sidebar patch for mutt 1.5.16?

On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 10:11:13AM -0400, Raffi Khatchadourian wrote:
> Does anyone have a working sidebar patch for mutt 1.15.16? The latest
> posted on the sidebar website is for 1.15.15.

I wrote an e-mail to the (Terry P. Chan / tchan <at> lunar-linux.org)
current maintainer of the patch for the previous mutt-devel version.
Since this is a lot of work I'm sure that he will take any help that
he can get.
In the meantime I tried to patch the current version with the last
patch - display of the folders and navigation works.  It seems that it
should not be a big problem to port this to the new mutt-devel
version.

--

-- 
Oliver PETER, email: hoschi <at> mouhaha.de, ICQ# 113969174
"Worker bees can leave. Even drones can fly away. The Queen is their slave."
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Kumar Appaiah | 2 Jul 06:22
Picon

Re: Messages tagged as Old ("O")

On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 08:22:10AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> You do not give enough information, but a guess:  You are running a
> mail notification program.

I think you're right. I'll try to find out which program it is that
reads my mboxes.

Thanks.

Kumar
--

-- 
Kumar Appaiah,
462, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Oliver Peter | 3 Jul 00:42
Picon

Re: sidebar patch for mutt 1.5.16?

On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 10:11:13AM -0400, Raffi Khatchadourian wrote:
> Does anyone have a working sidebar patch for mutt 1.15.16? The latest
> posted on the sidebar website is for 1.15.15.

I used Terry's excellent patch for 1.5.15 to write a new one for
1.5.16.  You can find it at
http://vader.homeunix.org/~hoschi/src/mutt-devel/mutt-1.5.16.sidebar.20070702.patch

It works fine for me with imap-ssl/hcache.

--

-- 
Oliver PETER, email: hoschi <at> mouhaha.de, ICQ# 113969174
"Worker bees can leave. Even drones can fly away. The Queen is their slave."
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Luis A. Florit | 3 Jul 02:29

Re: Invalid domain name

* El 28/06/07 a las 18:39, Michael Tatge chamullaba:

> * On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 Luis A. Florit (mutt-users <at> luisflorit.endjunk.com) muttered:
> >     I am using the built-in SMTP. When I try to send an email
> > changing the 'From', for example, using this sendhook:
> >
> > send-hook "~C gimp" 'unset hostname ; set signature= ; my_hdr Reply-to: gimpdevel <at> lll.endjunk.com ;
my_hdr From: "Luis A. Florit" <gimpdevel <at> lll.endjunk.com>'
> >
> > I always get the same error message in mutt:
> >
> >     SMTP session failed: 501 5.0.0 Invalid domain name
> >
>
> see $use_from, $use_envelope_from
>
> HTH,

I tried the 4 combinations

   (un)set $use_from, (un)set $use_envelope_from

with the same results.

This problem is very strange since it
works when I close and open mutt again.
Does not seem to be related to configuration (?).

    Thanks Mitchael,
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |

Gmane